A streamlined stack of supplements designed to meet your most critical needs - Adapt Naturals is now live. Learn more

The Definitive Fish Oil Buyer’s Guide

by

Published on

iStock.com/batteriesnotincluded

Update: I now recommend Bio-Avail Omega+ from Adapt Naturals. It’s a blend of ultra-pure fish oil and the most bioavailable forms of curcumin and black seed oil.

Summary

Sorry, folks. Another long one. It was unavoidable, though, because I really did want this to be a “definitive guide” that covers all (or at least most) of the relevant issues involved with choosing a fish oil. Here’s a summary for the time-challenged:

  • There are five important factors to consider when choosing a fish oil: composition, purity, freshness, bioavailability, and sustainability.
  • Not all fish oils are created equal. It’s essential to do your homework and make an informed choice. Many fish oils are oxidized or made with poor-quality ingredients and may cause health problems instead of solving them.
  • The potency of various products depends not only upon the levels of EPA and DHA but also upon the molecular structure of the fats in the oil, which in turn affects absorption.
  • Natural triglyceride fish oils are better absorbed than highly purified (i.e. ester) fish oils.
  • Many fish oils are made from fish that are endangered. Choose products made from fish that are certified by organizations such as Friend of the Sea or MarinTrust.

Introduction

So far in this series we’ve looked at why fish is superior to plant-based sources of omega-3. We’ve examined the importance of reducing consumption of omega-6 fats. We’ve considered how much omega-3 is needed to support health and treat disease. We’ve revealed that concerns about the safety of fish consumption have been overblown, and that eating fish regularly is not only safe but incredibly beneficial. And in the previous article we compared the benefits of eating fish to taking fish oil.

In this final article of the series, we’re going to take a closer look at fish oil. Fish oil is one of the most popular supplements taken by consumers today. Most people who are at least relatively health conscious understand that they need omega-3 in their diet and are probably not getting enough from food (unless they eat a lot of fish).

But why should you consider taking fish oil in the first place? Which fish oils are best? How much should you take? And what should you look for in a good product?

There’s a tremendous difference in the ingredients, purity, freshness and therapeutic benefit of the fish oils available today. The supplement industry is rife with false claims and unsavory companies that are far more interested in profiting on the fish oil craze than they are in your health and well-being.

In this article, I’ll focus more on dispelling common misconceptions about fish oil and helping you to choose the best product for your needs.

My current thoughts on fish oil

My view and recommendations for fish oil have evolved over time.

I’ll tell you what has remained constant first, then tell you what has changed.

I still recommend getting EPA/DHA from the diet whenever possible—either as your exclusive source or as a foundation to build upon.

And I still don’t recommend super-high doses of fish oil, like 10 grams per day. This isn’t common anymore, but there was a time when many health gurus were suggesting this as a way to reduce inflammation. But it’s not supported by research, and there’s no additional benefit beyond the 1-3 grams a day studies suggest is the best therapeutic target.

What has changed is my growing appreciation for the role fish oil can play in ensuring adequate EPA/DHA intake for many people. For all of the reasons I’ve mentioned in this series, many folks are just not getting enough EPA/DHA, and taking a fish oil supplement is probably the only way they’re going to get these critical fatty acids.

It’s also true that some people benefit from greater amounts of EPA/DHA than they can easily obtain in their diet.

My specific recommendations for EPA/DHA supplementation have also evolved. I have recommended cod liver oil for many years, and I still do today. It’s a good option because it contains vitamins A and D in addition to EPA/DHA.

However, the amounts of EPA and DHA are lower in cod liver oil than in most fish oil supplements. And if you’re already consuming organ meats like liver or an organ meat supplement, like Bio-Avail Organ from Adapt Naturals, you don’t really need (or even want) the additional A/D from cod liver oil.

This is why I now recommend a high-quality fish oil supplement for people who are either not getting enough EPA/DHA from their diet or who would benefit from additional EPA/DHA because of a chronic, inflammatory, or autoimmune condition.

But finding a high-quality fish oil is easier said than done. The global market for fish oil is north of $2 billion now. Whenever there’s that much money to be made, you can be sure all kinds of shenanigans will ensue!

So, let’s look at some of the most important factors to consider when buying fish oil.

Factors to consider when buying fish oil

There are five primary variables to be aware of when shopping for fish oil:

  1. Composition. In order to have the desired anti-inflammatory effect, fish oil must contain an adequate amount of the long-chain omega-3 derivatives EPA and DHA.
  2. Purity. The oil must meet or exceed international standards for heavy metals, PCBs, dioxins, and other contaminants. Many do not—even when they claim they do.
  3. Freshness. The oil should be fresh and not rancid. Rancid/oxidized oils promote oxidative damage and increase inflammation, both of which are risk factors for nearly every modern disease. Sadly, many fish oils on the market contain high levels of oxidative by-products.
  4. Bioavailability. The ability to absorb the beneficial components of fish oil is based on the molecular shape of the fatty acids. The more natural the structure, the better.
  5. Sustainability: The fish should be harvested in a sustainable manner, and species that are under threat should be avoided.

Composition

Composition refers to the overall concentration of EPA/DHA and the ratio of EPA to DHA. To some extent, this depends on the goal of taking fish oil. For example, some conditions may call for a higher proportion of DHA, while others benefit from more EPA.

Most studies suggest that a 3:2 ratio of EPA to DHA is optimal, with a total amount of omega-3 ranging between 500 mg and 2 g per day.

The optimal amount for each person will vary based on several factors, including how much fish/seafood you’re consuming in your diet. If you don’t eat any, and/or you have an inflammatory or autoimmune condition, you want to aim for the higher end. If you eat some fish/seafood, you can aim for the lower to mid-range.

Purity

Many species of fish are known to concentrate toxic chemicals like heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins, which can cause serious diseases, especially in children and developing fetuses. In a previous article, I explained how these chemicals are typically not a concern when eating whole fish because fish also contains selenium. Selenium binds to mercury and makes it unavailable to tissues, thus protecting against any damage it may cause.

And while fish constitute only 9% of our dietary intake of dioxins and PCBs, high doses of fish oils taken every day (as is often recommended) may raise this percentage significantly and expose us to undesirable levels of these toxins.

To address this, fish oil manufacturers use a process called molecular distillation to remove the toxins from the oil. When done correctly, molecular distillation is capable of reducing the toxins in fish oil to levels considered to be safe by the EPA and other agencies.

Although almost any fish oil manufacturer will tell you their product is free of these toxins, independent lab analyses tell a different story. In March of 2010, a lawsuit was filed in California court against the manufacturers of ten popular fish oils because they contained undisclosed and (possibly) unsafe levels of contaminants.

Unfortunately, this kind of deception is all too common in the supplement industry. The best companies will be able to provide a Certificate of Analysis (COA) from the manufacturer upon request. A COA is an analysis performed by an independent lab to measure the ingredients of a product and confirm whether it lives up to the claims made by the manufacturer.

If the manufacturer won’t provide a COA, I start to get suspicious. This is standard practice in the industry, and there’s no reason they shouldn’t be happy to show you theirs.

In general, fish that are lower on the food chain, like sardines and anchovies, naturally have a lower concentration of contaminants. For this reason, it may be wise to look for a product made from these fish.

So what levels of these toxins are safe? As you might imagine, there is some disagreement on this question since there is no single governing body that determines acceptable levels. However, the standards that are most often followed by fish oil manufacturers are summarized in the table below.

fish oil toxin standards

* ppt = parts per trillion
* ppb = parts per billion

The best fish oils will not only meet but exceed these international standards.

Freshness

I have written extensively about the dangers of oxidized, rancid oils. They promote oxidative damage and increase inflammation, both of which are risk factors for nearly every modern disease.

The more unsaturated an fat is, the more vulnerable it is to oxidation. Long-chain, omega-3 fats found in fish oil are the most unsaturated of the fats, and thus the most susceptible to being damaged.

This is why it’s crucial to ensure that the fish oil you select is fresh and not rancid. Once it has gone rancid, it will have the exact opposite effect on your body than you want it to.

The first thing to do is to check something called the “peroxide value” on the COA. This is a measure of rancidity reactions in the oil that have occurred during storage. It should be less than 5 meq/kg.

If this checks out, and you decide to order that product, break open a capsule once you receive it. There should be no “fishy” odors. They should smell like the ocean, but not like rotten fish. They should also not have a strong lemon or lime scent, which could be an indicator that the manufacturer is trying to mask the rancidity.

The p-anisidine value measures secondary oxidation products. The IFOS and GOED standard is less than 20 units. However, it’s important to note that p-anisidine is not appropriate for measuring secondary oxidation in omega-3 oils that have a strong color or contain added flavorings.

For example, salmon oil contains carotenoids, which have a natural yellow/orange coloring. Bio-Avail Omega+ from Adapt Naturals contains curcumin, which also has a natural orange coloring. This throws off the p-anisidine values and makes it an irrelevant test.

TOTOX is the last way to measure oxidation. It’s simply a combination of the peroxide and p-anisidine values. (For this reason, it’s also not appropriate for products with a strong color.) The IFOS and GOED thresholds are 19.5 and 26 meq/kg, respectively. But the best products have TOTOX values below 15 meq/kg.

Finally, some studies have shown that adding antioxidants (e.g. curcumin or resveratrol) to fish oil can improve stability.

A common misconception is that you can determine the quality of fish oil by freezing it. The theory goes that if you freeze the oil and it is cloudy, it’s rancid. That is not the case. All fish contain saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, albeit in small amounts. These fatty acids make the capsules appear cloudy when frozen in products that contain whole fish oil.

Potency

This is another area surrounded by significant controversy. Some argue the levels of individual constituents in fish oil aren’t paramount. Scientists discovered the healthful effects of omega-3s by studying people with fish-heavy diets, before supplemental fish oil even existed. Clinical trials using supplemental fish oils over the past few decades have contained widely variable levels of both long-chain omega-3 derivatives (EPA and DHA), and not super-high concentrations of either or both.

However, due to poor conversion of ALA to EPA and DHA, unless you are eating fish it is very likely you are deficient in long-chain omega-3s.

Following this line of reasoning, the DHA content in particular of fish and fish oils does seem important if we wish to obtain the best possible therapeutic effect. Many recent studies demonstrating the anti-inflammatory potential of fish oil used a daily dosage of DHA in the range of 1-3 grams. What’s more, foods like salmon roe that have been prized by traditional cultures for their nourishing and healing effects contain large amounts of DHA. A single 6 oz. serving of salmon roe contains 1 g of DHA. (In fact, this would be the best way by far of supplementing with DHA if money were no object. (Unfortunately, wild salmon roe goes for about $28/serving.)

The suggested DHA dose will of course depend upon the condition being treated. If you have a chronic inflammatory condition (heart disease, arthritis, Crohn’s or ulcerative colitis, etc.) I would suggest taking between 1 and 2 grams per day. If you are taking it simply for health maintenance, 500 mg is probably sufficient.

Unfortunately, many fish oils do not have significant amounts of DHA. This means you’d have to take an impractically high number of capsules each day to obtain the therapeutic dose. This is not desirable, since all unsaturated oils (including fish oils) are subject to oxidative damage. We don’t want to take large quantities of them for this reason.

Remember to check the label and ensure that your product has approximately 200-300 mg of DHA per capsule. This will allow you to achieve the therapeutic dose by taking no more than 3 capsules twice a day.

Like what you’re reading? Get my free newsletter, recipes, eBooks, product recommendations, and more!

Bioavailability

The ability to absorb the beneficial components of fish oil is based on the molecular shape of the fatty acids. In short, the more natural the structure and the less it is chemically altered, the better.

This is true for any nutrient, of course, and it explains why I am always in favor of obtaining nutrients from food or food-based sources when possible. Each additional step in processing from the natural state of food to extract or isolate nutrients introduces the potential of damaging the nutrient or changing its chemical form so that it’s more difficult to absorb or affects the body in a different way.

When it comes to fish oils, there are three forms currently available on the market:

  1. Natural triglyercide oil. This is what you get when you “squeeze” the whole fish and extract the natural oil from it. It is the closest to eating fish oil in its natural form and is highly bioavailable. The drawback of this form is that, because it’s not concentrated, it usually has low levels of EPA and DHA. And because it isn’t purified, it can have high levels of contaminants such as heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins.
  2. Ethyl ester oil. Occurs when natural triglyceride oil is concentrated and molecularly distilled to remove impurities. The ester form is still in a semi-natural state because it is the result of a process that naturally occurs in the body. The advantage of this form is that it can double or triple the levels of EPA and DHA.
  3. Synthetic triglyceride oil. This form occurs when natural triglycerides are converted to ethyl esters for concentration (as above) but then re-converted into synthetic triglycerides. The original position of the triglyceride’s carbon bonds changes, and the molecule’s overall structure is altered, which impacts the bioavailability of the oil.

Studies on absorption of the various types of fish oil suggest that, unsurprisingly, the natural triglyceride form is absorbed better than the ethyl ester form, which in turn is absorbed better than the synthetic triglyceride form.

One study by Lawson & Hughes in 1988 showed that 1 gram of EPA and 0.67 grams of DHA as natural triglycerides were absorbed 3.4 and 2.7 fold as well as the ethyl ester triglycerides.

In the previous article, we saw that fish oils were better absorbed when taken with a high-fat meal. In another study by Lawson & Hughes later the same year, they showed that the absorption of EPA & DHA from natural triglycerides improved from 69% with a low-fat meal (8g total fat) to 90% with a high-fat meal (44g total fat). Absorption of both EPA and DHA from ethyl ester oils was increased three-fold from 20% with a low-fat meal to 60% with a high-fat meal.

Sustainability

Our global fisheries are in dire straits, and fish oil is a big business. So, it’s crucial to choose a product that is manufactured with sustainability in mind and that has a fully transparent and traceable supply chain.

The easiest way to do this is to choose a product that is certified by organizations like Friend of the Sea or MarinTrust, two of the leading organizations for sustainable and responsible fishery management.

I would also choose a supplier/manufacturer with practices that minimize waste and its environmental impact.

For example, rather than catching fish that is only used to produce fish oil, some producers instead use fish meal to make the oil. This eliminates one of the main concerns about fish oil, which is that it will further deplete fisheries.

Recommendation

As a Functional Medicine clinician, author, and educator, I’ve been following the fish oil market closely for many years. I’ve used several different fish oils with my patients. I’ve read hundreds of studies on the purity, freshness, composition, and benefits of fish oil. I’ve spoken to industry experts and insiders, and I know what many companies do to cut corners and save money (at your expense).

When I started my own supplement company, Adapt Naturals, I knew that one of the first products we’d make would be fish oil. I wanted to create a product with the purest, freshest, and most sustainable fish oil available. And that’s exactly what we did with Bio-Avail Omega+.

I chose VivoOmega from GC Rieber as our fish oil. As the chart below illustrates, it significantly exceeds international standards for both purity and freshness.

Purity and freshness are critical. But I didn’t stop there. Most people who take fish oil are taking it to achieve certain outcomes, like better muscle and joint health, increased mental clarity, a more stable mood, clearer skin, and more balanced immune function.

So, when I formulated our fish oil product (Bio-Avail Omega+), I added the most bioavailable forms of two powerful nutrients that also support these goals: curcumin and black seed oil.

Now you can get the benefits of all three of these superfood nutrients in a single, two soft-gel daily serving.

Bio-Avail Omega+ contains an optimal composition of EPA and DHA (510 mg of EPA and 330 mg of DHA, a 3:2 ratio). It is made with triglyceride oils for optimal bioavailability and absorption. And it is produced with the most sustainable and traceable fish oil material in the industry. (See this page for more info.)

I’m proud of this product. It came directly out of my experience working with patients for 15 years and my extensive research into what is most important in a fish oil product. I hope it helps you to achieve your health goals!

ADAPT Naturals logo

Better supplementation. Fewer supplements.

Close the nutrient gap to feel and perform your best. 

A daily stack of supplements designed to meet your most critical needs.

Chris Kresser in kitchen
Affiliate Disclosure
This website contains affiliate links, which means Chris may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase using the links in the articles or advertisements. You will pay the same price for all products and services, and your purchase helps support Chris‘s ongoing research and work. Thanks for your support!

874 Comments

Join the conversation

    • I get omega 3 from simply supplements but after reading this article I cut open one of the capsules and it had a really fishy smell so I don’t think I’ll be getting them again

    • Maybe you could provide some factual support for your largely false and misleading claims that most fish oil dietary supplements are misbranded, adulterated and unsafe?

      Funny that FDA has approved various fish oils as pharmaceutical drugs and has absolutely no problem with fish oil dietary supplements. Perhaps FDA should get their education from you and the media.

      BTW, fish oils were not the target of the DOJ’s sting. They went after weight loss and boner pills, which of course deserve the negative attention.

      • Truth Seeker:
        You are mistaken. Vascepa (EPA-ethyl esters) and Lovaza (omega-3 acid ethyl esters) are not “fish oil.” In case you don’t know the definition of “fish oil” see the latest GOED monograph and USP, European Pharmacopoeia, and British Pharmacopoeia definitions. FDA did not approve “fish oil” they approved omega-3 acid ethyl esters which are not fish oil. Get your facts straight.

  1. Just wondering.. If some fish oils (omega3’s) contain unhealthy fats which are not good for our hearts, how do we know this when reading the label and is this the reason fish oil can increase your LDL cholesterol?

    • For the most part, it is actually the omega-3 fatty acid DHA that raises “cholesterol” levels in humans. Yet, DHA is one of the primary reasons to consume fish oil.

      The bigger picture, however, suggests that total cholesterol (and even HDL and LDL levels) alone is virtually completely useless information. One must know the total number of blood lipid particles as well as their size to truly know whether an increase in cholesterol actually represents an increase or a decrease in CVD risk.

      In many cases, as blood triglycerides fall while consuming fish oil, the size of the HDL and LDL particles actually increases and the total CVD risk decreases even though the total cholesterol number has gone up. Unfortunately the typical family practice or internal medicine doctor is not aware of this and sees it as a risk when it is actually not.

      Almost everything your doctor knows was bought and paid for by the companies who wish to sell you drugs. They have no interest in educating your doctor on the above facts, so don’t expect anything to change anytime soon.

  2. Is anyone out there knowledgeable enough to list some Omega 3 and/or Krill Oil products by comparison to each other as well as indicate by * as to whether or not they are actually good for you?

    I have taken:
    1) Omega Krill 5 X – by BioTrust
    2) Perfect Omega
    3) Finest

    I am not sure if any of these are actually an excellent product to use for heart health, joint pain and inflammation.

    Please, someone weigh in on these three products and if there is a better one out there than the top 2 I’ve listed, please advise.

    Thank you.

  3. Posted on another article about GP FCLO

    From drrons website –
    “A New Message from Dr. Ron: We will no longer carry Green Pasture Fermented Cod Liver Oil and Butter Oil.”

    See article on that website – Hook, Line and Stinker: The Truth About Fermented Cod Liver Oil

    Thanks

  4. Hello,

    Been using Nutrigold Trigelyceride Omega-3 so far and am wondering is I should switch to another one. If so, which one would you guys recommend currently. I’ve been doing some research and my head’s spinning with all the information.

    Is Green Pastures Fermented Cod Liver Oil and Butter Oil Blend (GP FCLO) still a top buy?

    Thanks

    • It would be so helpful to hear a definitive answer on GP FCLO. Yay or nay? Chris, we’d love your perspective!!

  5. Hello,

    After having done some research including this post, I decided to take Nutrigold TG Omega-3 Gold 1000mg/1400g Omega-3 capsules. Started in Dec-2014, took 2 capsules in the morning and 2 at night, got blood work done in April-2015.

    My total cholesterol remained the same.

    TG dropped from 215 to 86. extremely happy.

    But LDL increased from 112 to 134. Some research that I did suggested that Omega-3 might increase LDL.

    Have reduced capsules from April-2015 to 3/day and will gradually reduce it to 2 per day

  6. So my eye doctor recommended PRN Omega-3, even gave me a slick pamphlet. I googled it and found that lots of doctors are recommending this particular product. Is it because it is really better? Or do physicians get a kick-back or other renumeration?

    • I am in the same boat. Highly recommended by Dr. I have done research. I can not find anything definitive. It is so hard to know what is best.

  7. I’ve been reading reading and reading articles, some scholarly, some very biased. None, however, address my situation. Oils and fats can cause gut problems for someone who no longer has a gall bladder. Ophthalmologist insists I need Omega-3 in rather large quantities, tried several good quality, high priced supplements … and regretted it. So, guys and gals, any suggestions?

    • Betty:
      As you know, the gallbladder stores bile for on-demand release when fat is eaten. It is part of the feed-back mechanism to be sure the bile (detergent) is available when the partially digested fat (TAG) arrives (DAG + free fatty acids) in the small intestines. The bile is a detergent containing mainly phosphatidylcholine and is used to make emulsions so that pancreatic lipase can perform the hydrolysis of the remaining TAG and DAG molecules.

      Therefore, it would be best to eat a low-fat meal as is highly recommended regardless of having the gallbladder removed. With this in mind, try Coromega because it is emulsified omega-3 fatty acids that have been shown to undergo high absorption versus control of non-emulsified omega-3 fatty acids. See J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109:1076-1081. I would not recommend any enteric-coated products and any omega-3 fatty acids ethyl esters (not fish oil, not an oil) because they are poorly absorbed under low-fat meals.

      Remember that Coromega contains Stevia and it left a bad taste in my mouth. See my earlier post on Coromega. So, if there are no scandals, recalls, or other issues, give it a try while consulting with your health-care professional.

  8. Chris:
    Nice article on natural fish oil TAG vs Krill oil vs omega-3 acid ethyl ester solutions (not fish oil) when taken with a high fat meal. Re-esterified triglyceride omega-3 acids (not fish oil) and emulsified fish oil were not included in the study.

    Remember, Lovaza is not fish oil.

    Readers can form their own opinion and should ask the question when and under what conditions do you take your omega-3 acid sourced dietary supplements.

    Major nutrition experts recommend low fat meals and lots of natural fruits, vegetables, and fish. Throw in some exercise, quit smoking, and limit alcohol intake and you have a recipe for preventative heart disease and other disease,

    See:”Similar eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid plasma levels achieved with fish oil or krill oil in a randomized double-blind four-week bioavailability study”

    http://www.lipidworld.com/content/14/1/99#refs

    I purchased a Magic Bullet last week and started making sardine, hearing, or anchovy smoothies blended with yogurt and/or fresh fruit of the season. I added some honey for flavor and to assist in making an emulsion. Tastes great for a natural omega-3 acid sourced diet. You can also squeeze two capsules of natural fish oil in the smoothie so that you will not get fish burps.

    P

  9. hi everyone
    please may i ask regarding Jarrow’s Formula for the max DHA
    it is mole distill
    therefore it 100% is turned into ethyl ester

    but when i ask jarrow by email they say it is triglyceride
    and thats it
    is it 50% or each? or are they lying?

    or is it re-esterified …?
    so far no answer from them..

  10. Of course you can get micro-algae based EPA/DHA and have all the omega 3 you want without any risk of PCB’s, dioxins, mercury etc. Better still you don’t have to destroy the oceans to get it. You do not have to kill other creatures; yes unless your a sociopath why kill sentient beings if you don’t have to to live? (and you don’t!) The vast quantities of fuel used by fishing boats and the life and limbs lost by fisher(people) could all be saved using micro-algae.

    Combined with a teaspoon of flaxseed (cold milled or sprouted) and you have all the ALA’s too. This also stops the damage caused animal proteins (see Dr T Colin Campbell) so is a win-win-win all round.

    Here is the Pub-med reference:

    Omega-3 fatty acids for nutrition and medicine: considering microalgae oil as a vegetarian source of EPA and DHA.
    Review article
    Doughman SD, et al. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2007.
    Show full citation
    Abstract
    Long-chain EPA/DHA omega-3 fatty acid supplementation can be co-preventative and co-therapeutic. Current research suggests increasing accumulated long chain omega-3s for health benefits and as natural medicine in several major diseases. But many believe plant omega-3 sources are nutritionally and therapeutically equivalent to the EPA/DHA omega-3 in fish oil. Although healthy, precursor ALA bio-conversion to EPA is inefficient and production of DHA is nearly absent, limiting the protective value of ALA supplementation from flax-oil, for example. Along with pollutants certain fish acquire high levels of EPA/DHA as predatory species. However, the origin of EPA/DHA in aquatic ecosystems is algae. Certain microalgae produce high levels of EPA or DHA. Now, organically produced DHA-rich microalgae oil is available. Clinical trials with DHA-rich oil indicate comparable efficacies to fish oil for protection from cardiovascular risk factors by lowering plasma triglycerides and oxidative stress. This review discusses 1) omega-3 fatty acids in nutrition and medicine; 2) omega-3s in physiology and gene regulation; 3) possible protective mechanisms of EPA/DHA in major diseases such as coronary heart disease, atherosclerosis, cancer and type 2 diabetes; 4) EPA and DHA requirements considering fish oil safety; and 5) microalgae EPA and DHA-rich oils and recent clinical results.
    PMID 18220672 [PubMed – indexed for MEDLINE]

  11. There was a terrific article in the September issue of Life Extension on fish oil.

    I have studied fish oil/ supplements and highly recommend a minimum combined 1,500 mg of EPA/DHA

    Take a look at Purity Products “OmegaBerry Superformula”. It not only has a very high amount of EPA/DHA but also provides some berries.

    If you want to try a combintation formula with Krill Oil and Fish Oil I recommend Purity Products “KrillBerry”.

    I also recommend Life Extensions Omega 3 formula which has a combined 2,000 mg of fish oil and is a very pure formula.

    Respectfully,

    Steve

  12. What do you think about Life Extension’s “Mega EPA/DHA” fish oil supplement?
    http://www.lifeextension.com/Vitamins-Supplements/item00625/Mega-EPA-DHA
    It’s currently on sale and they wrote to me that this product meets the IFOS criteria, although only their other fishoil product “super omega 3” is really IFOS certified. They said these two products are processed the same way and sent me the analysis of Mega EPA/DHA which is really ok.
    My major concern is not the purity but rather the freshness. They wrote to me that the peroxide value of their recent charge is 1,05 meq/kg which is really good so I purchased some bottles. But as I opened the first it tasted and smelled a bit fishy and so I don’t really know if I should continue taking them..
    Any thoughts/experiences about/with this product?
    thanks

  13. I’ve been taking a tsp of Nordic Arctic Cod Liver Oil. After taking it a few weeks , I started to feel very lethargic and had some blurry eyes. As I read on it , could it be giving me too much Vitamin A? I found it helps with my skin and stomach and joints so I’d like to take a fish oil. What should I do? I also tried 1/2 tsp but still felt with being very lethargic.

    • Switch to Carlson’s Cod Live Oil. It’s been around for over 35 plus years.

      Unlike Nordic and other brands, Carlson’s is bottled in Norway at the source. All others are bottled in the USA from various suppliers who oil that has been extracted in Norway or Peru, shipped in large barrels the the USA and then sold.

      We have tried every liquid fish oil on the market and when we do we give them a good 30 days.

      Carlson is the only one that took away our aches and pains, improved our vision (and I’m 61), thicker hair, great skin etc,.

      Don’t believe all the hype from many of these omega 3 companies.

      • Rocksmith,

        I just want to know what specific Carlson’s Cod Liver Oil are you taking because when I go to their main website I saw 4 different cod liver oil supplements.

        – cod liver oil gems (low vit. a)
        – cod liver oil gems (lightly lemon)
        – cod liver oil (super 1000 mg)
        – cod liver oil (omega 3s epa & dha + vit. a & d)

        Thank you.
        DB

        • We only do the “liquid” oil. Capsules are a waste because you have to take 6-8 a day to get what you will in teaspoons of liquid.

          We use both of Carlson’s oils
          1) Cod Liver oil – lemon flavor – 500ml bottle
          2) The Finest Fish oil – lemon or orange – 500 ml bottle

    • The way that labdoor.com reviews and ranks products is quite off. Products are actually given a lower score if their potency is higher than the label claim. Companies will often include overages into their formulations so that the customer is guaranteed not less than 100% of the labeled potency. For some strange reason, such products are given a lower score on the labdoor.com review. This makes little sense unless the overage is possibly harmful/toxic.

      They also found that virtually every product was far below the GOED and Prop 65 limits for heavy metals for heavy metals in fish oils, yet they ranked each product in order from lowest to highest. This makes no sense then the levels were 50-100 times lower than the lowest level of concern.

      What they should have done is give each product meeting the minimal basic requirements 5 points, and those that are below this standard lower points. The problem with this, and most likely why they didn’t do this, is that virtually all the products would have been given very high scores. The reality is that most fish oils are very high quality and very few have any significant quality concerns except for maybe fermented cod liver oil and other raw oils.

      In my opinion, labdoor.com is a good tool to exclude poor products but does very little to determine which products are the highest quality.

    • As I read everybody’s comments, I can not help but regret the lack of discerning questions.
      1-If you make omega-6 the bad guy, you will limit the homeostasis of the cell membrane. So, when you evaluate your bioavailability….stop thinking in terms of blood tests and re-think in terms of the balance in the cell membrane.
      Think ” Panaseeda” There is none finer.

      • I wonder how the brain would function without Arachidonic acid (an omega-6 acid). I wonder how many cell membranes contain arachidonic acid.
        P

  14. I have read a great many threads about health on the web. This thread is one of the most confusing and complex I’ve encountered. It’s essentially useless for the ordinary reading public. I suppose it’s somewhat useful to science-trained experts, one percent of the population.

    I am glad that knowledgeable people contribute to this thread. I’ve learned a few things from them. That said, I believe that such people should recognize the essential, basic, fundamental requirement of 99 percent of people who visit here – to obtain buying suggestions that they can use this week in an effort to heal.

    It’s all well and good to say, “I’m doing a whole lot of research, I’ll get back to you with suggestions as soon as my labors are completed,” but this statement does not meet the essential, basic, fundamental requirement of visitors here. If the expert(s) here can’t meet the basic requirement, they should clam up, because, ironically enough, they’re doing more harm than good with their scholarly caution. They are saying to people, in effect, “I’m very bright, I’ve got a lot of knowledge, and I’m investigating this matter. I’ll share what I learn with you at some point, but not ’til I have reviewed the 10,000 products I have on my shelf, and am 100 percent ready.” This stance generates tremendous anxiety and unhappiness in people who seek health. Such people think, “You obviously know what you’re talking about when it comes to fish oil. I, myself, don’t have a clue about fish oil. I walk into a health food store or visit an online store and see 30 products and don’t know where to begin. I just want to find something that’s pretty good and not junk. Why can’t you help me do that? Right now? You’re an expert! Help me NOW. Arggggh!”

    I regard the scholarly reticence of health experts here as an ego trip in disguise: “I have knowledge. You don’t. Hah-hah! I will share it with you when I’m good and ready.” The ego can perform all kinds of funky tricks like that. Ego trips are a fairly common phenomenon among health researchers.

    My suggestion to the expert(s) here is to offer a partial, incomplete, kind-of-OK answer, to help consumers wade their way through shelves of products this week. Today. Right now. Then offer the full answer when it’s ready. Either (a) give people information they can use now or (b) keep a lid on how brilliant you are because you’re generating frustration and maybe rage.

    • Bob,

      Perhaps you read a couple of paragraphs and then became frustrated, figuratively wetting your pants?

      Drop to the bottom of the article. Chris gives you clear buying advice.

      It is people like you with a short attention span and a two year old’s need for immediate relief of all discomfort that makes it possible for the industry to be full of such crap products.

      My suggestion to you is, and the huge population of people of your ilk…

      Grow up.

      • Matthew,

        I am not referring to Chris, whose advice I find useful. I refer specfically to the Nutrigold situation, which Tom clarifies (thanks Tom). It’s far more complicated than you’ll be able to grasp.

        Re “immediate relief of all discomfort” – funny.

    • I can understand your frustrations. I think what more people need to know is that PIXE has an agenda. He’s trying to build a legal case against EE fish oils and then file a class-action lawsuit against the companies that manufacture/market them. He just hasn’t found out how to do it yet. It’s quite obvious that this is a true statement if you read what he has written here and everywhere else.

      This guy is mainly concerned with making money for himself, perhaps as his retirement plan. I recommend that you take everything he says with a grain of salt because he’s far from the neutral, innocent consumer he claims to be.

      • Thanks for your comment. I am just pointing out what is already known. I am not bias. If you enjoy having products mislabeled and misbranded, that is your happiness. I am not bias and why would I need or want to build a legal case. I will let that be the agenda of the lawyers. There are many legal cases out there already on misbranding and false advertising. I guess you don’t care about truth in advertising.

        Yes, I do have agenda to get the products named as they should be so that consumers, if they want to, can make an informed choice. How can you choose if the products are mislabeled? By not having the correct label, the manufacturers are making the choices for you. Suppose the ingredient in the dietary supplement is not compatible with a prescription drug, and this is not listed on the label.

        Perhaps you don’t remember those who died from l-tryptophan where the manufacturer changed the manufacturing process without informing various regulators.

        How about all those products that contain hidden drugs. I guess you are not familiar with the FDA’s website and the following:
        http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/resourcesforyou/consumers/buyingusingmedicinesafely/medicationhealthfraud/ucm236985.pdf

        Thanks for your concern. I will keep your concerns in mind for future posts so that I don’t harm your business of selling omega-3 acid ethyl esters masquerading as “fish oil” dietary supplements or your “100% Natural Fish Oil” containing 100% synthesized fatty acid ethyl esters.
        P

  15. I am very sorry, and annoyed, to report that Nutrigold Triple Strength Omega-3 Gold is no longer an rTG product. Under Supplement Facts, “Total Omega-3 Fatty Acids” is followed by an asterisk, which directs the reader’s attention (if in fact you are paying close attention to the tiny print) to the asterisked remark, *Expressed as Ethyl Esters.” Also, where before it had “Triglyceride Form” on the front part of the label, it now reads “IFOS 5-STAR CERTIFIED FISH OIL” which it certainly is not (fish oil). Similar changes now appear in the brochure Nutrigold ships with each order.

    This, of course, is the classic “bait and switch” gambit PIXE has written about many times in the Comments section of this blog. It worked in my situation, when today I received my first order of Nutrigold Triple-Strength Omega-3 Gold direct from the Nutrigold product website. I am most disappointed and displeased about the switch in ingredients from rTG to Ethyl Ester, especially since otherwise the label looks much the same as the former rTG product.

    I will call and or email Nutrigold tomorrow a.m. to complain and demand my money back for what I deem to be highly misleading product labeling and failing to inform the potential customer.

    So, since Kirkland Fish Oil is also no longer fish oil but “fish oil” meaning it too is in Ethyl Ester form, I am left with a few very expensive alternatives, one of which is Igennus STEP 1:RESTORE, which also recently changed, but in this case in reverse, from Ethyl Ester, to rTG.

    I hope y’all catch this since I did not. Very disappointing!!!

    • Tom,

      I looked at the fish oil products at Costco.com. According to the labels their basic fish oil product is still TAG. However the enteric coated product is esterified, which it may have always been. Please let us know if you see something different.

    • Tom,

      I’ve been using Nutrigold TG Omega-3 Gold 1000mg/1400g Omega-3 softgels. They still mention TG on the bottle.