Update: I now recommend Bio-Avail Omega+ from Adapt Naturals. It’s a blend of ultra-pure fish oil and the most bioavailable forms of curcumin and black seed oil.
Summary
Sorry, folks. Another long one. It was unavoidable, though, because I really did want this to be a “definitive guide” that covers all (or at least most) of the relevant issues involved with choosing a fish oil. Here’s a summary for the time-challenged:
- There are five important factors to consider when choosing a fish oil: composition, purity, freshness, bioavailability, and sustainability.
- Not all fish oils are created equal. It’s essential to do your homework and make an informed choice. Many fish oils are oxidized or made with poor-quality ingredients and may cause health problems instead of solving them.
- The potency of various products depends not only upon the levels of EPA and DHA but also upon the molecular structure of the fats in the oil, which in turn affects absorption.
- Natural triglyceride fish oils are better absorbed than highly purified (i.e. ester) fish oils.
- Many fish oils are made from fish that are endangered. Choose products made from fish that are certified by organizations such as Friend of the Sea or MarinTrust.
Introduction
So far in this series we’ve looked at why fish is superior to plant-based sources of omega-3. We’ve examined the importance of reducing consumption of omega-6 fats. We’ve considered how much omega-3 is needed to support health and treat disease. We’ve revealed that concerns about the safety of fish consumption have been overblown, and that eating fish regularly is not only safe but incredibly beneficial. And in the previous article we compared the benefits of eating fish to taking fish oil.
In this final article of the series, we’re going to take a closer look at fish oil. Fish oil is one of the most popular supplements taken by consumers today. Most people who are at least relatively health conscious understand that they need omega-3 in their diet and are probably not getting enough from food (unless they eat a lot of fish).
But why should you consider taking fish oil in the first place? Which fish oils are best? How much should you take? And what should you look for in a good product?
In this article, I’ll focus more on dispelling common misconceptions about fish oil and helping you to choose the best product for your needs.
My current thoughts on fish oil
My view and recommendations for fish oil have evolved over time.
I’ll tell you what has remained constant first, then tell you what has changed.
I still recommend getting EPA/DHA from the diet whenever possible—either as your exclusive source or as a foundation to build upon.
And I still don’t recommend super-high doses of fish oil, like 10 grams per day. This isn’t common anymore, but there was a time when many health gurus were suggesting this as a way to reduce inflammation. But it’s not supported by research, and there’s no additional benefit beyond the 1-3 grams a day studies suggest is the best therapeutic target.
What has changed is my growing appreciation for the role fish oil can play in ensuring adequate EPA/DHA intake for many people. For all of the reasons I’ve mentioned in this series, many folks are just not getting enough EPA/DHA, and taking a fish oil supplement is probably the only way they’re going to get these critical fatty acids.
It’s also true that some people benefit from greater amounts of EPA/DHA than they can easily obtain in their diet.
My specific recommendations for EPA/DHA supplementation have also evolved. I have recommended cod liver oil for many years, and I still do today. It’s a good option because it contains vitamins A and D in addition to EPA/DHA.
However, the amounts of EPA and DHA are lower in cod liver oil than in most fish oil supplements. And if you’re already consuming organ meats like liver or an organ meat supplement, like Bio-Avail Organ from Adapt Naturals, you don’t really need (or even want) the additional A/D from cod liver oil.
This is why I now recommend a high-quality fish oil supplement for people who are either not getting enough EPA/DHA from their diet or who would benefit from additional EPA/DHA because of a chronic, inflammatory, or autoimmune condition.
But finding a high-quality fish oil is easier said than done. The global market for fish oil is north of $2 billion now. Whenever there’s that much money to be made, you can be sure all kinds of shenanigans will ensue!
So, let’s look at some of the most important factors to consider when buying fish oil.
Factors to consider when buying fish oil
There are five primary variables to be aware of when shopping for fish oil:
- Composition. In order to have the desired anti-inflammatory effect, fish oil must contain an adequate amount of the long-chain omega-3 derivatives EPA and DHA.
- Purity. The oil must meet or exceed international standards for heavy metals, PCBs, dioxins, and other contaminants. Many do not—even when they claim they do.
- Freshness. The oil should be fresh and not rancid. Rancid/oxidized oils promote oxidative damage and increase inflammation, both of which are risk factors for nearly every modern disease. Sadly, many fish oils on the market contain high levels of oxidative by-products.
- Bioavailability. The ability to absorb the beneficial components of fish oil is based on the molecular shape of the fatty acids. The more natural the structure, the better.
- Sustainability: The fish should be harvested in a sustainable manner, and species that are under threat should be avoided.
Composition
Composition refers to the overall concentration of EPA/DHA and the ratio of EPA to DHA. To some extent, this depends on the goal of taking fish oil. For example, some conditions may call for a higher proportion of DHA, while others benefit from more EPA.
Most studies suggest that a 3:2 ratio of EPA to DHA is optimal, with a total amount of omega-3 ranging between 500 mg and 2 g per day.
The optimal amount for each person will vary based on several factors, including how much fish/seafood you’re consuming in your diet. If you don’t eat any, and/or you have an inflammatory or autoimmune condition, you want to aim for the higher end. If you eat some fish/seafood, you can aim for the lower to mid-range.
Purity
Many species of fish are known to concentrate toxic chemicals like heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins, which can cause serious diseases, especially in children and developing fetuses. In a previous article, I explained how these chemicals are typically not a concern when eating whole fish because fish also contains selenium. Selenium binds to mercury and makes it unavailable to tissues, thus protecting against any damage it may cause.
To address this, fish oil manufacturers use a process called molecular distillation to remove the toxins from the oil. When done correctly, molecular distillation is capable of reducing the toxins in fish oil to levels considered to be safe by the EPA and other agencies.
Although almost any fish oil manufacturer will tell you their product is free of these toxins, independent lab analyses tell a different story. In March of 2010, a lawsuit was filed in California court against the manufacturers of ten popular fish oils because they contained undisclosed and (possibly) unsafe levels of contaminants.
Unfortunately, this kind of deception is all too common in the supplement industry. The best companies will be able to provide a Certificate of Analysis (COA) from the manufacturer upon request. A COA is an analysis performed by an independent lab to measure the ingredients of a product and confirm whether it lives up to the claims made by the manufacturer.
If the manufacturer won’t provide a COA, I start to get suspicious. This is standard practice in the industry, and there’s no reason they shouldn’t be happy to show you theirs.
In general, fish that are lower on the food chain, like sardines and anchovies, naturally have a lower concentration of contaminants. For this reason, it may be wise to look for a product made from these fish.
So what levels of these toxins are safe? As you might imagine, there is some disagreement on this question since there is no single governing body that determines acceptable levels. However, the standards that are most often followed by fish oil manufacturers are summarized in the table below.

* ppt = parts per trillion
* ppb = parts per billion
The best fish oils will not only meet but exceed these international standards.
Freshness
I have written extensively about the dangers of oxidized, rancid oils. They promote oxidative damage and increase inflammation, both of which are risk factors for nearly every modern disease.
This is why it’s crucial to ensure that the fish oil you select is fresh and not rancid. Once it has gone rancid, it will have the exact opposite effect on your body than you want it to.
The first thing to do is to check something called the “peroxide value” on the COA. This is a measure of rancidity reactions in the oil that have occurred during storage. It should be less than 5 meq/kg.
If this checks out, and you decide to order that product, break open a capsule once you receive it. There should be no “fishy” odors. They should smell like the ocean, but not like rotten fish. They should also not have a strong lemon or lime scent, which could be an indicator that the manufacturer is trying to mask the rancidity.
The p-anisidine value measures secondary oxidation products. The IFOS and GOED standard is less than 20 units. However, it’s important to note that p-anisidine is not appropriate for measuring secondary oxidation in omega-3 oils that have a strong color or contain added flavorings.
For example, salmon oil contains carotenoids, which have a natural yellow/orange coloring. Bio-Avail Omega+ from Adapt Naturals contains curcumin, which also has a natural orange coloring. This throws off the p-anisidine values and makes it an irrelevant test.
TOTOX is the last way to measure oxidation. It’s simply a combination of the peroxide and p-anisidine values. (For this reason, it’s also not appropriate for products with a strong color.) The IFOS and GOED thresholds are 19.5 and 26 meq/kg, respectively. But the best products have TOTOX values below 15 meq/kg.
Finally, some studies have shown that adding antioxidants (e.g. curcumin or resveratrol) to fish oil can improve stability.
A common misconception is that you can determine the quality of fish oil by freezing it. The theory goes that if you freeze the oil and it is cloudy, it’s rancid. That is not the case. All fish contain saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, albeit in small amounts. These fatty acids make the capsules appear cloudy when frozen in products that contain whole fish oil.
Potency
This is another area surrounded by significant controversy. Some argue the levels of individual constituents in fish oil aren’t paramount. Scientists discovered the healthful effects of omega-3s by studying people with fish-heavy diets, before supplemental fish oil even existed. Clinical trials using supplemental fish oils over the past few decades have contained widely variable levels of both long-chain omega-3 derivatives (EPA and DHA), and not super-high concentrations of either or both.
However, due to poor conversion of ALA to EPA and DHA, unless you are eating fish it is very likely you are deficient in long-chain omega-3s.
Following this line of reasoning, the DHA content in particular of fish and fish oils does seem important if we wish to obtain the best possible therapeutic effect. Many recent studies demonstrating the anti-inflammatory potential of fish oil used a daily dosage of DHA in the range of 1-3 grams. What’s more, foods like salmon roe that have been prized by traditional cultures for their nourishing and healing effects contain large amounts of DHA. A single 6 oz. serving of salmon roe contains 1 g of DHA. (In fact, this would be the best way by far of supplementing with DHA if money were no object. (Unfortunately, wild salmon roe goes for about $28/serving.)
Unfortunately, many fish oils do not have significant amounts of DHA. This means you’d have to take an impractically high number of capsules each day to obtain the therapeutic dose. This is not desirable, since all unsaturated oils (including fish oils) are subject to oxidative damage. We don’t want to take large quantities of them for this reason.
Remember to check the label and ensure that your product has approximately 200-300 mg of DHA per capsule. This will allow you to achieve the therapeutic dose by taking no more than 3 capsules twice a day.
Like what you’re reading? Get my free newsletter, recipes, eBooks, product recommendations, and more!
Bioavailability
The ability to absorb the beneficial components of fish oil is based on the molecular shape of the fatty acids. In short, the more natural the structure and the less it is chemically altered, the better.
This is true for any nutrient, of course, and it explains why I am always in favor of obtaining nutrients from food or food-based sources when possible. Each additional step in processing from the natural state of food to extract or isolate nutrients introduces the potential of damaging the nutrient or changing its chemical form so that it’s more difficult to absorb or affects the body in a different way.
When it comes to fish oils, there are three forms currently available on the market:
- Natural triglyercide oil. This is what you get when you “squeeze” the whole fish and extract the natural oil from it. It is the closest to eating fish oil in its natural form and is highly bioavailable. The drawback of this form is that, because it’s not concentrated, it usually has low levels of EPA and DHA. And because it isn’t purified, it can have high levels of contaminants such as heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins.
- Ethyl ester oil. Occurs when natural triglyceride oil is concentrated and molecularly distilled to remove impurities. The ester form is still in a semi-natural state because it is the result of a process that naturally occurs in the body. The advantage of this form is that it can double or triple the levels of EPA and DHA.
- Synthetic triglyceride oil. This form occurs when natural triglycerides are converted to ethyl esters for concentration (as above) but then re-converted into synthetic triglycerides. The original position of the triglyceride’s carbon bonds changes, and the molecule’s overall structure is altered, which impacts the bioavailability of the oil.
Studies on absorption of the various types of fish oil suggest that, unsurprisingly, the natural triglyceride form is absorbed better than the ethyl ester form, which in turn is absorbed better than the synthetic triglyceride form.
One study by Lawson & Hughes in 1988 showed that 1 gram of EPA and 0.67 grams of DHA as natural triglycerides were absorbed 3.4 and 2.7 fold as well as the ethyl ester triglycerides.
In the previous article, we saw that fish oils were better absorbed when taken with a high-fat meal. In another study by Lawson & Hughes later the same year, they showed that the absorption of EPA & DHA from natural triglycerides improved from 69% with a low-fat meal (8g total fat) to 90% with a high-fat meal (44g total fat). Absorption of both EPA and DHA from ethyl ester oils was increased three-fold from 20% with a low-fat meal to 60% with a high-fat meal.
Sustainability
Our global fisheries are in dire straits, and fish oil is a big business. So, it’s crucial to choose a product that is manufactured with sustainability in mind and that has a fully transparent and traceable supply chain.
The easiest way to do this is to choose a product that is certified by organizations like Friend of the Sea or MarinTrust, two of the leading organizations for sustainable and responsible fishery management.
I would also choose a supplier/manufacturer with practices that minimize waste and its environmental impact.
For example, rather than catching fish that is only used to produce fish oil, some producers instead use fish meal to make the oil. This eliminates one of the main concerns about fish oil, which is that it will further deplete fisheries.
Recommendation
As a Functional Medicine clinician, author, and educator, I’ve been following the fish oil market closely for many years. I’ve used several different fish oils with my patients. I’ve read hundreds of studies on the purity, freshness, composition, and benefits of fish oil. I’ve spoken to industry experts and insiders, and I know what many companies do to cut corners and save money (at your expense).
When I started my own supplement company, Adapt Naturals, I knew that one of the first products we’d make would be fish oil. I wanted to create a product with the purest, freshest, and most sustainable fish oil available. And that’s exactly what we did with Bio-Avail Omega+.
I chose VivoOmega from GC Rieber as our fish oil. As the chart below illustrates, it significantly exceeds international standards for both purity and freshness.

Purity and freshness are critical. But I didn’t stop there. Most people who take fish oil are taking it to achieve certain outcomes, like better muscle and joint health, increased mental clarity, a more stable mood, clearer skin, and more balanced immune function.
So, when I formulated our fish oil product (Bio-Avail Omega+), I added the most bioavailable forms of two powerful nutrients that also support these goals: curcumin and black seed oil.
Now you can get the benefits of all three of these superfood nutrients in a single, two soft-gel daily serving.
Bio-Avail Omega+ contains an optimal composition of EPA and DHA (510 mg of EPA and 330 mg of DHA, a 3:2 ratio). It is made with triglyceride oils for optimal bioavailability and absorption. And it is produced with the most sustainable and traceable fish oil material in the industry. (See this page for more info.)
I’m proud of this product. It came directly out of my experience working with patients for 15 years and my extensive research into what is most important in a fish oil product. I hope it helps you to achieve your health goals!
Better supplementation. Fewer supplements.
Close the nutrient gap to feel and perform your best.
A daily stack of supplements designed to meet your most critical needs.

Chris:
Just got my Omega-3 index back from OmegaQuant and it is 13.4. As an experiment to test to see if the advertising about taking fish oil works, I have been taking two capsules per day (800 mg EPA 400 mg DHA) of NutraGold Triacylglycerol (Triglyceride on the label) and Jarrows Max DHA (250 mg DHA and 65 mg DHA) at night. I also take Kirkland Natural Omega-3 Fish oil (not the enteric ethyl esters). Both are TAG. I also eat sardines and salmon at least once per week and I exercise twice per day. I am not sure what contributed most to the rise in the omega-3 index, diet or supplements. I think both made a contribution.
However, although I am happy with my score, I don’t want to get a false sense of longevity based on an omega-3 index. Knowing that the odds are in my favor based on all those studies about CVD and CHD and omega-3s, I will continue my normal lifestyle. I don’t smoke or drink and try to eat healthy with an occasional apple pie and ice cream.
As I mentioned, I would invest in the omega-3 index test at $29.95 at http://omegaquant.com/omega-3-index/. I got my results within one week. Good investment, however, don’t get complacent about your health. Lightening could strike you while you are taking your fish oil.
Obviously, your results will vary.
Pixe
It is Vital Choice all the way. Have been taking it for years. Their cans of sockeye salmon and albacore tuna are beyond perfect..
Hi Pixe,
Like Ticamon, I am interested in your opinion of the Metagenics Fish Oil, as a practitioner only product, it is readily available in Australia.
hi, so am i right that krill oil is not a good fish oil supplement to take?
.
and has the Biotrust new supplement got your approval Pixe?
many thanks to you and all giving input here!!
i am not wanting a high EPA particularly , just normal extra bit of some kind of omega 3. EPA/ DHA still eluding me so far!!
Jay:
Don’t waste your money. I will have details shortly.
Lot # 1401051 there is no expiration or manufacturing date on my bottle which I believe is a violation of the law.
Stay tuned!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
P
Any updates on biotrust?
Kier:
My bottle with lot number 1401051 with no expiration or manufacture date (violation of DSHEA) does not contain Krill oil. Because there is no date, no telling when the product was produced. It is not the equivalent amount 2,300 mg DHA/EPA claimed.
I filed a complaint with the FDA and FTC for false claims and false advertising.
This is a ripoff to me. False advertising. I would not purchase this product based on “OmegaKrill 5X” thinking that you will get Krill oil. See my current report at http://www.omega-3snakeoil.com.
Pixe
Many opinion on Metagenics brand? They have a high dha product that provides 600 dha (and 60 EPA) in just 1 pill. Granted it’s much more expensive (around $50 for 90 servings) but I like the high dose in just one pill. Was wondering if quality justified price. Thanks!
PIXE-
What do you know about Omega Cure?
The Omega Cure product is monitored by two dedicated doctors that are also owner of the company that distribute this product. Their raw material is based on oil produced from pure and fresh atlantic cod liver. The raw material used in the production of this oil has certain requirements; One of them is that the raw material must be totally fresh and come from a cod catch on the same day it goes into crude oil production. I also know that the raw material goes through a particular selection for this brand. Only two producers in the world can comply with the standards that Omega Cure require for the oil that they distribute. Therefore the high price. They btw have celebrity customers like Jennifer Aniston.
Omega cure is the ONLY fish oil that I trust. You know it’s fresh when you can put a spoonful of fish oil in your mouth and it’s not fishy. Must take within 5 weeks or it starts to smell fishy – another indicator that the oil is super fresh upon delivery.
Also unlike other fish oil companies, they send you the oil in a fully insulated box with ice packs in it.
Companies like Nordic Naturals will send you fish oils in transparent bottles that arrive warm (stay away).
Nordic’s liquid oils are in dark blue bottles, not clear.
Randi, where did you get the information on their sourcing and production process? Everything I can find on this company seems to be sales literature, although I really do like their premise.
Mary:
I have this on order and will report back after it arrives. See http://www.omega-3snakeoil.com
Pixe
🙂
how can a molecular distilled product claimed to be in natural Triglyceride form eg Jarrow max DHA? I am confused!
Pixie,
Do you have any recommendation of good brands in UK?
many thanks
CORRECTION:
In my comment just completed I misstated the amount of DHA contained in four caps OmegaBrite Ethyl Ester, and, correspondingly the ratio of EPA to DHA I stated is different.
Each cap of OmegaBrite contains 350 mg EPA, and 50 mg DHA, a ratio of 7 to 1 EPA to DHA. 3 caps daily is the suggested dose on the OmegaBrite label. That works out to 3X350 mg or 1050 mg total EPA, and 3X50 or 150 mg DHA in one daily dose 3 caps. In addition, 3 caps supplies 150 mg “Other Omega-3 Fatty Acids,” 60 mg “Omega-6 Fatty Acids,” and 85 mg “Other Fatty Acids.”
My daily dose of OmegaBrite caps is four (4) caps, which altogether contain 1,400 mg EPA, and 200 mg DHA [not 350 mg as I misstated]. I apologize for any confusion arising from these discrepancies.
For tasty, creative ways to prepare sardines Italy and Portugal, for example, have had centuries of experience incorporating them into their daily diet. A good Italian cookbook with varieties of seafood recipes will probably give you ideas for preparing sardines the way *you will enjoy them.* They’re very tasty when prepared and cooked properly in a good recipe.
Anchovies, too, are a practical and versatile choice of oily fish which, like sardines, will provide substantial quantities of healthy Omega-3 Fatty Acids. Again, cultures such as those in Italy, Portugal, and Scandinavia would be valuable and rewarding to consult. Fresh anchovies are much harder to find a good source, but with a little persistence you might find one to supply you. Fresh anchovies are also tasty – very tasty imo – whether fresh or salted and tinned. Have fun exploring and creating your own delicious recipes as you gain more experience. Grilling for fresh sardines and anchovies is an ideal way to prepare a hot dish and the harmonious accompanying ingredients and dishes are similarly extensive.
For approx. 20 years I have taken OmegaBrite Ethyl Ester Omega-3 EPA/DHA exclusively, for general overall health, and specifically as adjunct to prescription mood stabilizers and antidepressants, for bipolar depression and major depression. They have proved invaluable to use in such capacity, with consistent effectiveness and strength dose-dependent, i.e., two caps is about as much more effective as one compared to none, three and four capsules the same improvement in mood and affect. Beyond four caps, which taken altogether contain 1,400 mg EPA and 350 mg DHA, I experience only slight improvement. Hence, 4 caps once a day is a good dosage for me. I have had no fishy burps or fish aftertaste at this dosage.
At one time past, OmegaBrite EPA/DHA caps received 5 stars on the FIOS website, however OmegaBrite is no longer listed there. This is puzzling to me, why the OmegaBrite people would not continue to submit samples for testing by FIOS – they do continue to receive a very high rating by ConsumerLab, perhaps the OmegaBrite people consider that rating to suffice. I don’t know if there is a significant cost to send samples periodically to FIOS, but that could be the reason, however I don’t know and thus far I haven’t asked OmegaBrite for an answer to the question of cost of testing.
Recently, on Pixe’s suggestion I purchased one bottle of Nordic Naturals EPA Elite Omega-3 EPA/DHA to try. I have been taking 2 caps a day of the Nordic Naturals EPA ELITE, and have noticed little to no difference in the way I feel compared to OmegaBrite. Two caps of Nordic Naturals Elite according to the label on the bottle contain 1,600 mg EPA and 60 mg “Other Omega-3s” which presumably include DHA, though a DHA value is not given, so I don’t know for certain.
Both OmegaBrite EPA/DHA Ethyl Ester and Nordic Naturals EPA Elite Ethyl Ester have a very high ratio of EPA to DHA, approx. 7 to 1 for OmegaBrite, and indeterminate for Nordic Naturals but certainly also very high ratio, probably in excess of the 7 : 1 ratio EPA to DHA for OmegaBrite.
My reason for choosing to use Omega-3s with such high ratios EPA to DHA is that a couple of recently published double-blind research studies of effectiveness of Omega 3s for adjunct treatment of bipolar depression, have stated that mental health researchers generally have come to find that high EPA to DHA ratio, including pure EPA alone, are more effective than combined EPA/DHA Omega-3 formulations. I have found this to be true for myself, that a high ratio EPA to DHA Omega-3 results in my feeling better than other Omega-3s I’ve tried recently which have the more typical ratios 2 to 1, 3 to 1, or 4 to 1 EPA to DHA found in other brands. For most people’s general overall health I expect one of those higher ratio EPA to EHA brand Omega-3s would be preferable to the very high ratio EPA to DHA found in OmegaBrite and Nordic Naturals EPA Elite. Nordic Naturals have a number of other Omega-3 EPA/DHA products which have more typical ratios EPA to DHA, so one of those would be preferable I guess to the EPA Elite product which I take.
Tom:
You need to give it time for the EPA Elite to work. Scientifically, this should work better than OmegaBrite ethyl esters. Also, Nordic Naturals Elite EPA is not an ethyl ester it is rTAG.
In the public domain is a very detailed report with individual patients with a variety of mental health issues being treated with Vascepa (EPA only ethyl esters). See US Patent 8,188,146.
https://www.google.com/patents/US8188146?dq=8188146&hl=en&sa=X&ei=XtpLU9LBCuTNsQSQmIG4Cw&ved=0CDUQ6AEwAA
Pixe
Chris:
I will be highlighting products that violate DSHEA at
http://www.omega-3snakeoil.com
Pixe
I am in agreement with Dannie ^^ I am a healthy 21 year old in good shape, and without high cholesterol or blood pressure problems. In simplified terms can someone just tell me if taking a normal omega-3 supplement from Nordic Naturals would be considered safe and somewhat effective in providing my body with healthy fatty acids?
What, if anything, is so bad about this company and they way they produce their omega-3 and cod liver oil supplements?
This thread began in 2010, so what is the current recommended company that we should be buying from?
I’m just looking for a supplement that will help reduce inflammation and improve my skin. Any input would be appreciated!
Jayme- The main thing you want to look for is the amount of EPA and DHA in one capsule. The world health organization and American heart Association recommends at least 300-500 mg per day for healthy adults. If you or your family have a history cardiovascular disease they recommend 1-4 grams a day.
I personally like Ocean Blue Omega-3 (www.oceanblueprofessional.com) because they are the highest omega-3 per capsule that you can buy without a prescription. This means less capsules you have to take and less unwanted fish fat and unknown impurities because of the high purity of oil they use. They also are fully tested as per the USP guidelines and they are actually made in the USA. Most other fish oil products are made outside the USA and just packaged in the USA. Check them out and compare the EPA and DHA amounts per capsule versus Nordic naturals.
Thank you Chad!!!
Jayme:
It is not so much about the company, it is about the product. Nordic Naturals is expensive but they are rTAG and no ethyl esters. Re-esterified triacylglycerol is not natural fish oil. Technically, it is classified as omega-3 triacylglycerol (formerly triglyceride). I believe Nordic is in control of the whole process from catch to capsule. They have improved their products because the older products still had residual ethyl esters from the conversion to rTAGs. Their EPA elite product which is about 80% EPA/EPA/EPA rTAG which in my thoughts will challenge the prescription drug Vascepa that is ethyl ester. My thought is that you can do more with less for rTAG because it is fat that the body’s digestion mechanism recognizes. In my opinion, Vascepa patients are overdosed because of the body’s defensive system (digestion) to block ethyl esters from being digested and absorbed.
It is my opinion that even though Nordic Naturals is expensive, you have to look at it from the scientific point. You may only need to take much less of the Nordic Natural product to get the same effect of more expensive ethyl ester products of higher concentrations or other products that are delivered in an enteric capsule.
Don’t believe all the marketing fiction as I will explain more snake oil products at http://www.omega-3snakeoil.com.
Only my opinion and best to diet first to get the Inuit effect.
Pixe
i am 25 y/o and i am just trying to include omega-3 supplements in my diet to become healthier overall because of all the benefits it provides. however, i didnt realize how much there was to choosing a fish oil supplement brand to buy and i am honestly in info overload!!!! i am becoming overwhelmed with it all. therefore, i was wondering if you could answer 2 questions for me… 1-do you take omega-3 fish oil supplements? 2-if you do, which brand do you take? i figure if i choose the brand that an omega-3 fish oil supplement expert chooses for themself then that would be the smartest way to go.
Dannie:
I would do a dietary inventory of the foods you typically eat weekly and calculate how much omega-3s you get from the diet. I eat salmon and sardines once a week when possible although salmon is expensive. In my area, there was a sale on Season Brand Skinless & Boneless Sardines for $1.98 that provides 1,300 mg of omega-3s. I purchased several cans and snack on these.
The American Heart Association recommends two oily fish meals a week which is about 500-600 mg/day omega-3. Eating two cans of sardines a week provides about 371 mg/day for about $208/year or $17.33/month or about $.60/day. Seems the price is competitive with some bogus “fish oil” dietary supplements and you get a good source of protein. I know, eating a can of sardines twice a week does not seem appealing but, be creative.
Another alternative is to get an omega-3 index test that is currently on sale for $29.95 from http://omegaquant.com/omega-3-index/. This way, you can determine your status and save your money purchasing omega-3 dietary supplements that depending on the brand, maybe useless.
Diet first, exercise, stop smoking, etc. and perhaps you can change your OM6/OM3 ratio for the better.
Personal opinion.
Pixe
Thanks Pixe. You’re seriously an omega-3 expert.
Hi, I found this, incredibly informative albeit hard to digest article, in my search for info on Simply Right fish oil -from Sam’s Club- specifically dosage and contents. I am relatively young and have high blood pressure that I would like to try to get in check the more natural way. Tired of doctors, Dr visits, Dr bills, pills pills pills and the cost of those pills let alone what they do to the rest of my body. I’ve been looking into fish oil and Coq10 for this reason. I’d like to know what your, informed, opinion is on the Simply Right brand. Any and all information is much appreciated. Please help me digest this info and some, helpful, supplements.
Just wondered if you have any opinion on the Brand Omax3. I currently take Puritan’s Price Omega 3 Salmon oil. Not sure of the quality of this brand.
Omax3 is a very pure ethyl ester product and almost rivals the purity of the prescription drug Lovaza.
Pixe
Omax3 is heavily tilted to EPA. Each softgel contains 563 mg EPA and 138 mg DHA for a 4.1:1 ratio. By comparison (using Pixe’s numbers), Nutrigold Triple Strength is 3:1, Lovaza is 1.3:1. The rTAG product Nordic Naturals Ultimate Omega is 1.4:1. If you take Omax3 it’s because you are more interested in EPA.
Ok, so read about 2 years of comments.
I’ve always imported Carlsons liquid fish oil from the states but am now quite confused.
Is it ok?
I’m in the UK , money is not an concern, Pixie, what would you suggest that’s purchasable in the UK?
Simon:
Not to patronize US companies abroad, but try the simple Costco Kirkland Natural 400 count TAG oil (http://www.costco.co.uk/view/product/uk_catalog/cos_7,cos_7.2,cos_7.2.1/142959). Each capsule supplies 300 mg EPA+DHA. Taking two of these will provide 600 mg/day which I believe is about the recommended daily dose in the UK. The UK has much more stricter laws for dietary supplements. I believe the Eskimo brand is from the UK. Perhaps you don’t need to supplement. Invest in a good diet or get the omega-3 index kit http://www.omegaquant.com/omega-3-index $30.00 US to determine your status. Then, you may not need to supplement.
Pixe
Fish oil is such a wide expression. What kind of fish?, which source for the crude oil?, where is the oil itself produced?, conditions?, sustainability? When this information is blury, I am as always more concerned about totox value than EPA/DHA, which in principle is a matter of daily intake only.
The quality of the final product will always depend on the source and quality of what goes into the final production.
Thanks Pixie.
I’ve never heard of Kirkland, this is a reputable brand?
Is Carlsons not a reputable brand ?
Simon:
Kirkland is a reputable brand from Costco. It is USP verified.
From USP: “Seeing the USP Verified Mark on a dietary supplement label indicates that the product:
Contains the ingredients listed on the label, in the declared potency and amounts Read More.
Does not contain harmful levels of specified contaminants Read More.
Will break down and release into the body within a specified amount of time Read More.
Has been made according to FDA current Good Manufacturing Practices using sanitary and well-controlled procedures Read More.
Assurance of safe, sanitary, well-controlled, and well-documented manufacturing and monitoring processes indicates that a supplement manufacturer is quality-conscious, and that the supplement will be manufactured with consistent quality from batch to batch.”
However, get only the natural one (real fish oil) and not the enteric one that is ethyl ester and to me, less effective.
Be aware that the softgels are rather large. Each capsule weighs 1.53025 g with length 24.50 mm and diameter 10.09 mm.
Pixe
Pixe,
Is the following link for the “real fish oil”?
http://www.amazon.com/Kirkland-Signature-Concentrate-Softgels-Omega-3s/dp/B000EQW3ZA
Thank you.
Pixe, your recommending Kirkland is a perfect example of a product which varies in quality depending on where you buy it. Mail order Kirkland, even from Costco, has been found to contain rancid fish oil in some cases where the consumer has had a negative experience, past sell-by date in others. I don’t know if there is a similar difference in quality buying in-store, but it raises the question, is the lower cost worthwhile. Obviously, buyer beware applies, but not everybody can remember which product is consistently good quality, and which may vary in quality to the point of making it an unacceptable choice.
What are your thoughts on Ocean Blue Omega-3? Looks like the highest amount of EPA & DHA in one capsule. 1050 mg of omega-3 per capsule, 675mg of EPA and 300mg of DHA in each capsule. This is higher than Lovaza!
They actually did a clinical trial on their product.
http://web.a.ebscohost.com/abstract?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=2157944X&AN=88261117&h=Cp4tMRcehDpicAKM0LpCTJCQk%2fxV58JktvI71tK9Xf%2bWrFPs%2bPcSWgKPC%2fJC4RWFG8S0PnVRk%2bFMwM6UMo3Xrg%3d%3d&crl=c
Also, you should read the newest article on krill oil… does not seem to work as good as people were told.
Berge K, Musa-Veloso K, Harwood M, Hoem N, Burri L,. Krill Oil supplementation lowers serum triglycerides without increasing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in adults with borderline high or high triglyceride levels. Nutrition Research 2014; 34: 126-133
3
Chad:
This product does not have the highest OM3 per capsule. Others on the market are Nutrigold Triple Strength Omega-3 Gold in which one softgel supplies 750 mg EPA-EE and 250 mg DHA-EE. If you take these high dose products that contain the same active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) that are in the FDA-approved prescription drugs Lovaza (465 mg EPA-EE, 370 mg DHA-EE) and Vascepa (1,000 mg EPA-EE), you should read the prescribing information for Lovaza (www.lovaza.com and http://www.Vascepa.com).
Of particular interest for taking these high dose products, you can’t stop taking them without consultation with your doctor.
Here is part of what is on the warning label for Lovaza: “Your doctor may start you on a diet that is low in saturated fat, cholesterol, carbohydrates, and low in added sugars before giving you LOVAZA. Stay on this diet while taking LOVAZA.
* Your doctor should do blood tests to check your triglyceride, bad cholesterol and liver function levels while you take LOVAZA.
What are the possible side effects of LOVAZA?
LOVAZA may cause serious side effects, including:
* increases in the results of blood tests used to check your liver function (ALT and AST) and your bad cholesterol levels (LDL-C).
* increases in the frequency of a heart rhythm problem (atrial fibrillation or flutter) may especially happen in the first few months of taking LOVAZA if you already have that problem.”
Also, the serving size for Ocean Blue (my bottle Lot 05CGO 1B, Exp. 07-2015) says two softgels that will provide 2,100 mg of omega-3s. The FDA does not allow more than 2,000 mg OM3 for a dietary supplement.
At least OB is partially honest about the label in that they say up front that it is an ethyl ester. The only contradiction is the term “fish oil” in which case this product dietary supplement is not the oil extracted from fish and is not “fish oil.” Also, the clinical trial was a nice way to showcase their product to compete with the prescription drugs at a fraction of the price.
Not sure of the statement “Made from 100% American fish oils” while the label says “Fish Oil (from anchovy).”
Also, these products don’t work well on a low fat diet which is the main reason for taking Lovaza and Vascepa is to lower blood fat. See the story on EPANOVA, the free fatty acid pending FDA approval for lowering blood fat (TAG) while on a low fat diet.
Pixe
Just FYI…Jarrow Max DHA is NOT made from sardines and mackerel…it’s made from squid. 🙂
Chris,
Thank you so much for this information. Could you please address some of the concerns regarding rancidity of the Fermented Cod Liver Oil? I had read about this in a few places, and was ready to order until I read through your comments. Do you know more about how Green Pastures sources their fish and their process? Do you still recommend this as you did in the article?
Thank you!!!
What is your view of BioTrust OmegaKrill 5x, which is making some spectacular claims regarding purity, bioavailability, rancidity, and balance of EPA/DHA? Do they have a COA as far as you can tell?
Richard:
Did you purchase this product? If so, is there any dates on the bottle? See my update at http://www.omega-3snakeoil.com.
Pixe
As of today, 10/15/2014, BioTrust’s recent batch is listed on the IFOS website (and I received an email from BioTrust w/that analysis as well). Is this the same thing as the Certificate of Analysis (COA) you’re referring to?
Weightress:
Notice that it is only certified for EPA and DHA as a fish oil and not certified for phospholipids that are in krill oil. I asked the company to go through the IKOS certification process because I believe they would fail for having just a trace of krill oil in this product that is not krill oil. If the product is being marketed as OmegaKrill, then why not have it certified for Krill Oil and phospholipids and not as a “fish oil.” Can BioTrust prove to us that: “OmegaKrill 5X™ is easily the #1 Omega-3 supplement on the market.”?
The IFOS consumer report is similar to COA but the IFOS consumer report is the sanitized simple consumer report. Some companies (Nutrigold) will send the entire report that they received from IFOS so that you can see all the details. Again, BioTrust (I have nothing against the company) has not come up with the OmegaKrill5x clinical claim study (peer reviewed) for their product. This raised a red flag at FDA and FTC for potential violations. Any clinical claims must be with the product making the claim and not some other study using a similar product with, in BioTrust’s case, polysorbate 80. Since they shipped me a product with no dates (cGMP potential violation, 21 CFR Part 111) on the bottle, I would rather verify first, then trust later.
See my additional comments:
http://omega-3snakeoil.com/
In my opinion, a better product would be http://www.coromega.com/ Coromega’s fish oil. They have published a clinical study using their product and they can substantiate their claim of “3x” better absorption.
Diet first,
Pixe
Forgot the link in my last post.
http://www.liquidkrilloil.com/
Joe