A streamlined stack of supplements designed to meet your most critical needs - Adapt Naturals is now live. Learn more

Raw Milk Reality: Benefits of Raw Milk

by

Published on

iStock.com/Anetlanda

In Raw Milk Reality: Is Raw Milk Dangerous?, we took a closer look at the claims made by groups like the FDA and CDC that raw milk is “dangerous”. We found that, though the relative risk of becoming ill from drinking raw milk is about 9 times greater than it is from drinking pasteurized milk, the absolute risk of developing a serious illness (i.e. one that would require hospitalization) from drinking raw milk is exceedingly small: about 1 in 6 million.

Nevertheless, as small as the risk of drinking raw milk is, we still need to answer the question: why take the risk? What benefits does raw milk have over pasteurized milk that have convinced nearly 10 million people in the U.S. alone to actively seek it out?

Why drink raw milk in the first place?

There are many reasons one might prefer raw milk over pasteurized milk, ranging from nutritional to ethical to environmental. Different people will resonate with different reasons, depending on their value system, worldview and priorities.

Nutrition

Many consumers believe that raw milk is higher in nutritional content than conventional milk, which may have some merit.

Raw milk comes from cows that graze on grass. Some evidence suggests that milk from these cows is likely to have higher levels of fat-soluble vitamins and other nutrients. Cows fed fresh green forage, especially those grazing grass, have been shown to have higher levels of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and essential fatty acids in their milk. (1,2)  Cows are natural herbivores and are healthiest when they eat grass, rather than the grain they are fed in confinement dairy operations.

The pasteurization process also reduces the nutritional quality of milk products. Research has shown a decrease in manganese, copper, and iron after heat treatment. (3) The FDA acknowledges that pasteurization destroys a substantial portion of the vitamin C in milk, and sterilization is also known to significantly impair the bioactivity of vitamin B6 contained in milk. (45) Beta-lactoglobulin, a heat-sensitive protein in milk that is destroyed by pasteurization, increases intestinal absorption of vitamin A, so the supplemental vitamin A in conventional milk may be harder to absorb. (6) While pasteurized milk does retain some level of nutritional value, it seems that unpasteurized milk is superior in vitamin and mineral content overall.

Tolerance

Many people experience digestive and other problems when they consume pasteurized milk, but have no trouble with raw milk. It’s not entirely clear why this is the case. The FDA insists that unpasteurized milk has no probiotic effect or any other characteristic that could explain this phenomenon. But the collective experience of raw milk consumers suggests otherwise. The Weston A. Price Foundation conducted an informal survey of over 700 families, and determined that over eighty percent of those diagnosed with lactose intolerance no longer suffer from symptoms after switching to raw milk. (7)

While this is certainly not rigorous evidence, it matches my own anecdotal experience and that of many of my patients, blog readers and radio show listeners.  I do not feel well when eat pasteurized dairy.  It gives me sinus congestion, headaches and intestinal discomfort.  Yet I thrive on raw dairy, and fermented raw dairy in particular played a substantial role in my own healing journey.

Is it possible that the millions of people that tolerate raw milk but not pasteurized milk are experiencing a massive placebo effect?  Sure.  Anything is possible.  But a likelier explanation is that raw milk has some quality that makes it easier to digest than pasteurized milk.  The fact that this has not been proven in clinical research doesn’t make it untrue.  Lack of proof is not proof against.

Fortunately, we shouldn’t have to wait long for more reliable evidence on this topic. A clinical study is currently being performed at Stanford University to help determine whether raw milk actually reduces the incidence of lactose intolerance. (8) The results have yet to be published, but will provide scientific evidence to support or refute the anecdotal claims of many raw milk drinkers.

Health

There is substantial epidemiological evidence from studies in Europe that consumption of raw milk during childhood may protect against asthma, allergies and other immune-mediated diseases.

A large cross-sectional study demonstrated a significant inverse association between “farm milk” consumption and childhood asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, sensitization to pollen and other allergens. (9) While we must always remember that correlation does not prove causation, the findings were consistent across children from farming and non-farming environments, indicating that farm milk consumption may have had an independent effect on allergy development.

This protective effect may be related to the hygiene hypothesis, which I recently wrote about. It is thought that low dose exposure to a variety of commensal bacteria may help regulate immune responses outside the gut. Another hypothesis is that the higher level of omega-3 fatty acids in grass-fed dairy, particularly in full-fat dairy products, may help reduce childhood atopy risk. (10)  More research is necessary before a definitive mechanism for a reduction in allergies in children drinking raw milk can be established.

Additionally, some research suggests that unpasteurized milk contains antimicrobial components absent in pasteurized milk. (11121314) These studies found that pathogens grow more slowly or die more quickly when added to raw milk than when added to heat-treated milk. This does not mean that raw milk cannot be contaminated with bacteria, nor does it mean that raw milk “kills pathogens”.

Rather, unpasteurized milk may be somewhat less susceptible to contamination than pasteurized milk due to its probiotic bacteria and antimicrobial enzymes.

The evidence for this is not conclusive, however, so there is no excuse for subpar hygiene standards when dealing with unpasteurized dairy products.

Like what you’re reading? Get my free newsletter, recipes, eBooks, product recommendations, and more!

Flavor

Many people think that raw milk has a superior flavor and texture to pasteurized, homogenized milk. They often use words like “fresh”, “real”, “alive” and “rich” to describe it. They also appreciate the subtle shift in the flavor of the milk through the seasons as the grasses change. Consumer research demonstrates that flavor is one of the top reasons that consumers choose raw milk in states where it is legal to buy. (1516) Emily Weinstein, blogging for The New York Times, describes her first raw milk experience:

The milk — oh man, the milk! — was creamy and full of flavors, not white like supermarket milk, but yellow-tinged. It was milk with a taste that wasn’t just defined by it texture — it was distinct, satisfying, delicious. All food should be like this, I thought, so natural it seems to redefine the word.

I’m sure those of you who drink raw milk can attest to the significant flavor differences between raw and conventional milk. While flavor alone is not reason enough for choosing raw milk, it is clearly a driving force in many consumers’ decisions.

Community

Raw milk is almost exclusively produced by local farmers. A growing segment of the population is choosing to support local, family farms and businesses over multi-national conglomerates. There is significant economic potential in the direct sales of milk from small farms, which is often the method of producing and distributing unpasteurized milk in most states. (17) The direct sale of raw milk allows farmers to set a price that allows profit for the farm and equals the fair market value of the product for the consumer. (18) This way, farmers are able to cover their costs while still earning a living to support themselves and their families.

Consumers are reconnected with their food supply, and farmers are held accountable for their products, allowing for the stimulation of the local economy and the promotion of sustainable farming practices.

Environment

Similar to above, consuming milk that is produced by local farmers using sustainable methods has far less of an environmental impact than drinking milk produced in large confinement feeding operations thousands of miles away.  Conventional dairy operations are highly destructive to the environment. Air and water pollution from dust and feedlot manure, plus fertilizers and pesticides used in grain production, are damaging to the environment and to the health of farmers, farm workers, and nearby residents. (19) Manure runoff into water can cause the death of aquatic life, as well as contamination of drinking water by nitrate, harmful microorganisms, and antibiotics and hormones.

Raising dairy cows on well-managed pastures decreases soil erosion, increases soil fertility, and improves water quality due to decreased pollution. Cows grazing on pasture reduce the energy needed to grow grains or to mow, bale, and move hay, requiring less fuel consumption. (20) Sustainable small dairy farms that produce raw milk are much more environmentally friendly as compared to typical large-scale dairy farms that are energy intensive.

Ethics

Cows that live on small farms and spend their days on green pasture are are much better off than those that live in overcrowded and inhumane “factory farm” conditions. This is important to those of us that care how animals are treated. When confined in small spaces under stressful conditions, cows often become ill and are treated with large quantities of antibiotics. (21) They are more prone to morbidity and mortality from diseases including dust-related respiratory conditions, metabolic diseases, and other ailments that can be directly attributed to their confined conditions, as well as their unnatural diet of corn, soy, and other grains. Pasture-raised cows have longer lifespans than conventionally raised cows, as corn-based diets contribute to health problems such as liver abscesses, and breeding practices designed to maximize milk production have caused reproductive problems. (22)

There are plenty of horror stories and disturbing videos that portray the inhumane treatment of cows in conventional dairy operations. (2324) By visiting small farms and purchasing raw milk from pastured cows, compassionate consumers can be assured that the animals are properly treated.

A personal decision

Any one of these reasons might be enough justification for choosing raw milk for a given individual or family. But when viewed together, it’s easy to understand why raw milk consumption has increased so significantly over the last two decades. Consuming unpasteurized milk and dairy products has several positive benefits that, for many people, may outweigh the possible risks. You must consider both the positive and negative qualities of raw milk consumption when making the decision for you and your family.

In the next article, I will discuss the important variables to consider when deciding whether raw milk is right for you and offer guidance on how to find a safe source of raw milk and minimize the potential risk, should you choose to consume it.

ADAPT Naturals logo

Better supplementation. Fewer supplements.

Close the nutrient gap to feel and perform your best. 

A daily stack of supplements designed to meet your most critical needs.

Chris Kresser in kitchen
Affiliate Disclosure
This website contains affiliate links, which means Chris may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase using the links in the articles or advertisements. You will pay the same price for all products and services, and your purchase helps support Chris‘s ongoing research and work. Thanks for your support!

472 Comments

Join the conversation

  1. Although its more expensive…OMG it taaaastes sooooo GOOOD!!!! If your lucky and your milk has got enough cream at the top. Scoop it off and throw it into your coffee. One word…”dddaaaaaaammmmmnnn”

  2. Pasturized dairy shuts down my my digestive system all the way through to my bowels. If I have any pasturized dairy, I am in bed with horrible pain for 3 days. However, I have no problems with RAW dairy.
    I would like to try some unpasturized european cheeses but I am nervous about it. Any thoughts?

  3. You are totally off base in your “Ethics” section. Your comments represent an uninformed position and viewpoint. The vast majority of “factory farms” as you call them, are owned by families that have the utmost concern for the well being of their animals and are dedicated to producing safe, affordable, and nutrious dairy protein for consumers. I suggest you pay a visit to Fair Oaks Farms, in Fair Oaks, Indiana. This will shatter your tainted view of conventional dairy farming and perhaps convince you that you have misrepresented and committed a disservice to the dairy industry.

    • It is true many dairy farms have improved over the years. This however has not always been the case, nor is it true of all dairy mills.

  4. My husband had pleurisy for about 9 months. His dr. prescribed meds that almost caused him to bleed to death. After a week in the hospital he was discharged and limped home worse off than before the dr. gave him the meds. Finally I figured it was an allergic reaction and looked at what he ate. Milk put out the fire of his now bleeding ulcer. I had a friend that swore by raw milk and we did a weekend test. His pleurisy receded. Now months later he has no pleurisy and plenty of raw milk.

  5. For anyone who doesn’t know, you can usually find raw milk being advertised for sale in any state in most areas as “Raw Milk Shares” or “Milk Shares” or “Herd Shares.” Milk shares come in cow and goat form. Basically you pay for or purchase “part” of the milk animal and that entitles you to part of the milk they produce. This is LEGAL because you can pay for your own animals keep and make your own raw milk, you just cant sell raw milk for human consumption in most places/states and if you can there is heavy laws put on it and huge fines. Watch your state laws and keep track of what they’re trying to make a law, some states (like mine Michigan) have tried or discussed passing laws making it illegal for farmers to drink their own raw milk.

  6. It’s amazing that people will literally believe in anything – absolutely anything. There’s groups of people that believed God was behind Haley’s comet and to meet him they had to drink cyanide. That is obviously more extreme than believing the questionable benefit of drinking raw milk is worth consuming liquid full of harmful bacteria (no matter if you get sick or not, you ARE consuming orders of magnitude more bacteria than in pasteurized milk), but at least the Heaven’s Gate cultists who killed themselves for their beliefs (CDC reports 2 deaths from milk borne illness), they only inflicted physical harm upon themselves. People drinking raw milk are criminally endangering children around them that are much more susceptible to these infectious diseases. As an adult, you could feel fine but be swarming with disease that can infect children or infants around you. Bacterial infection is not about if you have bacteria in you or not, it’s about how *many* bacteria you are exposed to – and certain kinds are definitely worse than others and the threshold for all of them is much lower for children.

    If you want to take the risks upon yourself of drinking raw milk and still think there’s enough benefit to warrant them, I would simply ask you to please not do so around children.

    • If you are so concerned about protecting the children then ask yourself: What did you do to prevent the 16,000 that will die this year from starvation or lack of nutrition?

      But more appropriately, where is it written that a child has a greater set of rights than you?

      I suggest you look further into what this government thinks about you, me and the children.

      FDA Quotes
      “There is No Absolute Right to Consume or Feed Children Any Particular Food”
      “There is No Generalized Right to Bodily and Physical Health”

      There are those who live, and those who are arm chair pundits.

    • You are extreme, and it seems mistaken about the nature of bacteria. Bacteria is everywhere, and is essential to life. Bacteria causes problems when it grows in areas it is not supposed to. For example, Staph aureus is normal flora for humans on the skin, but if it gets in other areas it can cause issues if bit checked in time by the normal flora there.
      Same with food, and in this case, milk. The reason, if you read the article, raw milk actually is safer than pasteurized, if we go by mortality studies, is due to bacteria. Raw milk is full of normal beneficial bacteria. Pasteurized is not due to the process of its name sake. If foreign bacteria enters raw milk, it’s chances of growth are minimized due to the natural microbial properties of milk. However that same bacterium has a greater chance of proliferation in pasteurized (after the process) milk due to colony counts of its normal flora being decimated.
      In closing, calm down.

    • Concerned citizen, please do your research before posting personal opinions as FACT.

      CDC: 1 Dead, 7 Others Sickened by Listeria Traced to Cheese
      11 Mar 2014 | 64,690 Views
      Another listeria outbreak has been reported, and once again it has nothing to do with raw milk.

      Raw Milk on the Rise — No Illness Seen
      28 Jan 2014 | 40,300 Views
      Months after the state of Arkansas loosened laws on raw milk, no illnesses have been linked to the sale of the unpasteurized dairy.

      Kids Who Drink Raw Milk Have Fewer Asthma and Allergies
      12 Nov 2013 | 54,703 Views
      This healthful beverage cuts the incidence of asthma and allergies among schoolchildren nearly in half.

      Raw Milk: A Key Ingredient in Some of the World’s Finest Cheeses
      15 Oct 2013 | 48,465 Views
      Raw milk is maligned by the US government, so why has it been an integral part of artisanal cheese-making for centuries?

      Can Adding Fluoride to Milk Help Improve Children’s Dental Health?
      08 Oct 2013 | 234,259 Views
      Hyped as a measure to improve health, even though 100 animal studies link it to brain damage and 25 human studies show it lowers IQ. So why is it being dumped into your child’s milk carton?

      Who Knew this Cocktail of up to 20 Chemicals Was in Your Glass of Milk?
      The number of drugs and hormones lurking in your “wholesome” glass of milk may surprise you
      No thanks. Give me good old raw milk from healthy cows who are not shot up with hormones and antibiotics.

      I have been drinking raw milk for some 76 years. Gave raw milk to my children when I could get it. Though I know it’s possible to be sickened by anything we enjest, I have never known of anyone getting sick from raw milk.

  7. I’ve had a similar experience to those that tried it, liked it, and tolerated it fine. Regular milk makes me a bit heavy, and noticeably tired throughout the day. Raw milk makes me feel energized, clean, and powerful. I’ve been using it post Run, (after a semi intense run), and it’s been a tremendous restoration food. Not exactly sure why – but I would assume the fat content is helping my energy get back to normal, as my diet is primarily ketogenic, about 50G of carbs a day on some days, and rarely ever above. I think it probably has to do with some of the other nutrients in the milk as well.

    Also – free range eggs have been making me feel just amazing lately! Switched to those recently too. Love every bite. Truly amazing.

  8. Chris I have read your article and the comments on it with great interest. In France where I live, raw milk is legal, but farmers selling it are subjected to a higher/stricter ISO level ( in other words the milking environment and the cow have to be even cleaner). I drink raw milk daily. I’m 64 and take no medication and only supplement with magnesium. Dogs are lactose intolerant if you give them pasteurized dairy – but they’re fine with raw milk. I give my dogs a little raw milk twice daily. When I ran out of raw milk one day I gave them pasteurized milk and they wouldn’t drink it, they could smell and taste the difference. It’s easy to buy unpasteurized cheeses and yoghurts here and the French are a lot healthier, and live longer, than Americans, for many dietary reasons. Continue the good work.

  9. I can honestly say that raw milk has cured me of chronic gum disease and my long term dentist is very impressed after I had been drinking raw milk for 2years as there has been no re-occurrence of the disease.

  10. It took me a long time to become accustomed to raw milk after decades of drinking processed milk. The former would upset my stomach. I overcame it eventually, however, and never touched pasteurized and/or homogenized milk again.

  11. I have read (from Dave Asprey, thebulletproofexec.com) that the reason raw milk is tolerated by those who are lactose intolerant is that raw milk contains lactase, the enzyme responsible for digesting lactose (a sugar in milk); pasteurization destroys this lactase.

    I generally don’t drink milk at all, but I am a huge fan of butter, and I go to local farmers to buy raw, grass-fed, (cultured if possible) butter. I love it but don’t know that I notice a difference in how I feel/perform between raw and pasteurized butter. Anyone else have comments on raw v. pasteurized dairy other than milk?

  12. Chris,
    I too am a big believer in raw milk after drinking very little milk for almost 30 years. However, my nurse practitioner has recommended the Paleo diet, which of course doesn’t allow for dairy. How does raw milk fit into the Paleo diet?
    Thanks,
    RJ

    • My understanding is this new petition, if approved, changes the standard definition of certain milk products so terms such as “reduced calorie” (for example) on a product using a non-nutrititive sweetener (such as Aspartame) will not require labeling on the front. The artificial sweetener will be listed as an ingredient, but on the front of the carton it will not be required to be labeled “reduced calorie” or “low-calorie” or anything to tip off kids that this is anything different than the flavored milk or yogurt they are used to, meaning those made with sugar or HFCS. This petition is a misguided attempt to combat childhood obesity by getting kids to consume lower calorie flavored milk/yogurt without their knowledge they are eating or drinking a “diet” product. How wrong this is is beyond belief.

  13. I just have to brag, boast, & praise that as of April 2013, we here in the state of Arkansas just got our rights back to sell or purchase RAW MILK!!!!! from dairy farms!!!!!!!! Hallelujah Praise the Lord!!!!!
    I was having to drive 2 hrs round trip to a neighboring state to illegally purchase raw milk and bootleg it back to Arkansas for the last several years. If this doesn’t prove to the naysayers that we are living proof of raw milk benefits and the lengths we will go to get it, I don’t know what does!!

  14. Maybe this isn’t entirely relevant, and I’m sure it needs some citing, but I remember in History class learning that pasteurizing of milk wasn’t for health benefits, it was for economical reasons. The pasteurized milk could be shipped long distances for selling. Pasteurizing was, I think, originally used for vaccinations as the body would have a response to even the dead or almost dead pathogens and create a defense. Now, I know my memory of what was learned in class is some 30 years old now, but that is what I think I remember. Any one want to check it? Or respond?

    • Cherilynne, You might want to read, “The Untold Story of Milk” by Ron Schmid, ND to learn about the long history of humans consuming dairy products. My understanding is pasteurization came about in this country because of the unsanitary and irresponsible practices of “distillery dairies” in the early 1900’s. After undergoing pasteurization, filthy, unhealthy milk could be sold and not outright kill any one. Not only that, pasteurization did extend shelf life. Homogenization was a boon to dairies as the cream line was no longer evident in the bottle so substandard milk (meaning with little butterfat) and milk with some of the cream taken off (to be used for butter, ice cream, etc. to gain more profit) could be sold without the consumer knowing. As far as vaccinations and milk, you might be remembering the story of Ralph Stolle in the 1950’s and his work to create an immune-enhancing milk for humans, known as “Stolle milk”. Another very interesting subject is “hyperimmune” milk, which has been used in cancer therapy and is a fascinating theory.

  15. Chris we need thumbs up and down options for these comments! Especially a thumbs down for Joe’s!!!

    • I’ve considered implementing such a system, but the technical hurdles have prevented it from happening so far.

  16. There are a few people who cannot tolerate milk period. There are people that cannot tolerate pasturized milk but do well on raw milk. Personally, I was raised on raw milk and thrived on it all my life until I developed celiacs disease. Now I can only tolerate Kefir made from raw milk, which I enjoy daily.

    If a person wants to drink pasturized “dead” milk, that’s their preoragitive. However, those who choose to consume raw, grass food milk should have the same choice. However, big government will spread all sorts of lies to try to discredit the small farmer when they start cutting into their profits.

    It really upsets me that the FDA allows damaging junk food, but prevents people from making an educated, informed food choice in purchasing raw grass-fed milk.

    This isn’t the first time the FDA has spent US tax dollars to violently clamp down on “illegal interstate commerce,” by raw milk farmers, all under the guise of doing their job and protecting the public’s health…

    Any level-headed person would argue that this is a poorly shrouded sham, seeing how the FDA has continuously allowed known toxins into the food supply, and those who willingly choose to harm their health are free to do so by consuming too much sugar, artificial non-food-based items, alcohol, and toxic cigarettes.

    Allgyer taking on the FDA in court is a classic case of David vs. Goliath. At stake is the issue of consumer choice and food freedom — something most people would agree is an absolute, basic, and unalienable right

    “The ban on raw milk crossing state lines is an economic regulation disguised as a health regulation,” Pete Kennedy points out. For those who cannot understand what this has to do with economics, you must understand that Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO’s) simply cannot compete with grassfed raw milk farms, and therefore stand to lose a lot of money as raw milk becomes increasingly popular.

    They cannot compete because in order for milk to be safely consumed raw, it should come from cows fed a forage based diet that includes pasture. CAFO-derived milk should not be consumed raw given the elevated risk of hazardous pathogens in the milk—an inevitable side effect of the environment in which these cows are raised.

    The reason why they’re trying to shut down raw milk farmers is because so many people consume raw milk and raw milk dairy products, and the numbers are growing every year. One 2008 survey conducted by the CDC found there were over nine million raw milk drinkers in the US, and today, the number of raw milk consumers is estimated to be in the neighborhood of 12-13 million. When you consider that each family can consume a few gallons of milk per week, it all starts adding up, and Big Dairy is losing business.

    Additionally, Kennedy stated that raw milk can be a “gateway to small farm prosperity”. Families who initially set foot on the farm to obtain raw milk typically end up purchasing other farm products such as produce, eggs, poultry and meat.

    The CDC’s study also highlights the error of the claim that raw milk poses a significant health risk. With that many millions of raw milk consumers, it’s quite clear that grassfed raw milk is extremely safe, because there are so few foodborne illness outbreaks attributable to it.

    http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/07/06/ron-paul-vs-the-fda-milk-police.aspx