In the last article I explained the three primary markers we use to track blood sugar: fasting blood glucose (FBG), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and hemoglobin A1c (A1c). We also looked at what the medical establishment considers as “normal” for these markers. The table below summarizes those values.
| Marker | Normal | Pre-diabetes | Diabetes |
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) | <99 | 100-125 | >126 |
| OGGT / post-meal (mg/dL after 2 hours) | <140 | 140-199 | >200 |
| Hemoglobin A1c (%) | <6 | 6-6.4 | >6.4 |
In this article, we’re going to look at just how “normal” those normal levels are – according to the scientific literature. We’ll also consider which of these three markers is most important in preventing diabetes and cardiovascular disease.
Fasting blood sugar
According to continuous glucose monitoring studies of healthy people, a normal fasting blood sugar is 83 mg/dL or less. Many normal people have fasting blood sugar in the mid-to-high 70s.
While most doctors will tell you that anything under 100 mg/dL is normal, it’s not. In this study, people with FBG levels above 95 had more than 3x the risk of developing future diabetes than people with FBG levels below 90. This study showed progressively increasing risk of heart disease in men with FBG levels above 85 mg/dL, as compared to those with FBG levels of 81 mg/dL or lower.
What’s even more important to understand about FBG is that it’s the least sensitive marker for predicting future diabetes and heart disease. Several studies show that a “normal” FBG level in the mid-90s predicts diabetes diagnosed a decade later.
Far more important than a single fasting blood glucose reading is the number of hours a day our blood sugar spends elevated over the level known to cause complications, which is roughly 140 mg/dl (7.7 mmol/L). I’ll discuss this in more detail in the OGGT section.
One caveat here is that very low-carb diets will produce elevated fasting blood glucose levels. Why? Because low-carb diets induce insulin resistance. Restricting carbohydrates produces a natural drop in insulin levels, which in turn activates hormone sensitive lipase. Fat tissue is then broken down, and non-esterified fatty acids (a.k.a. “free fatty acids” or NEFA) are released into the bloodstream. These NEFA are taken up by the muscles, which use them as fuel. And since the muscle’s needs for fuel has been met, it decreases sensitivity to insulin. You can read more about this at Hyperlipid.
So, if you eat a low-carb diet and have borderline high FBG (i.e. 90-105), it may not be cause for concern. Your post-meal blood sugars and A1c levels are more important.
Hemoglobin A1c
In spite of what the American Diabetes Association (ADA) tells us, a truly normal A1c is between 4.6% and 5.3%
And while A1c is a good way to measure blood sugar in large population studies, it’s not as accurate for individuals. An A1c of 5.1% maps to an average blood sugar of about 100 mg/dL. But some people’s A1c results are always a little higher than their FBG and OGTT numbers would predict, and other people’s are always a little lower.
This is probably due to the fact that several factors can influence red blood cells. Remember, A1c is a measure of how much hemoglobin in red blood cells is bonded (glycated) to glucose. Anything that affects red blood cells and hemoglobin – such as anemia, dehydration and genetic disorders – will skew A1c results.
A number of studies show that A1c levels below the diabetic range are associated with cardiovascular disease. This study showed that A1c levels lower than 5% had the lowest rates of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and that a 1% increase (to 6%) significantly increased CVD risk. Another study showed an even tighter correlation between A1c and CVD, indicating a linear increase in CVD as A1c rose above 4.6% – a level that corresponds to a fasting blood glucose of just 86 mg/dL. Finally, this study showed that the risk of heart disease in people without diabetes doubles for every percentage point increase above 4.6%.
Studies also consistently show that A1c levels considered “normal” by the ADA fail to predict future diabetes. This study found that using the ADA criteria of an A1c of 6% as normal missed 70% of individuals with diabetes, 71-84% with dysglycemia, and 82-94% with pre-diabetes. How’s that for accuracy?
What we’ve learned so far, then, is that the fasting blood glucose and A1c levels recommended by the ADA are not reliable cut-offs for predicting or preventing future diabetes and heart disease. This is problematic, to say the least, because the A1c and FBG are the only glucose tests the vast majority of people get from their doctors.
OGTT / post-meal blood sugars
If you recall, the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) measures how our blood sugar responds to drinking a challenge solution of 75 grams of glucose. I don’t recommend this test, because A) it’s not realistic (no one every drinks 75 grams of pure glucose), and B) it can produce horrible side effects for people with poor glucose control.
However, there’s another more realistic and convenient way to achieve a similar measurement, and that is simply using a glucometer to test your blood sugar one and two hours after you eat a meal. This is called post-prandial (post-meal) blood sugar testing. As we go through this section, the numbers I use apply to both OGTT and post-meal testing.
As the table at the beginning of this article indicates, the ADA considers OGTT of between 140 – 199 two hours after the challenge to be pre-diabetic, and levels above 200 to be diabetic.
But once again, continuous glucose monitoring studies suggest that the ADA levels are far too high. Most people’s blood sugar drops below 120 mg/dL two hours after a meal, and many healthy people drop below 100 mg/dL or return to baseline.
This study showed that even after a high-carb meal, normal people’s blood sugar rises to about 125 mg/dL for a brief period, with the peak blood sugar being measured at 45 minutes after eating, and then drops back under 100 mg/dL by the two hour mark.
Another continuous glucose monitoring study confirmed these results. Sensor glucose concentrations were between 71 – 120 mg/dL for 91% of the day. Sensor values were less than or equal to 60 or 140 mg/dL for only 0.2% and 0.4% of the day, respectively.
Even the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists is now recommending that post-meal blood sugars never be allowed to rise above 140 mg/dL. Unfortunately, less informed groups like the ADA haven’t caught up with the science.
The consequences of this are severe. Nerve damage occurs as blood sugar rises above 140 mg/dL. Prolonged exposure to blood sugars above 140 mg/dL causes irreversible beta cell loss (the beta cells produce insulin). 1 in 2 “pre-diabetics” get retinopathy, a serious diabetic complication. Cancer rates increase as post-meal blood sugars rise above 160 mg/dL. This study showed stroke risk increased by 25% for every 18 mg/dL rise in post-meal blood sugars. Finally, 1-hour OGTT readings above 155 mg/dL correlate strongly with increased CVD risk.
What does it all mean?
Let’s take a look again at what the ADA thinks is “normal” blood sugar:
| Marker | Normal | Pre-diabetes | Diabetes |
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) | <99 | 100-125 | >126 |
| OGGT / post-meal (mg/dL after 2 hours) | <140 | 140-199 | >200 |
| Hemoglobin A1c (%) | <6 | 6-6.4 | >6.4 |
But as we’ve seen in this article, these levels are only normal if you think increased risk of diabetes, heart disease, cancer and other serious complications is normal. Just because these conditions are common, doesn’t mean they’re normal.
If you’re interested in health and longevity – instead of just slowing the onset of serious disease by a few years – you’d be well advised to shoot for these targets instead:
| Marker | Ideal |
| Fasting blood glucose (mg/dL) | <86* |
| OGGT / post-meal (mg/dL after 2 hours) | <120 |
| Hemoglobin A1c (%) | <5.3 |
*If you’re following a low-carb diet, fasting blood sugars in the 90s and even low 100s may not be a problem, provided your A1c and post-meal blood sugars are within the normal range.
Another key takeaway from this article is that fasting blood glucose and A1 are not very reliable for predicting diabetes or CVD risk. Post-meal blood sugars are by far the most accurate marker for this purpose. And the good news is that this can be done cheaply, safely and conveniently at home, without a doctor’s order and without subjecting yourself to the brutality of an OGTT.
I’ll describe exactly how to do this in the next article.
Need Help?
I consult with patients locally in the San Fransico Bay Area, and around the world via telephone and Skype.
Learn More
Not a diet for everyone.
A diet for you!
Discover your own ideal diet >& end confusion about what to eat forever.
Learn More
Have the healthy baby you've always dreamed of.
Boost fertility naturally & promote lifelong health for you & your baby.
Learn More
Paleo for smart people.
Sign up for my free email series on burning fat, boosting energy and preventing and reversing disease naturally.
Learn More
Paleo recipes and meal plans – customized for you.
Create personalized recipes, meal plans & shopping lists with a few clicks of a button.
Learn More
{ 195 comments… read them below or add one }
K… Don’t know where or how old this info is. I’m work in pharmacy and just took a CEU on Diabetes that the info is good on for the next two yrs. Normal is 70-130 and a1c of 7%. So… wondering what source is being used for these statistics. You can view mine at wwww.powerpak.com look for the CEU on Diabetes.
The AACE (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists) and the IDF (International Diabetes Federation) are BOTH recommending Lower targets than the ADA (American Diabetes Association) which is where you get your numbers from, Bridwell.
The IDF mentions the following targets:
HbA1c 6.5%
BP 130/80 mmHg
Total cholesterol 4.5 mmol/L (174 mg/dl)
LDL-cholesterol 2.5 mmol/L (97 mg/dl)
HDL-cholesterol 1.0 mmol/L (39 mg/dl)
Triglycerides 1.5 mmol/L (133 mg/dl)
Urinary albumin:creatinine 2.5 mg/mmol (22 mg/g) – men
3.5 mg/mmol (31 mg/g) – women
Exercise 150 min/week
Both the IDF and the AACE also recognize the importance of reducing refined carbohydrates and starches to achieve these goals. They don’t come outright and recommend Paleo or LCHF diets, but they do recognize better glucose control in those that adopt those diets than in those that maintain a typical (western) diet.
BTW, the primary source of funding for the American Diabetes Association is Pharmaceutical and Processed food companies. I don’t have stats for every year, but in 2005 alone Big Pharma and Big Agro/Food companies gave them 23 MILLION DOLLARS. It’s only been increasing since then.
Regarding post-meal glucose, in the IDF “Guideline for the management of post-meal glucose” (the most-recent version) they clearly state: “The new IDF guideline recommends that people with diabetes try to keep post-meal blood glucose below 7.8 mmol/l (140 mg/dl) during the 2 hours following a meal.” Not just AFTER two hours following, but DURING. In other words, no spikes at 45 minutes, one hour or two hours…
The ADA still states 10.0 mmol/l (180 mg/dl) is a safe spike, which is ludicrous since every study done shows damage starts at 7.8 mmol/l (140 mg/dl)
Interestingly, the ADA tries to look good by being a member of the IDF … but they’ve yet to adopt their protocols, as doing so would mean they could no longer accept money from companies that make money of cheap cereals that spike sugar. I mean, Honey-Nut Cheerios – one of the highest glycemic cereals around – covered in high-fructose corn syrup and other sugars had the ADA seal on it…
Did you read the article? The whole point is that the mainstream targets you learned in your CEU class are not supported by the scientific literature. An A1c of 7% maps to an average blood sugar of 172 mg/dL. Studies clearly show blood sugar that high dramatically increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetic complications. The same is true for a fasting blood sugar above 95 mg/dL and 2-hour post-meal / OGTT readings above 140 mg/dL.
estimated Average Glucose = (A1C x 28.7) – 46.7. Check your math?
Actually Laurie, it depends on which formula you use.
Chris’ measurement was from the DCCT formula. There are SEVERAL formulas for determing eAG (Estimated Average Glucose) from A1c, including the ADAG formula you mentioned.
Unfortunately, none are perfect or correct in every instance. I’d rather estimate high than low, personally.
Chris, this is some of your best work. My BF and I are two months into a low carb diet and my blood sugar has stabilized, but he still has extreme hunger between meals and has to eat 4x a day. Can’t wait for your third installment where you show how to check blood sugar between meals–I suspect he has some insulin issues that I don’t have.
Thanks, Lacie. As for your BF, it could be a reactive hypoglycemia pattern, where the insulin surge after meals is too high, and he goes into a hypoglycemic state (which produces the extreme hunger). Cortisol dysregulation is often involved in this situation.
Thank you so much for these incredibly well-written articles.
Great article. You mention that FBG can be elevated on a low carb diet. What do you consider a low carb diet to be in terms of grams? Anything under 150g a day or do you mean a keto diet?
Lynn: I think there’s wiggle room here, and it depends somewhat on the metabolic function of the individual. But I don’t consider 150g to be low-carb. I’d say that’s more in the realm of “moderate”. I’m thinking more like 100g and below.
I used to think LC was under 100 carbs also, but apparently the strict definition of LC is less than 130: http://livinlavidalowcarb.com/blog/?p=6648.
My BS is better on 120-150 carbs than it was on VLC, but I am wondering why my FBS is not ideal still,; though my PP numbers are where they need to be.
Any thoughts?
If you’re PP & A1c are in the normal range, I wouldn’t worry about a mildly elevated FBG.
Any other thoughts on correcting IR? I read all your posts and I watch my carbs, eat a strict gluten free diet, limit vegtable oils (I have recently gone further and embraced an extremly low PUFA diet, so no more bacon etc. for me) and get good sleep. I also take metformin and natural thyroid.
Despite all of this, my insulin is never below the magic 10. Any ideas on what I can do?
There are a number of botanicals and nutrients that can help improve insulin sensitivity. You could also try intermittent fasting, provided your cortisol levels are not out of whack.
In February 2011, my cortisol level was 17.3. My naturopath at the time told me it was too high.
My insulin tested at 3.0 and my A1c was 5.8.
Is there any suggestion on how to lower AM cortisol? He never really gave me any help on that and he is no longer in my employ for a myriad of reasons.
My new practitioner is a typical MD and he told me I didn’t need a fasting insulin test, a CRP or homocysteine test. He gave me some lame explanation about my other numbers indicating the information. Finding a good doctor is almost impossible these days. Even the naturopaths really don’t know what they are doing.
My last total cholesterol (Sept. 2011) was 236. HDL 68, LDL 153, Tris 75.
I do have stubborn belly fat that I have had most of my adult life but I’m losing some of it as I work on my diet.
Phosphatidylserine (PS), massage, stress management, better sleep, adaptogenic herbs.
Could also try high intensity strength training, to make sure you’re really depleting muscle and liver glycogen occasionally. Something like Body By Science.
Chris: if, as you state, “low-carb diets induce insulin resistance,” why isnt it a cause for concern? I went low carb some time ago, no processed foods or bad oils, lost 20 lbs, do regular strength and resistance training, A1c 5.3, post-prandials <120, usually <100, very low BMI and BFP.
But now my FBG levels are as high as 125! (Used to be 87) I guess I don't get the logic behind the assurances that a low-carb diet "may not be a cause for concern" when in the same article you quote studies showing diabetes risk in people with FBG levels above 95. Type II diabetes runs in my family, including those who are not overweight. Does someone like me need to be concerned? What are the botanicals and nutrients you refer to that can improve insulin sensitivity?
Julie:
I didn’t mean to imply that it is never a concern; just that it may not be a concern. It depends a lot on what your post-meal and A1c levels are. For example, if you wake up at 105 mg/dL but drop down in the 80s soon after, and stay between 80-120 for the rest of the day, I may not be concerned (I’d also have to consider your symptoms, micronutrient status and other clinical variables).
However, if you wake up at 105, never drop below that level, and experience post-meal BS of above 140, then I’d be concerned. Those are two totally different patterns.
The studies that were done showing FBG >95 causing harm were likely done in people eating the Standard American Diet (for the most part). I suspect had the researchers tested their post-meal blood sugars, they would have been high. So I’m not sure we can extrapolate those results to someone eating a low-carb diet. I believe there are some studies showing that higher FBG with normal post-meal BG doesn’t predict future diabetes, but the opposite is not true, i.e. studies show that you can have a normal FBG, but if you have elevated post-meal BG you’re still at risk.
This is a complicated topic and several variables are involved. Check out an interesting article and discussion in progress at Stephan Guyenet’s blog. Make sure to read the comments.
Julie: also note that some people actually experience better blood sugar control on a moderate carb. diet than a low-carb diet. I suspect this is related to the phenomenon I described above, where introducing some carbohydrate gets the body accustomed to burning it again, and probably prevents cortisol and/or epinephrine from getting involved.
Chris
Thank you for doing this topic. I write a diabetes blog and I try not to club the ADA all the time but those guidelines always seem to pop up. They are a major problem because they give people a since of security that they shouldn’t have.
I was actually thinking about this just before I read your blog. I’m a type 2 ketosis prone diabetic with a family history of diabetes and because of this I view the ADA guidelines as nearly tragic for people like me. I’ve come to a decision that I’m going to tell people in my family what are the real guidelines for diabetes. Basically, I’m taking the FBS ADA guidelines and using them for everything. Less than 100 is normal. 100 to 120 is the prediabetic range and above 120 is diabetic. I know that sounds pretty drastic for postprandials and the like but I would rather my children and grandchildren have a chance for a healthy future.
I wrote a long blog on hemoglobin and A1c and put up charts of the people who are most likely to have these sorts of problem, whether they are diabetic or not. Interestingly enough, this seems to match up with peoples that live where Malaria or Malaria like diseases occur.
http://ketosisprone.blogspot.com/2010/10/a1c-glycation-problems-and-dka.html
Chris
Just read your replies on Whole Health. Here’s something to test on people you know who spike easily. Give them a NSAID for two or three days. If their blood sugars cease to spike then it might be a glucose desensitization issue. The has to do with inhibiting COX-2 and PGE 2. I’m reporting on this on my blog.
Thanks for your input, Micheal. I’ll check out that post.
Another great article, Chris. I’m puzzled by my FBS being around 95-99 but frequently my 2 hr post prandial will be below 90. Shouldn’t the FBS come in lower? Is this a morning cortisol stress response?
Not necessarily. It’s common for LC folks to have FBG in that range. Presuming your A1c and post-meal numbers are good (which it sounds like they are), I probably wouldn’t worry about it. As your body becomes accustomed to burning fat for fuel, insulin sensitivity decreases. This can cause a “dawn effect” where FBG is higher than you’d expect it to be.
Some people find that adding a moderate amount of carbs in the form of safe starch, for example, helps normalize their blood sugar.
Chris,
This is very interesting. I recently started eating fairly low carb, trying to follow the guidelines of the Perfect Health Diet (thanks for reviewing that, great book!) Then I got a FBG among other screening tests, because suddenly three elderly members of my family have been stricken by cardiovascular disease. The FBG was 110 mg/dL, causing me to investigate and freak out. Using a cheap glucometer I found evidence of the “dawn phenomenon” (83 mg/dL fasting usually, but 95-100 in the morning, have not repeated the 110 lab value). More shocking, I ate 8 oz of potato and it spiked my BG up to 237, down to 169 at 2 hrs, then mildly hyperglycemic (70 mg/dL) for a couple of hours. Response to a normal low-carb dinner was pretty benign. I did not mention the potato test to my doctor, who is unconcerned. I don’t know what to think. Looking forward to your next post!
Mark: that kind of pattern is consistent with reactive hypoglycemia, which is often the earliest stage of the progression towards diabetes. I’m glad to hear you’re now eating low-carb, as BG of 237 after a potato is definitely cause for concern.
If you’ve been LC for some time, it’s possible your body has adapted to burning fat and that’s why your glucose tolerance is impaired. The only way to find out would be to eat a higher amount of carbs over a 3-day period. If your blood sugars start to come down, it suggests you are adapted to fat burning but don’t have metabolic damage. If your BG stays high, it suggests you’ve got some metabolic damage that needs to be addressed.
Thanks for your thoughts, Chris. I may give your carb-up test a try. I think I may have always had this response to carbs, at least the reactive hypoglycemia part. I get a little sleepy after an unusually large meal, which in the past has always meant a meal with plenty of carbs. I used to think everyone reacted that way. Maybe my mom’s side of the family (where the CVD is occurring) all have this too, staying mild enough to not trigger investigation for diabetes, but causing damage. My wife (a doctor) and a friend (a nurse) both are very skeptical I could be T2 diabetic, perhaps because I am not overweight and seem healthy. But BG of 237 is not healthy! Do you think I should get a HbA1c test to assess the current damage level?
Mark: if you’ve always had that response, and if you feel sleepy after carby meals, I wouldn’t recommend the carb re-feeding. That’s indicative of a metabolic issue, and it’s probably not wise to potentially push your blood sugars above 200 in light of this.
Chris, thanks again for your advice. So do you think I should eat a low-carb diet, monitor BG to keep it under some level (140?), occasionally check HbA1c, and continue to exercise regularly? Should this prevent further trouble? Can the metabolic problem be improved, or just worked around carefully?
Usually it can be addressed. It depends on what’s causing the problem in the first place. For example, if it’s “lifestyle”-related (i.e. diet, stress, sleep, etc.) and it’s early enough in the process it should be possible to completely restore healthy metabolic function. If it’s autoimmune, or has progressed long enough to where beta cells have been destroyed, then insulin signaling may be permanently damaged. In that case it would be a case of improving insulin sensitivity and glucose utilization to the fullest possible extent, and making dietary and lifestyle changes to prevent further damage. Feel free to check out my professional site and book a free 15-minute consultation if you’re interested in pursuing this further.
Chris, how can you tell if your beta cells are being destroyed? I usually follow a strict diet but at times I “just have to have something, (i.e. cookies, bread, muffin, etc.) and then my BG shoots way up, sometimes almost 300. Is it really bad to have these spikes?
Hi Jean – hopefully Chris has the time to jump in here too – but I’ll add my 2c worth as well:
Beta Cell function can be measured somewhat using the C-Peptide and insulin-level tests. If you have decreased levels of c-peptide (a protein) it’s indicative of beta-cell damage.
If you have decreased c-peptide but hyperinsulinemia (high-insulin levels) – that’s usually an indicator of insulin-resistance, and it may be possible to still maintain your pancreatic function without insulin, if you reduce your carbohydrate levels enough to compensate. If you have low-insulin levels as well as decreased beta-cell function, then it’s very possible your beta-cells are damaged to the point you may need additional insulin to manage your condition, or go VERY-low-carbohydrate in order to manage your glucose.
My own experience – I managed to damage my beta-cell function without realizing it. Now I MUST eat very-low-carbohydrate to manage by glucose levels what little insulin production I have left. I don’t need basal or bolus insulin at this point in my life, but I *DO* keep my carbohydrate intake UNDER 20g maximum per meal. 15g maximum for any snack. Depending on my activity levels for the day I may have as little as 30g of carbohydrate, or as much as 90g. Typically it’s 45-60g in a day. That’s as a 220lb man eating 3,000 calories a day, BTW. That’s how low I need to go to keep my glucose “in-check”.
As for BG shooting up to nearly 300… YES, that’s really bad. It is physically damaging you – no if’s, and’s or but’s about it. Anything above 140mg/dl is causing damage – period. This is agreed upon by all experts in the field (with the exception of the ADA who seems to want you to be on medication and damaging yourself…) and is in position statements from both the IDF (International Diabetes Federation) and the AACE (American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists).
Unfortunately many of us MD’s as well as nutritionists, dieticians, diabetic-educators and others go by the recommendations of the American Diabetes Association (or in my case the Canadian Diabetes Association) simply because that’s the information we’re presented. Much of our continuing education is sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry – so it’s really no surprise that misinformation is rampant in those occupations.
Chris’ blog post here shows exactly why blood-sugar levels are important, and gives it straight, and all research I’ve ever seen shows it to be “spot-on” for targets.
Please, for your health’s sake, keep those spikes under 140mg/dl.
Thank you Glen for that info. I’m curious – do you have to use medication/insulin? Do you eat a lot of protein? My goodness, 15 g. carbs per meal is hardly anything. I don’t know if I could keep it that low. I eat a lot of veggies plus I probably eat 3-4 fruits a day. Thanks again.
Hi Jean – at diagnosis I was a very unhealthy 320lbs, with a fasting level of 267mg/dl and HbA1c of 12.1% … Not good.
Initially my own doctor prescribed insulin, metformin and sulfonylureas … but after research I decided to ONLY go on the metformin and see about controlling everything else through a very-low-carb/ketogenic diet.
As of now I have an HbA1c of 5.6% and virtually-all of my post-prandials are under 130mg/dl, unless I’m sick or very stressed. I’ve dropped 100lbs in the past year getting this under control.
Yes, I eat considerable amounts of protein, usually a minimum of 35% of my calories – but I’m also exceptionally active. I work out a minimum of 5 days a week, (weight-training, HIIT, and cycling in the summer) usually for a minimum of 75 – 90 minutes. In the summer I’ll do 5 to 6 hour bike rides on days-off or weekends. With that level of activity I find I need the protein in order to maintain my lean-mass.
I eat TONS of veggies – between 6 and 8 cups a day most days. I eat very little fruit. I’ll have at most two very small servings (like 1/2 of an apple or 1/4cup of berries) in a day. All the nutrients available in fruit you can get in vegetables with fewer calories and way less sugar. =)
Glen, first of all, congratulations!!! for what you’ve done for yourself! Hope I will be able to take this seriously and get my diabetes under “real control”. I must admit I find it hard to give up my fruit! I usually have a banana every morning (but at least I am trying to buy smaller ones these days). I know bananas are one of the worst for diabetes. One hour after my breakfast this morning (3 oz. turkey burger, banana and 1/3 c. whole milk, 1/3 c. 1% milk with my coffee) my reading was 167. Guess that’s not good huh? Again, thanks for your feedback.
I used to love bananas too – and I still eat them – sort of…
I buy GREEN bananas (less ripe = less sugar) and peel them and freeze them … then use 1/3 to 1/2 a banana in a post-workout smoothie if I’ve done exercise enough to deplete glycogen pretty severely.
Otherwise, I just don’t eat them.
I think you’ll find if you cut out the banana, maybe substitute an egg (from free-range chickens, if possible) and cut the milk (especially the 1%) you’ll have much better post-breakfast glucose levels.
My typical breakfast is 2-3 eggs, 2 strips of nitrate-free naturally-cured bacon (free-range pork), and I skip the coffee too. There are many diabetics that don’t respond well to caffeine – I’m one of them. This provides me between 400 and 500 very low-carb calories (depending on the number of eggs I eat). My post-prandials at breakfast are virtually identical to my fasting numbers, maybe 10 points higher at most.
If I’m exercising in the morning I’ll also add 1/2 slice of organic, sprouted-grain bread (no flour!) with 1/2 tbsp organic/natural peanut-butter and 1 tsp no-sugar-added organic jam – usually raspberry. This adds another 100 calories – 12g of carbohydrate, 4g of protein and 4g of fat.
I agree, once again, with Glenn. C-peptide is a cheap and readily available way to indirectly test beta-cell function. It is definitely bad to have spikes up to 300, and it’s indicative of deteriorating insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance. Not a direction you want to be moving in. It’s possible that by addressing the underlying causes of your condition, you may be able to recover some carbohydrate tolerance. However, if there has been beta-cell destruction, it’s likely you’ll need to maintain a low-carb diet to prevent those spikes. Your cravings can be addressed through proper nutritional treatment (identifying and addressing nutrient deficiencies). Best to find a practitioner skilled in treating metabolic issues with a natural approach. Good luck.
thank you Chris …..you say readily available …. is this a test one can do themselves …. a “kit” you can get at the pharmacy? Or do you need to see a doctor? I’m sorry, but I’m new at all this stuff (was diagnosed with diabetes quite a few years ago, but just recently took it really seriously)…… really appreciate your site. Oh, another ? ….. what do you think about the “peak” training? 30 sec. high intensity and then 90 sec. rest, etc. ?
C-Peptide is only available from a lab. It requires special equipment to analyze – so no home test is available.
As for training – what you’re calling “peak” training is likely what is referred to as HIIT – “High-Intensity Interval Training” and it’s by far the best exercise you can do as a diabetic – it’s also great for almost anybody – but it’s shown in several studies now to burn more fat and decrease insulin-resistance compared to moderate cardio.
Weight-training, sprints with rest in-between, jumping rope on/off, etc. are all good examples and very beneficial.
http://chriskresser.com/9-steps-to-perfect-health-7-move-like-your-ancestors
also, don’t over-train: http://chriskresser.com/why-you-may-need-to-exercise-less
You’d need to see a doctor to get cystatin-C. What I meant by readily available is that it’s not an exotic test your doctor hasn’t heard of. Any Labcorp or Quest lab can do it.
Thanks, Chris, that’s encouraging. I’ll check out your site. I have learned a lot from your blog.
Hi Chris
Thank you for your blog. It comes at just the right time. For the second time this year, my A1c was 6.0, so my doctor now wants me to do a 3 hour glucose test but I’ve been very weary of doing this (especially since my fasting glucose is 78). Your post-meal monitoring makes more sense to me. I know that I should be concerned that I might be pre-diabetic (even though I’m skinny). I’m looking forward to learning how to do this. Also, what kind of exercise do you feel is best to keep blood sugar levels down?
Angela,
I think high intensity strength training is the best type of exercise for restoring and maintaining insulin sensitivity and glucose utilization. I’ll write an article about this soon.
Great! Thank you.
Hi Chris,
What a timely post. I have been low carbing at about 50 carbs average per day for the past 21 months. I don’t normally check my BS but, was curious when I did do a FBS to find my morning level at 115. Then, I read about the phenomenon of LCers having high morning levels and felt a little more reassured. I have been checking my post-meal levels for the past few days and I am pretty confused. One hour after eating my level will be around 101 and two hours later it will be at 113. Even after three hours it is still going up, say to 119. I will have had nothing to eat or drink during this time. Is, perhaps, my meter not working correctly? Shouldn’t my levels be decreasing after that first hour postprandial?
I’ve seen patterns like that in my practice and it’s pretty typical of cortisol dysregulation. That may be why your fasting blood sugar is elevated as well. The normal pattern would be a blood sugar peak 45 minutes after eating, returning to baseline by 2 hours. Something is raising your blood sugar in a fasted state, and cortisol (and/or glucagon) are the likely culprits.
Hi Chris, firstly thanks for your posts, I’ve read them all and it is helping me in my plans to manage some diagnosed and undiagnosed problems. I want to monitor my blood glucose levels as they have been creeping up in FB tests. I had an OGTT, came in under range, but not a lot. I live in Australia, is there any chance you can convert the lab values you recommend into the common ranges we have here? Our fasting levels (IMVS labs) are “normal” at 4 to 6 mmol/L, and two hours post OGTT <7.8 mmol/L
Thanks
Jo
Hi Jo
To convert US units to mmol/L, simply divide by 18. So, a US unit of 90 divided by 18 = 5.0 in the UK, Ireland and Australia units. To convert an Aussie unit of 5.0; multiply by 18 = 90.
My blood glucose monitor is in the MMMOL/L units, but since all literature I read is in US units, I convert instantly and focus on the US number.
Hi Chris,
I have two questions. You have been very kind and answered many already. I hope it’s not too much to ask.
Regarding that effect of raised post prandial glucose after reintroducing carbs, I remember there was a day when I had two very small boiled potatoes in a salad with protein and fat for lunch and I felt very sleepy after a while. The idea was to help revv up my metabolism (a la Matt Stone) I got a bit scared but now (after reading Stephan and you) I understand that it takes time for the body to adapt. However, my body shows signs of previous hyperinsulinemia, like skin tags, small acanthosis nigricans, I was wondering how can I know if it’s still a problem after two years of low-carbing and losing weight. Is insulin resistance not the cause? Would high-cortisol (chronic stress) cause high insulin too and then high androgens (which is also a problem)?
My mother has diabetes type 2 for the last 25 years or so. She has had severe hypos and some of them happen at night. What could be the reason for a hypo at 2-3 am when there isn’t much basal insulin left (taken at 8 a) Is the glucagon/epinephrine release necessary to get glycogen out of liver not working?
Four questions, not two.
Thank you.
Thanks Lynn, these conditions have killed my brain! Am looking forward to the next article, I’ll be picking up a monitor shortly.
Simona
If you want to try Matt Stone’s protocol, I would suggest you pick up his free RRARF eBook. His program is not just about increasing carbs; it is also very low fructose and very low in PUFA’s. There are other parts of it too.
Also, feel free to email him. He is very responsive to emails.
I have tried everything to get my insulin down and eight years of low carbing has done nada. So, I am trying the Ray Peat program. It is high carb too; but is extremely stringent re: PUFA, meat etc. The only thing Stone and Peat have in common with the SAD is that they both include carbs. However, thereoin they are world’s apart. Just raising carbs ala SAD won’t help at all. The biggest misconception re: Stone is that he advocates junk food and junk carbs. He does not.
Also Jo, what conditions do you have?
my sugar was up last nite when i got off wotk to 177,, then todat it was 120 fasting,then after supper it was 199, then a hr later it wen to 106 it seemsthe more i move it goes down and when im stressed i havto take anxiety pills .every nite to sleep ,,plus i got a heraniated disc my bs has bee good till i hurt my back ,,,any ideas
Thanks Lynn,
I have his free ebook. I have been low carb (50 g veg carbs) low Pufa (o6 only from meat, olive oil and eggs, o3 about 2 grams for a while, stopped it) and low sugar, low fruit, no wheat, no pulses for more than two years (aug 2008). Minimal supps. I was only increasing potatoes and sweet potatoes (see also Paul Jaminet’s blog) for the last month. I should be doing better, but still struggling with gum disease/infections, even worse than a year ago, acne, hairloss, weight loss stall. Wide ranging hormonal issues, I think, cortisol affecting inflammation, underlying androgen (5 alpha reductase) problems due to possibly inherited insulin signalling problems. Just guessing here, trying to make sense of it. Couldn’t get a clear PCOS diagnosis in the last 10 years I’m suffering of these symptoms. More recently low T3 shows the metabolism slowed down, the cause of which is not clear.
Simona,
High cortisol can cause insulin resistance, and vice versa. Low cortisol can cause hypos during the night. Insulin upregulates 17-20 lyase in women, which converts estrogen to testosterone and causes androgen dominance.
Unfortunately this stuff is very complex and it’s impossible for me to say more without knowing the particulars of your case. There’s no one-size fits all approach. Over-feeding may work in some people whose metabolic function is still relatively intact (though under-functioning), but I don’t believe it’s a good strategy across the board.
Hi Simona
Peat is more gung ho anti PUFA’S than Stone is. A max of two eggs a day, olive oil only as a condiment and PUFA free meat such as beef and lamb.
When one increases carbs, it can expose hidden issues. Have you had a cortisol saliva test, a full thyroid panel (TSH, Free T4, and Free T3, anti-TPO, anti-TgAb and Reverse T3) and sex hormone panel done?
What are you basal temps? Temps during the day? Have you been to Stop The Thyroid Madness?
Thanks Chris,
Lynn,
I saw a private endocrinologist in August and I think she asked for these tests, I had them done, but unfortunately I haven’t seen the results although I asked for them. She hasn’t said anything besides the fact that my LDL cholesterol is high. You would think she knows how to interpret them properly. She didn’t ask for a salivary cortisol test, so I’m just guessing there, from my experience. She doesn’t want to prescribe T3 as allegedly it is not licensed in Ireland.
Oh, my basal temperature was ok when I had a look at it in the morning but I’m freezing all the time especially at night when I go to bed late, however, very often it’s around 14 C in the house. I checked that website too.
Hi Simona
Do you live in Ireland? Snap…..
It is ILLEGAL for her to withhold your test results. You need to speak to her secretary and demand them. If that fails, send a written letter to the records department, citing the Data Protection Act 1989. If nothing within a month, threaten them with legal action. Worked for me, because they knew that what they were doing was illegal.
T3 is available in Ireland yep. It’s not illegal.
Oh, hello there. Thank you for reminding me about the Data Protection Act.
Lynn, I have Hashi’s, IBS, diagnosed with fibro, not yet convinced as I have chronically high inflammatory markers and signs of lupus without the ANA, kidneys at stage 2, elevated liver enzymes etc. I’ve just changed doctors and he is redoing all tests, so I haven’t modified my diet yet as I wanted to have these results without changing anything (to help eliminate factors that may be causing symptoms), then going to reexamine diet.
Chris,
Thank you so much for your response. Could a chronic aggravating pain, such as in a heel spur, possibly be responsible for the inbalance of cortisol and/or glucagon that causes the rise in blood sugar?
Once again, thank you.
It would be the inflammation, more than the pain, that could contribute to cortisol dysregulation and blood sugar imbalance. But yes, the end result is the same.
Hi Chris, thank you so much for your informative articles. I would be very interested to hear more of your thoughts on reactive hypoglycemia. I’ve had symptoms for as long as I can remember – eating moderate carb or low carb paleo helps a great deal. Not once in my life have I had a (fasting or otherwise) blood glucose reading over 100, though I haven’t done a careful two and three hour post-prandial test all together. Fasting is typically in the 70s, 1 hr after 50 g dextrose is low 80s, and other than that a few 90s over the years when not fasting. My symptoms of shakiness, sweating, and weakness occur approximately 2&1/2 hour after a high sugar meal (sugary cereal and skim milk, for example, back in the day, or a coke, which I haven’t had in 20 years due to this issue) and resolve with juice consumption or eating a piece of fruit. Once my blood glucose was checked then and it was high 60s, another time low 70s. (A aspartame diet drink while fasting, especially “cherry-flavored” will cause the same symptoms after 2 hours, though I haven’t checked the blood glucose then).
Anyway, your more detailed thoughts on the whole topic of reactive hypoglycemia would be most welcome. I seem to have found my curative diet in any event.
Hi Emily,
With reactive hypoglycemia (RH), it’s typical to see a big spike in blood sugar after meals, followed by a hypo. In your case, I’m not seeing any spikes at all so I’d be more likely to call what you’re dealing with plain old hypoglycemia.
If you’ve been able to manage it with diet, that’s fantastic. Be aware that hypoglycemia is often associated with low cortisol levels or cortisol dysregulation, so that may be something you want to investigate.
Dear Chris it is a great article. Two issues here (49y old)
1. My blood sugar after 2 hrs from normal meal is 100-120
However fasting is 110. I have low bg variance around 110 all the day.
2. My a1c is 6.5 and does not match with my average of 110
thanks
Khalid:
What are your highest readings at 1-hour after meals? With an A1c of 6.5, and FBG of 110, it would appear you must be having some spikes somewhere throughout the day.
OTOH, A1c isn’t always accurate for a variety of reasons. You could try getting fructosamine tested to see how it compares.
Blood sugar regulation is complex, and individual. It’s hard for me to say more without doing a more extensive intake.
Chris
One thing I just thought about in relation to Khalid. Most of the world uses mmol/l for A1c. A 6.5 would translate into about a 5.5 mg/dl A1c which would be about the right number given his daily readings. He might just need to check the units.
Good point, Michael. It would be so much easier if the U.S. caught up with everyone else in this regard.
Recently diagnosed with insulin-dependent diabetes, and told to check BG only before meals and bedtime. These numbers were usually nothing to worry about.
But then I started post-prandial testing and was horrified to find out how worrying those were. I am on insulin but the ‘quick’-acting does absolutely nothing for the first two hours, then starts working about three hours later and is done in five hours. (A pattern verified by two weeks of testing hourly while awake, from which my fingers are just recovering, ouch.)
My FBG is normally in the 90s and each 10g of carb will raise by BG by about 50. Anything I eat will stick around until my insulin gets going 2-3 hours later, so it only takes a piddling 10g to put me in the >140 danger zone. If I do a 2-hour PP reading, it is *always* high but if at that point I add a small bolus, I’ll hypo about 3 hours later.
I have tried injecting further and further in advance of meals (up to 2 hours before eating, despite being warned not to do so by my diabetes team) but this hasn’t always worked as it is really hard to estimate how much you’re going to eat 2 hours later. Plus some days, the insulin does do what it says on the tin and leads to dangerous hypos (in the 20s).
Most days when the bolus is matched to my food, I’m back in normal range 5 hours later. Evidently I would prefer never to go above 140 but since it only takes 10g of carb to do that, that is easier said than done even on a low-carb diet. How much do I need to worry about those hours when my BG is above 140, as it almost always comes back down later?
My A1C is 5.9 which is a bit higher than what I would like; however my diabetes team doesn’t think it should go any lower.
Lila: Have you read Dr. Bernstein’s “Diabetes Solution”? He’s T1 himself and it’s by far the best book I know of for T1s because he goes into great deal on how to use insulin properly with an LC diet. You might also want to check out bloodsugar101.com.
Hi, I have read both cover to cover.
I’m just worried about constantly going over 140. My diabetes team isn’t too concerned about this because my BG is back in range by the next meal, and they say my A1C is fine and control is excellent. But from what I read from Jenny Ruhl and also from yourself (as in this article), BG shouldn’t go over 140 *ever* and I just wonder how concerned I should be as mine often does.
Lila,
All of the research I’ve read, and people whose opinions I respect (like Jenny Ruhl & Dr. Bernstein), suggests that keeping blood sugar below 140 mg/dL is the best way to prevent future diabetic complications. I don’t have much experience with T1, so you might want to contact Jenny and see what she thinks. She’s usually pretty responsive.
Hi – despite living my life like a T1, I am officially a ‘ketosis prone type 2′. So I have the double joy of MDI/hypos _and_ the T2 baggage of ‘sloth and gluttony’ etc.
So does your advice on never going above 140 also apply to shooters like me?
I don’t see why it would be different, since the high blood sugar spikes are what cause the organ damage, complications and elevated CVD risk. Perhaps Micheal Barker will chime in here. He has a blog specifically for T2KPD.
Organ damage etc caused by spikes by themselves (with HBA1C below 6), or prolonged high levels (HBA1cs of 6.5 and above)?
I’m being told only the latter, but you seem to be saying *both*
With my deranged metabolism (slightly more deranged than your ‘average’ diabetic!), the only way I can never got above 140 is to never eat more than 10g of carb in one sitting.
Yikes! Lila, I read your post and the first thing I thought was that you might be a KPD. I really try not to post too much on other’s blogs so I wanted to see what Chris had to say.
First of all, you’re one of the few people who I’ve heard of that have been officially dubbed “KPD”, that is a miracle in itself.
What made me think you were KPD? Your fast acting doesn’t work. Your body is producing counter regulatory hormones strong enough to counter a fast acting insulin. You go low hours after the fast acting is long gone, which means that your body is making insulin. You have a very strong response to carbs and that A1c is hanging near 6. Welcome to the “goofy” diabetes.
This is where KPD differs from regular type 2. Everything is still there and it’s working, it’s just all miss timed. It’s as if some control element is broken so the pieces no longer work together. The continual spikes, however, are going to keep messing up the system though.
I am willing to talk with you about this. You can find me on “Diabetes Forums” as Rekarb or on Tudiabetes with the same name.
I eat very low carb, except once a day i eat about 30-40g carbs in the form of white rice or sweet potato (this is to spare protein – i don’t want to have to eat an extra 50g protein a day just for gluconeogenesis).
My fasting BG is about 83 mg/dl , but i just checked my BG about an hour after I ate some white rice, and it was 147 mg/dl!!!
I’m pretty concerned about this! I’ve been eating this way for about 3 weeks now.(before, i was practically zero carb)..Will i always have peripheral insulin resistance, or will my body get used to this amount of carbs i eat per day?
Reem:
When your body has become accustomed to burning fat for fuel, it becomes naturally insulin resistant. However, this usually reverses after 3-4 days of a higher carb diet. I would keep testing and see if it doesn’t resolve.
It’s possible, however, that there are other mechanisms causing poor glucose tolerance that need to be explored. If your metabolism is damaged from previous poor eating habits or from autoimmune disease, your carbohydrate tolerance may remain low.
Another possibility, if you’re not doing this already, is to add high-intensity strength training to your regiment. This is an excellent way to restore insulin sensitivity and improve glucose tolerance. I’ll be writing an article on this soon.
Chris, I just got some blood results back:
FBG: 78
A1C: 5.4
HDL 63
Trig: 65
The A1C # seems high. My diet has been Paleo+raw dairy since April 2010. However, I was borderline anemic on a few tests during late summer. Think there’s anything to worry about with that A1C number?
Bryan: test your post-meal blood sugars. A1c isn’t particularly reliable in that it can be influenced by a number of different factors. If your post-meal #s are normal, I wouldn’t worry about the A1c – especially in light of your FBG. You could also run fructosamine, which is another measure of average blood sugar that isnt affected by hemoglobin variation.
Thanks, Chris. I am going to pick up a glucose monitor this week. BTW, fructosamine was 1.9 in that same blood work.
Assuming fructosamine was measured in umol/dL, 1.9 is excellent and suggests you don’t have elevated blood sugars. But the glucometer is most accurate, so still a good idea to do that.
It was measured in mmol/L. The report says that 1.2-2.1 is “normal”
Okay. Since it’s getting towards the top of the range, probably good to test the post-meals.
Hi Chris,
is very low fasting insulin (below the range) something worth considering or it is just good?
2.073 mcIU/ml (you mentioned <5 mcIU/ml) or 14.4 pmol/l less than 16.5 lower end of the lab range
at the same time glucose was 5.2 mmol/l or 93.69 mg/dl a bit high
I was eating low carb which could explain the higher glucose but previously in the last 2 years since I'm low carbing my FBG has been low 4.5, 3.9, 4.1. or under 81.
Thanks.
Fasting insulin is an inaccurate marker, especially in the mid-to-later stages of insulin resistance. I think post-meal blood sugars are more useful in measuring insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance.
Hey Chris, I did my glucometer testing. Here are my results for premeal, 1,2 and 3 hours after:
Day 1: 87, 96, 100, 87
Day 2: 89, 101, 114, 94
Day 3: 92, 151, 141, 80
I had white rice on day 3, which apparently I should not eat. Anything else I should gather from this?
Looks pretty normal except for the white rice. Definitely want to avoid that.
Oops. My response got submitted before I was finished.
One potential question mark is that your 2-hour reading was higher than your 1-hour on two days. That can indicate a compromised or delayed insulin response, or in some cases, slow digestion. Still, the important thing is that you’re below 140 at one-hour and below 120 at two-hours which you are in all cases except the white rice day.
I definitely have digestive issues (IBS-C) that I have been working on for a while. It was IBS-D before I eliminated gluten. Also had a positive ANA test, so possible autoimmune issues, although lupas was ruled out. My new years resolution might be to book an appointment with you.
Hey chris, me again
I followed your advice and continued to test. I’ve been eating 30-50g carbs for several weeks now (in the form of white rice or winter squash).
Yesterday, i tested my FBG and it was 77
Today I ate 40g carb in the form of white rice, and 1 hour later it was 171 mg/dl!!! i just tested it now (1.5 hrs later) and it is 158.
I don’t understand, i wouldve thought my body would be used to the carbs by now?? However it may be worth mentioning, that the past few days i have been recovering from jetlag and my sleeping cycle has been really messed up (going to sleep really late, sleeping 12 hours or more..) so maybe this has disrupted by BS balance?
It still doesn’t make sense though that my FBG is normal, yet my response to carbs is insanely abnormal.
BTW, I’m 20 yrs old, and have never been overweight. I’ve been eating LC for a few years now (and before that a high carb moderate fat diet, and before that a junk food, high carb high sugar high gluten and everything bad diet)
I appreciate your thoughts!!
Reem
How long have you been eating higher carb? Glucose tolerance TEMPORARILY decreases on LC and will be higher at first. I once got a BS of 170 when I first moved to a higher carb WOL. Now I get a MAX BS of 120 for the same amount of carbs.
So, give it time. Also, be aware that protein increases BS. You might be very surprised to find that a potato with some butter will cause less of a spike than a steak with potato. Strange, but true.
It’s actually not strange at all to see normal FBG and impaired post-meal blood sugars. There are studies showing that people with normal FBG and impaired OGTT are at higher risk for developing diabetes later on. I don’t say this to scare you, but to clarify why post-meal #s are a better indicator of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity than FBG.
It may be that your numbers come down further after more time. However, it’s possible that you have LADA or some other process affecting insulin output or sensitivity. The low-tech response is to simply avoid whatever raises your blood sugar above 140 mg/dL if you continue to experience this.
Hi Chris,
Just spent five days collecting BG levels. Found this article after as many days of searching–most searches return information for diabetic rather than non-diabetic scenarios so it took awhile.
I’ve gone on a keto diet on-and-off over the last 10 years and always feel dramatically better on one, but eventually grow weary and give it up. Idea is that the glucometer will help motivate me to stay mostly low-glycemic even when keto grows old.
As expected, my levels are below ADA pre-diabetic, but are not idea by the standards of the studies cited above. Will be interesting to see if I can knock the 10-20 mg/dl off the baseline over time.
The thing I find interesting is that my BG level goes up quite a bit after each of my three weekly weight lifting sessions. I work out pretty hard and consistently, always going as close to maximum intensity as reasonably possible. Today, three days into keto, my BG was 95 before a lower-body session and a tad lower at 93 at the end of the session. Twenty minutes later it went to 120 mg/dl and gradually drifted back down to 105 over two hours. Haven’t eaten since hours before the session. Before switching to keto BG peaked at 130 after lifting. On cardio days (500 kcal in 35 minutes rowing) BG followed a similar pattern on high-carb and was close to flat on keto, rising 10 mg/dl at the end of the workout and staying there.
I’ve read that an increase in BG post-workout is to be expected since the liver brings glucose out of storage for muscles to use, but can’t find much information on what levels would be reasonable to expect for an normal to mildly glucose intolerant person.
Do you have any information regarding this? Any interesting studies?
Thanks,
David
How would all this apply to children? would the numbers be the same as adults? If not, could you share what optimal levels would be for kids? I would love to show my kids what happens to them after they junk out on high sugar foods!
My post exercise BG# is higher after weight work out (but is lowered with 10 min of “easy” cardio). Would this be “expected” (I’m paleo). Also, BS is often higher after overnight fasting. Does this indicate that glucagon or gluconeogenesis has kicked in as BS drops during the night?
At some point, can you define “low carb” ….I get my carbs almost exclusively from low glycemic veg – but these can add up. When people are quoting under 50 grams of carbs per day, does this usually mean TOTAL carbs, or are then netting out fiber? I can easily eat 3 cups raw brussels sprouts (yields about 2 cups cooked) either way total carbs are about 24 grams. Same for cabbage, etc.
update:
I#ve been continuing eating the same way for the past few months, but still no improvement. Occassionally my blood sugar readings are normal (especially if i eat alot of fat with carbs, or i eat them after a workout or with whey protein).
However today i ate about 80g carbs (white rice) with about 2 tsp fat (first thing i’ve eaten today)
12pm – ate half the rice
12:30 – ate the rest of it
1pm – 128 mg/dl
1:30pm – 174.6
2pm – 156
2.30pm –
Clearly i have problems..I called my doctor the other day requesting hbA1c, etc, but she refused because i am “20 years old and not a diabetic”
I’m really not sure what to do now. I#m cutting out the white rice,and will see how other starches affect my blood sugar, but is there any way to reverse this? Any supplements/nutrients to take, lifestyle changes, etc? How can i find out what is going on with my body?
Would appreciate any advice as i’m really at a loss here…
Could I suggest trying to immediately replicate? i.e. if you get one that high (174.6) immediately do another stick. This happened to me today. I have been testing a lot the last 24 hours and knew from the quantity of CHO I had eaten my BS could not have increased as high/fast as it did. I retested using “better technique” (I got a bigger initial drop of blood and it filled the strip more rapidly) and this time it was what I would have anticipated. I sometimes use two glucometers side by side (there is far more variability than it seems there should be). Also, next time you are having a lab fasting BS, take your glucometer and do finger stick just before the draw – then you will have an idea of the accuracy of your meter. Bayer Contour is working best right now – but I am using up my Accu-check strips, just as a relative indicator (i.e. does exercise make BS go up or down), as it routinely runs 10-20 higher than the Bayer.
Question for Chris – from the “data” (google David Mendosa ‘Free Foods’ blog article where Dr. Bernstein weighs in) we would expect that 10 gm CHO will increase BS 50 in Type 1 and non-obese type 2. Do you have an “overlay” for low-carb/Paleo type eaters? I am wondering if this might also happen?
Still trying to understand why intense exercise (kettlebell type work out for an hour) in a fasted state increases blood sugar, while 10-15 min easy cardio (treadmill walking after mea) decreases. Does this make physiological sense in terms of glycogen and glucagon kicking in:fasted state and muscle uptake of glucose: fed state?
Other ideas: Listened to a lecture on continuous blood glucose monitoring results. It showed (in agreement with what Calorie Restriction society says) that your am (first) blood glucose response is the strongest (insulin production is shut down from the overnight fast, and needs to be gently teased awake – not shocked with a quick glucose spike). This is great reinforcement for NOT starting the day off with CHO (especially something as glycemic as white rice).
@Deb B…I have a suspicion that the reason your glucose is high after your intense workouts is something I learned from Dr. Bernstein. It depends WHEN you workout. I tested this myself and it’s true. If you do an intense workout, like serious weights or HIIT cardio (which I tested mine on) within 3 hrs. after awakening, your bloos sugar shows a significant rise.
I tried this as my routine was always doing intense exercise sometimes on an empty stomach within the 3 hr. awakening mark. Sure enough, I tested at 94. You can try this yourself and see if it helps to wait 3 hrs. and then get to your exercise. It has something to do with AM cortisol, according to Berstein.
Sharon, Thanks for your response. Yes, I tend to agree (I have the new ed. of Dr. Bernstein, have to read up on this part).
Thanks for posting the Dr. Dall info as well (wonder if she collaborates with Dr.”Wheat Belly” Davis, Milwaukee, WI.
Reem: seems your glucose tolerance is impaired for some reason. There’s no way of knowing why without investigating further. The typical culprits when blood sugar doesn’t improve with dietary changes are cortisol dysregulation or (less likely) late onset autoimmune diabetes (LADA, or Type 1.5). A1c isn’t particularly helpful in this situation – post-meal #s are much more accurate.
Hey
thanks for the quick response. Is there a way i can get tested for cortisol dysregulation or LAMDA?
I’m eating Paleo / low carb and have just started tracking my blood glucose. A typical day sees me at a average of 5.5mmo/L of 99mg/dl, no matter if it’s FBG or post prandial. Also, my 2hr post prandial is the highest. Can you touch on delayed insulin response on a future podcast? Should I be aiming to get BG any lower? A1c results are due in the next week, so that’ll reveal more.
Date Time mmol/L Notes
09-Mar 06:13 5.1 FBG
09-Mar 08:05 5.2 Post workout, fasted, 10g BCAA
09-Mar 08:50 5.5 Post workout, 10g BCAA
09-Mar 12:21 5.4 Pre-lunch
09-Mar 13:31 5.4 1hr post prandial
09-Mar 14:31 5.7 2hr post prandial
09-Mar 15:28 5.5 3hr post prandial
Chris,
Thanks for writing this article. I just got back my annual blood test results and the numbers were surprising. My FBG is 90, while my hba1c is 6.7%. My HDL/LDL/Triglycerides are excellent, and nothing else in my results clearly points to a cause for the elevated hba1c. I am and have always been slightly anemic, although I don’t yet know the root of the anemia (B12, iron, etc.). Last year at this time, my hba1c was 5.9, and nothing significant has changed in my diet or exercise. I am 40 years old, 5’9, 148lbs. I exercise 5 times a week, alternating between high intensity strength training and cardio. I eat a moderate carb diet, although I’ve never felt the need before to measure my macronutrients, so I don’t know exactly where I fall in that spectrum. I haven’t measured my post-prandial glucose, but I suspect that is the next step. This is all very confusing, but I’m trying to keep a cool head until my PCP comes back from vacation so we can talk about it.
I have the normal FBS with high A1c issue. HAve done much searching, and am convinced it is due to longer-lived red blood cells. Google “physiological” insuliln resistance (vs. pathological). Also, listen to the recent JEnny Ruhl podcast with Jimmy Moore, she talks about why A1c isn’t a great INDIVIDUAL (vs. population-wide) marker, and the author of another best-selling diabetes books use of continuous blood glucose monitoring. Her BS never went over 90, but she had the high A1cs. OF course, you should still monitor post meal blood sugar to make sure there are no bad surprises there.
It’s interesting to me that I have the anemia issue, also. Its normal now, but ferratin seems to take forever to replete.
Thanks, Deb, that’s great information. I will definitely read up on physiological insulin resistance,
Thanks for the 2 articles but it did not answer the question: Why your “normal” blood sugar isn’t normal (Part 2)
bob
I follw strict regiment diet wise , no sugar etc. All of a sudden my blood Sugar Spiked to 484, I’m nt a drinkr, I took double hot Of Crown Royal whisky an hour later it was 117! This is never happenedb-4 machine is calibrated rt. I checked it 2 hours aftr 3 OZ. Of Chicken, 491-like I said it has been happening for a month My PHYSICIAN tld me not to worry about it-AND I thinkhe is wrong
My gtt report says:
Fasting : 82.3
First Hour : 85.6
Second Hour : 95.3
Can anyone guide me….is it normal?
Somi, I think your values are perfectly normal. You are not at all likely to have diabetes
Hi Chris. I just read the blood sugar part 2 article you emailed me and now I am being referred to the next article which discusses,” How to measure your blood sugar at home.” Can I please have that link. Thanks again, Talayna Testa
Hi Chris. I am a relatively healthy female age 41. I’m petite and thin – 5’1″, 97 lbs. However, I just recently found out that my last two fasting blood sugar counts (one last year and one just a couple of weeks ago) were 97 and 96 respectively. I haven’t been able to talk with my doctor yet as I just received the results of the second test, and he is currently out of town. From what I’ve been reading here and in some other online articles is this could be a predictor of future diabetes. However, I have none of the other indicators associated with metabolic syndrome. My waist is small, my blood pressure is consistently low, my HDL is high and my tricglycerides are normal. Still, should I be concerned? I have had several bouts of reactive hypolglycemia over the past few years. I’m thinking it must be related.
Kristin – Could I suggest (based on my experience):
Define “fasting blood sugar” Often they tell you 8 hours and coffee, tea is ok. Should be water only (the caffeine will raise your blood sugar) and my understanding is a true fast is 12 hours. Also, Per Jenny Ruhl, your 1 hour post prandials (checked with a meter) is FAR more predictive of blood sugar dysregulation – you should test yourself for awhile on the post prandials. Check out Jenny Ruhl (Blood Sugar 101) website. Im pretty sure Chris refers to her in his writings as well.
Thank you Deb. I’m sorry. I should have specified. I did a water-only 12-hour fast before having my blood drawn. The result was a FBG of 96. I will see if I still have a blood glucose monitor. I used to have one but haven’t seen it in awhile. I’ll then test my blood sugar after a meal. I’ll also check out Jenny Ruhl’s website. Thank you
Awesome articles Chris. While trying to attack a cholesterol issue, I thought it would be a good idea to buy a glucose meter. My first fasting test was a level of 97! I freaked out a bit. But after reading, I found the fact I’ve been low carb (under 100g/day) for 10 months may have something to do with my fasting levels. So, my results were as follows:
Before meal: 95
1 hr: 98
2 hr: 83
Anything out of the ordinary here I need to investigate?
Thanks for the help
Steven
Not at all. It’s normal to have high FBG on a VLC diet. As long as it goes down into the 80s after eating, not a problem.
Thanks Chris. Had an A1c test with the result of 5.6…. yikes, a little too high. Still after testing my meal values I consistently get:
FBG: 90-98
1 hr: 90-105
2 hr: 78-88
Wonder what’s going on here. VLC diet… and lately been too low on the calories so need to improve that. Any suggestions or advice?
Forgot to add… maybe these will help. Thyroid numbers are:
TSH: 2.8
T3, Free: 3.2
T4, Free: 1.5
T4: 8.8
T3 Uptake: 36%
Free T4 Index: 3.2
Couple were on the upper end of the reference. Anything you can glean from these and if they could be affecting my blood glucose readings? Wonder if calorie reduction with some days of 12-16 hours fasting would affect these numbers? Thanks so much for your help!
Dear Chris,
Thank you for the the rich article. I did the Glucose Tolerance Test (75 grams) yesterday and my results where as follows:
H A1c: 5.3
Fasting Blood Glucose : 88
After 1 hour: 152
After 2 hours: 93
I’m 31 year old male & I’m really worried of my numbers after I read the article; so would you please tell me if I’m pre-diabetic or not because my doctor told me that I’m fine and there is nothing to worry about.
Thank you very much
sorry I forgot to mention that I’m around 150 lbs and about 6 ft tall, also recently donated blood and my Iron level was 15.5, blood pressure 106/72, and cholesterol 145 mg/dl. Just mentioned these in case they might help asses my situation.
Thanks again
Yami
Exactly it is normal. after 2 hour <140 is normal and FBG <100 is normal — you are normal range
Thank you sridhar.
My FBS is 110
2 hours After Meal it is 115
Is it Pre diabetic
It may be. I can’t make a diagnosis online.
Hi Chris
Love the podcast and blog (BTW, congrats on the new addition!). You’ve been very kind answering all these questions. Quick one. I’ve been Paleo for nearly a year but am very low carb (consistently under 100g per day). My recent blood tests have me a bit worried. They are:
FBG: 95
HA1c: 5.6
C-Peptide: 1.5
So, I bought a glucose meter and found my results over about a week to be as follows:
Wake: 90-105
Before Meal: 78-101
1 Hr After meal: 85-122
2 Hr After meal: 78-100
Before Bed: 89-101
So, anything I need to investigate here? Are the ranges normal? Why does my glucose level seem to rise late a night? A little worried about the lower C-Peptide score along with the 95 glucose. Thank you for all your help.
Pretty normal to have high FBG on a VLC diet. You’re well under the 1-hr and 2-hr targets. Can’t see much to worry about.
Thanks a bunch Chris. Any worries about the low-normal C-peptide in conjunction with the FBG of 95? Some have hinted at LADA possibility. Take care and thanks for all your work. Can’t express how valuable it is.
Hello Chris,
I am a male aged 50 & have ben low carbing for the last 2 months whilst also reducing considerably both quantity & calorie intake & I have lost 20 pounds in the process from 216 to 196 resulting in a BMI of 27.3. I have been very disciplined & well controlled with regard to diet & carb intake.
My Bayer Contour meter readings show an overall Average Reading of 5.3 with a break down of:
Before Breakfast:
Maximum =6.1 Minimum = 4.1 Deviation = 0.5 Average = 5.0
After Breakfast:
Maximum = 6.2 Minimum = 3.5 Deviation = 1.0 Average = 5.2
Before Lunch:
Maximum = 6.1 Minimum = 3.7 Deviation = 0.7 Average = 5.2
After Lunch:
Maximum = 7.3 Minimum = 4.5 Deviation = 1.0 Average = 5.6
Before Dinner:
Maximum = 7.1 Minimum = 3.8 Deviation = 1.1 Average = 5.1
After Dinner:
Maximum = 8.3 Minimum = 3.9 Deviation = 1.0 Average = 5.7
Night:
Maximum = 7.4 Minimum = 4.3 Deviation = 1.0 Average = 5.9
From using a number of online calculators I was expecting an HBA1C figure of 4.9% but I was very concerned to find that the actual HBA1C result was 6.0% & cannot understand why. I have been restricting calories, fat & carbohydrates as well as losing 20 pounds in the process & this has me very dismayed as achieving a low HBA1C was my prime motivator & it now seems all my hard work & efforts are have been in vain.
It may further interest you to know that my previous HBA1C conducted earlier in the year was also 6.0% & I had very little if any control over any aspects of my diet. How can it be that if I pigged out & ate terribly with high carbs, processed & junk foods in large quantities heavier results in exactly the same HB1AC 6% score as when I was most well controlled low carb, low calorie, low fat diet & resulting weight loss & that my average numbers do not match that of the calculators?
Many Thanks
hi chris
i am 35 yrs old male from india with normal BP,
& both my parents are diabitic
my bg reading before medication were-
fbs- 136
pp-202
random-218
& a1c – 8%
doc just recently i diagnsd me with type 2 diabetise & priscribed me glusofin xl 500mg once daily after dinner…
my bs readings after medication are as under-
on 3rd day- fbs -119
on 4th day fbs-122
my queries are-
1) Am i severly diabitic? or in my case can i ever get back to normal range without medications?
2) what calorie diet should i get into?
3) I have stopped having rice & sugar stuffs completely, will this help?
4) wht should be my approach towards this condition considering my age?
5) i am really worried…do i really need to right now?
would be highly obliged for your early reply
thanks a ton
kaps
sorry i forgot to mention that my weight is 82 kgs & height 172cms
& yaa my pp on fouth day of medication is 149 ..
My fasting BG was 101. Normally, it is 99, or under 100. I do not eat a lot of bread, or rice. All I did that morning was gargle with mouthwash, and prior blood test before this one. Have not been exercising lately. Do I have a mild case of insulin resistance?
I have been regularly testing my blood sugar (both fasting and post prandial) and my HBA1C. While the sugar levels seems normal (90 and 130), my HBA1C seems higher at 6.5%. My HBA1C has gone as high as 6.8% while my sugar levels remained the same. I am very confused about the readings as they do not seem to add up. Can you please advise.
Hi and thank you for this site.been a very good read. I have been getting diabetes symptoms after meals. Been checing bs. Fbs is 95,120. Post meal goes up to 230+ after an an hour of eating. But will drop to 150 and so on after a couple more hours. I think it may be type 1.5. Im 32 slim and very active. Walk about three milrs a day for work. I know somthing isnt right. I have checked bs levels a couple years ago, and y readings never went over 90.
thank you and let me know your thoughts on this.
Chris, just wanted to get your thoughts…
I’m 28years old, 6’1″, about 240 pounds (overweight, I know), over the last 2 months I’ve had a few bloods tests and a physical, here are my results.
HBA1C 5.7
Fasting Glucose (12 hour fast, I did exercise that morning but only consumed water), 99
Fasting Glucose Test (12 hours), I checked 2 days later in the morning as I woke up, no breakfast, etc 104
Non fasting glucose after breakfast, about 2 hours, 97
6 hour non fasting (Only had water between lunch and dinner) before dinner, 96
2 Hours after dinner, which included a glass of soda, 103
I’m not overly concered because I know I need to change my eating habbits, I like sweets to include chocolate (maybe have a couple of hershey kisses throughout the day) and probably eat a bowl of ice cream before bed 3-4 days a week. That has stopped.
My blood test indicated that my tric were eleveated, HDL a little low but the Chol was in the normal range..
Long story short, everything as a whole did worry me, I’ve significanty changed my eating habits and did start working out 4-5 times a week about 2 months ago.
Would any of the numbers above concern you. What I thought most interesting was my Glucose levels, fasting and non fasting, even after a meal, were all ~ 100, which I thought was acceptable? It always quickly came back down to 100.
My Dr. said that a 5.7 is within the normal range and I had no reason to be concerned with a FGT of 99 and the HBA1c of 5.7 but a few minutes online left me concered.
Thanks in advance for the reply!
High fasting glucose along with high A1c is not a good trend. Probably a good idea to address it now and clean up your diet before it progresses.
I assume that eating too many sweats regularily over a long period of time would increase the A1c level? Are you at all surprised that with an elevated fasting glucose that it comes back to ~ 100 so quickly after eating? All the indicators I’ve read for “pre-diabetic” indicate that <140 after eating is normal and I'm no where near that.
Chris, I guess to be more clear on what I was saying, I see that “pre-diabetic” is the HBA1C, FGT and Random Glucose tests can point to a problem depending on the results. I’m aware that my FT and A1c are high, and I contribute that to my lack of exercise and poor eating habits, but i’m surprised that my Random Glucose tests all came back at 100.
my brother’s sugar was 8.7 two hours after he had dinner. Does it mean that he’s diabetic?
It certainly suggests he is. He should get checked out ASAP.
But is it very high?I’m very worried for him. His fasting blood sugar was 5.3 one day and 6.1 the other. Is his organs already being affected by this?Please advice me.
I’m wondering if this is normal. Sometimes my hands gets cold and I feel really faint when my glucose reads 92. Tonight it was strange, I ate something to hold me off til I could fix something which was peanut butter on whole wheat toast 1 slice and milk and then a few pieces of dark chocolate and then a serving of yogurt….and 15 mins after eating or so ot was just 95 or then ate salad about a 1/3 of it chicken sald….something like that then 30-45 mins bout 112 then drank OJ to see what would happen 15 mins back to 104 I feel hands cold and shaky weak, I do have anxiety but it all feels the same to me I can’t tell the difference if I’m actuallly hungry or not as I don’t really get hungry, my fasting glucose is 101-108 for the past 5-6 years. A1C is 5.1. Should I be worried my sugar isn’t increasing?
My daughter had a period when she was very young of high blood sugar (350) and it quickly normalized. We spent the weekend in the hospital and it never got high again, except once it was 200. That was when she was a toddler. She is now 8 and has been having some unusual sugars again. This started a few months ago when I noticed her being more dramatic than usual. This usually prompts me to check her. Her FBG was 126. So they gave her the A1c test. It came back in the range of “pre-diabetic.” It was 5.7 I think? After this the doctor was going to “get back with me” on how to procede or what to do or not do. On the home front I cut her fruit intake in half. That was the only change we made. She was eating quite a bit of peaches. She is a small girl with no wieght issues. She does urinate a lot, especially at night requiring pull-ups that are usually soaked through in the AM. But she does NOT drink an alarming amount. I am pretty strict with her diet, but she is ALWAYS hungry and craves fruits. (I don’t allow sweets other than natual raw fruit.) The DR never got back with me and I just let it go, because her blood seems to have normalized. But this past week she let me know that she has been waking up feeling dizzy and sick like she may throw up. So we checked her morning FBG and it was 110, one day and 90 the next. Seems kind of high to me. What are your thoughts on the whole mess??
I should have pointed out that the 350 BG normalized on its own without any medications etc. Just a fluke we thought.
I still would love some in put on this. We still are getting some periodic high Fasting BG. We’ll be seeing a pediatric endro. Tuesday. But I would sure love the in put of a more natural friendly person. Chris??? Any opinions????
I’m type II and my issue is primarily high morning FBG. Ususually 120 to 150. I can go to be bed with 90 to 110, but it’s always up in the morning. No matter what I do, snack, no snack. cinnamon, apple cider vinegar, fenugreek. I’ve experimented a lot. I’ve been trying 5,000 iu of D3 for the past month and that has had no effect either. My A1C was 5.9% two weeks ago. It was 7.9% when I was diagnosed three years ago. In addition I’ve notice that my after breakfast levels have risen considerably over the past six months. Used to drop down to the mid 80s but no longer. It really concerns me and my doctor just didn’t seem concerned. Really irritation not to get anywhere with a MD until it becomes a real problem. Any ideas?
Hi Chris,
How does this apply to a diagnosis of gestational diabetes? I just turned 33, was a few pounds overweight at the beginning of my pregnancy and have no family history of diabetes. I am approximately 31 weeks pregnant. I was diagnosed at 28 weeks with gestational diabetes and started treatment (measuring my sugar with a glucometer) shortly thereafter. I have excellent 2 hour numbers, almost always under 100 and usually falling in the high 80′s low 90′s…however, my fasting numbers have been higher recently. Before becoming stricter with my diet (carb intake), I was getting fasting readings between 75-85. Recently my highest to date has been 96. I am wondering if this could be due to the fact that I am on a low carb diet? Or could this be the insulin resistance that they speak of with gestational diabetes? I am trying to avoid insulin as well as other interventions during my pregnancy. I have been told that in order to do so, I need to keep my fasting numbers under 90. This diagnosis has created more anxiety and stress than is probably healthy! lol. But I have diligently modified my diet and activity levels nonetheless. I am at a loss as to how to keep my fasting numbers lower. It’s frustrating because I don’t have much time to figure all this stuff out before insulin will be proposed as a means to adjust my sugar levels. Any thoughts would be immensely appreciated. Thanks!
Kit,
I have been searching for an answer to this, as well – my daughter has gestational diabetes and all she is getting is “conventional wisdom” which now includes drugs.
I could not find where Chris answered this, did you? Or did you find any other resources to help you? I am following the link provided by Lynn in response to your question, to see what that says.
There must be non-traditional, non-pharmaceutical ways to fix this problem!
Kit
Low carb diets can indeed raise fasting glucose, and even insulin levels. I posted on this thread a year ago that I couldn’t lower my insulin levels. Well, I severely decreased my PUFA intake (eliminated nuts and seeds, pork and chicken skin, along with and all traces of vegetables oils) and increased my intake of gluten free starch. My insulin levels fell from 33 (extremely insulin resistant) to 4.7 (extremely healthy). My fasting blood sugars are now 75-85.
Low carb is not the only way.
My story is covered here: http://180degreehealth.com/2011/06/starch-lowers-insulin
Hi …
My name si Utsav Pathak .I am 30years old , i am a Diabetic…..My Sugar fasting and post having some food ….both levels are comming 87 nad 83 …..i wanted to know that is it OK or not….
Regards
Utsav Pathak
Have you written the next article to this? I am very interested in this topic and would like to get my A1c down to what you suggest. My last A1c was 6 and the one before that was 5.7. I have not been lower than 5.6. I eat a low carb diet, I do eat fruit (apples, cherries, berries) but all before 3PM. I exercise on a regular basis and intense (I am a certified trainer). However, diabetes seems to run in my family. I see an Osteopath for my HRT program and this information mirrors much of his advice. However this blood sugar issue and my kidney function concern me. Any and all input would be greatly appreciated.
Side note, I modified my diet myself because I realized that even moderate carb intake was causing me to experience low blood sugar within 20 minutes of eating. I also did so due to reflux issue and I read your articles there. Grain products and glueten were big culprits there. It’s a mine field out there!
My FBS readings are between 110 and 123 and PPBS after two hours shows between 86 and 95.
To make sure the readings are correct, i did my testings in different self testing machines and in lab.
As per my machine value above 110 is diabetic.
In my case, FBS is higher than PPBS. Why could be the reason ???
FYI, 2 hours after a meal you SHOULD be back to normal blood sugars. To properly test post-prandial glucose, it’s important to realize that most people get their highest spike anywhere between 45 minutes and 1hr 15 minutes.
To find out where my own highest spikes were, I tested multiple different meals post-prandial readings every 15 minutes. For me I typically spike between 45 minutes and one-hour.
You should take a look at what your 1hr spike is, not just your 2hr.
As for mornings being higher – it’s not uncommon in diabetics. Many of us have an issue often referred to as “Dawn Phenomenon” whereby the body determines it should likely dump some glucose into your system as you go through the process of waking. Various people have tried various methods to cure the issue – we’re all so different that there’s just no “cure-all” for everyone.
For me what works best is not “sleeping in” – too much sleep keeps my liver dumping glucose and ensuring I eat a small snack just before bed. Again, we’re all different so what works for me may not work for you.
For the past few weeks, I have noticed my FBS has been low 70s and today it was 67.
I do a LC diet and have been doing intermittent fasting. I didn’t do IF yesterday and woke up to this low number , 67, this morning.
I don’t have hypoglyemic symptoms during the day and my post prandials are usually under 120, but sometimes during the night, I’ll wake up , or sweat or wake up with some anxiety middle of night.
I’m wondering if cortisol is at play here. If it turns out that I am hypo, how do I test for that? How do I fix it and does it lead to diabetes?
Would it be a good idea to test fasting insulin? Does it mean that my insulin is running to high during the night?
Everyone I know if being diagnosed with diabetes so I went to my doc for testing along with cholesterol testing. My A1c was 6.0 and FBG was 105. My cholesterol levels were all fine. I about freaked out but my doctor said everything was fine. I am confused about this. How could I be fine when everything I have read says I am prediabetic? I need to lose about 10 pounds so I have started on that, I already exercise a lot so am keeping that up, and am going on a low carb diet as I am a carbaholic! I plan on going back to have the A1C and FBG tests done in about 6 months and see where I stand. Is there anything else I should be doing? Thank you. P.S. – I am a 59 year old female with no diabetes in my family.
An A1c of 6.0 and FBG of 105 is not “fine”, unless your doctor considers pre-diabetic blood sugar to be not worth taking action on. Sadly, this is the state of our medical system, where common is confused with normal. You should be testing your post-meal blood sugars with a glucometer as described in a future article in this series.
Thanks for your comments. I did go to Walmart and bought the glucometer. My FBG so far has been in the 80′s and low 90′s. That is better than the 105 at the docs office but I need to work on getting it lower. I did test one night after eating pizza and my numbers were 135 after two hours so I have to work on that also. The beauty of the glucometer is you find out real fast what your numbers are and you can work on them immediately. My total cholesterol was 189, Triglycerides 86, HDL 52 and LDL 93. Do I need to work on them or are these numbers ok? I want to be aggressive with this.
Chris – you do a wonderful job with this site. Thank you so much.
My son is a 5yr old boy who was delivered as a premature 33wks due to renal failure due to bilateral hydronephrosis and hydroureters which was corrected by numerous surgeries. He now has developed glucose intolerance since march 2011 treated with diet control but now his spikes are above 10mmol an he is irratable agressive an un able to sit still an has trouble concentrating. I am worried about his eye sight an he doesn’t heal well when he gets wounds. What are my options regarding treatment because he can’t go on like this he is also so thirsty he can drink easily up to 2l of water at his age in a day he will finish a glass an immediately ask for another one. He also passes large amounts of urine. Please help me I live in south africa. Thanks for your time
I am a 31 year ld male. I am overweight. I started getting more serious about my health the last couple of months. I figured i would screen for diabetes by getting a blood glucose meter from CVS. This morning was the first time I used it. I tested myself in the morning after not eating for 8 hours- it was 104. About 10 mins after testing I had a Fiber One oatmeal and chocolate Fiber bar for breakfast…. I tested exactly 2 hours after that, and it read 86. 2 hours after I tested 86 for breakfast, I ate lunch. I then tested myself 1 hour after lunch, and it was at 84??? I am very concerned as the internet when researching these results give me too many answers that dont seem to match up…. I have started running, and watching my calorie intake and switching to a better diet… but are these reading cause for me to now go and see a doctor???
You reply is GREATLY appreciate Chris!! amazing writing!
One of the best websites I’ve found so far on the issue. Thank you for the information!
I’m 56 yo female with recent medical blood tests showing FBG of 89, and I am overweight with the most fat concentrated in my belly region which I already know is unhealthy. All my doctor says is “you’ve gained weight since the last time you were here, why?” I have 1 living brother who is morbidly obese and has HBP and Type 2 diabetes which he manages both only with medications. I would prefer to avoid that if possible. Having said that, I do have HBP and manage that with lisinopril-hctz, and I have started an exercise program and am working up to making it 5x per week. I also have COPD with multiple sinus/allergy problems and manage those with various nasal sprays, and a stabilizing inhaler rather than rescue inhaler daily. I have become acutely aware that I must eat more healthy and increase my fresh veg and fruit intake, but I want to make a lifestyle change where I can manage it for the rest of my life. I’ve been looking at various diets, and one of the most trendy tells me that by eating high protein and vegs that my blood sugar will drop but this sounds to me more like Atkins/HPLC diet. Is it really necessary for me to give up all white starches and all bread/pasta? If my FBGL is 89 why am I gaining weight all around my belly?
Everything I have read here is very enlightening, but I wonder if I need to start to monitor my blood sugar post meal as indicated earlier, along with new eating and exercising patterns? And by the way, where is the future article you have mentioned about how to monitor it? I haven’t seen a link to it anywhere. Did I miss it?
Thanks for everything you’ve written and shared on the web. I really appreciate it!!
A significant percentage of type 2 diabetics have normal or high normal FBG, so yes, I always recommend testing post-meal blood sugars for this reason if you suspect you have a problem. And yes, it is necessary to give up white starches and pasta if you’d like to optimize your health and your blood sugar regulation.
Thank you so much for such a speedy response, and I will get to work on this absolutely! I’ve been told by a trainer at the gym that the only starches I should consume are sweet potatoes, brown rice and oatmeal. Do you agree with this? And I have recently become more aware of artificial sweeteners, even those touted as Stevia but are actually chemically produced. What is your opinion about artificial sweeteners? Do I need to lose them altogether too?
Again, many thanks, I’m so grateful I came upon this website and your willingness to share your knowledge!! Be blessed!!
Kind regards,
Lisa
I’m glad you mention this Chris – unfortunately for many Type II diabetics the FBG is the LAST thing that is compromised.
As such, since medical doctors often rely on FBG to screen for diabetes, they often miss something that should have been diagnosed years earlier. That was my case.
The OGGT (Oral Glucose Tolerance Test) is usually a much better indicator – but most doctors don’t send someone for this test unless they already suspect diabetes, which is somewhat backwards.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cr9dDbVHuk is a great video with Dr. Tara Dall talking about how we currently diagnose diabetes… Worth a quick watch. Lots of research is showing advanced lipid testing can give an indication of onset of type II diabetes years before it is diagnosed with glucose…
Thanks for the info on Dr. Tara Dall, Glen. I really enjoyed the information.
I think that NMR Liposcience test is really important and many docs will just skip it or say it’s unnecessary. The last time I had one, my LDL-P number was 1741..too high. I’m hoping that a low carb and higher fat diet changes it.
We are told that even if the LDL is high, as long as the size is big and fluffy, you are safe, but Dr. Dall says differently. She claims the LDL should never be over 1000.
Of course, the battle of the experts opinions charges on, doesn’t it?
Glen, I’m very anxious to see what Chris thinks of Dr. Tara Dall and her view on diabetes and lipids.
When I took the NMR test (back in Sept. 2010), my insulin resistance score was 13 which is well below their suggestion of 45.
I called LipoScience to explain how to read the results. It’s a bit confusing.
My LDL size was 21.1
HDL size 9.5
LDL P 197
HDL P 11.2
My last mainstream Triglyc. test was 75 (Sept. 2011)
My total C at the time was 254. My last test in Sept 2011 was 236.
Then there was a reading which got flagged..
LDL Part number 1741 (flagged as HIGH) mainstream LDL read as 173
HDL Part number 29.6 (flagged as LOW) even though my mainstream HDL read as 67
I wonder if there is any way to bring down the LDL because according to Dr Dall, I’m doomed!
My primary doc, who is sort of natural, gave me plant sterols to lower cholesterol. I took them for awhile, but dumped the idea. I thought cholesterol was good for us.
I eat low carb, been pumping iron and cardio for 28 yrs.
Any thoughts? Thanks so much for your input. It’s much appreciated as is Chris’s wonderful mind.
Hi Sharon – first, I cannot give ANY medical advice over the internet, and it wouldn’t be appropriate on Chris’ fine blog anyway – (unlike me he’s not paid by the government and needs to make an independent living.)
BUT I will say this:
The evidence is quite clear that for many people (many, but not all – biological individuality tells us we ARE all different, naturally) when you eliminate refined/processed carbs/sugars and increase your intake of healthy fats, including saturated fats (as natural as possible) your cholesterol ratio improves AND your triglycerides drop.
I personally get all my carbohydrate sources from non-starchy vegetables and a little bit of lower-GI fruit. (Of course, as a Type II diabetic I must eat lower-GI fruit than healthier people simply to control my sugars – your mileage may vary.) I will sometimes (very rarely, maybe two times a week) have one slice of organic sprouted-grain bread – but only when the family is having sandwiches for supper… Even then it’s only 13g of carbohydrate.
Some people say you shouldn’t cut out fruit entirely – but you can if you wish. There is no nutrient found in fruit that you cannot get from vegetables – and with vegetables you get those nutrients with much fewer calories and much less sugar. Myself, I eat berries or cherries every day (they are my ‘go-to’ fruits, high-fiber and low-GI) and sometimes 1/2 a granny smith apple at a time. That’s all I can tolerate. Others that can enjoy more fruit are lucky, I suppose. =)
I don’t know how long you’ve been eating low-carb, or how low-carb you are. For me I *always* have LESS than 10% of my calories from carbohydrate. But I am severely diabetic, not everybody needs to eat that low. Most paleo people, for example, eat more than that – especially the ones that also engage in crossfit.
If you can afford it, it would be worth engaging Chris to look at your labs, your diet, and assist you in that regard – I’ve read enough of his work to believe in him, and have no problem recommending him as a medical professional. If you can’t afford it, I would recommend you read, research and learn as much as you can to help yourself – there’s a wealth of information out there for free if you take the time to look and find it.
I hope that helps, and good luck!
Hey Glen..I totally understand and with much due respect to you as well as Chris.
I appreciate any input, so thanks for taking time to respond.
I agree with you about being able to live quite nicely without fruit. I can go for days or weeks without and if I treat myself, it’s just like you..berries, a bit of apple, etc. Sometimes (very rarely) I’ll cheat with 1/3 banana in a smoothie..I’m such a wild, naughty girl..LOL!
I will continue to stay low carb and hope for the best. I can’t wait to see my next blood test results.
Again..thanks so much for being available and generous with your opinions.
When I do long cycling rides in the warmer months I enjoy little bits of banana in my smoothies too – but what I do is buy GREEN bananas, and then peel (which is pretty-darned difficult if they’re green enough) and freeze them. I break them into 3 chunks per banana and will add them to a smoothie if I really feel like a little extra carbohydrate…
Honestly, I also like the texture the small bit of frozen green banana provides – it makes it slightly thicker and more “milkshake-like” if that makes sense…
Chris, I have noticed that lately, my AM FBS is in the low 70s. I follow a LC diet. My post prandials are usually under 120 or even 100. If I eat or cheat with a starch or sugar, they will go higher.
My concern is the FBS. Are numbers in the 70s cause for concern?
I hope Chris doesn’t mind me jumping in on this one, Sharon. As both a diabetic (Type 2) and a medical professional, I’ve done a great deal of research on this myself. I’m hoping what I say is in line with Chris’ thinking – I’d be surprised if it wasn’t…
Fasting readings in the low-70′s are nothing to be worried about in my opinion. There’s various ideas on why hypoglycaemia is, but technically, it’s simply “low blood sugar”.
However, there’s a difference between being low, and being low that requires intervention.
Most emergency rooms consider severe medical hypoglycemia to be a combination of three things:
1) below 65mg/dl, and;
2) showing physical symptoms relating to hypoglycaemia, and;
2) continuing to quickly drop.
If you’re low 70′s, even high 60′s, but not dropping, and you feel OK, and your breakfast meal brings you up to healthy post-prandial levels you’re technically not hypoglycaemic and you’re just fine.
Here’s the thing about hypoglycaemia – it affects everyone according to what they’re USED to.
When first diagnosed as a diabetic, my sugars were routinely so high that when I got down in the 120′s I started experiencing physiological symptoms of hypoglycaemia (shakiness, confusion, etc.) yet I was technically not so. But my body FELT hypoglycaemic because it wasn’t used to normal readings.
Now that I’m in the normal range again, I only feel hypoglycaemic when I’m literally under 55mg/dl – which used to happen to me due to some medication I was on but no longer am taking. I felt fine in the 70′s as you likely do.
Again, fasting readings in the low 70′s are nothing to be concerned about. I know some people regularly in the 60′s in the morning. It’s only a concern if you’re symptomatic and dropping fast.
I hope that helps.
Hi Glen,
I do agree – thanks for your response!
I’m a 45 year young female nurse. My FBS is 3.8 (68) and my 2 hour post BS if I have simple carbs (which I crave) is usually around 3.5 (63). My 1 hour post BS is never over 6 (108) no matter how much carbs I eat.
I get symptomatic with tingling hands and feet, palpitations and a feeling of unreality. All of which go away with more carbs. I tried low carb paleo and my morning blood sugars were very low and symptomatic.
Any dietary advice would be appreciated.
Connie – fyi none of the readings you mentioned are truly hypoglycaemic.
If your only symptoms are the ones you mention, I would get tested for reactive hypoglycaemia. It’s something commonly overlooked by medical professionals who are more concerned about testing for hyperglycaemia, in all honesty.
That being said – there can be other reasons for the symptoms you mention – including anxiety. But I’d start with reactive hypoglycaemia due to it’s oft-overlooked status and the post-prandial readings you metnion.
Thank you Glen,
I won’t give all details but I have an indepth knowledge of TCM & nutrition with a special focus on Paleo nutrition. I was looking for input from Chris whom I view to be more knowledgable than myself.
I was thinking reactive hypoglycemia as well and was wondering about diet. Perhaps I need to give low carb a longer chance to adabt. These symptoms most often wake me up at 4 or 5am when I have to eat something to go back to bed and usually sleep soundly for another couple of hours. Perhaps given the timing there’s also an adrenal component die to timing?
Connie
Connie- Hypoglycaemia is indeed a red flag for adrenal insufficiency. Do you have other adrenal symptoms?
Thanks Lynn, yes I believe so. Will see if some of Chris’ recommendations for adrenal insufficiency help with symptoms. I also have crushing insomnia.
Any thoughts on high morning fasting levels? The last six to nine months mine have gone from in the 110-130 to around 140. I’m usually 90-100 at bedtime. My last A1c was 5.9 three months ago. Been type II for 3 and half years now. First A1c was 7.9. Dr. didn’t seem concerned over the high morning levels.
Hi Becky…
It is my opinion that this entire diagnosis of gestational diabetes is made out to be more serious than it necessarily has to be. I recommend reading Ina May Gaskin’s view (Guide to Childbirth) on gestational diabetes as well as Henci Goer:
I didn’t have any luck finding any info other than the link that Lynn sent. I had been told to drastically reduce my breakfast carb intake to 15g. After reading this article, I increased my intake to 30g with no drastic consequence and felt much better! lol. However, my fasting numbers were still bordering in the high 80′s to low 90′s. I feel ridiculous even complaining of such numbers because I know people who have type 2 diabetes that would kill for these numbers. However, the medical establishment has become quite strict that fasting numbers during pregnancy remain under 90; the practice I go to is not exempt from this. What I found that worked well for me after much trial and error and keeping a food diary was that I needed to eat a relatively light dinner…salad, protein – lighter on the carbs for this particular meal. I don’t seem to have a great issue with carbs during the morning or afternoon. I try to not eat anything after 8:30pm. I also found that I didn’t necessarily need the snack they suggested before bed. If I am still hungry before bed I have a very light snack, for instance five wheat thins. And like clockwork I wake up at 3am every morning, so I drink about 4 oz. of milk… I don’t follow the eat every two hours philosophy that is also very prevalent – I eat when I feel hungry. Usually I eat every 4 hours. This has worked better for me in that I don’t feel like I am constantly keeping track of when I need to eat…I started to feel like this entire eating business and sugar control was taking over my life. lol. I still have occasional fastings numbers in the low 90′s, but I personally don’t find this all too concerning…my postprandrials are all in an acceptable range. I personally would not agree to insulin use during pregnancy unless my fasting numbers were over 100 on a regular basis and/or I seemed to be having problems after meals as well. Strangely enough…when I went back to eating similarly to how I ate before the diagnosis of gestational diabetes (which was relatively healthy, minus the refined sugar) I found that I felt better, was less stressed, and seemed to have better results. So there you go!
http://www.ivillage.com/gestational-diabetes-common-sense-approach/6-a-129188
http://www.gentlebirth.org/archives/gdhgoer.html
I found both of these articles helpful in dealing with this diagnosis, as well as in making decisions regarding the recommended treatment.
I also found this website useful:
http://www.plus-size-pregnancy.org/gd/gd_index.html
Best of luck to your daughter! I hope she can figure out something that works for her.
I was just diagnosed with pre-diabetes last week. The Dr put me on 500mg of Metformin for two weeks and then said to increase 2 twice a day if I can tolerate it. How loing does it take for the body to get settled with the medicine? Sometimes I feel worse than when I wasnt on the meds. My morning blood sugars have been
118
128
111
126
108
121
92
102
My ave after meal have beeen 117. Is his incrediblly bad? I meet been really watching my carbs and meet with a nutritionist next week. I have overwight and have lost 6lbs since I found out so I am trying to get on the road on to a healther weight. Is it possible to control with diet and exercise alone or is the mecdicine going to be a part of my life foerever? Any comments or advice is appreciated.
If those are 1-hour post-meal numbers, they’re within the recommended targets. Statistically speaking, if you stay under 140 at 1-hour and 120 at 2-hours, you’re at no greater risk for blood sugar-related complications than a normoglycemic person.
Thanks Chris–the first list of numbers are my morning #s prior to eating.
My sugar count today:
Prior to having any food :102
1 hour after breakfast 101
2 hours after breakfast 85
1 hour after lunch 102
I am new to this so since I am going to start working out what is recommended? I heard that this causes the sugar count to to decrease quickly.
I really appreciate this forum. Its very helpful.
sorry didnt spell check or anything before I submitted my comments
Grammatical mistakes everywhere 
by the way–my AIC was 6.1 at the time of diagnosis
Hi Chris,
I posted early about my daughter with no answer to it. I love the input you give and am at my wits end at this point. Please respond to this one and tell me what you think…
My daughter had BG of 350 at age 2 ish. and once more at that time it was 200. After that she was fine. She is now 8 and has been having periodic high fasting sugars of anywhere from 90 – 140. Not always and i can’t really predict when she will have issue. But we can usually tell when she is having the issues because of her behavior and attitude. Then we will test her and watch. During the day its kind of high after meals during those times. Nothing scary. 120 – 140. This will go on for a few days to a week and then go kind of low normals. 80 after meals FBG of 60 – 70. Twice in a row she has had an A1C of 5.7% and after giving her a GTT her 1 hour was 200 and 2 hours was 108. The 2 hour was great.
Yesterday we finally got in to see the Pediatric Endo. He said that none of this is indicative of anything and that having a bad emotional day can lead to sugars of 350 or whatever. He said that I am just being nervous and that she is 100% fine. An A1C is no signs of anything, and that fasting blood sugars less than 200 are just fine. So, now I am pretty confused. I kind of don’t trust him. Really?? FBG can be 140 and he doesn’t consider this a problem? Now, while I dont’ believe she has diabetes and I am not trying to borrow trouble I would like to know what is causing the off sugars. She is a small girl so none of this is weight related. He also said NOTHING except diabetes causes high blood sugars in a person. Is that true? There are no other conditions that would lead to high blood sugars? He wanted her to go get a blood draw for a FBG test this morning. I didn’t do it because I know right now it would be normal anyway. I don’t need him treating me like a nervous silly mother.
Now, I am really not sure what to do. Second opinion with a different Endo.? Or visit a naturopath? Or just continue being strict with her diet and hope that this truly is her noraml.
THANKS FOR SOME IN PUT!
It definitely sounds as if she has some insulin resistance and blood sugar issues. Unfortunately, it’s impossible for me to know more without a more thorough intake. I suspect autoimmune involvement, but that’s speculation at this point.
Thank you. If I was nearer to you I would be knocking at your office door first thing in the morning. LOL I live in Arizona, though. What would you do if you were me? Another Endo.? I really don’t want to ignor this and wait for it to be too late. I would rather deal with the hang nail and not wait for an infected finger if you know what I mean. Would you do intake over the phone or through email?
Hello Chris,
Thank you for this website, you do an excellent job at educating diabetics and nondiabetics about diabetes. Why is there so little said about thin people who have been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes? I come from a family with a strong history of diabetes. Some of them were thin people.
Thin diabetics are often recommended to begin low carb and low calorie diets when many of us are already at or below a reasonable weight. The result is we often end up looking and feeling deprived. How can we maintain a sensible weight and have good blood sugars?
Also, I was testing my blood sugars 3 to 4 times daily (fasting and 3 post-prandial). This routine kept me (which can get expensive) very informed about how portion size, GI, and even the time of day I ate certain foods would affect my blood sugars. My doctor told me testing this often is not necessary and testing once daily would be sufficient. I was a little suprised to hear this news, I had always assumed testing frequently is one of the diabetic’s greatest weapons. It’s sort of like having the enemy’s strategy book. Could you please tell me your opinion on blood glucose testing?
i have a very big worry. my a1c level is 6.7 and my fbs levels are all with in normal range of 75 and 77 when i do check them. random checking through the day is about 80. my pharmacist told me that there was nothing to worry about. i am however of african decent and dont know if this influences my a1c in anyway. i would be grateful if u kindly get back to me
Hi nana. I hope Chris will also jump in here, but when I saw your post, I just HAD to comment.
The pharmacist who told you there was “nothing to worry about” is absolutely wrong, in my opinion, as well as the opinion of many other medical professionals and the American Diabetes Association (who isn’t even in the cutting-edge when it comes to diagnostic criteria…)
For many people who become diabetic (studies are showing this is particularly true for middle-aged women) the fasting blood sugar level is the very LAST measurement to become abnormal.
There’s an excellent write-up here: http://www.phlaunt.com/diabetes/14046621.php – read particularly the section just over half-way down the page with the heading “Why Fasting Blood Sugar Levels are Often the Last to Deteriorate” — it explains it quite well.
A HbA1c of 6.7% is now ABOVE what the ADA’s latest recommendations are for diagnosing diabetes. As of the most recent standards, the ADA is stating >6.5% meets the definition of diabetes. (American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2010.)
What this means to you is according to current diagnostic criteria, you ARE diabetic. It’s quite likely you have very high post-prandial (after-meal) readings, but not high fasting levels yet. You can still reverse this in the early stages – but you likely need to address things ASAP.
Nana: it really depends. A1c is not a particularly reliable marker in individuals because it depends on the assumption that everyone’s red blood cells survive an average of 90 days, which we now know is not true. If your fasting glucose is in the mid-70s, and your post-meal (one-hour after and two-hour after meals) blood sugars are below 120, it’s possible your red blood cells live longer than the average, and you have a falsely high A1c reading. I’ve written about that here: http://chriskresser.com/why-hemoglobin-a1c-is-not-a-reliable-marker
On the other hand, if you’re having dramatic blood sugar spikes throughout the day that are raising your average blood sugar, and that is showing up in elevated A1c, it’s definitely an issue.
I”m an overweight RN who eats a MOSTLY paleo/low carb diet. I have been feeling ‘strange’ lately, frequent urination, thirst, etc.
Just got a glucometer, thought I’d do some testing on myself.
My FASTING BS was 139 this morning – terrible. But my POST PRANDIAL blood sugars are running 100-130.
What the hell do I take away from THAT?
Hey Chris,
I started feeling rough a few months ago and have been struggling ever since. The first time I checked my BG was maybe a week into feeling bad and it was 60. It’s never been below 60 for me. It will always go back up and not get too low. Usually it seems like my BG drops into the 60s after 1 hour or 1 hour and a half. Sometimes I remember in the mornings it would drop into the 60s like 40 minutes after eating breakfast. I started eating 3 eggs with cheese on wheat bread for bfeast. So I thought this may be why I feel bad was because my BG was getting low. My fasting was always 71-73 basically maybe 74 or 70 but never in the 60s so I think that’s probably good even tho I seem to feel a little off in the mornings like dizzy or something so I always eat bfeast before anything else. I also went to a Endo. and he told me my blood sugar levels looked normal and that 60s is probably normal for me and didn’t care to much and said I would just get better. What happened was I was in China for 4 months and at that 4 month mark I started feeling crappy and didn’t know why. So I had to come back to America cause I couldn’t hardly walk when this all hit me. I’m not sure if I just have bad Anxiety or if it’s just hypo causing this. I’ve been on a good diet for about 3 months now. This all started in mid November of 2011.
I did start feeling better tho about 2 months after this all started. I felt pretty normal for 2 weeks. I thought I was getting better. Now I’m started to kinda slip back into this again but not as bad as it was in China. I felt I would die in China. Now I just feel lightheaded and weak sometimes or something like that. I haven’t really gotten sweaty no blurred vision, no hunger pains or anything. Usually just dizzy, heart rate goes up a little, feels like I may faint. So Idk if it’s all anxiety or what. I do seem to feel a lot better when I can control my anxiety but 60s just seemed low to me but maybe it’s not. I’m 6’2 and way 177 now. I did get pretty skinny in China. I lost a lot of wait because I was always riding a bike and walking every where. Also they eat lots of rice and noodles. I probably didn’t eat well enough. I weiged 160 I think in China. And people said I looked pretty skinny and could see my bones in my face and things. My Endo. here in America said he thinks I just got malnurished and since I’ve gained my weight back I should just get better. He also said to try to just stop eating every 2 hours and try to get back to eating 3 meals a day maybe with a night snack. But I haven’t really been able to do that I feel too bad I guess to do that. I don’t want to take the chance yet. He also did some blood test on me. I think one was called a cortisyn stem test. They injected me with something that did something to my adrenalin and checked my cortisol levels. They injected me at 10am I think then checked my blood at 10:30am and my level was 25 something then and at 11:00am they checked again and it was 30 something my cortisol levels. I saw in my medical record the normal range is between 6-22 or something like that but my Endos. nurse called me back and said all my blood work looked perfectly normal and my BG levels were pretty much normal. So I hope this isn’t too long just worried why if seems hard to control when I’m eating right. Who knows maybe it is all just anxiety but that seems hard to believe when my BG drops into the 60s so fast and when I eat I feel better. I used to check my BG a lot but haven’t now for probably a month. Checking it just gave me anxiety and made my feelings worse. Thanks for the help!
Matt