Update: I now recommend Bio-Avail Omega+ from Adapt Naturals. It’s a blend of ultra-pure fish oil and the most bioavailable forms of curcumin and black seed oil.
Summary
Sorry, folks. Another long one. It was unavoidable, though, because I really did want this to be a “definitive guide” that covers all (or at least most) of the relevant issues involved with choosing a fish oil. Here’s a summary for the time-challenged:
- There are five important factors to consider when choosing a fish oil: composition, purity, freshness, bioavailability, and sustainability.
- Not all fish oils are created equal. It’s essential to do your homework and make an informed choice. Many fish oils are oxidized or made with poor-quality ingredients and may cause health problems instead of solving them.
- The potency of various products depends not only upon the levels of EPA and DHA but also upon the molecular structure of the fats in the oil, which in turn affects absorption.
- Natural triglyceride fish oils are better absorbed than highly purified (i.e. ester) fish oils.
- Many fish oils are made from fish that are endangered. Choose products made from fish that are certified by organizations such as Friend of the Sea or MarinTrust.
Introduction
So far in this series we’ve looked at why fish is superior to plant-based sources of omega-3. We’ve examined the importance of reducing consumption of omega-6 fats. We’ve considered how much omega-3 is needed to support health and treat disease. We’ve revealed that concerns about the safety of fish consumption have been overblown, and that eating fish regularly is not only safe but incredibly beneficial. And in the previous article we compared the benefits of eating fish to taking fish oil.
In this final article of the series, we’re going to take a closer look at fish oil. Fish oil is one of the most popular supplements taken by consumers today. Most people who are at least relatively health conscious understand that they need omega-3 in their diet and are probably not getting enough from food (unless they eat a lot of fish).
But why should you consider taking fish oil in the first place? Which fish oils are best? How much should you take? And what should you look for in a good product?
In this article, I’ll focus more on dispelling common misconceptions about fish oil and helping you to choose the best product for your needs.
My current thoughts on fish oil
My view and recommendations for fish oil have evolved over time.
I’ll tell you what has remained constant first, then tell you what has changed.
I still recommend getting EPA/DHA from the diet whenever possible—either as your exclusive source or as a foundation to build upon.
And I still don’t recommend super-high doses of fish oil, like 10 grams per day. This isn’t common anymore, but there was a time when many health gurus were suggesting this as a way to reduce inflammation. But it’s not supported by research, and there’s no additional benefit beyond the 1-3 grams a day studies suggest is the best therapeutic target.
What has changed is my growing appreciation for the role fish oil can play in ensuring adequate EPA/DHA intake for many people. For all of the reasons I’ve mentioned in this series, many folks are just not getting enough EPA/DHA, and taking a fish oil supplement is probably the only way they’re going to get these critical fatty acids.
It’s also true that some people benefit from greater amounts of EPA/DHA than they can easily obtain in their diet.
My specific recommendations for EPA/DHA supplementation have also evolved. I have recommended cod liver oil for many years, and I still do today. It’s a good option because it contains vitamins A and D in addition to EPA/DHA.
However, the amounts of EPA and DHA are lower in cod liver oil than in most fish oil supplements. And if you’re already consuming organ meats like liver or an organ meat supplement, like Bio-Avail Organ from Adapt Naturals, you don’t really need (or even want) the additional A/D from cod liver oil.
This is why I now recommend a high-quality fish oil supplement for people who are either not getting enough EPA/DHA from their diet or who would benefit from additional EPA/DHA because of a chronic, inflammatory, or autoimmune condition.
But finding a high-quality fish oil is easier said than done. The global market for fish oil is north of $2 billion now. Whenever there’s that much money to be made, you can be sure all kinds of shenanigans will ensue!
So, let’s look at some of the most important factors to consider when buying fish oil.
Factors to consider when buying fish oil
There are five primary variables to be aware of when shopping for fish oil:
- Composition. In order to have the desired anti-inflammatory effect, fish oil must contain an adequate amount of the long-chain omega-3 derivatives EPA and DHA.
- Purity. The oil must meet or exceed international standards for heavy metals, PCBs, dioxins, and other contaminants. Many do not—even when they claim they do.
- Freshness. The oil should be fresh and not rancid. Rancid/oxidized oils promote oxidative damage and increase inflammation, both of which are risk factors for nearly every modern disease. Sadly, many fish oils on the market contain high levels of oxidative by-products.
- Bioavailability. The ability to absorb the beneficial components of fish oil is based on the molecular shape of the fatty acids. The more natural the structure, the better.
- Sustainability: The fish should be harvested in a sustainable manner, and species that are under threat should be avoided.
Composition
Composition refers to the overall concentration of EPA/DHA and the ratio of EPA to DHA. To some extent, this depends on the goal of taking fish oil. For example, some conditions may call for a higher proportion of DHA, while others benefit from more EPA.
Most studies suggest that a 3:2 ratio of EPA to DHA is optimal, with a total amount of omega-3 ranging between 500 mg and 2 g per day.
The optimal amount for each person will vary based on several factors, including how much fish/seafood you’re consuming in your diet. If you don’t eat any, and/or you have an inflammatory or autoimmune condition, you want to aim for the higher end. If you eat some fish/seafood, you can aim for the lower to mid-range.
Purity
Many species of fish are known to concentrate toxic chemicals like heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins, which can cause serious diseases, especially in children and developing fetuses. In a previous article, I explained how these chemicals are typically not a concern when eating whole fish because fish also contains selenium. Selenium binds to mercury and makes it unavailable to tissues, thus protecting against any damage it may cause.
To address this, fish oil manufacturers use a process called molecular distillation to remove the toxins from the oil. When done correctly, molecular distillation is capable of reducing the toxins in fish oil to levels considered to be safe by the EPA and other agencies.
Although almost any fish oil manufacturer will tell you their product is free of these toxins, independent lab analyses tell a different story. In March of 2010, a lawsuit was filed in California court against the manufacturers of ten popular fish oils because they contained undisclosed and (possibly) unsafe levels of contaminants.
Unfortunately, this kind of deception is all too common in the supplement industry. The best companies will be able to provide a Certificate of Analysis (COA) from the manufacturer upon request. A COA is an analysis performed by an independent lab to measure the ingredients of a product and confirm whether it lives up to the claims made by the manufacturer.
If the manufacturer won’t provide a COA, I start to get suspicious. This is standard practice in the industry, and there’s no reason they shouldn’t be happy to show you theirs.
In general, fish that are lower on the food chain, like sardines and anchovies, naturally have a lower concentration of contaminants. For this reason, it may be wise to look for a product made from these fish.
So what levels of these toxins are safe? As you might imagine, there is some disagreement on this question since there is no single governing body that determines acceptable levels. However, the standards that are most often followed by fish oil manufacturers are summarized in the table below.

* ppt = parts per trillion
* ppb = parts per billion
The best fish oils will not only meet but exceed these international standards.
Freshness
I have written extensively about the dangers of oxidized, rancid oils. They promote oxidative damage and increase inflammation, both of which are risk factors for nearly every modern disease.
This is why it’s crucial to ensure that the fish oil you select is fresh and not rancid. Once it has gone rancid, it will have the exact opposite effect on your body than you want it to.
The first thing to do is to check something called the “peroxide value” on the COA. This is a measure of rancidity reactions in the oil that have occurred during storage. It should be less than 5 meq/kg.
If this checks out, and you decide to order that product, break open a capsule once you receive it. There should be no “fishy” odors. They should smell like the ocean, but not like rotten fish. They should also not have a strong lemon or lime scent, which could be an indicator that the manufacturer is trying to mask the rancidity.
The p-anisidine value measures secondary oxidation products. The IFOS and GOED standard is less than 20 units. However, it’s important to note that p-anisidine is not appropriate for measuring secondary oxidation in omega-3 oils that have a strong color or contain added flavorings.
For example, salmon oil contains carotenoids, which have a natural yellow/orange coloring. Bio-Avail Omega+ from Adapt Naturals contains curcumin, which also has a natural orange coloring. This throws off the p-anisidine values and makes it an irrelevant test.
TOTOX is the last way to measure oxidation. It’s simply a combination of the peroxide and p-anisidine values. (For this reason, it’s also not appropriate for products with a strong color.) The IFOS and GOED thresholds are 19.5 and 26 meq/kg, respectively. But the best products have TOTOX values below 15 meq/kg.
Finally, some studies have shown that adding antioxidants (e.g. curcumin or resveratrol) to fish oil can improve stability.
A common misconception is that you can determine the quality of fish oil by freezing it. The theory goes that if you freeze the oil and it is cloudy, it’s rancid. That is not the case. All fish contain saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, albeit in small amounts. These fatty acids make the capsules appear cloudy when frozen in products that contain whole fish oil.
Potency
This is another area surrounded by significant controversy. Some argue the levels of individual constituents in fish oil aren’t paramount. Scientists discovered the healthful effects of omega-3s by studying people with fish-heavy diets, before supplemental fish oil even existed. Clinical trials using supplemental fish oils over the past few decades have contained widely variable levels of both long-chain omega-3 derivatives (EPA and DHA), and not super-high concentrations of either or both.
However, due to poor conversion of ALA to EPA and DHA, unless you are eating fish it is very likely you are deficient in long-chain omega-3s.
Following this line of reasoning, the DHA content in particular of fish and fish oils does seem important if we wish to obtain the best possible therapeutic effect. Many recent studies demonstrating the anti-inflammatory potential of fish oil used a daily dosage of DHA in the range of 1-3 grams. What’s more, foods like salmon roe that have been prized by traditional cultures for their nourishing and healing effects contain large amounts of DHA. A single 6 oz. serving of salmon roe contains 1 g of DHA. (In fact, this would be the best way by far of supplementing with DHA if money were no object. (Unfortunately, wild salmon roe goes for about $28/serving.)
Unfortunately, many fish oils do not have significant amounts of DHA. This means you’d have to take an impractically high number of capsules each day to obtain the therapeutic dose. This is not desirable, since all unsaturated oils (including fish oils) are subject to oxidative damage. We don’t want to take large quantities of them for this reason.
Remember to check the label and ensure that your product has approximately 200-300 mg of DHA per capsule. This will allow you to achieve the therapeutic dose by taking no more than 3 capsules twice a day.
Like what you’re reading? Get my free newsletter, recipes, eBooks, product recommendations, and more!
Bioavailability
The ability to absorb the beneficial components of fish oil is based on the molecular shape of the fatty acids. In short, the more natural the structure and the less it is chemically altered, the better.
This is true for any nutrient, of course, and it explains why I am always in favor of obtaining nutrients from food or food-based sources when possible. Each additional step in processing from the natural state of food to extract or isolate nutrients introduces the potential of damaging the nutrient or changing its chemical form so that it’s more difficult to absorb or affects the body in a different way.
When it comes to fish oils, there are three forms currently available on the market:
- Natural triglyercide oil. This is what you get when you “squeeze” the whole fish and extract the natural oil from it. It is the closest to eating fish oil in its natural form and is highly bioavailable. The drawback of this form is that, because it’s not concentrated, it usually has low levels of EPA and DHA. And because it isn’t purified, it can have high levels of contaminants such as heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins.
- Ethyl ester oil. Occurs when natural triglyceride oil is concentrated and molecularly distilled to remove impurities. The ester form is still in a semi-natural state because it is the result of a process that naturally occurs in the body. The advantage of this form is that it can double or triple the levels of EPA and DHA.
- Synthetic triglyceride oil. This form occurs when natural triglycerides are converted to ethyl esters for concentration (as above) but then re-converted into synthetic triglycerides. The original position of the triglyceride’s carbon bonds changes, and the molecule’s overall structure is altered, which impacts the bioavailability of the oil.
Studies on absorption of the various types of fish oil suggest that, unsurprisingly, the natural triglyceride form is absorbed better than the ethyl ester form, which in turn is absorbed better than the synthetic triglyceride form.
One study by Lawson & Hughes in 1988 showed that 1 gram of EPA and 0.67 grams of DHA as natural triglycerides were absorbed 3.4 and 2.7 fold as well as the ethyl ester triglycerides.
In the previous article, we saw that fish oils were better absorbed when taken with a high-fat meal. In another study by Lawson & Hughes later the same year, they showed that the absorption of EPA & DHA from natural triglycerides improved from 69% with a low-fat meal (8g total fat) to 90% with a high-fat meal (44g total fat). Absorption of both EPA and DHA from ethyl ester oils was increased three-fold from 20% with a low-fat meal to 60% with a high-fat meal.
Sustainability
Our global fisheries are in dire straits, and fish oil is a big business. So, it’s crucial to choose a product that is manufactured with sustainability in mind and that has a fully transparent and traceable supply chain.
The easiest way to do this is to choose a product that is certified by organizations like Friend of the Sea or MarinTrust, two of the leading organizations for sustainable and responsible fishery management.
I would also choose a supplier/manufacturer with practices that minimize waste and its environmental impact.
For example, rather than catching fish that is only used to produce fish oil, some producers instead use fish meal to make the oil. This eliminates one of the main concerns about fish oil, which is that it will further deplete fisheries.
Recommendation
As a Functional Medicine clinician, author, and educator, I’ve been following the fish oil market closely for many years. I’ve used several different fish oils with my patients. I’ve read hundreds of studies on the purity, freshness, composition, and benefits of fish oil. I’ve spoken to industry experts and insiders, and I know what many companies do to cut corners and save money (at your expense).
When I started my own supplement company, Adapt Naturals, I knew that one of the first products we’d make would be fish oil. I wanted to create a product with the purest, freshest, and most sustainable fish oil available. And that’s exactly what we did with Bio-Avail Omega+.
I chose VivoOmega from GC Rieber as our fish oil. As the chart below illustrates, it significantly exceeds international standards for both purity and freshness.

Purity and freshness are critical. But I didn’t stop there. Most people who take fish oil are taking it to achieve certain outcomes, like better muscle and joint health, increased mental clarity, a more stable mood, clearer skin, and more balanced immune function.
So, when I formulated our fish oil product (Bio-Avail Omega+), I added the most bioavailable forms of two powerful nutrients that also support these goals: curcumin and black seed oil.
Now you can get the benefits of all three of these superfood nutrients in a single, two soft-gel daily serving.
Bio-Avail Omega+ contains an optimal composition of EPA and DHA (510 mg of EPA and 330 mg of DHA, a 3:2 ratio). It is made with triglyceride oils for optimal bioavailability and absorption. And it is produced with the most sustainable and traceable fish oil material in the industry. (See this page for more info.)
I’m proud of this product. It came directly out of my experience working with patients for 15 years and my extensive research into what is most important in a fish oil product. I hope it helps you to achieve your health goals!
Better supplementation. Fewer supplements.
Close the nutrient gap to feel and perform your best.
A daily stack of supplements designed to meet your most critical needs.


Wow, tough crowd. I’m not the only one that writes for the blog. The post you cite was written by Jessica Johnson. It should be obvious that it’s written by a woman — I can’t remember the last time I thought about my skin. 😉
Here’s the obituary:
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2000-03-31/news/0003310122_1_blountstown-butler-survivors/4
Amazing how cynical people are.
Marshall, thank you for getting back – however, I find this to be a little contradicting from what you just explained in your response to Lara.. You claim that you take fish oil because you want to prevent heart issues like your father.. I grew interest in your blog and decided to check it out only to find an article you wrote on “Why I Take Fish Oil” … This was your answer:
“Like everyone else reading this blog, I know all about the long-term health benefits of omega-3s. But, if I told you that was the main reason I used supplements…
…it would be a complete crock.
To be completely and utterly honest with you — the main reason I take fish oil is to get healthy looking skin.
That’s right. I want good skin.
The truth is, I pay so much attention to the mirror because I see how my skin is effected by what I eat.
There are half a dozen other reasons why I started taking fish oil, but healthy looking skin is what usually reminds me to keep taking it.
—>”I see my skin everyday. To me, taking care of it seems more relevant than preventing heart attacks, reducing the risk of stroke, or making sure I limit my risk to 70 other health conditions that won’t develop for years.”
Doesn’t seem to match up with your explanation above. I’m not denying that you have knowledge of fish oils, it’s just hard to trust your intention after reading that.
I too was impressed by Marshall’s knowledge and so went to his wwbsite. Unfortunately when recommending Vitality Ultra-Pure by Omegor he omits to say that he sells the stuff! Which, for me, kind of undermines his advice.
What should undermine my advice is whether or not I’ve said anything accurate. Let me give you some background info. Since 2004, I’ve run a blog teaching people about fish oil. Why fish oil? My father suddenly died from a heart attack at 54, and I was determined not to suffer a similar fate. I then discovered fish oil, which at the time was very much undiscovered. The number 1 question I received over the years was, “which brand of fish oil?” My response was always to buy an IFOS-certified fish oil, and my preferred brand changed a few times over the years. First it was an EE brand. Then once I learned the difference, a Canadian TG brand, then a TG product from Italy. Both were hard to acquire in the US without expensive shipping charges. After a few years of running my blog, I thought: Why not make it easier for people and sell it myself? So now I sell only one single product: fish oil (which I import from Italy).
If you look back up, you’ll see my first post was in July of 2010. I didn’t suggest a product until over 2 years later, when asked directly. So I can understand your complaint if you thought my intentions here were commercial, but I hope you see that’s not the case.
PIXE –
Will you please give me your recommended fish oil supplement? I’ve read most of the comments above, sorry if I’ve missed it if you already wrote one.
Chris –
I really appreciate this post. Wonderful writing, knowledge and care when putting a post like this together to educate others to be purchasing the best for their health. I will also look into your fish oil recommendations.
Marshall – What are your recommendations?
You ALL three seem very knowledgeable on this subject and I would appreciate your honest, personal advice for a general, best quality, purity, worthy fish oil that one can trust to maintain great health.
Thank You!
Hi Taylor,
I recommend Vitality Ultra-Pure by Omegor:
http://store.fishoil101.net/
I suspect PIXE will recommend Nordic Naturals. Both are highly purified triglyceride-based fish oils that have been 5-star certified by the International Fish Oil Standards program. But I like that Vitality has a much higher omega-3 concentration than Nordic Naturals, making it easy to get much more omega-3 with smaller doses. I also like how the capsules are individually sealed, protecting them from oxidation.
Taylor:
To me, one of the best omega-3 dietary supplements is Quell by Douglas Labs that one gel cap provides 600 mg EPA 400 mg DHA. This product is what they call re-esterified triacylglycerol (TAG) in which DHA and EPA have been removed from natural fish oil and then re-attached to glycerol to produce TAGs that predominantly contained DHA and EPA and very little of any of the other fatty acids. This means that many of the molecules (fat) TAG will contain let’s say DHA-DHA-DHA, EPA-EPA-EPA, or combinations of DHA-EPA per molecule of TAG. That means that each TAG will supply at least three moles (molecules) of omega-3s DHA and EPA. Comparing Nordic Naturals Ultimate and Vitality by Omegor, they do not have this profile even though they have been made by re-esterification. Nordic and Vitality’s TAGs have other fatty acids attached that are not DHA and EPA. This means that you get less DHA and EPA released per gel cap as compared to Quell. However, Quell is more expensive than Nordic and Vitality.
I also purchased a home kit to determine my omega-3 index that I will send back next week to the company to get my omega-3 index. This will give me an idea how well the Quell is working and if I can cut back since my body perhaps has reached the saturation point where taking these high doses (high prices) are not needed anymore because my omega-3s have reached a steady state concentration and I can get by on lesser amounts of DHA and EPA at which point I can switch to a lower content omega-3 supplement at a lower price. Lower amount does not mean lower quality. I will look for a product that weighs less but still has TAGs that are predominately DHA and EPA.
I am not knocking ethyl ester products but only calling attention to the fact that products labeled “fish oil” that are synthetic chemicals of ethyl esters are misleading the public and is false advertising. They are not “fish oil”. Lovaza (the prescription omega-3 ethyl esters) is not fish oil and is also falsely advertised. In addition, do a search on the term “fatty acid ethyl esters” or FAEE and you will see all the toxic properties of these chemicals that cause liver and pancreas damage. That is why it is important to take (if you must) a high purity ethyl ester omega-3 where the purity in EPA and DHA in the product is at least 80%. Because TAG products do not contain FAEE, to me they are safer and more bioavailable than omega-3 ethyl esters. In addition, one of the metabolites of omega-3 ethyl esters dietary supplements is ethanol.
PIXE
PIXE Thank you for all the great information you have provided, it is greatly appreciated. When it comes to distilled supplements, it wasn’t clear to me if your thoughts on that were to avoid these or if they are a good choice because it removes impurities? Otherwise, are they able to remove impurities without harming the quality of the oil?
As for distinguishing which supplements are TAG, did you mean that a rule of thumb for the TAG are the ones with a lower EPA/DHA (180/120) content? if so, would the Quell Brand not be a TAG since it is high in EPA/DHA concentration? I did not see the Quell Brand on the IFOS site, is it under a different section?
What are your thoughts on Krill oil as compared to other fish oils in terms of health benefits, quality and IFOS standards in general? Thanks!
Hey PIXE,
I checked out Qüell. It’s non-IFOS certified — how come you recommend it? Also, you said it’s molecularly distilled in a previous post, but their website says it’s not. They claim their process is superior, but they don’t go into much detail. Do you understand the process or have any details?
Also, I wouldn’t be so quick to dismiss omega-3s other than EPA and DHA. For example, research has shown benefits for DPA. In fact, human breast has very high amounts of DPA and DHA, but very little EPA. Here’s a couple studies that suggests DPA is much more effective at inhibiting platelet aggregation and preventing the development of arterial plaques:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8832760
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11085354
This in spite of the fact that EPA is sometimes considered the most important omega-3 for preventing atherosclerosis.
So I consider it a negative that Qüell only has EPA and DPA. Vitality offers 834mg total omega-3 in the latest batch, with 718mg being EPA and DHA and 116mg of other omega-3s. I think that makes it a more balanced product — but I’m open to your feedback, PIXE!
Best,
Marshall
I meant “human breast milk”, not human breast. 🙂
Chris,
First of all great article and series, I’ve only been recently following your website and already I have learned so much. My question though relates to the COA. When asking the company for this is there some things we should look for to insure that they’re presenting us with a legitimate COA and not something that they just typed up themselves?
any thoughts on axastanthin? is this as good as Mercola says it is?
Great response Piex – thank you.
I found that the fish oil I take is a mix of trig/ethlester:
http://www.xtend-life.com/product/Omega_3_DHA_Fish_Oil/Bio-Availability.aspx
I suppose that companies that do not share this info generally try to hide something….
Is there a way to tell from a Certificate of Analysis whether fish oil is in a triglyceride form or ethyl ester form?
Another high quality TAG fish oil: Quell: 60 softgels at $49.50 from Amazon ($1.38/g EPA and $2.06/g DHA). Each softgel supplies 600 mg EPA and 400 mg DHA for total = 1,000 mg. Each softgel weighs 1.71929 g.
Compare with Nordic Naturals Ultimates 180 softgels at $51.00 from Amazon (87¢/g EPA, $1.26/g DHA). Each softgel supplies 325 mg EPA and 225 mg DHA for total = 550 mg. Each softgel weighs 1.48093 g, length = 25.41 mm, and diameter = 9.70 mm.
Quell has less saturated fat than Nordic Naturals Ultimate but again cost more.
Many of the “fish oil” dietary supplements on the market do not list the chemical form in which EPA and DHA are esterified. Most of the time (99%) if the label says 180 mg EPA and 120 mg DHA or if the label says total EPA and DHA = 300 mg, then the product is triacylglycerol and are just purified natural fish oil. These are inexpensive fish oils and you have to take several in order to get the American Heart Association’s (AHA) recommended dose of at least 500-mg per day (EPA+DHA) for those without heart disease. Those with heart disease, AHA recommends 1,000 mg per day combined EPA and DHA. AHA does not mention whether the omega-3 should be EE or TAG. Remember that when the fish are caught, they are steamed cooked and pressed to release what is known as “crude fish body oils” CFBO which would be the oil you would get if you ate cooked fish. These CFBOs are barreled and sold on the open market to various refiners who convert the CFBO into refined “fish oils” that are used in encapsulated “fish oil” dietary supplements. The refined fish oils are the CFBO that have been stripped of various components such as PCBs, heavy metals, free fatty acids, and phospholipids. This is the product in the so called “18/12” fish oil dietary supplements and as I mentioned above, is mostly TAG. I only saw two products (Vitabase Value Fish Oil 180 mg EPA 120 mg DHA (http://www.vitabase.com) and Nature’s Measure Extra Strength Fish Oil 1000 mg (http://www.amazon.com/Natures-Measure-Strength-1000mg-Tablets/dp/B00395R1B4) in which these “18/12” supplements were of the ethyl esters which shows that these manufacturers tried to fool consumers by offering an inferior dietary supplement. The Natures Measure Extra Strength-1000mg “Fish oil” is being sold for 25 cents on Amazon for 30 softgels and $4.49 shipping, WOW!!
The chemical form can be obtained rarely if you look carefully on the back of the bottle for details on the label. Only a few will mention the chemical form and say as “ethyl ester” or natural “triglyceride” form. In the clinical trials with Lovaza (Omacor) (prescription EPA and DHA ethyl esters), LDL (bad cholesterol) increased in a small percentage of the patients. There are several over-the-counter omega-3 ethyl esters that have similar concentration as Lovaza.
PIXE
P.S. Sorry for the winded response.
Hey Pixie, I hope you see this, what do you think of Ethical Nutrients Hi-Strenth Liquid Fish Oil?
Much Thanks,
Regards,
Ty
I’m using Xtendlife OMEGA 3 QH ULTRA.
http://www.xtend-life.com/product/Omega_3_QH_Ultra.aspx
Any thoughts/experience with this product ?
Also, wouldn’t it just be safer to use the Algae capsules that contain Omega 3 (DHA/EPA) ? No risk of contamination/more stability. Any thoughts on this point ?
Thank you,
Michael
Anyone else experiencing nausea after taking cod liver oil WITH a meal? I’m currently taking 1/2 tsp from Green Pasture’s FCLO. I’ve lowered the dosage from 1 tsp to 1/2 tsp but still have issues.
Has anyone looked at the New Chapter fish oil offering, WholeOmega, for purity and other characteristics?
http://tinyurl.com/6qtjgbj
Also, concerning the Jarrow products and the phrase “molecularly distilled”; doesn’t that essentially mean “heated” and therefore the quality of the oil is suspect, depending on how much heat is used in the distillation process? I was unable to find any definition about what that process actually consists of.
I read the comments above from Pixe about what comes out of the process being different in nature from what is in fish oil, so perhaps this process is simply poorly named and doesn’t involve heat.
Glenn
Glenn:
You are correct in that “molecularly distilled” does use heat to purify the oil. However, it depends on where in the fish oil refining process this occurs. Some refiners take the crude fish body oil (triacylglycerol, TAG) and molecularly distill the oil to remove PCBs etc. Then the refined fish oil undergoes further processing that will remove more impurities and damage oil due to distilling. Deodorization is another heat treatment to remove bad odors and off flavors in the oil that also uses heat. This heat can cause isomerism such as the conversion of cis to trans fatty acids in the oil or ethyl esters (not an oil). In addition, cyclic fatty acid monomers (CFAMs) which are toxic can also be produced from heat treatment. Other methods to purify the oils or ethyl esters include supercritical fluid carbon dioxide which does not use heat and does not damage the oils or ethyl esters as much.
Molecularly distilling is used to purify the man-made chemical ethyl esters of omega-3 and causes all kinds of transformations to the chemical.
A very good book titled “Long-chain Omega-3 Specialty Oils” (2007) edited by Harald Breivik is an excellent book for details on omega-3 processing, algal oils, fish sources, etc.
PIXE
Pixe, thanks for this. I appreciate your detailed comments.
I think the difficult part of this, as a food consumer and health enthusiast (in other words, and not a scientist or health professional), is that I can’t detect any positive effects on my health of any of the fish oil in capsules. There are times when you can take a nutritional supplement, and you notice a change for the better in a short period of time. It might not be enough to satisfy a scientist, but it satisfies me as a consumer that I am on the right path.
But I don’t notice this with the fish oil capsules, with any of the brands I have tried.
I did think, years ago, that the Carlson liquid fish oils were helping my daughter and I, but it was hard work to keep taking them and keep convincing my daughter. But even then, the effect was very subtle.
Tiger:
What brand of fish oil are you taking? Many times it will depend on the brand. Also, fish oil can work in a silent manner. To determine the biological effects, get a lipid profile of your blood. In addition, see if you can get your omega-3 index value. This index can assess your chances of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and your overall cardiovascular system health. There is this fishing village in Japan where they eat lots of fish (natural TAG) and other ingredients in fish. They have one of the highest omega-3 indexes (7-11%) in the world and very low cardiovascular disease. See the open source publication http://www.lipidworld.com/content/11/1/43/#B17 and references within.
This web site (http://www.genesmart.com) is selling a home test kit for the index and I will give it a try since I have been taking fish oil dietary supplements for the past 5 years. Has anyone tried the kit?
Disclaimer: I am an analytical chemistry college professor concerned with truth in omega-3 dietary supplements. I use analytical methods to separate marketing fiction from scientific fact. I receive no support from any dietary supplement manufacturers and I purchased more 400 “fish oil” and krill oil dietary supplements out of my own pocket. See part of my collection at http://www.fishoilsupplementanalysis.com/.
My apologies if any of the above information is redundant and has been posted previously.
PIXE
I think you have stated the essence of the problem, that “fish oil can work in a silent manner.” At least that is my experience.
My cardiac health is at least “not bad.” My current doctor said something like “he wished the good cholesterol number was higher” but overall, for my weight and age and all my other problems, my lipid profile wasn’t particular problematic.
(I would be happy to share the lipid numbers if anyone cares…I have another test coming up shortly)
My point was that I can’t detect feeling any different no matter which fish oil I take, or even if I stop taking it. There are other supplements (for example, pycnogenol, which reduces inflammation and corresponding pain, or 5-HTP) where you can clearly understand the benefit by seeing how you feel before and after taking the supplement. I simply can’t find any obvious improvement or noticeable change from the fish oil.
I am currently taking New Chapter WholeOmega.
http://www.newchapter.com/fish-oil/wholemega
Before that, I had taken Jarrow Max DHA, the Carlson liquid, Natural Factors…(my wife is still using this one)
http://www.iherb.com/Natural-Factors-RxOmega-3-Factors-EPA-400-mg-DHA-200-mg-240-Softgels/4251
and probably some others I have forgotten about.
I am fascinated by the test for the lipid profile, and want to hear if you think it is accurate.
By the way, the state of New York refuses to allow consumers to have access to such tests. New York consumers can’t order any of these blood tests; it is against New York law.
Tiger
Chris, the link you provided for Green Pasture’s FCLO is broken. Is this the same product you’ve recommended? Thanks!
http://www.greenpasture.org/public/Products/ButterCodLiverBlend/index.cfm
One thing that you will rarely hear is that people are having adverse reactions to krill oil. I took krill oil for many months. After a while, I noticed that my heart would skip and act erratically from time to time. It eventually got to the point where I had to go to the heart clinic and get a holter monitor to find out when and why my heart was acting up. Nothing was recorded during the time of the monitor. Health care is so expensive so I decided to do some research online and was surprised to find one little forum on a remote page found on google. People were having similar issues as I was and they were all taking krill at the time of their heart problems. I stopped taking krill that day and ever since, all my heart symptoms went away. The doctors have no clue about this. This was a case where the internet helped “cure” me through simple exchange of information. That’s power! Anyway, people should know that krill oil and it’s possible adverse effects are certainly not being reported by the media, fish oil companies, or by the health industry.
It was the MegaRed softgel product that I took.
Jerry
Could you address the potential dangers of consuming fish oil that has been molecularly distilled and advise whether we should avoid such molecularly distilled oils? I’ve been taking Omapure Fish Oil by Vitoria Biosciences for the past year (which is molecularly distilled), and I’ve just read information cautioning against taking any molecularly distilled oil. If we should in fact avoid consuming molecularly distilled fish oils, are there manufacturers you would recommend who produce non-molecularly distilled fish oil products? Thanks.
If the bottle says molecularly distilled, you can be about 95% sure the product is ethyl ester omega-3. The concentration of EPA and DHA are much higher that the traditional “18/12” tracylglycerol (TAG) natural fish oil that are found naturally in fish. The ethyl ester forms of EPA and DHA are made by reacting ethanol with the free fatty acids released from the nature made natural fish oils. This reaction converts the nature-made EPA and DHA to a man-made chemical that has a less efficient bioavailablity. This reaction (transeterification) is the same reaction that is used to convert cooking oils (TAG molecules) to bio-diesel. The absorption of the ethyl esters are only effective if you take them with a high fat meal and then they are still not effective as the TAG form of the omega-3s. In addition, when the body digests the ethyl ester forms, the byproduct is ethanol. There are a few brands that are TAG and molecularly distilled such as the Nordic Naturals and Quell brands. They are more expensive but they are more absorbed when compared to the synthetic EPA and DHA ethyl esters. I don’t understand how these manufacturers get away with calling their products “fish oil” when they are not.
PIXE: Love your comments. You’re probably the smartest guy on this page when it comes to fish oil. Would you mind emailing me? I have some questions to ask you. marshallsontag =at= gmail.com
By the way: Here’s another IFOS-certified brand that’s also in the TAG form that I like because it has 80% omega-3 concentration: http://store.fishoil101.net/
Hi, can anyone provide an update since this article on whether krill oil is the way to go? And if so, which brand?
If anyone can help with current info on best brands of fish oil available in UK I’d be so grateful.
Many thanks, Lara
For those in Canada looking for FCLO I have found it here http://www.fermentedcodliveroil.ca
How does the USP compare to IFOS ? Which one is more strict/safer ?
IFOS has more details including actual numbers on the amount of EPA and DHA vs the labels and they also report dioxans, PCB specs met. See http://www.ifosprogram.com/files/21006154%20-%20AN%20Super%20Critical%20Omega%20-%20IFOS_REPORT.pdf for a detailed report. There are many more products on IFOS as compared to USP. One issue of Consumer reports http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/2012/01/fish-oil-pills-vs-claims/index.htm reported that Nordic Naturals supplement has the USP seal of approval by failed in Consumer Reports test. It was later discovered that the lemon flavor may have interfered with the testing.
PIXE
What fish oil would you suggest for Canadians ?
Janis, you can get FLCO in canada at http://www.fermentedcodliveroil.ca
Your definition of the ethyl ester of omega-3 is incorrect. The ethyl esters of omega-3s are produced from fish by transesterification where crude fish oil as triacylglycerols (not the old outdated term triglycerides) which is a triester is reacted with ethanol (ethyl alcohol) in the presence of a catalyst to form the DHA and EPA ethyl esters. If the fish oil says “molecular distilled” there is a high probability that it is of the ethyl ester form. In addition, the ethyl esters don’t contain saturated fat as do the triacyglycerols fish oil which is the natural molecule in fish. Fish don’t produce ethyl esters. Fish oil of ethyl esters are not really fish oil, it is a synthetic compound of omega-3 ethyl esters. See Omacor and Lorvaza.
This statement is also incorrect “The ester form is still in a semi-natural state because it is the result of a process that naturally occurs in the body. ” The body does not make the ethyl ester and it is not in a semi-natural state. When the ethyl esters of omega-3s are digested, one of the end products is ethanol (ethyl alcohol) and the other is the free fatty acids of DHA and EPA.
PIXE
PIXE — Great response!
Don’t forget about re-esterified triglycerides, which were shown in a recent study to have even better absorption rates than not only ethyl ester, but also natural triacylglycerols.
How’d you become so knowledgeable on this subject?
I have been studying fish oil dietary supplements since 2006. There is so much misinformation out there that the typical consumer is completely confused. In addition, most of the labels on the supplements are incorrect. To see some quality products visit http://www.ifosprogram.com/ifos/consumerreport.aspx that has a nice listing of products that passed 5 tests for quality and label concentrations of the DHA and EPA. Also of interest is USP verified products which I believe only shows Nature Made and Kirkland (http://www.usp.org/usp-verification-services/usp-verified-dietary-supplements/verified-supplements)
Also, the phrase “pharmaceutical grade fish oil” as you know means nothing and is just a marketing ploy.
PIXE
Thank you Pixe for your post. I find it most informative.
Thank you Marshall for your attention to details. Your posts are appreciated.
Hi Chris,
Great article.
Regarding the COA. How can I get Jarrow’s COA ? Is it published online somewhere ?
I saw that some Omega 3 producers use the IFOS standard which seems safer and more strict than CRN (the one Jarrow uses). What do you think ?
Thank you,
Michael