The Acid-Alkaline Myth: Part 1

Maria Lozada: “First I used my uncle as an example to say chemo can work in cancers that are not easy because he is elderly and was around 70 when he got cancer. He has been more than five years without cancer.”

And again, colon cancer can often be treated with surgery. So how is this scientific proof of the effectiveness of chemo? Hint, it ISN’T!!!!

And again, you are leaving out various import facts such as the stage of the cancer, which is indicative of someone trying to mislead people.

Maria Lozada: “Second, if there is a better treatment for cancer than chemo that is great, it should be made widely available. ”

I totally agree, but that is not the way things work in the real world. Government is run by big business who basically tells the government what they are going to do.

Look at the complete farce known as Obamacare, which did nothing but to help the insurance companies financially and who lobbied for the change.

Obamacare raised insurance costs and gave outrageous deductibles to prevent most people from even using the insurance in most cases.

Then there are other problems such as there was a lady locally who found out that she was not covered for her breast cancer under Obamacare.

Then there is the FDA, who is in bed with and caters to the pharmaceutical industry.

For example, remember a few years back when the FDA was caught approving untested drugs in exchange for payoffs? Then the FDA targeted the whistle-blower also in violation of the law. Yet not one FDA official spent even one day in jail for the multiple violations of the law.

That is just one example of many illegal activities by the FDA to protect pharmaceutical profits. In fact, ex-Commissioner for the FDA Herbert Ley testified before Congress that the FDA was using governmental police powers to protect the profits of the pharmaceutical companies and in turn the FDA officials were being rewarded by the pharmaceutical companies with money, and gifts including high level positions within the drug companies. In fact, have you ever looked in to how many FDA officials have gone to work in high level positions within the drug companies after pushing for approval of drugs that were later proven to be worthless or more dangerous than the public was told?

And then there is the fact that it has been reported for over 4 decades that there are over 150 FDA officials that own stock in the same pharmaceutical companies they oversee in direct violation of insider trading laws. Yet once again nothing has ever been done about this illegality and not a single FDA official has ever gone to jail over it.

Also did you know that the FDA was Court ordered in 1969 to remove 710 FDA approved prescription drugs from the market because they were found to be ineffective or too dangerous for human use. The FDA found a loophole and left all the drugs on the market. Furthermore, many of these worthless or dangerous drugs have since been changed to over the counter from prescription only. This includes dextromethorphan (DM), which is used in cough medicines and was shown in multiple studies to be no more effective than placebo.

Along the same lines let’s see how smart you really are. Can you answer this question? What is the PRIMARY cause of AIDS? Hint, it is not HIV. In fact, under the original definition of AIDS HIV CANNOT cause AIDS. Due to this fact the definition of AIDS was changed in the early 80s to fit the HIV virus after one of the government’s top scientists, Robert Gallo, who had already been busted for scientific fraud lied to the world that HIV was the cause of AIDS. Gallo did this for financial reasons since he held the patent rights on the highly inaccurate HIV antibody test. Still he was gong to majorly embarrass the government again so the only way the US government could prevent this was to change the definition of AIDS to fit the HIV virus.

The reason I bring all this up is that medicine is driven by big business, which is about profits.

When I first started in to cancer research 36 years ago what really caught my attention was the fact that I found cure after cure for cancer that has the research backing their effectiveness yet the FDA was banning every single one of them. In fact, if you look in to it you will also find the same exact thing with AIDS therapies that have been shown to be effective such as hyperthermia and ozone. In both cases despite positive results in initial testing the FDA blocked all further testing stating there was no evidence of effectiveness. Of course this was a lie and further research would have only solidified that fact and thus these therapies were illegally “banned” by the FDA to protect pharmaceutical profits.

The more banned cures I found the more intrigued I became and the more I started researching FDA and pharmaceutical corruption. For example, the JAMA report and other sources showing the drug companies dropping patients who died or did not respond to chemotherapy drugs from the final results to make the worthless chemotherapy drugs appear effective. A practice still going on to this day.

As an example they were doing a documentary on the development of a new anti-angiogenesis drug derived from rat urine. In the documentary they followed three participants. One died during trials, who I am sure was dropped from the study especially considering the fact that a second participant was dropped citing his “tumor grew beyond the parameters of the study”. In other words the drug failed to stop or slow the growth so they simply eliminated that participant from the study to make the drug appear more effective than it really was.

As long as medicine is dominated by a make a profit attitude instead of a cure the patient attitude effective cancer therapies for cancers in general are not going to reach the market.

In fact, imagine what would happen to the economy. It has been said that if an effective general cancer cure were to come on the market every single medical school in the nation would go under due to the loss of research grants. And look at the losses to cancer associations like the highly corrupt American Cancer Society (ACS), who receives over $4 billion in donations. Yet they have never come up with a single advancement in cancer treatment, but have been associated with the blackballing of researchers who do come up with effective cures.

As another example I used to post on the American Leukemia and Lymphoma Society message board. That was until I was banned for providing proof that these cancers were viral induced. One of their other posters was being sarcastic telling me to tell his doctor that since his doctor had never heard of leukemia or lymphoma viruses. So I told him he needs to find a new doctor since leukemia and lymphoma viruses, such as HIV (human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus type 3), have been well known for about 25 years. Then I proceeded to post numerous medical journal abstracts about the various known human leukemia and lymphoma causing viruses. I was immediately banned from the message board and all of my posts were erased while all the posts calling me a quack, which were in clear violation of their posting rules were left up. The problem is that if they admitted that leukemias and lymphomas were primarily viral in origin then they would also have to admit the cures already exist since we have numerous pharmaceutical and herbal antivirals that are highly effective in treating leukemias and lymphomas and thus there is NO reason for the American Leukemia and Lymphoma Society to exist. Therefore, they had to get rid of me and my posts before people started to catch on to what a major scam they had going.

Do you really think these societies such as the ACS, American Leukemia and Lymphoma Society, Susan G Komen, etc. really want a cure when it means they will no longer exist either?

I also find it very interesting when a German ozone doctor was bring interviewed he mentioned how many members of groups such as the National Cancer Institute and their families were coming to Germany for ozone treatments and even mentioned a US president that had come over. Why would these people be going clear to Germany for ozone therapy if things like chemotherapy have really been proven to be that effective?

Maria Lozada: “But you’re ignoring that for many years chemo was the best option since better methods are relatively new.”

You are assuming a lot again.

First of all ozone therapy, which is significantly better than chemotherapy or ozone therapy has been around since 1892. Thus it is far from “relatively new”. Same with herbs that have a very long history of being used to cure cancer that were around long before ozone therapy. Modern research is proving the effectiveness of these herbs all the time. Try looking at PubMed and you will find all sorts of studies showing the effectiveness of various herbs for cancer.

Speaking of ozone being around for so long this brings up another point. Did you know that ozone therapy is perfectly legal to use? According to the law any therapy in use prior to the induction of the FDA (1909) that shows no unreasonable risk to human safety has a grandfathered approval status. This ozone and most herbs used in medicine have grandfathered approval status and thus are LEGAL to use.

Yet the FDA has arrested people and immediately seizes their bank accounts illegally for performing ozone therapy. They seize bank accounts without due process in violation of constitutional law to prevent the people from hiring good attorneys to challenge the FDA’s completely illegal activity.

And why is the FDA once again outright breaking the law and violating people’s rights? To protect the profits of the drug companies and thus their own cash, gift and high level job source.

Maria Lozada: “We should find better alternatives but we can’t condemn what we already have wholesale.”

We don’t need to look for better alternatives, they already exist. And they are cheaper and more effective than chemotherapy or radiation therapy.

For example, an ozone setup can be purchased for less than $1,000 and each treatment uses about $0.05 worth of oxygen and electricity while actually getting rid of the cancer and its cause preventing recurrence. Compare that to the over $100,000 for chemo and radiation treatments that are carcinogenic, generally have low success rates and do not address the cause of the cancer. On top of that there is the cost of more treatment when the cancer comes back or secondary treatment induced cancers occur, which is VERY common for chemotherapy and radiation therapy. By definition this makes chemotherapy and radiation therapy quackery.