Update: I now recommend Bio-Avail Omega+ from Adapt Naturals. It’s a blend of ultra-pure fish oil and the most bioavailable forms of curcumin and black seed oil.
Summary
Sorry, folks. Another long one. It was unavoidable, though, because I really did want this to be a “definitive guide” that covers all (or at least most) of the relevant issues involved with choosing a fish oil. Here’s a summary for the time-challenged:
- There are five important factors to consider when choosing a fish oil: composition, purity, freshness, bioavailability, and sustainability.
- Not all fish oils are created equal. It’s essential to do your homework and make an informed choice. Many fish oils are oxidized or made with poor-quality ingredients and may cause health problems instead of solving them.
- The potency of various products depends not only upon the levels of EPA and DHA but also upon the molecular structure of the fats in the oil, which in turn affects absorption.
- Natural triglyceride fish oils are better absorbed than highly purified (i.e. ester) fish oils.
- Many fish oils are made from fish that are endangered. Choose products made from fish that are certified by organizations such as Friend of the Sea or MarinTrust.
Introduction
So far in this series we’ve looked at why fish is superior to plant-based sources of omega-3. We’ve examined the importance of reducing consumption of omega-6 fats. We’ve considered how much omega-3 is needed to support health and treat disease. We’ve revealed that concerns about the safety of fish consumption have been overblown, and that eating fish regularly is not only safe but incredibly beneficial. And in the previous article we compared the benefits of eating fish to taking fish oil.
In this final article of the series, we’re going to take a closer look at fish oil. Fish oil is one of the most popular supplements taken by consumers today. Most people who are at least relatively health conscious understand that they need omega-3 in their diet and are probably not getting enough from food (unless they eat a lot of fish).
But why should you consider taking fish oil in the first place? Which fish oils are best? How much should you take? And what should you look for in a good product?
In this article, I’ll focus more on dispelling common misconceptions about fish oil and helping you to choose the best product for your needs.
My current thoughts on fish oil
My view and recommendations for fish oil have evolved over time.
I’ll tell you what has remained constant first, then tell you what has changed.
I still recommend getting EPA/DHA from the diet whenever possible—either as your exclusive source or as a foundation to build upon.
And I still don’t recommend super-high doses of fish oil, like 10 grams per day. This isn’t common anymore, but there was a time when many health gurus were suggesting this as a way to reduce inflammation. But it’s not supported by research, and there’s no additional benefit beyond the 1-3 grams a day studies suggest is the best therapeutic target.
What has changed is my growing appreciation for the role fish oil can play in ensuring adequate EPA/DHA intake for many people. For all of the reasons I’ve mentioned in this series, many folks are just not getting enough EPA/DHA, and taking a fish oil supplement is probably the only way they’re going to get these critical fatty acids.
It’s also true that some people benefit from greater amounts of EPA/DHA than they can easily obtain in their diet.
My specific recommendations for EPA/DHA supplementation have also evolved. I have recommended cod liver oil for many years, and I still do today. It’s a good option because it contains vitamins A and D in addition to EPA/DHA.
However, the amounts of EPA and DHA are lower in cod liver oil than in most fish oil supplements. And if you’re already consuming organ meats like liver or an organ meat supplement, like Bio-Avail Organ from Adapt Naturals, you don’t really need (or even want) the additional A/D from cod liver oil.
This is why I now recommend a high-quality fish oil supplement for people who are either not getting enough EPA/DHA from their diet or who would benefit from additional EPA/DHA because of a chronic, inflammatory, or autoimmune condition.
But finding a high-quality fish oil is easier said than done. The global market for fish oil is north of $2 billion now. Whenever there’s that much money to be made, you can be sure all kinds of shenanigans will ensue!
So, let’s look at some of the most important factors to consider when buying fish oil.
Factors to consider when buying fish oil
There are five primary variables to be aware of when shopping for fish oil:
- Composition. In order to have the desired anti-inflammatory effect, fish oil must contain an adequate amount of the long-chain omega-3 derivatives EPA and DHA.
- Purity. The oil must meet or exceed international standards for heavy metals, PCBs, dioxins, and other contaminants. Many do not—even when they claim they do.
- Freshness. The oil should be fresh and not rancid. Rancid/oxidized oils promote oxidative damage and increase inflammation, both of which are risk factors for nearly every modern disease. Sadly, many fish oils on the market contain high levels of oxidative by-products.
- Bioavailability. The ability to absorb the beneficial components of fish oil is based on the molecular shape of the fatty acids. The more natural the structure, the better.
- Sustainability: The fish should be harvested in a sustainable manner, and species that are under threat should be avoided.
Composition
Composition refers to the overall concentration of EPA/DHA and the ratio of EPA to DHA. To some extent, this depends on the goal of taking fish oil. For example, some conditions may call for a higher proportion of DHA, while others benefit from more EPA.
Most studies suggest that a 3:2 ratio of EPA to DHA is optimal, with a total amount of omega-3 ranging between 500 mg and 2 g per day.
The optimal amount for each person will vary based on several factors, including how much fish/seafood you’re consuming in your diet. If you don’t eat any, and/or you have an inflammatory or autoimmune condition, you want to aim for the higher end. If you eat some fish/seafood, you can aim for the lower to mid-range.
Purity
Many species of fish are known to concentrate toxic chemicals like heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins, which can cause serious diseases, especially in children and developing fetuses. In a previous article, I explained how these chemicals are typically not a concern when eating whole fish because fish also contains selenium. Selenium binds to mercury and makes it unavailable to tissues, thus protecting against any damage it may cause.
To address this, fish oil manufacturers use a process called molecular distillation to remove the toxins from the oil. When done correctly, molecular distillation is capable of reducing the toxins in fish oil to levels considered to be safe by the EPA and other agencies.
Although almost any fish oil manufacturer will tell you their product is free of these toxins, independent lab analyses tell a different story. In March of 2010, a lawsuit was filed in California court against the manufacturers of ten popular fish oils because they contained undisclosed and (possibly) unsafe levels of contaminants.
Unfortunately, this kind of deception is all too common in the supplement industry. The best companies will be able to provide a Certificate of Analysis (COA) from the manufacturer upon request. A COA is an analysis performed by an independent lab to measure the ingredients of a product and confirm whether it lives up to the claims made by the manufacturer.
If the manufacturer won’t provide a COA, I start to get suspicious. This is standard practice in the industry, and there’s no reason they shouldn’t be happy to show you theirs.
In general, fish that are lower on the food chain, like sardines and anchovies, naturally have a lower concentration of contaminants. For this reason, it may be wise to look for a product made from these fish.
So what levels of these toxins are safe? As you might imagine, there is some disagreement on this question since there is no single governing body that determines acceptable levels. However, the standards that are most often followed by fish oil manufacturers are summarized in the table below.
* ppt = parts per trillion
* ppb = parts per billion
The best fish oils will not only meet but exceed these international standards.
Freshness
I have written extensively about the dangers of oxidized, rancid oils. They promote oxidative damage and increase inflammation, both of which are risk factors for nearly every modern disease.
This is why it’s crucial to ensure that the fish oil you select is fresh and not rancid. Once it has gone rancid, it will have the exact opposite effect on your body than you want it to.
The first thing to do is to check something called the “peroxide value” on the COA. This is a measure of rancidity reactions in the oil that have occurred during storage. It should be less than 5 meq/kg.
If this checks out, and you decide to order that product, break open a capsule once you receive it. There should be no “fishy” odors. They should smell like the ocean, but not like rotten fish. They should also not have a strong lemon or lime scent, which could be an indicator that the manufacturer is trying to mask the rancidity.
The p-anisidine value measures secondary oxidation products. The IFOS and GOED standard is less than 20 units. However, it’s important to note that p-anisidine is not appropriate for measuring secondary oxidation in omega-3 oils that have a strong color or contain added flavorings.
For example, salmon oil contains carotenoids, which have a natural yellow/orange coloring. Bio-Avail Omega+ from Adapt Naturals contains curcumin, which also has a natural orange coloring. This throws off the p-anisidine values and makes it an irrelevant test.
TOTOX is the last way to measure oxidation. It’s simply a combination of the peroxide and p-anisidine values. (For this reason, it’s also not appropriate for products with a strong color.) The IFOS and GOED thresholds are 19.5 and 26 meq/kg, respectively. But the best products have TOTOX values below 15 meq/kg.
Finally, some studies have shown that adding antioxidants (e.g. curcumin or resveratrol) to fish oil can improve stability.
A common misconception is that you can determine the quality of fish oil by freezing it. The theory goes that if you freeze the oil and it is cloudy, it’s rancid. That is not the case. All fish contain saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, albeit in small amounts. These fatty acids make the capsules appear cloudy when frozen in products that contain whole fish oil.
Potency
This is another area surrounded by significant controversy. Some argue the levels of individual constituents in fish oil aren’t paramount. Scientists discovered the healthful effects of omega-3s by studying people with fish-heavy diets, before supplemental fish oil even existed. Clinical trials using supplemental fish oils over the past few decades have contained widely variable levels of both long-chain omega-3 derivatives (EPA and DHA), and not super-high concentrations of either or both.
However, due to poor conversion of ALA to EPA and DHA, unless you are eating fish it is very likely you are deficient in long-chain omega-3s.
Following this line of reasoning, the DHA content in particular of fish and fish oils does seem important if we wish to obtain the best possible therapeutic effect. Many recent studies demonstrating the anti-inflammatory potential of fish oil used a daily dosage of DHA in the range of 1-3 grams. What’s more, foods like salmon roe that have been prized by traditional cultures for their nourishing and healing effects contain large amounts of DHA. A single 6 oz. serving of salmon roe contains 1 g of DHA. (In fact, this would be the best way by far of supplementing with DHA if money were no object. (Unfortunately, wild salmon roe goes for about $28/serving.)
Unfortunately, many fish oils do not have significant amounts of DHA. This means you’d have to take an impractically high number of capsules each day to obtain the therapeutic dose. This is not desirable, since all unsaturated oils (including fish oils) are subject to oxidative damage. We don’t want to take large quantities of them for this reason.
Remember to check the label and ensure that your product has approximately 200-300 mg of DHA per capsule. This will allow you to achieve the therapeutic dose by taking no more than 3 capsules twice a day.
Like what you’re reading? Get my free newsletter, recipes, eBooks, product recommendations, and more!
Bioavailability
The ability to absorb the beneficial components of fish oil is based on the molecular shape of the fatty acids. In short, the more natural the structure and the less it is chemically altered, the better.
This is true for any nutrient, of course, and it explains why I am always in favor of obtaining nutrients from food or food-based sources when possible. Each additional step in processing from the natural state of food to extract or isolate nutrients introduces the potential of damaging the nutrient or changing its chemical form so that it’s more difficult to absorb or affects the body in a different way.
When it comes to fish oils, there are three forms currently available on the market:
- Natural triglyercide oil. This is what you get when you “squeeze” the whole fish and extract the natural oil from it. It is the closest to eating fish oil in its natural form and is highly bioavailable. The drawback of this form is that, because it’s not concentrated, it usually has low levels of EPA and DHA. And because it isn’t purified, it can have high levels of contaminants such as heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins.
- Ethyl ester oil. Occurs when natural triglyceride oil is concentrated and molecularly distilled to remove impurities. The ester form is still in a semi-natural state because it is the result of a process that naturally occurs in the body. The advantage of this form is that it can double or triple the levels of EPA and DHA.
- Synthetic triglyceride oil. This form occurs when natural triglycerides are converted to ethyl esters for concentration (as above) but then re-converted into synthetic triglycerides. The original position of the triglyceride’s carbon bonds changes, and the molecule’s overall structure is altered, which impacts the bioavailability of the oil.
Studies on absorption of the various types of fish oil suggest that, unsurprisingly, the natural triglyceride form is absorbed better than the ethyl ester form, which in turn is absorbed better than the synthetic triglyceride form.
One study by Lawson & Hughes in 1988 showed that 1 gram of EPA and 0.67 grams of DHA as natural triglycerides were absorbed 3.4 and 2.7 fold as well as the ethyl ester triglycerides.
In the previous article, we saw that fish oils were better absorbed when taken with a high-fat meal. In another study by Lawson & Hughes later the same year, they showed that the absorption of EPA & DHA from natural triglycerides improved from 69% with a low-fat meal (8g total fat) to 90% with a high-fat meal (44g total fat). Absorption of both EPA and DHA from ethyl ester oils was increased three-fold from 20% with a low-fat meal to 60% with a high-fat meal.
Sustainability
Our global fisheries are in dire straits, and fish oil is a big business. So, it’s crucial to choose a product that is manufactured with sustainability in mind and that has a fully transparent and traceable supply chain.
The easiest way to do this is to choose a product that is certified by organizations like Friend of the Sea or MarinTrust, two of the leading organizations for sustainable and responsible fishery management.
I would also choose a supplier/manufacturer with practices that minimize waste and its environmental impact.
For example, rather than catching fish that is only used to produce fish oil, some producers instead use fish meal to make the oil. This eliminates one of the main concerns about fish oil, which is that it will further deplete fisheries.
Recommendation
As a Functional Medicine clinician, author, and educator, I’ve been following the fish oil market closely for many years. I’ve used several different fish oils with my patients. I’ve read hundreds of studies on the purity, freshness, composition, and benefits of fish oil. I’ve spoken to industry experts and insiders, and I know what many companies do to cut corners and save money (at your expense).
When I started my own supplement company, Adapt Naturals, I knew that one of the first products we’d make would be fish oil. I wanted to create a product with the purest, freshest, and most sustainable fish oil available. And that’s exactly what we did with Bio-Avail Omega+.
I chose VivoOmega from GC Rieber as our fish oil. As the chart below illustrates, it significantly exceeds international standards for both purity and freshness.
Purity and freshness are critical. But I didn’t stop there. Most people who take fish oil are taking it to achieve certain outcomes, like better muscle and joint health, increased mental clarity, a more stable mood, clearer skin, and more balanced immune function.
So, when I formulated our fish oil product (Bio-Avail Omega+), I added the most bioavailable forms of two powerful nutrients that also support these goals: curcumin and black seed oil.
Now you can get the benefits of all three of these superfood nutrients in a single, two soft-gel daily serving.
Bio-Avail Omega+ contains an optimal composition of EPA and DHA (510 mg of EPA and 330 mg of DHA, a 3:2 ratio). It is made with triglyceride oils for optimal bioavailability and absorption. And it is produced with the most sustainable and traceable fish oil material in the industry. (See this page for more info.)
I’m proud of this product. It came directly out of my experience working with patients for 15 years and my extensive research into what is most important in a fish oil product. I hope it helps you to achieve your health goals!
Better supplementation. Fewer supplements.
Close the nutrient gap to feel and perform your best.
A daily stack of supplements designed to meet your most critical needs.
Hi! My pharmacist recomended me Pharma Nord 1000mg Bio-Fish oil. It hasn’t any fishy smell or taste but a light lemon one. The price is quite good, 20 € for a box of 120 gely caps. Any coments on that oil brand, please? I would like to know if I have made the right choice. I live in Spain and most of the brands you recomend are not available here. I used to take Neptune Krill Oil, but it’s terribly expensive here. I’m looking forward to geting a reply. Thanks a lot.
I don’t see anybody mentioning Larry King’s latest infomercial topic, Omega XL? Anyone?
As far as this product is concerned, if you absolutely hate money, and desire virtually zero Omega 3 benefits, I strongly encourage you to purchase this product. In fact, so does Larry.
The ETA in the Green Lipped Mussel makes it the most compelling anti-inflammatory our precious Earth has to offer.
The research is enormous and the benefits greater than all the other products put together.
The Omega XL is nonetheless in my opinion overpriced.
Dr. Newman:
My results do not support your bias views of the product you have a financial interest in. I doubt you even know what is ETA and its two isomers. Omega XL at least lists the content of their highly disputed GLM dietary supplement.
If you believe that Frezzor Black is not “snake oil” provide the readers with evidence of its contents. How is the GLM oil extracted for use in your product?
Obviously, you have not read my analysis that I put on http://www.omega-3snakeoil.com.
Pixe
Your tone wrings with engagement. You should always know to whom you write. Time will announce the winner. Personally, I like natural, clean and allow the body to use its innate intelligence. Unfortunately, time is not your friend and alliances to faulty concepts derails the best of us. Good luck Pixie. I will not respond to you again.
Dr. Newman:
I am just trying to balance my comments with the information you are posting. No tone of engagement on my part and I am just clarifying what your marketing is trying to get across.
As I said previously, do your due diligence on the product that you are trying to sell and hype.
Also, since this product is sold in the USA, why don’t you have on file with the FDA a New Dietary Ingredient Notification for the dietary ingredients in Frezzor Black. Is this product exempt from an NDI?
Please don’t miss the point to have the product tested for the contents on the label. How do we the consumer know what is actually in the product?
Best of luck selling your product.
Pixe
Your snake oil comments on Frezzor need to be amended as you have initiated your analysis on what appears to be damaged product.
You say you received Frezzor from amazon. May I suggest that you get it from the manufacturer before you lambast any product.
When I evaluate a product, I like to send a sample to Brunswick Laboratories and get a full unbiased analysis.
What is the totox?
What is the ORAC ( after processing)?
What is the lipid profile and does it have the elusive ETA?
Did it ever occur to you that your lack of adequate investigating could do more harm than good. Which I understand is not your intention.
DO IT AND GIVE THIS BOARD A REVISION.
Thanks for the comment and I am awaiting another sample. However, this does not take away from the label contents of undisclosed amounts of the various components.
Pixe
Occasionally the pursuit of the extraordinary needs to be voiced.
One piece of the puzzle is the extraction process that you queried.
The extraction process of Frezzor is Sub-critical CO2 extraction.
I am not an industrial scientist so your conclusions will be your own.
This is the ONLY free fatty acid product I know that uses this process of extraction.
It is slow and costly, but provides a cleaner end product. Interestingly, this process is able to extract the Astaxanthin in the Green Lipped Mussel while the Super critical does not.
Frezzor is on a mission whose excellence sometimes goes beyond first impressions.
The closer you look, the more apparent the differences.
Dr. Newman:
The term eicosatetraenoic acid (ETA) or C20:4 contains twenty carbons with four double bonds and the molecular formula is: C20H32O2. . There are two known isomers that depend on the locations of the double bond. In marine organisms, the isomer with trivial name arachidonic acid (AA), is a polyunsaturated omega-6 fatty acid 20:4(n-6) or all cis 5,8,11,14-Eicosatetraenoic acid. This is the same isomer that is in many human tissues and in the blood. As a result, measurements of ETA are reporting arachidonic acid (AA). The other isomer (all cis 8,11,14,17-eicosatetraenoic acid) is 20:4(n-3) is an omega-3 acid found in very low concentrations in marine organisms and is very difficult to measure because it is an isomer of the more abundant AA. This is the isomer that is supposed to give the green lipped mussel its anti-inflammatory function. Another isomer reported in GLM is all cis 7, 11, 14 , 17-eicosatetraenoic acid. However, because these dietary supplements contain about 50-mg of GLM per softgel, the amount of this ETA isomer is extremely small and very difficult to isolate and prove that it exists. Therefore, reports of ETA in GLM are really reporting arachidonic acid.
Pixe
The amount of free fatty acids (FFA) in marine organisms is a sign of lipolysis and a rancid product. For the GLM, the high concentrations of FFA sometimes approaching 30% reflect poor processing and spoilage of the oil. The folks that eat GLM eat them raw immediately after being caught to get the maximum therapeutic properties that GLM may offer. However, the benchmarked product is OmegaXL for which there have been several clinical trials that have demonstrated some efficacy in taking high doses that are much higher than the serving size on the bottle of two capsules. There are no clinical trials for Frezzor as of this writing and perhaps the marketing of the product is based on the results of OmegXL’s clinical trials.
I have no connection or financial interest in OmegaXL or to any other GLM product or any dietary supplements or food companies, etc. OmegaXL has worked for those in the infomercial but for the average person, there have been many complaints that it does not work and the product has been called “snake oil”. If there are many complaints of OmegaXL with 50-mg of GLM stated in the supplement facts, how can one trust a product (Frezzor) that does not list how much GLM is in the product. In addition, what is the source of the GLM and how is it extracted. If supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) CO2 is being used, then this maybe a violation of the patent holder Pharmalink International Limited US Patent 6,083,536 issued July 4, 2000. Then, consumers should ask the question why isn’t the method of Frezzor’s GLM extraction method listed on the bottle like OmegaXL.
As a watchdog of dietary supplements, care should be exercised before purchasing a product. Know your rights under DSHEA. Companies selling dietary supplements should have the burden of proof of showing that the contents of the softgels correspond to what is on the label. If a new dietary ingredient (NDI) is being used in a dietary supplement that was not used before October 1994, then the manufacturer of the NDI must have their NDI vetted by the FDA to be sure the product is safe before being introduced into US commerce.
Pixe
Thanks for the chemistry 101 tutorial.
20:4 Arachidonic (n6)
20:4 Arachidonic (n3) ETA
The ETA is difficult to isolate so your position is ?????
You speak of the potential for rancidity and I could not agree with you more.
But my position is that I am equally concerned about a product being rancid pre-ingestion as well as the long chained fatty acids oxidizing internally.
Again, the totox of Frezzor is below 7, which you FAILED to investigate. I do not like doing your homework.
And lastly,my directive to you is the same as my previous post.. Go to Brunswick Labs. They do not seem to have a problem isolating ETA from the Frezzor Omega 3 Black.
I just read your blog, and it’s filled with many factual inaccuracies. For example, you state that supplements without manufacturing dates or expiration dates violate DSHEA. Perhaps you might wish to know that neither are a requirement of DSHEA and they are optional.
See IX Subpart E, B, 3 here http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/DietarySupplements/ucm238182.htm
Additionally, ethyl ester fish oils are Old Dietary Ingredients and do not require and NDI.
I appreciate your desire to dig into the regs, but do so correctly please.
Truth Seeker:
How can omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters be a dietary ingredient when they do not meet the definition? Since ethyl esters are not “a component of food”, they are not a dietary ingredient. They are not in food and are synthetic chemical compounds.
In addition, there are no Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) ethyl ester omega-3 fatty acids. Consumers can go to http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=GRASNotices to search all of the 572 GRNs and there are no ethyl ester omega-3s. Specifically, all the GRAS products are TAGs such as natural products salmon oil, tuna oil, krill oil, menhaden oil, algae oil, and fish oil (OmegaPC, from Enzymotec). See http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=GRASNotices&id=539 then go to page 23 that list all the marine based GRAS notifications that can be used in food. Remember, dietary supplements are food per DSHEA.
There is a self proclaimed GRAS from Ocean Nutrition for their 30/20 ethyl ester omega-3 fatty acids that was not vetted by the FDAs GRAS process.
The GRAS notifications are an excellent source of consumer information if you need to know how a product is manufactured and how the natural TAG based biological oils are extracted and purified from marine organisms.
Therefore, how are ethyl esters omega-3 fatty acids GRAS?
Also, all of the NDIs (new dietary ingredients) that had no objections are TAG based products. Consumers should read NDI 819 Tersus Pharmaceuticals that was rejected by the FDA in their 75-day pre-market evaluation of the dietary ingredient Provinal that is the fatty acid ethyl esters synthesized from fish oil.
The burden of proof that a dietary ingredient is unsafe is on the FDA and the FDA has spoken. The FDA writes: “Based on the information in your submission, it is unclear if “fatty acid esters, derived from anchovy or menhaden oil”, which you intend to market under the trade name Provinal™ is a “dietary ingredient” within the meaning of21 U.S.C. 321(ff)(l). For example, synthetic fish oil fatty acid ethyl esters do not fit within the statutory definition of “dietary ingredient” because they are not constituents of a dietary substance for use by man under section 201(ff)(l)(F).”. FDA continues, “Therefore, your product may be adulterated under 21 U.S.C. 342(f)(1)(B) as a dietary supplement that contains a new dietary ingredient for which there is inadequate information to provide reasonable assurance that such ingredient does not
present a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury. Introduction of such a product into interstate commerce is prohibited under 21 U.S.C. 331 (a) and (v).”
So, according to the FDA, synthetic fish oil ethyl esters are not a dietary ingredient. Since most of the “fish oil” products on the market are misbranded and are ethyl esters, one should question the safety of synthetic fish oil knockoffs.
Just do a search of fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEE) and you will see that they are linked to organ damage. The subject of FAEE has been studied extensively for alcoholics. Many of the misbranded “fish oil” products on the market contain these same FAEE and particularly saturated fatty acid ethyl esters.
Another great source of consumer information is the 75-Day Premarket Notifications for New Dietary Ingredients that describe in detail (if released reports) how dietary supplements (dietary ingredients) are manufactured and why the FDA has objections. You can read and subscribe to all the latest NDIs at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FDA-2014-S-0023
I have nothing against omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters. However, many omega-3 fatty ethyl esters products are masquerading as “fish oil” and they contain the active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) in FDA approved drugs such as Lovaza (and its generics) and Vascepa. As such, consumers are missing the prescribing information and warning notes that accompany these products.
Stay informed and know your rights (DSHEA cGMP) as a consumer so that you are not victimized by bogus synthetic fish oil knockoffs.
Pixe
None of this is relevant, because fish oil ethyl esters were sold prior to DSHEA, which according to DSHEA and the last draft of the New Dietary Ingredient proposed rule, makes them old dietary ingredients. Old Dietary Ingredients are legally grandfathered in as legal dietary supplements.
So, EE fish oils are therefore actually recognized as dietary ingredients by FDA (even if they don’t know it yet) because they were present in the “food” supply prior to DSHEA. Paperwork to prove this exists and is held by leading trade organizations. There is no debating this, it is fact.
Ultimately, FDA has no legal authority to remove EE fish oils from the market, which is presumably why they have not done so.
In the case of Provinol, the simple fact that FDA was notified of this New Dietary Ingredient now means that the tables have turned and they would now have to PROVE that Provinol is unsafe before removing it from the market. The simple act of filing an NDI, even if FDA objects, causes this to be true, and FDA could not just invoke 402(f)(1)(B) to take it off the market because the submitting company has notified FDA. This letter is an “Inadequate Evidence Letter”, not a “Not a Dietary Ingredient” Letter. FDA may try and push their stance once the revised NDI draft is published, but they will lose because the law is against them and the proof of this is readily available.
None of this is ultimately relevant, because fish oil ethyl esters were sold prior to DSHEA, which according to DSHEA and the last draft of the New Dietary Ingredient proposed rule, makes them old dietary ingredients. Old Dietary Ingredients are legally grandfathered in as legal dietary supplements. This is how the law was written.
So, EE fish oils ARE therefore actually recognized as dietary ingredients by FDA (even if they may not know it yet) because they were present in the “food” supply prior to DSHEA. Paperwork to prove this exists and is held by leading trade organizations. There is no debating this, it is fact.
Ultimately, FDA has no legal authority to remove EE fish oils from the market, which is presumably why they have not done so.
In the case of Provinol, the simple fact that FDA was notified of this New Dietary Ingredient now means that the tables have turned and they would now have to PROVE that Provinol is unsafe before removing it from the market. The simple act of filing an NDI, even if FDA objects, causes this to be true, and FDA could not just invoke 402(f)(1)(B) to take it off the market because the submitting company has notified FDA. This letter is an “Inadequate Evidence Letter”, not a “Not a Dietary Ingredient” Letter. FDA may try and push their stance once the revised NDI draft is published, but they will lose because the law is against them and the proof of this is readily available.
I found this GRAS acceptance for Provinol fish oil ethyl esters on the FDA website. Am I missing something? FDA has actually accepted fish oil ethyl esters as GRAS.
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=GRASNotices&id=494&sort=GRN_No&order=DESC&startrow=1&type=basic&search=ethyl%20ester
You can read the submission here http://www.fda.gov/ucm/groups/fdagov-public/@fdagov-foods-gen/documents/document/ucm386773.pdf
Truth Seeker:
Can you provide proof of “fish oil” or “omega-3 acid” dietary supplements that contained EPA and DHA ethyl esters that were marketed before October 1994? What were the names of these dietary supplements and does the supplement facts list the “dietary ingredients” as “ethyl esters”? I am aware that MaxEPA, was TAG and I believe that this was the first “fish oil” that was available as a prescription and was sold in the UK as a drug. There were some fish oil omega-3 methyl esters dietary supplements that I believe were marketed but later removed because of concerns of toxic residual methanol.
Pixe
Most of the proof is held by the companies that sold EE fish oils, but both the NNFA (now NPA) and CRN have lists of grandfathered ingredients.
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/DOCKETS/dockets/05p0305/05p-0305-cr00001-03-NNFA-List-vol1.pdf
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/05p0305/05p-0305-cr00001-04-Council-For-Responsible-Nutrition-vol1.pdf
While I don’t have a link to show that these fish oils were sold in the EE form, I am 100% positive that EPA and DHA EE’s were indeed sold as “fish oil” prior to DSHEA.
Truth Seeker:
Thanks for your guidance and I did some research and now have a list of all the fish oil dietary supplements sold before 1994. Interesting about MaxEPA which was the first prescription fish oil and was sold in the UK. You can still purchase this product today in the US.
Also, as you said it is irrelevant that omega-3 acid ethyl esters are not GRAS. I still contend that there are no omega-3 acid ethyl esters that are GRAS . There is one self acclaimed GRAS for 30/20 ethyl esters that the company did not submit to FDA and there is no details on the product like those submitted to the FDA and are available to the public. The Provinal product is not Omega-3 acid ethyl esters as I contend that there are no GRAS submissions. As you pointed out, this is not relevant. Having GRAS status is still no guarantee that the food additive can’t be recalled later or as has happened in the past, the GRAS submitter removed their product from commerce because the product caused health problems in consumers using the food with the ingredient.
Then, since the FDA objected to the NDI for Provinal, it seems to me that DSHEA is useless in that the ingredient maker puts the product into interstate commerce anyway. Then, why bother submitting an NDI when the submitter has the attitude “so what” and puts the product into interstate commerce even though the FDA concludes that the product is unsafe. It would then suggests that the owner of the NDI is putting the consumer at risk, my opinion. Then, would you purchase a dietary supplement that has an NDI that the FDA says is unsafe? I would probably guess that most consumers don’t care what the FDA (government) is saying and purchase the product anyway.
Pixe
FDA objected to the Provinol NDI application because it was incomplete/insufficient, not because they felt the ingredient was unsafe. Very few NDIs are accepted the first time around. Most have to be filed multiple times to be accepted.
FDA accepted a GRAS application for the Provinol material (as stated above), which precludes the requirement to file an NDI. A company needs to obtain EITHER a GRAS status or an approved NDI, not both. Since Provinol is GRAS, it IS legal for sale in the US and an NDI is no longer needed.
If Provinol is an ethyl ester fatty acid from fish, and has GRAS status, please explain to me how or why any other fatty acid ethyl ester from fish would suddenly be unsafe? Your argument is that the ethanol moiety itself is harmful, yet the GRAS acceptance by FDA says otherwise. Once the fatty acid is absorbed, whether it be an Omega-3 or an Omega-7, it is metabolized the same way by the body. The only difference the fatty acid itself makes is its’ nutritional qualities.
Also, that ODI list is not complete in that it doesn’t list every single variant, brand or type of material that was sold prior to DSHEA. In other words, there were many other fish oils sold prior to 1994 besides those listed.
If you want more concrete proof of their ODI status, simply call EPAX in Norway and ask them if they sold ethyl ester raw materials to the US prior to 1994. They will confirm that they’ve been selling them to the US market since at least the early 1980s.
Truth Seeker:
Thanks for your knowledge.
US Patent 8,703,818 B2 April 2014 for “COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS COMPRISING C16:1N7-PALMITOLEATE”, Provinal
“The batches of crude oil (anchovy or menhaden) first had
substantially all C20:5n3 eicosapentaenoic acid and C22:6n3 docosahexaenoic acid removed according to methods generally known to one of ordinary skill.
The resulting oil was deacidified (e.g., by treatment with base or an aqueous basic wash) and, optionally, bleached. The deacidified product was treated with ethanol and acid (e.g., HCl) to convert substantially all of the fatty acid derivatives into ethyl esters.”
This suggests that the raw material was the oil left over from molecular distillation of the crude fish oil.
The review of the Provinal NDIN 819 by the FDA states: “Based on the information in your submission, it is unclear if “fatty acid esters, derived from anchovy or menhaden oil”, which you intend to market under the trade name Provinal™ is a “dietary ingredient” within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. 321(ff)(l ). For example, synthetic fish oil fatty acid ethyl esters do not fit within the statutory definition of “dietary ingredient” because they are not constituents of a dietary substance for use by man under section 201(ff)(l )(F). Therefore, FDA cannot determine, at this time, whether your product contains a dietary ingredient that may lawfully be marketed as a dietary supplement.”
I am not questioning whether omega-3 ethyl esters are ODIs, I am pointing out that the dietary ingredient Provinal (the ethyl ester of palmitoleic acid, CAS# 56219-10-4) is not in fish oil. It is a synthetic chemical compound made from fish oil or macadamia nut oil as described in the above patent. In the evaluation of the “incomplete/insufficient”
NDI, FDA states: “For the reasons discussed above, the information in your submission does not provide an adequate basis to conclude that the dietary supplement containing “Provinal™”, when used under the conditions recommended or suggested in the labeling of your product , will reasonably be expected to be safe. Therefore, your product may be adulterated under 21 U.S.C. 342(f)(l)(B) as a dietary supplement that contains a new dietary ingredient for which there is inadequate information to provide reasonable assurance that such ingredient does not present a significant or unreasonable risk of illness or injury. Introduction of such a product into interstate commerce is prohibited under 21 U.S.C. 331(a) and (v).”
Interesting ingredient (Provinal) in which FDA’s review concludes it is not safe whereas the GRAS committee of “panel of experts” concludes it is safe. In addition, GRAS 494 states: “Provinal™ contains ethyl ester forms of fatty acids isolated from anchovy or menhaden oil.” It would be nice to know who are the “panel of experts” that think this statement is true.
Therefore, is Provinal safe or or unsafe for its intended use based on two different reviews?
Thanks for your expert truth and knowledge.
Pixe
Truth Seeker:
I looked over the list that I have and compared it with the ones you submitted. There is no omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters on the list.
I gather for my list “THIS LIST MAY NOT BE TOTALLY INCLUSIVE” that some items are left off. Fish oil and other edible oils are listed as well as omega-3, EPA and DHA but no chemical compounds of EPA and DHA ethyl esters.
Probably because consumers think that the active moieties EPA and DHA is all that is required and not the chemical compounds supplying the actives. That is great because one could make any compounds that contain EPA and DHA and sell them as dietary supplements. For example, Pb salts (soaps) of EPA and DHA and any other substituent that I could synthesize and make omega-3 derivatives would be legally sold as a dietary supplement today even though such a compound did not exist before DSHEA. Back to the laboratory.
Anyway, it is probably irrelevant that omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters are not on the list since FDA does not officially recognize the list anyway. The main point is that omega-3 acid ethyl esters are here to stay. I wish that the dietary supplements with these ingredients be properly labeled so that us senior citizens know what we are taking in case a conflict with other medications.
It is great to see the iconic “fish oil” brand is on the list and no “chemically altered” fish oil.
The toxicity of the compound delivering the active moiety is also important. One of the supplement marketers was selling (in the 1980s?) omega-3 fatty acid methyl esters (Pharmacaps) but switched to the less toxic alkyl esters of ethanol. Because these were sold before DSHEA, they would probably still be on the market today as ODIs and sold as “fish oil” without consumers knowing the true identity of the dietary ingredients.
Thanks for your expertise.
Pixe
PIXE:
You keep referencing the toxicity of ethyl esters, yet you haven’t offered any scientific evidence of such an effect. Where are you getting this information on their supposed toxicity? Can you please link to studies or epidemiological data?
Omega XL is a product that uses a clean natural source to procure its oil.
They use a super critical CO2 extraction process that captures many of the free fatty acids and leaves behind the proteins ( to which some are allergic ) and other toxic substances.
They add 60% pharmaceutical grade olive oil to cut the sludge of the Green Lipped Mussel.
Most Doctors dispense this as the natural anti-inflammatory of choice. Unfortunately, Frezzor Omega-3 Black is the premier Omega-3 Green Lipped Mussel product that is still below the radar.
All of the before mentioned products pale in any comparison.
Dr. Newman:
Your statement: “Unfortunately, Frezzor Omega-3 Black is the premier Omega-3 Green Lipped Mussel product that is still below the radar.
All of the before mentioned products pale in any comparison.” should be backed up with proof.
Pixe
Too bad their oil has been molecularly distilled before it is supercritically distilled.
Hello Kris,
I’ve read great reviews about Vergin Cod Liver oil produced by Rosita Real foods in Norway…
http://evclo.com/
What do you think about it?
Thanks in advance!
Gabriella
I would also like to know what Chris thinks about EVCLO.com 700mg of DHA per teaspoon!
FATTY ACID CONTENT
Wild & Raw EVCLO contains a wide spectrum of fatty acids including omega 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 11 etc. The test data for select fatty acids of the total lipid content are shown below. Levels of other fatty acids not shown are available on request.
SAMPLE ID mg/teaspoon
Wild & Raw EVCLO
20:5n-3 (EPA) 510
22:6n-3 (DHA) 700
18:1n-9 (Oleic acid) 1,200
20:1n-9 (Gadoleic acid)* 660
22:1n-11 (Cetoleic acid)* 375
Fatty acids, Sum of Omega 6 Calc. 160
Fatty acids, Sum of Omega 3 Calc. 1,460
Unidentified fatty acids 240
My mom takes 1 Schiff MegaReds, 500mg a day. She is 91. She is running out of them and wants me to get more. I want to do that the best for her so are these good quality? She likes them because they are small and there is no fishy after taste.
Dawn:
Your grandmother survived all these years without the low EPA and DHA found in MegaRed. In fact, there is a class action lawsuit against MegaRed for false advertisement. Here is the link to the complaint. https://www.truthinadvertising.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Sultan-v-Schiff-cmpt.pdf
You may want to look at a new product launched by Nordic Naturals to compete with the krill oil folks. The product is omega-3 phospholipids. http://www.nordicnaturals.com/en/Products/Product_Details/514/?ProdID=1723
124 mg EPA, 137 mg DHA per capsule.
I must caution you about this product since there is no 75-day pre-market notification for a New Dietary Ingredient Notification (NDIN) on file for this product with the FDA. Therefore, the product maybe adulterated according to the Dietary Supplement Education and Health Act (DSHEA) of 1994.
Pixe
Thanks for the information!
i was only in search of a good comparison of my brand Norwegian Gold Critical Omega versus Omega Red. Krill Oil so could someone just give an average consumer seeking the best anti inflammatory benefits the truth! The average consumer would be so confused by all the research in this article and the comments from Pixie, And Newman, and Truth Seeker, we just want a laymans understanding on best choice,because we are not scientist, medical research students nor manufactures/distributors of products. Please honestly weigh in on Norwegian Gild. Critical Omega versus Krill oil. Thank You
Also, keep an eye out for Almega PL products which are just now starting to hit the market. They are vegetarian-sourced and rich in EPA in a phospholid form. Basically, more potent than krill oil with the exact same absorption benefits, while being MUCH less expensive.
Krill is oil is a waste of money.
Dear TruthSeeker,
It appears from one of Almega PL’s linked retail web sites, that 1 capsule of Almega PL contains 200mg DHA, 100mg EPA, and 1mg Astaxanthin. 1 serving = 2 capsules, so, per serving one receives 400mg DHA, 200mg EPA, and 2mg Astaxanthin. At a Sale Price of $46.78 (Full Retail Price = $59.97) for 60 caps, or, 30 day supply, each serving costs a minimum of $1.56 per serving.
Do you consider that to be an inexpensive product, and why? What additional considerations do you believe should be taken into account when buying as expensive a product as Almega PL?
The product you describe contains more than Almega PL, which is why the price is so high. That’s not the best comparator.
This product is an example of one that’s more reasonably priced http://www.drdavidwilliams.com/product/almega-pl-vegetarian-epa. One capsule daily, for a total daily cost of $0.33 per day. This is much cheaper than this krill oil http://www.walgreens.com/store/c/schiff-megared-omega-3-krill-oil-1000-mg-ultra-strength-softgels/ID=prod6196336-product.
Personally, I just take fish oil because I think the “science” behind krill oil is not valid. Fish oils are perfectly well absorbed. However, I’d take Almega PL over krill oil any day of the week.
The market is just barely beginning to establish itself. Keep on the lookout for more choices soon.
I recently ordered OMAX-3 ultra pure soft gels. $1/ pill. Do you know of this product? Is it worth the price? Dr. Maroon, a Pittsburgh physician is affiliated with this product. Thanks for your input.
I had to go to several sites to find out the concentrations of EPA and DHA in this product. The manufacturer is very vague on this item. Here’s the numbers: 1178mg EPA and 280mg DHA. Now, that is for TWO capsules which means about 590 EPA , 140 DHA per capsule. At a price of $1 per day, that is a total and complete rip off. There is far better value elsewhere with the same or better quality characteristics.
Mary:
Omax-3 is a drug according to its US patent 7,652,068 that states among others: “The invention also provides methods of using the dosage forms to treat a variety of cardiovascular, autoimmune, inflammatory, and central nervous system disorders by administering a formulation of the invention to a patient in need thereof.” This patent statement contradicts the products disclaimer “This statement has not been evaluated by the FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.”
In addition, the company does not have on file with the FDA a New Dietary Ingredient Notification (NDIN) for its patented formulae to be used in a dietary supplement. As such, the product maybe adulterated. Also, the product contains the same active pharmaceutical ingredients EPA-ethyl ester, and DHA-ethyl ester that are in the FDA approved drugs Lovaza, Vascepa, and Lovaza generics (Teva, etc. omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters). It is unclear how these companies can lace their synthetic omega-3 fatty acid dietary supplements with FDA drug substances since Lovaza (Omacor) has been in the public domain (investigative new drug (IND) application long before this company came into existence.
In my opinion, it is not fair to the TAG products that use the iconic name “fish oil” that is legitimate whereas all those misbranded products with “fish oil” that contain the synthetic omega-3 ethyl esters are cheating. They contain undeclared FDA drug substances in high doses that may pose a risk to your health.
Also, Omax-3, according to its US patent, is synthesized by reacting good quality natural fish oil (TAG) by boiling it with car battery acid (H2SO4, sulfuric acid) and then extracting the ethyl esters with the hazardous solvent hexane. “For example, crude fish oil may be diluted with ethanol,
and then refluxed in the presence of catalytic amounts of
concentrated sulfuric acid. After extraction with hexane, the
transesterication mixture is subjected to silica gel
chromatography, then to a two-step molecular distillation process, with a vacuum of about 10-3 mm Hg and at an evaporation temperature ranging from 65°-70 o C. to 1050-125 o C. and a condenser at 50 C.”
However,if you are suffering from baldness, this product may help as a treatment as outlined in the patent. Additional claims in the patent include “Improvement in Cognition, Attention, and Tics After Treatment With Omax3.”
I hope this helps.
Pixe
Omega-3 ethyl esters are GRAS, and therefore don’t require an NDI. Additionally, they were sold prior to DSHEA and are considered old dietary ingredients (grandfathered).
Try to give accurate information next time, please.
Truth Seeker:
There are no omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters that are in the FDA vetted GRAS inventory. Just because they were sold before DSHEA does make them ODIs.
See the latest FDA GRAS inventory of 572 products at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=GRASNotices
I appreciate your fact checking and the truth you seek.
Pixe
There is no vitamin C in the FDA vetted GRAS category, and there doesn’t need to be, because both vitamin C and fish oil EEs are Old Dietary Ingredients.
Why would a self-affirmed GRAS need to be vetted by FDA if it is for an Old Dietary Ingredient? That makes no sense.
Truth Seeker:
Thanks for clarity. I don’t get your argument that EE are ODI and are grandfathered in. They are not a “component of food”. Where in food are omega-3 fatty acid ethyl esters? Great debate and I am just trying to uncover the truth. In addition, there are all different formulations for EE fish oils. Are you saying that a product with dietary substances 30/20, 18/12, and other formulations don’t need NDIs? Are you saying that no matter what the combinations of omega-3 acid ethyl esters as a dietary ingredient substance, they do not need NDIs is very interesting. That means that a dietary supplement with 1/2 (EPA, DHA) i.e. 3% OM3 and 94-97% other fatty acid ethyl esters does not need NDI. Is it the substance (entire mixture) that is being submitted for NDIs and not the individual chemical compounds EPA-EE and DHA-EE?
I am not trying to get EE removed from the marketplace and my comments are for truth in labeling of the “fish oil” regardless of whether they are NDIs.
Many of the fish oil dietary supplements are not labeled as having ethyl esters and are misleading to the consumer so that they know what they are purchasing.
Thanks for your perspective and expert knowledge.
Pixe
Any dietary ingredient (i.e. raw material in a dietary supplement) sold prior to DSHEA is automatically grandfathered in as an Old Dietary Ingredient and indirectly “approved” for continued distribution by FDA unless proven to be unsafe by FDA. EE “fish oils” of various EPA/DHA ratios were part of the “food” supply (in that they were sold as dietary ingredients in dietary supplements in the US) prior to October 15th 1994.
The simple fact that omega-3 EEs were sold in various ratios and concentrations prior to DHSEA automatically proves that they are ODIs under the law.
Additionally, the processes under which these ODIs are manufactured has really changed much since this time, so they would not be considered NDIs.
FDA has shown interest in taking the stance that everything is an NDI if any tiny little change has occurred ever, but they will lose this battle in time. They’ve already withdrawn the first draft of the proposed NDI guidelines because they knew it.
There is a difference between what FDA wants and what the LAW says they will get.
I meant to say…
the processes under which these ODIs are manufactured has NOT really changed much since this time, so they would not be considered NDIs.
Can anybody let us folks in the UK know what our best option is for products that can be ordered in the UK?
Not a link to a selection of products on Amazon but a simple link to the best product we can purchase from.
Would love if there was a liquid fish oil option but would settle for caps.
Suggest that you contact this company: [email protected].
They have a very high concentration liquid fish oil, 2200 EPA / 1100 DHA. Pricy, but very good product. i believe they ship to Europe.
If you are looking for or interested in a “pure” EPA 90%, rTG, capsules, 500mg EPA per capsule/suggested serving = 2 caps = 1k milligrams, I can highly recommend Igennus’ Pharmepa STEP 1:RESTORE. 60 caps per box, a 30-day supply when taken 2X a day.
I have been taking Pharmepa STEP 1:RESTORE for over 6 months and my experience has been excellent to outstanding. No fish burping in my case. Digests well, and helps as it is designed to help, correcting Triglycerides, relieving symptoms of depression/mild to severe, unipolar, and bipolar, depression, and mania, assists in proper weight regulation, and is anti-inflammatory (in my case, to my astonishment, arthritis osteo pain, soreness, and inhibited joint mobility, have reversed and, very gradually over a period of weeks to months, my joints appear actually to be healing. In any event, the negative symptoms have abated palpably. In regard to pain soreness arthritis benefits, I also take Innovix Labs Purified ‘Omega-7’ Palmitoleic Acid 210mg. 30 caps 1 cap 1X day. Palmitoleic Acid, according to the label, is also powerfully anti-inflammatory. It feels to me as if this product, in conjunction with EPA, enhances the anti-inflammatory effect from taking EPA, like a possible synergy of the two taken together; but that is just my speculation, and I haven’t read anywhere of research testing that hypothesis, EPA + Palmitoleic Acid, for arthritis pain and soreness.
Igennus Ltd., St. John’s Innovation Centre, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 OWS, UK. http://www.igennus.com, [email protected], 0845 1300 424 local rate charges, or from abroad +44 1223 421434
mercenary of me to ask, but if you wouldn’t mind mentioning my name, Tom (Thomas) Gossard, I would appreciate it very much, and, I might somewhat on, earn some extra credit points toward ordering my own Igennus Pharmepa STEP 1:RESTORE Thank You!
Oh, and just to be clear, STEP 1:RESTORE formerly was an Ethyl Ester process Omega-3 product. However, about 3 months or so back I noticed that the package labeling stated it was rTG. I emailed a sales representative to confirm any change, and they said ‘yes, we did change the ingredients in our STEP 1:RESTORE, to rTG form “because many of our customers have expressed interest in our doing so”
I don’t want to weigh in too heavily in this blog’s ongoing “controversy” about whether rTG rTAG (re-esterified triglycerides) process fish oil and fish oil caps, is superior to Ethyl Ester products, BUT my understanding is, leave aside that Ethyl Ester fish oil melts styrofoam, which is simply because the ethanol process used to effect separation of EPA/DHA from the fish oil, is a solvent, one which as it happens dissolves styrofoam (or, put another way, styrofoam happens to be soluble in ethyl alcohol, causing the styrofoam to dissolve and ‘melt’ away); Ethyl Ester and rTG (or rTAG) are equally effective. There might be differing side effects between products which are Ethyl Ester when compared to rTG/rTAG, but in any case, for either, side effects are usually mild.
As if you hadn’t read enough already, consideration definitely needs to apply to differences between EE Ethyl Ester, and rTG/rTAG, in how and at what rates the respective products are absorbed through the colon, in which respect rTG/rTAG are more readily absorbed than Ethyl Ester forms. However, that fact does not count as a deficiency of Ethyl Ester, instead it means *it will take somewhat longer* for the Ethyl Ester form, compared to rTG/rTAG forms. in order to reach a maintenance level concentration of EPA (eicosapentaenoic acid), and DHA (docosahexaenoic acid), in the blood stream; which is the objective.
Either form is absorbed better when taken with food than alone, but Ethyl Ester is better absorbed with food, preferably a fatty meal, e.g. fatty fish, or including other saturated fatty foods, such as butter, whole milk, eggs, etc.. I’m not clear whether unsaturated fats would serve as well in this regard than saturated — perhaps another commenter could enlighten on the question, saturated vs unsaturated fat for best absorption. /Tom Gossard
Polystyrene is not dissolved by ethanol. If it was, people couldn’t drink alcoholic beverages from these cups (but they can). Polystyrene melts with EE fish oils due to polarity.
You can also melt polystyrene with orange/lemon peels. https://www.usc.edu/CSSF/History/2012/Projects/J1001.pdf
Yes. I confirmed the nature of the chemical interaction betw. styrofoam and ethanol somewhere else, after researching the issue for myself.
Due to my 1) very limited fixed income; 2) availability of Vascepa 1000mg EPA Ethyl Ester (from the product label) Capsules, by Dr’s. prescription; finally, 3) for treatment of Bipolar Major Depression difficult to treat, I must take 1g capsule 4 times a day. This is adjunct to treatment with anti-depressant and mood stabilizing meds. Works well, to my complete amazement, and my arthritis soreness and inhibited joint mobility have improved and are improving greatly.
If somebody needs to take large doses of EPA only, Vascepa with prescription insurance (Medicare, for example) is the way to go, imo.
Vascepa is a waste of money if you DON’T have insurance. And even if you do, you’re just contributing to increased insurance costs over time. These EPA-only fish oils are less expensive and should do the exact same thing:
http://www.vitacost.com/carlson-elite-epa-gems
http://www.amazon.com/OmegaVia-Pharmaceutical-Omega-3-Triglyceride-form-Capsules/dp/B00D37S0HC
http://www.renewlife.com/norwegian-gold-epa-1000-omega.html
Thank you very much, ‘Truth Seeker,’ for your helpful suggestions and guidance re: EPA, and, Vascepa, specifically. My being on fixed low-income status in Kaiser Advantage, was such that I could obtain 1 bottle for less than $10, initially. However, if I continue with the drug, taking as I do 1000mg X 4 caps minimum per day, there will be a copay which I understand might be as much as full retail price, or $229.00/mo. Medicare (not) covered, which at my fixed low income is simply put 0.00% possible!
I probably will opt for Omega-Via 500, 120 caplets 2bottles, which will run me about $60/mo. At least it is within bounds of the possible! Also, Omega-Via appears to be the most bang for the buck, given its very high quality specifications.
I am happy to find more high value high reputation brands selling a near-100% Pure EPA. And, I believe their product is rTG as well, though that doesn’t seem to me now to be a significant distinction compared to Ethyl Ester, taken long term. That, too, is very good news!
Thanks again for responding so quickly and valuably. Sincerely, Tom Gossard
Thank you very much, ‘Truth Seeker,’ for your helpful suggestions and guidance re: EPA, and, Vascepa, specifically. My being on fixed low-income status in Kaiser Advantage, was such that I could obtain 1 bottle for less than $10, initially. However, if I continue with the drug, taking as I do 1000mg X 4 caps minimum per day, there will be a copay which I understand might be as much as full retail price, or $229.00/mo. Medicare (not) covered, which at my fixed low income is simply put 0.00% possible!
I probably will opt for Omega-Via 500, 120 caplets 2bottles, which will run me about $60/mo. At least it is within bounds of the possible! Also, Omega-Via appears to be the most bang for the buck, given its very high quality specifications.
I am happy to find more high value high reputation brands selling a near-100% Pure EPA. And, I believe their product is rTG as well, though that doesn’t seem to me now to be as significant a distinction compared to Ethyl Ester, taken long term. That, too, is very good news!
Thanks again for responding so quickly and valuably. Sincerely, Tom Gossard
I do have one additional question, which is what is the meaning of say, Omega-Via being, 87% EPA, vs Vascepa 96% EPA?
If there were good reason to prefer a higher concentration, I would probably buy Igennus’ STEP 1:RESTORE, which according to their website http://www.igennus.com, 90% EPA, and rTG.
I don’t personally find those differences in EPA percentage to be significant. All of the previously linked products provide an abundance of EPA in a single softgel, which is what matters. The small percentage of non-EPA fatty acids in these products is insignificant in my opinion.
Barlean’s Organic Oils do have great products with high recommendations. I would have bought these had it not been for one small detail: last ingredient is “Caramel Color”.
I’m a wildlife photographer whom has contracted Lyme’s Disease that lead me to be bed ridden for two years. I am finally starting to recover with the proper treatments.
90% of my treatments are a barrage of natural high grade supplements and implementing a non SAD (Standard American Diet) approach to eating. This way of life has lead me to a years worth of in depth research on the SAD.
At the end, it all came down to a few simple steps that are so complicated in the SAD. No sugar, no grain (please note that corn is a grain not a vegetable and contrary to recent advertising it is virtually impossible to find non-GMO corn, as the true original form of corn [which is tiny in comparison to todays monstrosities] is basically non existent to consumers and only a couple of study facilities world wide have been able to keep a sample of real corn), all organic, natural, non-GMO, and no synthetic man made anything (which seems to be in everything).
One such synthetic chemical is caramel coloring. It is a harmful chemical added to foods for the sole purpose that the company doing the adding, thinks we as consumers are simply unable to deal with the color of real food, so they must improve it to sell it.
Any company willing to put in a harmful chemical for cosmetic and sales reasons, absolutely does not care about people and only profit margins made by fads and gimmicks.
I have come across “completely 100% natural” iced-tea in bottled form for example. Upon turning the bottle over and reading ingredients I found caramel color, I guess because in that companies mind, home brewed iced-tea does not look enough like iced-tea so… “lets add chemicals”.
Please avoid these potentially harmful carcinogens and stick with the true natural and sustainable products.
I have inquired many questions to this company about why the need for caramel coloring in their fish oils, I have received no responses to date.
The list of chemicals in the SAD is endless and terrifying, please learn as much as you can, for your sake!
Not that I don’t care about fish oil because I do (been reading these comments over an hour) but you seem passionate about your health and not swallowing fancy chemicals “just because.” Would you be opposed at all to sharing with me if you are on social media or a blog page about your research and your journey.
Anyone have any thoughts on the Barlean’s Total Omega? Either in liquid or pill form?
Barleans has one of the highest quality reputations and consistently receives high test grades in health foods and supplements, such as Total Omega.
Myself not an expert, I also haven’t tried this Barleans Total Omega myself. The formulation of Total Omega appears to be a good one, providing a well balanced broad spectrum of Omega, including Omega-3 Alpha Linoleic Acid and EPA+DHA (in correct proportion 3:2 EPA:DHA); Omega-6 Linoleic and Gamma-Linoleic Acids, and Omega-9 Oleic Acid.
You might think of Total Omega in similar terms as a high quality all-you-need general purpose multi-vitamin formula. The problem with these sorts of “multi-“ products is *you* might need more of one ingredient than a suggested serving contains, while for another ingredient you might need less than provided in the serving, or, in some cases, none at all. It behooves you, then, to have a blood test for each ingredient to determine your needs with accuracy. Blood tests can be expensive, but so can high quality supplements running as high as 80¢ per capsule or higher, or a serving of the oil supplement form. In the longer run I think testing first to determine your needs, deficiencies and all, is the smart way to go. Then you can be certain what you are paying for is best for your individual health, compared to a cover all the bases “complex” formula.
As to buyer confidence, I would buy Total Omega myself with complete confidence, in either liquid or capsule form.
I believe elsewhere on this long page of comments, commenter “PIXE” compiled a list of manufacturers of high quality oils and capsules in table form. Search this page for “PIXE” to more quickly locate her comments. She ranks high among the expertly commenters, and she does her own lab testing to verify, or not, ingredients and their manufacturer stated amounts and potencies per serving.
Thank you!
Can someone tell me what is the best OTC alternative to Lovaza. I have been denied by my insurance company for Lovaza and wondering which OTC fish oil will be the closest match.
My insurance company also would not cover Lovasa. Plus, i have a real difficult time with large pills, particularly taking lots of them. After doing a LOT of research, I came across this product:
http://www.sfh.com/products/omega_3-oil
To the best of my knowledge, this is amongst the top in EPA/DHA concentrations for fish oil, liquid or pill, EPA: 2,071, DHA: 1,173. I take 1 tsp. per day and, 1 bottle lasts for 48 days.
At $49.99 per bottle, that’s about $1 per day. Well, do the math to see what it would cost you taking another product to attain the same level of EPA-DHA. You might find that you are spending more than $1 per day!
The company offers a discount code (?) of 10% that equates to essentially paying for the shipping. Also, if you go on their “auto-pay” program, the discount goes to 15%. Finally, if you order $200 or more in product (s), shipping is free in addition to any discount. Both my wife and I take this so, to maximize savings, we have 5 bottles shipped on the auto pay program every 4 months.
I have absolutely no affiliation with this company. I have found it to be an excellent product. Go to the link and check out the product label.
Bill,
What form of O3’s is this? Website doesn’t say. rTriglyceride, Ethyl Esters, or Natural Triglyceride?
What is the TOTOX value?
How can you make an informed decision without this info?
In my research, I have found this to be the best option:
Naturenetics, available on amazon.com with a ratio of 90.67 (EPA+DHA/O3)%. Cost per gram of O3 comes to $.26
TOTOX = 6.48
My suggestion is simply to call the company. I have found them to re very helpful. Toll free number:
1-877-682-9067
The price for this product on Amazon is $37.21 for 20 capsules. That’s a whopping $1.88 per capsule, irrespective of the gram per O-3 breakdown. They recommend 2 capsules per day so, your spend is $3.76.
Finally, to get the same amount of EPA-DHA on the SFH product, you would have to take 4 capsules per day and your spend would be $7.52 per day!!
If somebody wants to challenge my math, please do.
You have to view the correct product:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00DMWOBJY
$35.71 per 180 count
Forget what any manufacturer recommends as a dosage. Go by what you body’s needs are. If you have no idea what that value is, you need a blood test that will measure your EPA, DHA, O3, O6, etc.
I stand corrected. I read the wrong number on the Amazon site. My bad.
Yes, it .21 per capsule. This would still mean, in order to get roughly the same EPA-DHA as the SFH product, one would have to take 4 capsules for an .84 spend per day, which is .01 less than the SFH product, after applying discounts. To me, taking 1 tps of liquid per day is much better than taking 4 capsules.
And, I concur that the EPA-DHA concentration should coincide with your personal need. My physician recommended this volume.
Thanks for the product link. I came across this NY Times article:
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/01/22/whats-in-your-fish-oil-supplements/
It reference to a lab test of various products:
https://labdoor.com/rankings/fish-oil
Never heard of this lab before. But the results seems interesting. Like to know what others think of the rankings. Considering getting the top rank product.
We all must thank ” Big Pharma ” for their extensive research. Unfortunately, after too much man manipulation the bio-availability is only 10% of natural alternatives. And lovaza is too expensive.
With all the information and conversation on this board, I am pleased to announce that we have the Holy Grail in product development.
As a disclosure I distribute Frezzor Omega-3 Black. Additionally, I dispense this as the third part of a three tiered protocol to treat gum disease.
I attend integrative medical conferences and evaluate products.” Buyer Beware “. Of all the vendors only 5-10% pique my interest. And those show great promise.
Bloggers all, go to bioavailableomega3.com and decide for yourself if this product line makes sense for you.
I cannot punch any holes or lambast any ingredient. The superiority of Omega-3 Black is overwhelming.
I challenge the most avid purveyors of excellence to do your homework. We are on the cusp of a new and workable medical paradigm.
I will answer all serious questions.
nothing is better then Herbalifeline and Nightworks
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=herbalifeline+experiment&spfreload=1
I am not a Dr, but a social worker. I had a client with the same issue. The Dr prescribed Nature Made FS Mini Omega 3 Fish Oil Concentrate 788 mg for my client. Hope this helps.
Perhaps this has been mentioned previously however, I just watched an infomercial for a product by the name of “Omega XL”. The moderator was Larry King.
I do not happen to be a big believer in the concept of sin however, this comes about as close to that concept one can get. It is out-and-out FRAUD!
Larry King has placed his name on a very good product. The research for this product is overwhelming. Moreover, I hope you are aware that hundreds of doctors prescribe this product as Omaprem.
Green Lipped Mussel oil, the major ingredient in this product is rather thick and hence needs to be cut with thinner oils.
They use pharmaceutical grade olive oil which in my opinion is nothing more than a cheap filler.
It is sad that they own the professional market as there is much better out there. But their product is clean, safe and it is a much better anti-inflammatory than most of the other junk out there. I give it a B-.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=herbalifeline+experiment&spfreload=1
I recently discovered about Omega 3 from Clary Sage Seed Oil. Previously I’ve been using Omega3 from fish oil and suffered from really bad taste in my mouth *yak*. I take my health seriously and after research I found out not only Omega3 from Clary Sage has a great taste, this vegan & natural product also provides the best Essential Fatty Acid for our body without the side effects that go along with fish oil (weight gain, metal poisoning..)
This site was very helpful with all the information – https://vegan-omega3.com/content/19-better-than-fish-oil?jo
I hope you’ll enjoy it as much as I do 🙂
I would suggest trying OmegaGuard from Shaklee, this is doctor recommended and they publish all of their information. http://pthomas.myshaklee.com/us/en/shop/healthysolutions/smartheart/product-_p_omegaguard_p_
Question, is there a liquid fish oil – available in the UK (without importing) that is considered a high quality?
Hi Simon,
I suggest you visit http://www.beps-shop.com for superior quality European omega-3 supplements and http://www.bepsbiopharm.com for general information on omega-3.
I would like to inform you that I am a major shareholder of that company so I am not absolutely “independent” here – but give it a shot and decide yourself.
I recently had a mini stroke and after researching I decided to order vital choice salmon oil capsules with lemon, but now I am concerned about masking rancid oil. Should I be concerned about the oil being rancid from this company? Thanks, Ellie
To all,
The DHA and the EPA are derivatives of essential fatty acids. Only 1-2% are ever produced in the body as Nature always knows what is needed.
The problem with our ill health is that we are not making these long chained fatty acids due to the processed food supply. Yes, you can supplement using mega dosages of the DHA/EPA but that means you have to believe in magic nutrition rather than G-ds inherent design.
Frezzor Omega-3 Black redirects the inflammatory pathway so YOU make your own anti-inflammatory pathway perfect. This is accomplished by the rare, unique omega in The Green Lipped Mussel called Eicosatetranoic Acid ( ETA ). Allow G-d to due her magic and allow Man to appreciate and wonder
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=herbalifeline+experiment&spfreload=1
To Dr Peter Lemke,
In direct response to your question as to the lipid profile of the Green Lipped Mussel, my answer is ” I will get this information and report it to this forum”
I would like to report that I have taken the ” Omega Challenge” and can report my blood lipid profile in regards to ETA/EPA.
ETA-is double that of the average American
EPA- is 31/2 times that of the average American
My conclusion is that the ETA in the Green Lipped Mussel is initiating an inhibition of the inflammatory pathway and promoting my body to manufacture its own EPA. If this is shown to be true for others, we have a new game.
These findings have not gone unnoticed by Senior research advisors at the very highest levels. And I quote “excited about the purity, novelty, and relevance of your product line. There is great potential in it.
There is the possibility of a research project in regards to the Frezzor Omega 3. This would NOT be sponsored by any manufacturing company. Strictly University financed. But time marches to the lethargic beat of a snails crawl.
I submit to you Peter that we all are in the ” wild west” and true unbiased research without commerce as a driving force will soon present a new paradigm for wellness.
Its a slippery slope as some of us become aligned to a particular persuasion and then it takes years to dance that back to our original questions.
I additionally submit to you that dispensing supraphysilogic doses of anything is a wrong turn.
Our cell membranes are a delicate balance of saturated fats, Omega 6s and omega 3s. To separate this balance into good guys vs bad guys completely misses the mark. Why does Man always think he can do better than G-d?
Sorry that was 3 1/2 times not 31/2 the ETA
Any update on the composition of Frezzor?
Pixe
Thanks for your response Donald.
Looking forward to see the lipid profile of the Green Lipped Mussel extract. In my opinion it is better to compare absolute numbers and not observations and relative figures. I have no idea what the average ETA/EPA blood lipid content is of an average American and I guess most of the readers in this forum share this with me. Generally it is said that the omega-3 lipid concentration in average US citizens is very low. As long as we do not have absolute numbers (like “mg per dl blood” or “mg/g supplement” or even only “%”) it is very difficult to judge if your values you achieved with “Omega Challenge” are good, excellent or maybe even still too low. We also do not know if you wouldn’t have had far better values taking a highly concentrated omega-3 supplement, or not. I dare to say that any person, anywhere in the world, who is taking a Fishoil-/Algae oil- or Omega-3 concentrate supplement on a daily basis will have a significant higher ETA, EPA, DPA and DHA content in his blood lipid profile compared to an average person with an average diet.
You mention “supraphysilogic” (so high concentrated) dose is the wrong approach. Is it really? I am sure you agree with me that the diet of the average US or European person has far too much pro-inflammatory Omega-6 fats and too little Omega-3’s. The result is that our natural ratio between Omega-6 and Omega-3 fatty acids is totally out of balance and we ingest daily up to 20-times more pro-inflammatory Omega-6 than anti-inflammatory Omega-3 (EPA, DHA, ETA and DPA). If we really want to achieve a significant shift back towards a natural balance between the Omega-6 and Omega-3 fats in our diet we absolutely need to increase strongly the Omega-3 part. This can be done most efficiently with highly concentrated omega-3 supplements. Lower concentrated products also have a good effect but are less efficient than the high concentrates. If we would not have this dramatic oversupply of Omega-6 in our diet I would fully agree with you. In this case there would be no need for high concentrated Omega-3 products. Of course we could also change our diet, our food industry and farming sector so that we return to a more natural food composition … I would love this. But this is not very likely to happen.
Regarding your last paragraph I would like to comment as follows. According to your own words, the Green Lipped Muscle extract is “unique” because of its high ETA content not found anywhere else in nature. Following your concept of looking at what Nature served us as nutrients during many thousands of years I am wondering if this “unique feature” of the Green Lipped Mussel (GML) extract is actually good for us? Why did not Nature offer us more sources of ETA in the first place? Instead we do find EPA and DHA in significant amounts in certain foods (including the GLM).
Finally let me say that my intention here is certainly not to speak against the GLM-extract. We somehow slipped into this interesting discussion. I believe every source of Omega-3’s is important for us. That is also why I created my company after working over 25 years in the Omega-3 field. BEPS BIOPHARM does not have its own manufacturing site. Nor are we bound to certain oil origins (fish, squid, krill, algae, GLM, etc.). What we do is we try to select the best omega-3 oils in the market with respect to purity, concentration, contamination and at an affordable price. We take these oils and make our supplements with them. These supplements carry the “beps-best choice omega-3” quality seal. I do not exclude at all that someday we might also have Green Lipped Mussel extract supplement in our portfolio. But before that, I really need to convinced … 🙂
Hi Peter L.,
Here’s the science of why you might be off base on balancing out dietary levels of Omega6 with high levels of Omega 3….I always thought that was so logical it couldn’t be contraverted, but I believe you as well as I have been wrong…check out the reasoning here:
http://robbwolf.com/2011/10/05/fish-oil/
it hit me in the head like a frying pan and you are right about one thing for sure, it is absolutely critical to greatly reduce omega 6 consumption in the diet…you CAN’T fix it with a pill…see what you think.
I have a question about Vayarin, it has a strength of 167mg, my son was prescribed to take two a day to help with ADHD Symptoms, I have found a few research articles on this medication, but curious about how safe it truly is. thank you.
Erin,
RE: Vayerin safe, the answer is ‘yes,’ it is a prescription drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration, having been rigorously tested for safety; when taken according to your physician’s instructions; not to exceed the maximum suggested dosage unless directed by your physician.
If you have read literature from Vayarin’s web site, and research, supposedly a large enough double-blind test(s) have been performed by the researcher in order to supply the FDA with adequate supporting documentation, which they, in turn may perform additional tests to determine if the medical food is safe.
In my online search, I found that Vayarin is an extract from Krill source. I don’t know if it is Krill oil or another Krill derived substance. Basically, then, Vayarin is extract of Krill, possibly Krill oil, produced by the pharm company according to “proprietary” process(es) to yield what is the active ingredient. With Vayarin, in addition to the active ingredient are a preservative to insure freshness and potency, and ingredients which facilitate digestion.
What proprietary processes the manufacturer uses to obtain active ingredients is a ? I can’t answer. Hope this is helpful in some way.
Thank you that was helpful. we will give it a shot.
Hello
Does anyone have any views on PolarPower Salmon Oil from North America Herb and Spice? It’s cheaper than Vital Choice but is it as good? As far as I can see, it’s made from the same fish source using the same cold processing techniques. Many thanks.
Liz
Since its relatively easy to verify that a product has been cleaned via molecular distillation, I find that the best way to compare products is to look at the cost per 1000 mg combined EPA + DHA.
Thank you very much vor this interesting article. Please allow me to male a few comments:
1. Cloudy oil/saturated fat: you mention “all fish oils contain saturated fats”. That is correct for the Standard fish oils. However, high quality, concentrated Omega-3 supplements (see for e.g. “beps-best choice omega3” are free of any saturated fats. In my opinion this is very important because natural fish oils contain about 30% saturates. It is well known that our modern diet is far too rich in saturated fats and that these fats are one of the main causes of elevated blood cholesterol levels. So it is not a bad idea to remove them from the oil. Saying this, it is also not a bad idea to remove the omega-6 fats and natural cholesterol content of a fish oil. High quality omega-3 supplements will contain 80% or 90% omega-3 fatty acids. In this case one or two 1g capsules per day supply all you need – and do not “stress” your body with unnecessary components like saturated fats, omega-6 and cholesterol.
2) Bioavailability: I generally agree with your comments. However when comparing these Bioavailability studies please make sure that they really looked at the Bioavailability and not the “speed of absorption” (which is very often mistaken as Bioavailability). It is correct that the free fatty acids and phospholipids (Krill oil) get faster absorbed than the TGs and then the ethyl esters (EE) – however the difference is in the magnitude of minutes. The pass way of an omega-3 supplement oil through our digestive system takes over 24 hours. So more than enough time to get a good absorption and in the end a comparable Bioavailability. And finally … the only approved omega-3 drugson the market, which actually had to prove their sufficient Bioavailability, are in the ethyl ester (EE) and free fatty acid (FFA) form – not in a triglyceride (TG) form.
3.) Krill oil: There is no doubt that the phospholipids of a krill oil get faster directly and more easily absorbed as the TGs or EEs. However, krill oil only contains 7-10% Omega-3’s. That is a 10th and less of what you would find in a good omega-3 concentrate. So even if the Bioavailability would be twice as good as in case of a fish oil/omega-3 concentrate it would still not make up the big difference in the concentration. Finally, have a look at the whales (biologically mammals just like us). They eat every day many tons of fresh krill. Wouldn’t we therefore expect whale oil to be extremely rich in omega-3? Its not! If you are lucky it will contain 5-7%.
4.) Sustainability: I would like to add here that most omega-3 concentrates are made from sardine and anchovy oils as a by-product from the fish meal production. These are fish which have a relative short life span (the longer their life, the more contaminants they accumulate!) and luckily do belong to any endangered species. We (beps biopharm s.l.) publish all our analysis results of every batch on our web site http://www.beps-shop.com – in this way the consumer can inform himself before purchasing our products. I believe this should be done by all other omega-3/fish oil/krill oil producers.
Thanks once again for this interesting discussion.
Peter
Thank you, Peter Lembke. At last someone posts something I can understand.
I have been taking the concentrated ethyl ester (EE) form for years and have had nothing but beneficial results.
Dear Peter,
Thank you for your comments, I am still having trouble understanding the whole Omega-3 industry myself. I must say that I’ve tried many products with little effect and I keep getting very confused about all the scientific terms being thrown around. However, after going on the website you recommended of “www.beps-shop.com” I saw that there is also a “www.bepsbiopharm.com” site. I found this site extremely helpful! It has a very easy explanation of what Omega-3’s are, how they work and where they come from that I can understand 🙂 The charts provided under “Why high concentrates from BEPS” I found to be extremely useful because I was starting to getting so confused by all the misleading information fish oil distributors use for their products (changing the ingredients list from 2 to 4 or 6 capsules, talking about cheap products when you actually need to take 10 caps a day…. damn I hate these marketeers!).
Anyways, thanks for sharing! And I can recommend giving the bepsbiopharm website a shot I found it the most user friendly fish oil website this far.
Dear Dr. Newman,
As I have commented elsewhere, my primary need for Omega-3 supplementation is bipolar depression. Additionally, as anti-inflammatory for osteo-arthritis pain, soreness, and inhibited joint mobility.
For depression, would, for example, a green-lipped mussel Omega-3 product such as Frezzor makes available, be a viable option worth my giving it a trial. In other words, will it serve as well as a pure-EPA, or high-EPA/DHA ( ≥7-to-1 EPA to DHA ratio). More effective? Less effective? or about the same?
Since I don’t quite understand what the distinctions are Omega-3 concentrates on the one hand, and PEOs on the other.
Thanks for your help!
Dear Tom,
You need to find a high concentrated EPA oil. Green Mussel oil is in my opinion not suitable because it simply does not provide sufficient amounts of EPA. You need at least 1 g, better 2g EPA per day. This is not possible with green mussel extract…
I recommend you visit following web site http://www.bepsbiopharm.com/clinical-studies/ and then go to “Folder_v7 ” – there you will find valuable information regarding the benefits of EPA and DHA for different indications. I am sure this could be helpful for you.
Take care,
Dr. Peter Lembke
The website you referenced doesn’t have the TOTOX values, but only lists the MAX. Where can we find the lab results showing the actual values? What form of Omega-3 are these products in? EE? Also, what are the long term effects of Omega-3 supplementation as opposed from food sources?
I am a Little confused … I do see the max acceptable TOTOX values in the specifications listed. If you like to see the actual analysis results of recent batches I recommend you visit http://www.beps-shop.com – then go to the “Products” page – on the right side you see “BEPS batch analysis” – click on there. An Excel file will open and you see the results.
Form of omega-3: most products are in the TG form. Only the “pur3” capsules are EEs.
I truly believe with an optimal diet rich in EPA and DHA, avoiding too much omega-6 and saturated fats, no additional omega-3 supplementation would be necessary. However, lets face it: for most of us our daily diet is far from “optimal” and chances are very low that most of us can change our habits for the long term. Therefore most of us definitely need to supplement their daily diet with high concentrated Omega-3’s. Only with these concentrates we have a chance to at least partly re-equilibrated our omega-6: omega-3 ratio. Unfortunately normal Fish Oil, Mussel Oil or even Krill Oil contains next to the Omega-3 also substantial amounts of Omega-6 and saturated fats. So the important effect to bring back the omega-6: omega-3 ratio is not so strong as with highly concentrated Omega-3’s (They are highly concentrated because the omega-6 and saturated fats were removed!).
Finally long-term effects: I have not heard of any negative long term effects coming from fish oil or concentrated fish oils/Omega-3’s. The only long term effects you would expect are positive. ones Unfortunately there may be long term effects if you cover your daily EPA and DHA requirements with adding a daily fish plate to your diet. This is due to the fact that the fish are relatively strongly contaminated with heavy metals and other industrial contaminants. These can accumulate over the years also in our bodies and finally may cause harm. Good quality fish oil/omega-3 concentrates have eliminated or reduced these contaminants as one part of the concentration. process. As this is an additional process step these oils are more expensive – but its worth it! Honestly, can you really expect Quality from an “omega3 product” that costs for example $4.99 per 200 capsules? I do not think so …
To Dr Peter Lemke,
” Settled Science ” Is a thought provoking comment by Dr Charles Krauthamer. Abstacts that settle medical considerations are shown to be ONLY 5 percent correct 50 years later. Dr Krauthhamer wants people to understand that in medicine very few things are ever settled.
Peter, you say ” You need to find a high concentrated EPA oil. Green Mussel oil is in my opinion not suitable because it simply does not provide sufficient amounts of EPA. You need at least 1 g, better 2g EPA per day. This is not possible with green mussel extract…”
Are you aware that The Green Lipped Mussel is the ONLY food on planet Earth that provides the omega ” ETA” This unique and compelling omega inhibits arachadonic acid and increases the bodies ability to make its own ” EPA “. This should open ALL eyes to understand that this is a game changer!
To deliver a supraphysiologic dose of anything is a dangerous turn in the our understanding of optimal health.
In nature, cold water fish have a high percentage of DHA/EPA. Without this Salmon could never spawn upstream.
As the waters warm, the percentages of DHA/EPA go down by 15 to 20 times. Nature understands that in warmer waters these volatile long chain fatty acids would oxidize and injure the fish.
Now consider Man. Only 1-3% of our essential fatty acids ever become derivatives like DHA/EPA
Nature has once again displayed its wisdom in diminishing our capacity to produce large amounts of DHA/EPA as you would suggest is so vital for optimal health.
Nature provides a window for understanding and I would strongly recommend that we listen and follow her wise direction. Millions of years of evolution can not be that wrong.
—–Original Message—–
Dear Donald. Thanks for your comment. Please correct me if I am wrong, but I thought the Green Lipped Mussel extract main fatty acids are C16:0, EPA and DHA. Correct? I have tried to find out how much ETA is actually in the Green Lipped Mussel capsules. Could you help me here? I would really like to know the absolute amount of ETA in a let’s say 500 mg capsule. I fully agree with you that the ETA is a very interesting omega-3 fatty acid – please do not misunderstand me here.
Supplementation for bipolar depression is not my specialty. However there has been research that supports taking long chained fatty acids to modulate hormones that could help.
Nature works as a package deal and rarely delivers just a few compounds as nutrients. The truth is that we know less than what we pontificate.
I have elected to support a product that in my opinion is light years ahead of the curve. It is a natural synergistic approach to complement the body to ” fill in the gaps” Unfortunately, you cannot approach supplementation as a panacea. Lifestyle, detoxification, fresh wild or organic foods, joy of life all are integral aspects of health.
In answer to your question, Frezzor is the very best this planet has to offer and works even better as you engage in an ” oil change ” of your cell membranes. Remove the adulterated fats and replace them with Frezzor. It’s an intelligent consideration.
Thanks for the information. At this time, however, I am looking specifically at “liquid” fish oil comments and/or recommendations. The SFH product, at this juncture, seems to lead the pack as it relates to EPA/DHA concentrations, costs, quality, etc. Still looking for other suggestions though in the “liquid” fish oil category. Thanks.
The fish oil with the highest EPA DHA I’ve found is Pharmax Finest Pure Fish Oil. Please offer any opinions on this product
I’ve listed the content below. Thank you
Serving Size 1 Teaspoon (5 ml)
Servings Per Container 30
Calories 40
Calories from Fat 40
Total Fat 4.5 g
Saturated Fat 1 g
Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) 950 mg
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) 725 mg
Total omega-3 1975 mg
(DHA, EPA & other omega-3’s provided as sardine & anchovy oil)
Other Ingredients: Essential oil of orange, natural mixed tocopherols
Your EPA/DHA as a % of total Omega 3’s is 84.81%. Most fall in that range. The highest ratio I have found is Naturenetics, available on amazon.com with a ratio of 90.67%.
Thanks for the info on this product, I will be ordering some to try
Is the ratio as important as the total number of EPA and DHA?
The ratio represents how concentrated the product is. You want to make sure you’re getting the most bang for your buck. If you don’t get a flavored product, you’ll have fishy burps. Fish are fish. Fish smell like fish, not roses. The smell of fish doesn’t mean it’s a bad fish. Go catch a fish, cut it up and smell it. It will smell fishy! It doesn’t mean it is a bad fish. If you want to know if your oil is rancid, get the TOTOX value.
Thanks for the reply
are you still using the Naturenetics brand?
Yes. Pregnant wife is too! Did you ever order yours?
NEVER use any product that has flavorings as it hides the taste of rancidity..
Your purchase has Essential oil of orange…..unacceptable!