Update: I now recommend Bio-Avail Omega+ from Adapt Naturals. It’s a blend of ultra-pure fish oil and the most bioavailable forms of curcumin and black seed oil.
Summary
Sorry, folks. Another long one. It was unavoidable, though, because I really did want this to be a “definitive guide” that covers all (or at least most) of the relevant issues involved with choosing a fish oil. Here’s a summary for the time-challenged:
- There are five important factors to consider when choosing a fish oil: composition, purity, freshness, bioavailability, and sustainability.
- Not all fish oils are created equal. It’s essential to do your homework and make an informed choice. Many fish oils are oxidized or made with poor-quality ingredients and may cause health problems instead of solving them.
- The potency of various products depends not only upon the levels of EPA and DHA but also upon the molecular structure of the fats in the oil, which in turn affects absorption.
- Natural triglyceride fish oils are better absorbed than highly purified (i.e. ester) fish oils.
- Many fish oils are made from fish that are endangered. Choose products made from fish that are certified by organizations such as Friend of the Sea or MarinTrust.
Introduction
So far in this series we’ve looked at why fish is superior to plant-based sources of omega-3. We’ve examined the importance of reducing consumption of omega-6 fats. We’ve considered how much omega-3 is needed to support health and treat disease. We’ve revealed that concerns about the safety of fish consumption have been overblown, and that eating fish regularly is not only safe but incredibly beneficial. And in the previous article we compared the benefits of eating fish to taking fish oil.
In this final article of the series, we’re going to take a closer look at fish oil. Fish oil is one of the most popular supplements taken by consumers today. Most people who are at least relatively health conscious understand that they need omega-3 in their diet and are probably not getting enough from food (unless they eat a lot of fish).
But why should you consider taking fish oil in the first place? Which fish oils are best? How much should you take? And what should you look for in a good product?
In this article, I’ll focus more on dispelling common misconceptions about fish oil and helping you to choose the best product for your needs.
My current thoughts on fish oil
My view and recommendations for fish oil have evolved over time.
I’ll tell you what has remained constant first, then tell you what has changed.
I still recommend getting EPA/DHA from the diet whenever possible—either as your exclusive source or as a foundation to build upon.
And I still don’t recommend super-high doses of fish oil, like 10 grams per day. This isn’t common anymore, but there was a time when many health gurus were suggesting this as a way to reduce inflammation. But it’s not supported by research, and there’s no additional benefit beyond the 1-3 grams a day studies suggest is the best therapeutic target.
What has changed is my growing appreciation for the role fish oil can play in ensuring adequate EPA/DHA intake for many people. For all of the reasons I’ve mentioned in this series, many folks are just not getting enough EPA/DHA, and taking a fish oil supplement is probably the only way they’re going to get these critical fatty acids.
It’s also true that some people benefit from greater amounts of EPA/DHA than they can easily obtain in their diet.
My specific recommendations for EPA/DHA supplementation have also evolved. I have recommended cod liver oil for many years, and I still do today. It’s a good option because it contains vitamins A and D in addition to EPA/DHA.
However, the amounts of EPA and DHA are lower in cod liver oil than in most fish oil supplements. And if you’re already consuming organ meats like liver or an organ meat supplement, like Bio-Avail Organ from Adapt Naturals, you don’t really need (or even want) the additional A/D from cod liver oil.
This is why I now recommend a high-quality fish oil supplement for people who are either not getting enough EPA/DHA from their diet or who would benefit from additional EPA/DHA because of a chronic, inflammatory, or autoimmune condition.
But finding a high-quality fish oil is easier said than done. The global market for fish oil is north of $2 billion now. Whenever there’s that much money to be made, you can be sure all kinds of shenanigans will ensue!
So, let’s look at some of the most important factors to consider when buying fish oil.
Factors to consider when buying fish oil
There are five primary variables to be aware of when shopping for fish oil:
- Composition. In order to have the desired anti-inflammatory effect, fish oil must contain an adequate amount of the long-chain omega-3 derivatives EPA and DHA.
- Purity. The oil must meet or exceed international standards for heavy metals, PCBs, dioxins, and other contaminants. Many do not—even when they claim they do.
- Freshness. The oil should be fresh and not rancid. Rancid/oxidized oils promote oxidative damage and increase inflammation, both of which are risk factors for nearly every modern disease. Sadly, many fish oils on the market contain high levels of oxidative by-products.
- Bioavailability. The ability to absorb the beneficial components of fish oil is based on the molecular shape of the fatty acids. The more natural the structure, the better.
- Sustainability: The fish should be harvested in a sustainable manner, and species that are under threat should be avoided.
Composition
Composition refers to the overall concentration of EPA/DHA and the ratio of EPA to DHA. To some extent, this depends on the goal of taking fish oil. For example, some conditions may call for a higher proportion of DHA, while others benefit from more EPA.
Most studies suggest that a 3:2 ratio of EPA to DHA is optimal, with a total amount of omega-3 ranging between 500 mg and 2 g per day.
The optimal amount for each person will vary based on several factors, including how much fish/seafood you’re consuming in your diet. If you don’t eat any, and/or you have an inflammatory or autoimmune condition, you want to aim for the higher end. If you eat some fish/seafood, you can aim for the lower to mid-range.
Purity
Many species of fish are known to concentrate toxic chemicals like heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins, which can cause serious diseases, especially in children and developing fetuses. In a previous article, I explained how these chemicals are typically not a concern when eating whole fish because fish also contains selenium. Selenium binds to mercury and makes it unavailable to tissues, thus protecting against any damage it may cause.
To address this, fish oil manufacturers use a process called molecular distillation to remove the toxins from the oil. When done correctly, molecular distillation is capable of reducing the toxins in fish oil to levels considered to be safe by the EPA and other agencies.
Although almost any fish oil manufacturer will tell you their product is free of these toxins, independent lab analyses tell a different story. In March of 2010, a lawsuit was filed in California court against the manufacturers of ten popular fish oils because they contained undisclosed and (possibly) unsafe levels of contaminants.
Unfortunately, this kind of deception is all too common in the supplement industry. The best companies will be able to provide a Certificate of Analysis (COA) from the manufacturer upon request. A COA is an analysis performed by an independent lab to measure the ingredients of a product and confirm whether it lives up to the claims made by the manufacturer.
If the manufacturer won’t provide a COA, I start to get suspicious. This is standard practice in the industry, and there’s no reason they shouldn’t be happy to show you theirs.
In general, fish that are lower on the food chain, like sardines and anchovies, naturally have a lower concentration of contaminants. For this reason, it may be wise to look for a product made from these fish.
So what levels of these toxins are safe? As you might imagine, there is some disagreement on this question since there is no single governing body that determines acceptable levels. However, the standards that are most often followed by fish oil manufacturers are summarized in the table below.

* ppt = parts per trillion
* ppb = parts per billion
The best fish oils will not only meet but exceed these international standards.
Freshness
I have written extensively about the dangers of oxidized, rancid oils. They promote oxidative damage and increase inflammation, both of which are risk factors for nearly every modern disease.
This is why it’s crucial to ensure that the fish oil you select is fresh and not rancid. Once it has gone rancid, it will have the exact opposite effect on your body than you want it to.
The first thing to do is to check something called the “peroxide value” on the COA. This is a measure of rancidity reactions in the oil that have occurred during storage. It should be less than 5 meq/kg.
If this checks out, and you decide to order that product, break open a capsule once you receive it. There should be no “fishy” odors. They should smell like the ocean, but not like rotten fish. They should also not have a strong lemon or lime scent, which could be an indicator that the manufacturer is trying to mask the rancidity.
The p-anisidine value measures secondary oxidation products. The IFOS and GOED standard is less than 20 units. However, it’s important to note that p-anisidine is not appropriate for measuring secondary oxidation in omega-3 oils that have a strong color or contain added flavorings.
For example, salmon oil contains carotenoids, which have a natural yellow/orange coloring. Bio-Avail Omega+ from Adapt Naturals contains curcumin, which also has a natural orange coloring. This throws off the p-anisidine values and makes it an irrelevant test.
TOTOX is the last way to measure oxidation. It’s simply a combination of the peroxide and p-anisidine values. (For this reason, it’s also not appropriate for products with a strong color.) The IFOS and GOED thresholds are 19.5 and 26 meq/kg, respectively. But the best products have TOTOX values below 15 meq/kg.
Finally, some studies have shown that adding antioxidants (e.g. curcumin or resveratrol) to fish oil can improve stability.
A common misconception is that you can determine the quality of fish oil by freezing it. The theory goes that if you freeze the oil and it is cloudy, it’s rancid. That is not the case. All fish contain saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, albeit in small amounts. These fatty acids make the capsules appear cloudy when frozen in products that contain whole fish oil.
Potency
This is another area surrounded by significant controversy. Some argue the levels of individual constituents in fish oil aren’t paramount. Scientists discovered the healthful effects of omega-3s by studying people with fish-heavy diets, before supplemental fish oil even existed. Clinical trials using supplemental fish oils over the past few decades have contained widely variable levels of both long-chain omega-3 derivatives (EPA and DHA), and not super-high concentrations of either or both.
However, due to poor conversion of ALA to EPA and DHA, unless you are eating fish it is very likely you are deficient in long-chain omega-3s.
Following this line of reasoning, the DHA content in particular of fish and fish oils does seem important if we wish to obtain the best possible therapeutic effect. Many recent studies demonstrating the anti-inflammatory potential of fish oil used a daily dosage of DHA in the range of 1-3 grams. What’s more, foods like salmon roe that have been prized by traditional cultures for their nourishing and healing effects contain large amounts of DHA. A single 6 oz. serving of salmon roe contains 1 g of DHA. (In fact, this would be the best way by far of supplementing with DHA if money were no object. (Unfortunately, wild salmon roe goes for about $28/serving.)
Unfortunately, many fish oils do not have significant amounts of DHA. This means you’d have to take an impractically high number of capsules each day to obtain the therapeutic dose. This is not desirable, since all unsaturated oils (including fish oils) are subject to oxidative damage. We don’t want to take large quantities of them for this reason.
Remember to check the label and ensure that your product has approximately 200-300 mg of DHA per capsule. This will allow you to achieve the therapeutic dose by taking no more than 3 capsules twice a day.
Like what you’re reading? Get my free newsletter, recipes, eBooks, product recommendations, and more!
Bioavailability
The ability to absorb the beneficial components of fish oil is based on the molecular shape of the fatty acids. In short, the more natural the structure and the less it is chemically altered, the better.
This is true for any nutrient, of course, and it explains why I am always in favor of obtaining nutrients from food or food-based sources when possible. Each additional step in processing from the natural state of food to extract or isolate nutrients introduces the potential of damaging the nutrient or changing its chemical form so that it’s more difficult to absorb or affects the body in a different way.
When it comes to fish oils, there are three forms currently available on the market:
- Natural triglyercide oil. This is what you get when you “squeeze” the whole fish and extract the natural oil from it. It is the closest to eating fish oil in its natural form and is highly bioavailable. The drawback of this form is that, because it’s not concentrated, it usually has low levels of EPA and DHA. And because it isn’t purified, it can have high levels of contaminants such as heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins.
- Ethyl ester oil. Occurs when natural triglyceride oil is concentrated and molecularly distilled to remove impurities. The ester form is still in a semi-natural state because it is the result of a process that naturally occurs in the body. The advantage of this form is that it can double or triple the levels of EPA and DHA.
- Synthetic triglyceride oil. This form occurs when natural triglycerides are converted to ethyl esters for concentration (as above) but then re-converted into synthetic triglycerides. The original position of the triglyceride’s carbon bonds changes, and the molecule’s overall structure is altered, which impacts the bioavailability of the oil.
Studies on absorption of the various types of fish oil suggest that, unsurprisingly, the natural triglyceride form is absorbed better than the ethyl ester form, which in turn is absorbed better than the synthetic triglyceride form.
One study by Lawson & Hughes in 1988 showed that 1 gram of EPA and 0.67 grams of DHA as natural triglycerides were absorbed 3.4 and 2.7 fold as well as the ethyl ester triglycerides.
In the previous article, we saw that fish oils were better absorbed when taken with a high-fat meal. In another study by Lawson & Hughes later the same year, they showed that the absorption of EPA & DHA from natural triglycerides improved from 69% with a low-fat meal (8g total fat) to 90% with a high-fat meal (44g total fat). Absorption of both EPA and DHA from ethyl ester oils was increased three-fold from 20% with a low-fat meal to 60% with a high-fat meal.
Sustainability
Our global fisheries are in dire straits, and fish oil is a big business. So, it’s crucial to choose a product that is manufactured with sustainability in mind and that has a fully transparent and traceable supply chain.
The easiest way to do this is to choose a product that is certified by organizations like Friend of the Sea or MarinTrust, two of the leading organizations for sustainable and responsible fishery management.
I would also choose a supplier/manufacturer with practices that minimize waste and its environmental impact.
For example, rather than catching fish that is only used to produce fish oil, some producers instead use fish meal to make the oil. This eliminates one of the main concerns about fish oil, which is that it will further deplete fisheries.
Recommendation
As a Functional Medicine clinician, author, and educator, I’ve been following the fish oil market closely for many years. I’ve used several different fish oils with my patients. I’ve read hundreds of studies on the purity, freshness, composition, and benefits of fish oil. I’ve spoken to industry experts and insiders, and I know what many companies do to cut corners and save money (at your expense).
When I started my own supplement company, Adapt Naturals, I knew that one of the first products we’d make would be fish oil. I wanted to create a product with the purest, freshest, and most sustainable fish oil available. And that’s exactly what we did with Bio-Avail Omega+.
I chose VivoOmega from GC Rieber as our fish oil. As the chart below illustrates, it significantly exceeds international standards for both purity and freshness.

Purity and freshness are critical. But I didn’t stop there. Most people who take fish oil are taking it to achieve certain outcomes, like better muscle and joint health, increased mental clarity, a more stable mood, clearer skin, and more balanced immune function.
So, when I formulated our fish oil product (Bio-Avail Omega+), I added the most bioavailable forms of two powerful nutrients that also support these goals: curcumin and black seed oil.
Now you can get the benefits of all three of these superfood nutrients in a single, two soft-gel daily serving.
Bio-Avail Omega+ contains an optimal composition of EPA and DHA (510 mg of EPA and 330 mg of DHA, a 3:2 ratio). It is made with triglyceride oils for optimal bioavailability and absorption. And it is produced with the most sustainable and traceable fish oil material in the industry. (See this page for more info.)
I’m proud of this product. It came directly out of my experience working with patients for 15 years and my extensive research into what is most important in a fish oil product. I hope it helps you to achieve your health goals!
Better supplementation. Fewer supplements.
Close the nutrient gap to feel and perform your best.
A daily stack of supplements designed to meet your most critical needs.

11-07.2014 Please note: this morning I expected to place a re-order on Amazon for Nordic Naturals ProEPA Elite 60caps. 2 caps = 1600mg EPA ; Other Omega-3s 60mg.
It appears (on Nordic Naturals own website) that this product has been discontinued. I cannot find it for sale excepting 3 or 4 websites other than Nordic Naturals site, where it is more expensive &/or unavailable.
This grieves me considerably since NN’s ProEPA Elite was near ideal dosage and tolerance for me. Now I must try to find another EPA-only (or EPA:DHA ratio 7:1 or greater) which is as high quality an rTAG fish oil product. My preferred daily dose is 1500mg – 1600mg EPA. It is invaluable treating, in addition to prescription drugs, for bipolar disorder. Again, for myself, it acts as a mood stabilizer, and has made an enormous difference in my quality of life.
I’m confident, eventually, I will find another fish oil product somewhere, but I’m starting from the beginning again, which is a bummer.
Igennus sells what appears to be a similar fish oil formula product, but it is available only from UK and so will likely be more expensive, perhaps prohibitively so since I have a low fixed income. In fact Nordic Naturals was taking a big bite out of my monthly spending plan, but no question I really need to have it. Last resort I may consult my psychiatrist to see if he can prescribe Vascepa, for a trial period at least.
Tom,
I take Omegavia’s EPA 500. 500 mg EPA only per capsule, no DHA. 3 pills a day would do the trick for you. The price is very good and pharmaceutical grade, at $27.89 (autoship with free shipping) for 120 capsules. If you order, please use my name (Mark Thornsberry) as the referral, I will get a free bottle. Many times I give these bottles out to others to get them started on a trial of it. The research indicates a dose of 2000 mg EPA (4 capsules) a day for 3-4 months until the depression/anxiety is decreased. You can then go on a maintenance dose 1000 mg EPA (2 capsules) a day.
You also may want to read “The Natural Way to Beat Depression/The Groundbreaking discovery of EPA to change your life”. Excellent book on some of the original research with high dose EPA in Britain. It outlines the high dose EPA protocol in detail.
The research is pretty clear with fish oil and mood disorders. It seems that the trials that used pure EPA or higher ratios of EPA to DHA were more successful in relieving symptoms. Doses of effective EPA were between 500-2000 mg, more is not necessarily better.
You may also want to consider doing an Omega Quant bloodspot test. This is invaluable in knowing your AA/EPA ratio which in those with mood disorders is usually very high. This test is only $30 from their site, omegaquant.com.
Mark:
Great comment. I have nothing against EPA ethyl esters and I am glad they may work for you.
It is great to see that OmegaVia is helping to reduce the cost of health care by perhaps selling a misbranded and adulterated product that is half-strength (500 mg) of the FDA approved drug Vascepa (1,000 mg) from Amarin Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited. FDA approved Vascepa on July 26, 2012. This OmegaVia EPA 500 contains undeclared FDA drug substance (active pharmaceutical ingredient, API) EPA-ethyl ester (icosapent ethyl) and FDA says this product is adulterated and misbranded because the label does not disclose to the consumer the true identity of the product per 21 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 111 under cGMP. Under DSHEA Section 3; 21 USC 321(ff)(3)(B), a dietary supplement cannot contain an FDA approved drug substance. Consumers don’t care about their lawful rights and label accuracy and the fact that they are taking “tainted dietary supplements”. That said, in my opinion a great way to reduce your health care cost. In fact, IFOS certified that OmegaVia EPA 500 contains 500 mg (half-strength Vascepa) of the FDA approved drug substance EPA-EE (icosapent ethyl) that is the same as the Japanese prescription drug Epadel (ethyl icosapentate). It is great to know that you are taking the amount 500 mg that is stated on the label (IFOS reports 529 mg of FDA drug substance API).
Since this is half-strength of the prescription drug Vascepa, users should read the prescribing information for Vascepa at http://www.vascepa.com/full-prescribing-information.pdf to see how to take the drug successfully without physician supervision. Of particular interest on the prescribing label is: “Do not change your dose or stop taking VASCEPA without talking to your doctor.” If you want to see the details on how this drug works and the FDA approval process for Vascepa, go to: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2012/202057_vascepa_toc.cfm .
It is interesting how OmegaVia can sell an FDA approved drug substance as a dietary supplement without going through the process of filing an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) for their generic-like OmegaVia EPA 500. Seems like a great way to sell a FDA approved drug substance at a fraction of the cost of the prescription drug, great for the consumer. Anyway, since the product is helping you with your condition at a fraction of the cost of Vascepa, seems like a great bargain. As you are aware, Vascepa is approved for lowering blood fat (triglycerides) and not for mood. In my opinion, it is interesting to see a drug used off-label for other health problems and well-being.
If you want an even higher dose of EPA-EE, then see http://www.renewlife.com/norwegian-gold-epa-1000-omega.html who are selling 1,000 mg EPA-EE capsules. Rather than taking two OmegaVia EPA 500, you can take one Norwegian Gold 1,000 mg. This is the same dose as the FDA approved drug Vascepa at a fraction of the cost and is also adulterated and misbranded. However, as a consumer, you are getting a bargain without having a prescription and the need of physician supervision.
I know there is a big difference between FDA approved drugs (prove to FDA efficacy and safety) and dietary supplements (no need to prove efficacy and safety to FDA). Then, FDA approved drugs have been recalled for safety and efficacy.
Enjoy your generic-like OmegaVia EPA 500 and the benefits it provides you.
Pixe
Igennus’ PHARMEPA STEP 1:RESTORE 60 Caps, 500mg EPA per cap, has recently changed the products’ active ingredient **from Ethyl Ester (EE) to rTG triglyceride form**
Some of Igennus’ printed brochures, may not yet reflect the ingredient change: the former one displays “MARINE ETHYL-EPA 90%.” However, the new brochure, and box design, now read “PURE EPA OMEGA-3, 1000mg | 90% concentration”
Also, listed under “Nutritional Information” on the side panel, is “EPA (rTG) (eicosapentaenoic acid) 1000mg” per serving = 2 capsules.
Likewise, on the same side panel, “INGREDIENTS/
RTG EPA (re-esterified triglyceride eicosapentaenoic acid) concentrate from wild anchovy fish oil; capsule shell (fish gelatine [sic], emulsifier: vegetable glycerol: anti-oxidant: vitamin E. (etc.)
I confirmed the change via email with the Igennus representative.
I have used this newer rTG product 3 months now, and it is as effective as was the Nordic Naturals EPA-ELITE, Pure EPA (which Nordic Naturals stopped making, quite recently, and is no longer available except at grossly inflated prices from a few online vendors).
Used as directed, I haven’t experienced any marked difference using the Ethyl Ester, compared to the rTG Triglyceride, processes. However, I always take my alternate, Ethyl Ester, OmegaBrite brand caps, with a fatty meal – for me, taken with a serving of full fat whole milk yogurt, to which a little melted butter is stirred in. With the rTG product, although taking with a fatty meal might be a better way to ingest than all by itself, it is not as important in order to get a full bang for the buck.
Lastly, PHARMEPA STEP1:RESTORE, purchased online, is somewhat more expensive than the better Ethyl Ester brands, but Igennus does provide several ways to reduce the monthly cost by auto-order (UK-only); or “Bulk Buy” which is a single purchase of 6 boxes, at 60 caps per box, in a special mailer, which is how I buy it, living in the USA.
Hi. I just per your recommendation asked a company for their COA. I was told this, “Certificate of Analysis are considered proprietary as they contain our “recipe” for the product. ” And of course the answer is no, I can’t see it. What do you think of that reply? Does anyone actually give us the consumer this COA?
Most companies use contract manufacturers, which would be disclosed if they released their CofAs. They would have to test it independently as a finished product to have a CofA that did not disclose proprietary information.
Some companies just make up CofAs too, so be careful when obtaining a “CofA” that does not list methods for each test.
This has got to be one of the most well thought out and well researched reviews on fish oils that I have seen. I have a number of questions and comments that I’m hoping can be addressed.
First, with reference to are you taking the right product or enough fish oil. There is a Genova Labs NutreVal test that will look at your RBC’s and advise you as to the content of EPA & DHA vs the idea population. Now the reference population is Japanese who eat a lot of fish, but this will at least tell you if you are in the right ballpark. I’d be interested in knowing if anyone has a better way to tell if you are getting enough, because once you have a test you can simply increase the dose of whatever you are taking until you get the desired test result (ie feedback).
Second, I too spoke to Green Pastures about their toxicity levels and they simply advised me that multiple tests show that their product is low in toxicity. However, the gold standard is to look at your hair, blood, and urine for mercury and mine are high. This could, however, be residual from dental amalgams or other fish intake so I’d be curious to know of other peoples experience. Also Green Pastures does not suggest a dose and doesn’t list their levels so I was glad to see this.
I watched an infomercial on the BioTrust product and they made a number of claims that I am interested in getting feedback on here.
1. They claimed that 90% of most fish oils are NOT absorbed and not bioavailable. They refer to this study. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3358766 Essentially the study says that as Triacyglycerols EPA & DHA are absorbed about 60-70% as well as free fatty acids and since the ester form is only 20-21% as well absorbed this gives you close to 90% not absorbed. This is a far cry from 1.5 times less absorbed and would suggest you need to eat 9X the amount not 50% more of the ester form.
2. VesiSorb http://source-1-global.com/products-offered/vesisorb-delivery-system/ The BioTrust product uses VesiSorb which they claim increases absorption by up to 25X. The basic idea is that if Bile improves absorption (hence why taking the fish oils with a fatty meal works better) than a colloidal construct that mimics this and more works better. What do you think?
3. They claim that CO2 extraction is the safer way to remove toxins and clean the fish oil. Do you agree? Apparently they have some certifications to document this.
4. Finally they are using a TG based product which as you point out is a variant to EE that perhaps more closely resembles the original product. Their claim is that the data are superior for TG vs EE, but is that really the case since most of the studies are using the EE form right?
Hi, thanks for all the great info. I was just diagnosed with leaky gut, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and have heavy metal poisoning from 8 different metals. Anyway, part of the doctor’s recommendation is to put me on a very high dose of enteric coated fish oil to help heal the gut so that as I detox the metals, they won’t continue to poison the blood stream. Can you suggest a few safe brands I can look at. I’m so concerned that I’m gonna end up taking something that will make my condition worse. (Already been through 5 surgeries, and all the lifestyle changes I’m implementing are making my head spin.) Thank you.
Very good post and glad the topic of fish oil purity and all the other considerations when choosing supplements are discussed.
At least from a safety point of view, I can recommend to check if the supplement has been independently tested. A good source of information can be found on the IFOS (International Fish Oil Standards Program) website at:
http://www.nutrasource.ca/ifos/consumer-reports/default.aspx
Matteo
I don’t know if anyone has asked you about the PRN Dry Eye Omega Benefits, I scrolled through and didn’t see anything but may have missed it. My mother’s opthamologist recommended it, here is the link to the product:
http://prnomegahealth.com/product-category/eye-health/dry-eye/
My only problem with it, is that you have to sign up for an automatic recurring order with your credit card, and would like to find something comparable that I can buy through another method.
Very interesting article and discussion. Does anybody have an opinion about Life Extension ‘s Mega EPA/DHA:
http://www.lef.org/vitamins-supplements/Item00625/Mega-EPA-DHA
Thank you.
Ivan
I have nothing against ethyl ester products. This is not fish oil and is the ethyl esters of EPA and DHA. These compounds are the same that are in the FDA approved drug Lovaza. Unfortunately the company like many others, did not disclose this required information on the label. Therefore, before taking this product you should read the prescribing information for Lovaza. In my opinion a better purchase would be http://www.herbalprovider.com/Triglyceride-Omega-3-Fish-Oil where you get 180 softgels in TAG. Each capsule supplies 400 mg EPA and 200 mg DHA. Better absorption and your body is use to digesting fat molecules and not ethyl esters.
I eat lots of fish like those canned sardines when they are on sale 2 for 1 price. If possible diet first, then think about dietary supplements.
Pixe
This is a very interesting article and discussion to read. I was wondering if somebody has any opinions regarding Life Extension Mega EPA/DHA:
http://www.lef.org/vitamins-supplements/Item00625/Mega-EPA-DHA
PIXE/Chris, do you have any info on: Naturenetics? http://naturenetics.com/portfolio-items/premium-omega-3-fish-oil/ rTAG, O3=750, EPA=408, DHA=272, % EPA DHA of total O3=90.67%. Cost per gram of DHA = $.72 based on $35.71/bottle of 180 caps sold through amazon.
what are your thoughts on myprotein.co.uk super omega 3’s?
do you know anything about them? i have requested the COA and asked if TG or EE.
great article by the way – spot on with info. Well done
Pixe:
Some, if not most, fish oils contain soy or soy derivatives. I assume the ones that specifically indicate “no gluten, no artifical colors, no X…, no Y….) but does not say anything about “soy” also contain soy. I suppose this is mostly true for products that includes “(mixed and/or natural) tocopherols” or “Vitamin E” in their ingredients. For instance, take a look at Sundown Naturals fish oil products: on their label (downloadable from their website), except for salmon oil, it says “No Artificial Color, Flavor or Sweetener, No Preservatives, No Sugar, No Starch, No Milk, No Lactose, No Gluten, No Wheat, No Yeast, No Shellfish. Sodium Free”, all of which including “mixed natural tocopherols”. Their salmon oil product, however, adds “no soy” in the addition to the aforementioned list, which only includes “Gelatin, Vegetable Glycerin” in its ingredients. Among the products that contain soy, only a few indicates non-GMO, which leads me to think the others soy content is genetically modified.
The worst part is, among the fish or salmon oil softgel products in the form of natural triglyceride, unfortunately I could not find any product that does not contain soy. The Pure Alaskan Salmon Oil does not seem to include any, but it says it includes “vitamin E (as mixed tocopherols)”, from which I assume it indeed contains. Others explicitly state soy content such as, if memory serves correct, Berkley & Jensen, Sam’s Club, Nature Made and CVS, the last one containing other nasty stuff. (As a side note Puritan’s Pride Extra Strength fish oil seems to be not in natural triglyceride from any more) Even recent batches of Nordic Natural’s regular Omega-3 product, when checked from National Institutes of Health’s Dietary Supplements Label Database, “may include soy”. (I also saw photos of previous labels indicating the product may contain soy due to being manufactured with other products that contains soy).
After this long introduction, I have some questions (I will appreciate your separate reply to each):
1) What is your general stance on fish oil supplements containing soy? (Please also dwell on GMO vs non-GMO)
2) Other than the brands mentioned above, is there a fish oil product sold in softgels in the form of natural triglyceride which does not include soy, or at the very least includes non-GMO soy, that I might be overlooking?
3) Do you agree with me about the Pure Alaskan Salmon Oil about containing soy?
4) There are high quality fish oils in the EE form that do not contain soy at all such as Innovix. Its actual EPA and DHA (which I roughly calculate by deducting 1.5 times the content) is roughly equal with 2 Kirkland Signature 1000mg softgels. In such case, except cost, the difference boils down to KS containing soy and the other not, and to KS being in the natural triglyceride form and the Innovix in the EE form.
In this scenerio would you recommend Innovix over KS?
Thanks!!!
I checked it before I bought my nordic naturals ultimate omega 3. According to their Q&A answer, despite its vitamin E is derived from soy oil but the formula does not soy protein. It is considered safe to consume even for people who has soy allergy. Besides, the label did mentioned non-GMO as well…
Just bought ultimate omega 3 + Q10 for my parents, also labelled non GMO.
Due to extensive refining, virtually all vitamin E from soy will be free of soy protein and GMO-free.
Sorry if I missed it but when do you take the baseline and when do you take the supplement, or does it really matter? E.g., baseline in the morning and supplement after exercise? Or at meals?
I would like to know your opinion of Now Neptune Krill Oil and Biotrust Omega Krill 5x . . thank you
Has anyone here validated the performance of BioTrust’s OmegaKrill 5X?
I’m 66 and have been taking 6 grams of fish oil (Pure Alaska Omega from Costco) for at least 10 years now. And before that I always took at least 1 gram/day. My annual physical numbers always come up stellar and my BP hovers around 120/70. So I’m on the band wagon, but this article by Chris muddies the water for me: “So I still recommend eating fatty fish a couple times per week, and taking cod liver oil daily, presuming your diet is as I described above. What I don’t endorse is taking several grams per day of fish oil, especially for an extended period of time. Unfortunately this advice is becoming more and more common in the nutrition world.” http://chriskresser.com/when-it-comes-to-fish-oil-more-is-not-better
Patrick:
Great comment. In my opinion, you maybe taking to much fish oil capsules. I would bet that your omega-3 index is above 10.0. You should note that the body can become saturated and not be able to absorb any more EPA and DHA. Studies have shown that the dose response curve plateaus after a certain amount of EPA and DHA. I would get an omega-3 index
(http://www.omegaquant.com/omega-3-index/) test to confirm your values and cut back on taking so many capsules. Then, use the savings to purchase more fatty fish and get your omega-3s the natural way.
I suspect that the comments from Chris were based on all those studies in which the patients were taking ethyl esters which are not “fish oils.” If taking so much fish oil was harmful, then we should all stop eating “fat” which includes almost everything we eat. Olive oil, etc. are all TAGs and the body has evolved to efficiently digest TAGs. However, ethyl esters are not fat and the body has a defensive mechanism to prevent them from being digested. That is why Lovaza (prescription omega-3, incorrectly called “fish oil”) has to be taken in high doses and with a high fat meal in order for digestion to take place.
Pixe
Does anyone have any comments about NutraSea? I’ve only found it online. They have liquid & capsules. Good customer service is available, & they’ve been able to answer questions well.
Hello just read this amazing article and was wondering what someones thought was on this product from Krilloil.com from Viva Labs! I chatted with a rep online and he couldn’t answer me about a COA but the website provides allot of info? Any help would be great!!!
Love your research
Hi- really enjoyed much of your article. However I am concerned that people are unaware of the impact of krill fishing. The hi-tech fishing boats are literally sucking up krill all day and all night leaving stocks decimated for all the wildlife that rely on it. Please watch this extremely interesting documentary which I hope will change all of your minds about supporting this worrying industry.
http://www.channel4.com/programmes/hughs-fish-fight/episode-guide/series-1
You have to register to watch and it’s the one about Antarctica but it really is mind blowing. They are literally using machines like hovers and sucking out the contents of the ocean. How can this ever be sustainable? Equally please just google krill fishing. I truly believe this industry cannot be supported- we have survived this long without krill in our lives so why do we need this expensive supplement now?
Thanks
Hello Pixe
I ordered the Vital Choice capsules recommend by Chris. I received them the mail last Friday but realized they had been sitting in a box in the heat inside of my mail box for maybe 2 hours. I cut one open and did a taste and smell test. They don’t smell really strong but they have a slight fish smell. I tasted them and they taste somewhat like raw fish, but not bad. I’m not sure if they’re rancid?? I would really love your opinion before I start taking them because I’m pregnant and not willing to risk it.
Thank you!!
Hi Sabrina:
I see no problem with the oil being rancid from the heat. As you know, this product is made from salmon cuttings which is a great way to make products from fish waste (offal). In my opinion, check with your OBGYN because I believe you should be taking a minimum 200-400 mg/day DHA. There are other products out there that have high DHA for pregnancy. However, be careful and make sure these are TAG and not ethyl esters. I posted earlier a list of prenatal DHA products.
Best of success with your pregnancy.
Pixe
I’ve been using salmon oil from last 4 months and it worked very well to increase my blood level and personally I feel salmon oil is a safe alternative to some other fish oils. Try it!
Hi Pixe. First off, I’d like to apologize to you.
Initially I thought you were just another troll that was spreading misinformation, and trying to sell something like every other so-called “expert” out there. But I’ve now seen your many thorough, insightful responses and have concluded that not only are you extremely knowledgeable on the subject, but you also seem to have the consumer’s best interest at heart. So thank you. Truly.
Second, when I go to your site krilloildetective.com, all I get is the home page. Should there be articles up already or are you still working on them?
Finally, what do you think about Omega Cure? It’s expensive, but they claim to be the “Rolls Royce” of fish oil. According to their website:
-They use natural, raw, full-spectrum oil (non-winterized)
-Their products “comes from wild cod captured off the north-west coast of Norway, following the strict sustainable fishing regulations of the Norwegian government. ”
-A Norwegian health magazine study named their product THE best:
“Omega3 Innovations recently learned that their Omega Cure liquid fish oil ranked the freshest in a Norwegian study that examined more than 100 brands of omega-3 fish oil products.
The physician-directed, Venice-based health-food company was excited to hear of the high ranking in a study published in the Norwegian health magazine, Vitenskap & Fornuft (“Science & Reason”), according to co-founder Dr. Bo Martinsen.
“We are extremely proud of the results,” Martinsen said, adding that the findings showed Omega Cure’s freshness was attributed to it having one-hundredth the oxidation levels of other leading omega-3 products.
The study examined more than 100 brands of omega-3 marine-sourced products, including capsules and liquid fish oils. Martinsen said that more than half of the products initially selected were excluded because they contained too many added ingredients to provide an accurate oxidation value, and 95 percent of the remaining 56 products didn’t meet industry standards.”
-They also claim most of these pills have ridiculously long shelf lives and that oxidation and rancidity occurs throughout the entire process, so that by the time we get our product, it’s probably already rancid.
-Another one of their premises is you should treat your oil like your food. You wouldn’t have your fish sitting on a shelf for months before consuming it so why would you do that with your fish oil?
-I agree with the idea of taking your oil in a liquid form and maintaining its freshness with refrigeration.
-I couldn’t find them on the IFOS cert list.
Thanks in advance~
Mo:
No problem on the trust. I am just pointing out how we as consumers are being taken advantage of because of the Dr. Oz and Inuit effect. Consumers are not aware of cGMP by way of 21 CFR 111 (Current Good Manufacturing Practice in Manufacturing, Packaging, Labeling, or Holding Operations for Dietary Supplements) describes in detail the “label holder” responsibility for accurate labeling and disclosing the true identity of their dietary supplements. Then DSHEA of 1994 removed the FDA’s pre-market approval for “label holders” introducing new dietary supplements into the marketplace. As such, any “label holder” can put whatever they feel like on the dietary supplements regardless of efficacy. Then, the FDA has the burden of proof to show that the product is adulterated and misbranded. By the time the FDA figures this out, the “label holder” closes shop and moves on with a different name. See
http://www.omega-3snakeoil.com for more information.
My http://www.krilloildetective.com is a work in progress and will be updated as more information becomes available.
Pixe
Hi Chris,
Thanks for a very useful article.
I have chronic inflammation due to psoriasis… if i choose to take Krill Oil on a daily basis.. shall i take supplemental and baseline recommendations as well at the same time on a daily basis.. will it be of any help or will be it a over dose?
Thanks,
Ishaan