A streamlined stack of supplements designed to meet your most critical needs - Adapt Naturals is now live. Learn more

The Definitive Fish Oil Buyer’s Guide

by

Published on

iStock.com/batteriesnotincluded

Update: I now recommend Bio-Avail Omega+ from Adapt Naturals. It’s a blend of ultra-pure fish oil and the most bioavailable forms of curcumin and black seed oil.

Summary

Sorry, folks. Another long one. It was unavoidable, though, because I really did want this to be a “definitive guide” that covers all (or at least most) of the relevant issues involved with choosing a fish oil. Here’s a summary for the time-challenged:

  • There are five important factors to consider when choosing a fish oil: composition, purity, freshness, bioavailability, and sustainability.
  • Not all fish oils are created equal. It’s essential to do your homework and make an informed choice. Many fish oils are oxidized or made with poor-quality ingredients and may cause health problems instead of solving them.
  • The potency of various products depends not only upon the levels of EPA and DHA but also upon the molecular structure of the fats in the oil, which in turn affects absorption.
  • Natural triglyceride fish oils are better absorbed than highly purified (i.e. ester) fish oils.
  • Many fish oils are made from fish that are endangered. Choose products made from fish that are certified by organizations such as Friend of the Sea or MarinTrust.

Introduction

So far in this series we’ve looked at why fish is superior to plant-based sources of omega-3. We’ve examined the importance of reducing consumption of omega-6 fats. We’ve considered how much omega-3 is needed to support health and treat disease. We’ve revealed that concerns about the safety of fish consumption have been overblown, and that eating fish regularly is not only safe but incredibly beneficial. And in the previous article we compared the benefits of eating fish to taking fish oil.

In this final article of the series, we’re going to take a closer look at fish oil. Fish oil is one of the most popular supplements taken by consumers today. Most people who are at least relatively health conscious understand that they need omega-3 in their diet and are probably not getting enough from food (unless they eat a lot of fish).

But why should you consider taking fish oil in the first place? Which fish oils are best? How much should you take? And what should you look for in a good product?

There’s a tremendous difference in the ingredients, purity, freshness and therapeutic benefit of the fish oils available today. The supplement industry is rife with false claims and unsavory companies that are far more interested in profiting on the fish oil craze than they are in your health and well-being.

In this article, I’ll focus more on dispelling common misconceptions about fish oil and helping you to choose the best product for your needs.

My current thoughts on fish oil

My view and recommendations for fish oil have evolved over time.

I’ll tell you what has remained constant first, then tell you what has changed.

I still recommend getting EPA/DHA from the diet whenever possible—either as your exclusive source or as a foundation to build upon.

And I still don’t recommend super-high doses of fish oil, like 10 grams per day. This isn’t common anymore, but there was a time when many health gurus were suggesting this as a way to reduce inflammation. But it’s not supported by research, and there’s no additional benefit beyond the 1-3 grams a day studies suggest is the best therapeutic target.

What has changed is my growing appreciation for the role fish oil can play in ensuring adequate EPA/DHA intake for many people. For all of the reasons I’ve mentioned in this series, many folks are just not getting enough EPA/DHA, and taking a fish oil supplement is probably the only way they’re going to get these critical fatty acids.

It’s also true that some people benefit from greater amounts of EPA/DHA than they can easily obtain in their diet.

My specific recommendations for EPA/DHA supplementation have also evolved. I have recommended cod liver oil for many years, and I still do today. It’s a good option because it contains vitamins A and D in addition to EPA/DHA.

However, the amounts of EPA and DHA are lower in cod liver oil than in most fish oil supplements. And if you’re already consuming organ meats like liver or an organ meat supplement, like Bio-Avail Organ from Adapt Naturals, you don’t really need (or even want) the additional A/D from cod liver oil.

This is why I now recommend a high-quality fish oil supplement for people who are either not getting enough EPA/DHA from their diet or who would benefit from additional EPA/DHA because of a chronic, inflammatory, or autoimmune condition.

But finding a high-quality fish oil is easier said than done. The global market for fish oil is north of $2 billion now. Whenever there’s that much money to be made, you can be sure all kinds of shenanigans will ensue!

So, let’s look at some of the most important factors to consider when buying fish oil.

Factors to consider when buying fish oil

There are five primary variables to be aware of when shopping for fish oil:

  1. Composition. In order to have the desired anti-inflammatory effect, fish oil must contain an adequate amount of the long-chain omega-3 derivatives EPA and DHA.
  2. Purity. The oil must meet or exceed international standards for heavy metals, PCBs, dioxins, and other contaminants. Many do not—even when they claim they do.
  3. Freshness. The oil should be fresh and not rancid. Rancid/oxidized oils promote oxidative damage and increase inflammation, both of which are risk factors for nearly every modern disease. Sadly, many fish oils on the market contain high levels of oxidative by-products.
  4. Bioavailability. The ability to absorb the beneficial components of fish oil is based on the molecular shape of the fatty acids. The more natural the structure, the better.
  5. Sustainability: The fish should be harvested in a sustainable manner, and species that are under threat should be avoided.

Composition

Composition refers to the overall concentration of EPA/DHA and the ratio of EPA to DHA. To some extent, this depends on the goal of taking fish oil. For example, some conditions may call for a higher proportion of DHA, while others benefit from more EPA.

Most studies suggest that a 3:2 ratio of EPA to DHA is optimal, with a total amount of omega-3 ranging between 500 mg and 2 g per day.

The optimal amount for each person will vary based on several factors, including how much fish/seafood you’re consuming in your diet. If you don’t eat any, and/or you have an inflammatory or autoimmune condition, you want to aim for the higher end. If you eat some fish/seafood, you can aim for the lower to mid-range.

Purity

Many species of fish are known to concentrate toxic chemicals like heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins, which can cause serious diseases, especially in children and developing fetuses. In a previous article, I explained how these chemicals are typically not a concern when eating whole fish because fish also contains selenium. Selenium binds to mercury and makes it unavailable to tissues, thus protecting against any damage it may cause.

And while fish constitute only 9% of our dietary intake of dioxins and PCBs, high doses of fish oils taken every day (as is often recommended) may raise this percentage significantly and expose us to undesirable levels of these toxins.

To address this, fish oil manufacturers use a process called molecular distillation to remove the toxins from the oil. When done correctly, molecular distillation is capable of reducing the toxins in fish oil to levels considered to be safe by the EPA and other agencies.

Although almost any fish oil manufacturer will tell you their product is free of these toxins, independent lab analyses tell a different story. In March of 2010, a lawsuit was filed in California court against the manufacturers of ten popular fish oils because they contained undisclosed and (possibly) unsafe levels of contaminants.

Unfortunately, this kind of deception is all too common in the supplement industry. The best companies will be able to provide a Certificate of Analysis (COA) from the manufacturer upon request. A COA is an analysis performed by an independent lab to measure the ingredients of a product and confirm whether it lives up to the claims made by the manufacturer.

If the manufacturer won’t provide a COA, I start to get suspicious. This is standard practice in the industry, and there’s no reason they shouldn’t be happy to show you theirs.

In general, fish that are lower on the food chain, like sardines and anchovies, naturally have a lower concentration of contaminants. For this reason, it may be wise to look for a product made from these fish.

So what levels of these toxins are safe? As you might imagine, there is some disagreement on this question since there is no single governing body that determines acceptable levels. However, the standards that are most often followed by fish oil manufacturers are summarized in the table below.

fish oil toxin standards

* ppt = parts per trillion
* ppb = parts per billion

The best fish oils will not only meet but exceed these international standards.

Freshness

I have written extensively about the dangers of oxidized, rancid oils. They promote oxidative damage and increase inflammation, both of which are risk factors for nearly every modern disease.

The more unsaturated an fat is, the more vulnerable it is to oxidation. Long-chain, omega-3 fats found in fish oil are the most unsaturated of the fats, and thus the most susceptible to being damaged.

This is why it’s crucial to ensure that the fish oil you select is fresh and not rancid. Once it has gone rancid, it will have the exact opposite effect on your body than you want it to.

The first thing to do is to check something called the “peroxide value” on the COA. This is a measure of rancidity reactions in the oil that have occurred during storage. It should be less than 5 meq/kg.

If this checks out, and you decide to order that product, break open a capsule once you receive it. There should be no “fishy” odors. They should smell like the ocean, but not like rotten fish. They should also not have a strong lemon or lime scent, which could be an indicator that the manufacturer is trying to mask the rancidity.

The p-anisidine value measures secondary oxidation products. The IFOS and GOED standard is less than 20 units. However, it’s important to note that p-anisidine is not appropriate for measuring secondary oxidation in omega-3 oils that have a strong color or contain added flavorings.

For example, salmon oil contains carotenoids, which have a natural yellow/orange coloring. Bio-Avail Omega+ from Adapt Naturals contains curcumin, which also has a natural orange coloring. This throws off the p-anisidine values and makes it an irrelevant test.

TOTOX is the last way to measure oxidation. It’s simply a combination of the peroxide and p-anisidine values. (For this reason, it’s also not appropriate for products with a strong color.) The IFOS and GOED thresholds are 19.5 and 26 meq/kg, respectively. But the best products have TOTOX values below 15 meq/kg.

Finally, some studies have shown that adding antioxidants (e.g. curcumin or resveratrol) to fish oil can improve stability.

A common misconception is that you can determine the quality of fish oil by freezing it. The theory goes that if you freeze the oil and it is cloudy, it’s rancid. That is not the case. All fish contain saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, albeit in small amounts. These fatty acids make the capsules appear cloudy when frozen in products that contain whole fish oil.

Potency

This is another area surrounded by significant controversy. Some argue the levels of individual constituents in fish oil aren’t paramount. Scientists discovered the healthful effects of omega-3s by studying people with fish-heavy diets, before supplemental fish oil even existed. Clinical trials using supplemental fish oils over the past few decades have contained widely variable levels of both long-chain omega-3 derivatives (EPA and DHA), and not super-high concentrations of either or both.

However, due to poor conversion of ALA to EPA and DHA, unless you are eating fish it is very likely you are deficient in long-chain omega-3s.

Following this line of reasoning, the DHA content in particular of fish and fish oils does seem important if we wish to obtain the best possible therapeutic effect. Many recent studies demonstrating the anti-inflammatory potential of fish oil used a daily dosage of DHA in the range of 1-3 grams. What’s more, foods like salmon roe that have been prized by traditional cultures for their nourishing and healing effects contain large amounts of DHA. A single 6 oz. serving of salmon roe contains 1 g of DHA. (In fact, this would be the best way by far of supplementing with DHA if money were no object. (Unfortunately, wild salmon roe goes for about $28/serving.)

The suggested DHA dose will of course depend upon the condition being treated. If you have a chronic inflammatory condition (heart disease, arthritis, Crohn’s or ulcerative colitis, etc.) I would suggest taking between 1 and 2 grams per day. If you are taking it simply for health maintenance, 500 mg is probably sufficient.

Unfortunately, many fish oils do not have significant amounts of DHA. This means you’d have to take an impractically high number of capsules each day to obtain the therapeutic dose. This is not desirable, since all unsaturated oils (including fish oils) are subject to oxidative damage. We don’t want to take large quantities of them for this reason.

Remember to check the label and ensure that your product has approximately 200-300 mg of DHA per capsule. This will allow you to achieve the therapeutic dose by taking no more than 3 capsules twice a day.

Like what you’re reading? Get my free newsletter, recipes, eBooks, product recommendations, and more!

Bioavailability

The ability to absorb the beneficial components of fish oil is based on the molecular shape of the fatty acids. In short, the more natural the structure and the less it is chemically altered, the better.

This is true for any nutrient, of course, and it explains why I am always in favor of obtaining nutrients from food or food-based sources when possible. Each additional step in processing from the natural state of food to extract or isolate nutrients introduces the potential of damaging the nutrient or changing its chemical form so that it’s more difficult to absorb or affects the body in a different way.

When it comes to fish oils, there are three forms currently available on the market:

  1. Natural triglyercide oil. This is what you get when you “squeeze” the whole fish and extract the natural oil from it. It is the closest to eating fish oil in its natural form and is highly bioavailable. The drawback of this form is that, because it’s not concentrated, it usually has low levels of EPA and DHA. And because it isn’t purified, it can have high levels of contaminants such as heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins.
  2. Ethyl ester oil. Occurs when natural triglyceride oil is concentrated and molecularly distilled to remove impurities. The ester form is still in a semi-natural state because it is the result of a process that naturally occurs in the body. The advantage of this form is that it can double or triple the levels of EPA and DHA.
  3. Synthetic triglyceride oil. This form occurs when natural triglycerides are converted to ethyl esters for concentration (as above) but then re-converted into synthetic triglycerides. The original position of the triglyceride’s carbon bonds changes, and the molecule’s overall structure is altered, which impacts the bioavailability of the oil.

Studies on absorption of the various types of fish oil suggest that, unsurprisingly, the natural triglyceride form is absorbed better than the ethyl ester form, which in turn is absorbed better than the synthetic triglyceride form.

One study by Lawson & Hughes in 1988 showed that 1 gram of EPA and 0.67 grams of DHA as natural triglycerides were absorbed 3.4 and 2.7 fold as well as the ethyl ester triglycerides.

In the previous article, we saw that fish oils were better absorbed when taken with a high-fat meal. In another study by Lawson & Hughes later the same year, they showed that the absorption of EPA & DHA from natural triglycerides improved from 69% with a low-fat meal (8g total fat) to 90% with a high-fat meal (44g total fat). Absorption of both EPA and DHA from ethyl ester oils was increased three-fold from 20% with a low-fat meal to 60% with a high-fat meal.

Sustainability

Our global fisheries are in dire straits, and fish oil is a big business. So, it’s crucial to choose a product that is manufactured with sustainability in mind and that has a fully transparent and traceable supply chain.

The easiest way to do this is to choose a product that is certified by organizations like Friend of the Sea or MarinTrust, two of the leading organizations for sustainable and responsible fishery management.

I would also choose a supplier/manufacturer with practices that minimize waste and its environmental impact.

For example, rather than catching fish that is only used to produce fish oil, some producers instead use fish meal to make the oil. This eliminates one of the main concerns about fish oil, which is that it will further deplete fisheries.

Recommendation

As a Functional Medicine clinician, author, and educator, I’ve been following the fish oil market closely for many years. I’ve used several different fish oils with my patients. I’ve read hundreds of studies on the purity, freshness, composition, and benefits of fish oil. I’ve spoken to industry experts and insiders, and I know what many companies do to cut corners and save money (at your expense).

When I started my own supplement company, Adapt Naturals, I knew that one of the first products we’d make would be fish oil. I wanted to create a product with the purest, freshest, and most sustainable fish oil available. And that’s exactly what we did with Bio-Avail Omega+.

I chose VivoOmega from GC Rieber as our fish oil. As the chart below illustrates, it significantly exceeds international standards for both purity and freshness.

Purity and freshness are critical. But I didn’t stop there. Most people who take fish oil are taking it to achieve certain outcomes, like better muscle and joint health, increased mental clarity, a more stable mood, clearer skin, and more balanced immune function.

So, when I formulated our fish oil product (Bio-Avail Omega+), I added the most bioavailable forms of two powerful nutrients that also support these goals: curcumin and black seed oil.

Now you can get the benefits of all three of these superfood nutrients in a single, two soft-gel daily serving.

Bio-Avail Omega+ contains an optimal composition of EPA and DHA (510 mg of EPA and 330 mg of DHA, a 3:2 ratio). It is made with triglyceride oils for optimal bioavailability and absorption. And it is produced with the most sustainable and traceable fish oil material in the industry. (See this page for more info.)

I’m proud of this product. It came directly out of my experience working with patients for 15 years and my extensive research into what is most important in a fish oil product. I hope it helps you to achieve your health goals!

ADAPT Naturals logo

Better supplementation. Fewer supplements.

Close the nutrient gap to feel and perform your best. 

A daily stack of supplements designed to meet your most critical needs.

Chris Kresser in kitchen
Affiliate Disclosure
This website contains affiliate links, which means Chris may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase using the links in the articles or advertisements. You will pay the same price for all products and services, and your purchase helps support Chris‘s ongoing research and work. Thanks for your support!

874 Comments

Join the conversation

  1. Hi I am allergic to shell fish. Would taking fish oil or cod liver oil be the same as shell fish? I really need a good supplement and just can not eat fish or seafood. It repels me. So any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

  2. Hi Chris,
    Recently I listened to an infomercial about the benefit of TG over EE Fish oil. The reason that I take fish oil supplements is for the anti-inflamatory effect for my degenerative disc disease. My doctor, Joseph Maroon conducted a study through the University of Pittsburgh. He says that it doesnt really matter what kind of fish oil you buy, just get the dose up to 3,000 mg/ day. Any thoughts on this?

  3. PIXE, Thank you for the response. I wouldn’t necessarily say that the Swanson product has been “working” for us. I don’t think either of us feel any different for taking it! I had just read and heard over the years how important it was take fish oil. Do you notice a difference when you take it, other than improved cholesterol levels?

    I don’t have to worry about cholesterol levels, myself. Mine are naturally very good. I am taking it more for brain power and inflammation. I read recently in Nutrition Action Healthletter that arthritic people with the highest blood levels of DHA have the least cartilage loss. This is a correlation — not cause and effect — but the study also found that there was no correlation between cartilage health and EPA blood concentrations. (Osteoarthritis Cartilage 20: 382, 2012).

    Thank you very much for pointing out that the Swanson EFAs Super EPA is only about 50% Omega-3’s. Now I think I understand how to read the label. So the Kirkland product you recommend is only 30% Omega-3’s, but according to the article you referenced above, that is the amount expected in a natural fish oil.

    Thanks also for the article information. The link that you provided did not work for me, but I did a Google Scholar search and was able to access the article because my college has access to full text. I didn’t see any comparisons there of absorption/availability as a liquid oil versus in a regular gel cap. Do you know? Are the gel caps just as easily absorbed?

  4. Lisa:
    The good news for you is that if these have been working for you and your husband, then why change. The bad news is that you are taking marine biodiesel fuel. My bottle 189621 MFG 11/11 Swanson EFAs Super EPA 300 mg EPA, 200 mg DHA out of 1,000 mg ecOmega 30/20 is only 50% EPA and DHA and not the 90% you quoted. Did you ever wonder what the other 50% is? Well, it is saturated and monunsaturated fatty acid ethyl esters which is the same flammable chemicals that are in marine biodiesel fuel. To me, this is a low quality omega-3 ethyl ester dietary supplement. Although you may have paid $6.49 for 100 softgels, it is my opinion that you are wasting your money. With ethyl esters, they must be taken with a high fat meal to be effective. To me, a better investment would be the Costco Kirkland “Natural Omega-3 Fish Oil 1000 mg” 400 softgels for $5.99 when on sale otherwise $7.49 After $2.50 OFF. This is USP verified for content and purity. Taking two of these per day gives you 600 mg EPA + DHA which are already in the natural TAG (fat) form that your digestive system knows how to deal with since your birth date.

    A very good article on TAG vs EE digestion and metabolism can be found in the peer reviewed article just published in Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, Please cite this article as: J.P. Schuchardt, A. Hahn, Bioavailability of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, Prostaglandins Leukotrienes Essent.Fatty Acids (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plefa.2013.03.010i with title “Review Bioavailability of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids”.

    Sorry to burst your bubble, but this is what the science shows (analytical chemistry) your Swanson Super EPA to be composed of.

    PIXE

  5. Hello. I’ve been reading this article and many posts with interest. PIXE, have you done any analysis of any of the Swanson brand products? I have been buying all my supplements from Swanson (swansonvitamins.com) for years as they seem to be a good value. My husband and I have been taking their ecOmega Super EPA gel caps (300 mg EPA, 200 DHA, 50 mg other EFA’s) for years. Since these are over 90% EFA’s, does that mean they are high quality? Are they EE’s?

    Swanson has many other fish oil, krill oil, etc. products. I’m very curious if you have tested any of them. Thanks in advance!

  6. “Most already were taking cholesterol-lowering statins, aspirin and other medicines to lower their chances of heart problems.”

    Doesn’t tell us how well fish oil works for those of us who take it instead of statins.

    • From a sample of one: I’ve been taking 3,000-4,000mg EPA+DHA in EE fish oil for years, and my LDL-HDL ratio is outstanding. Recent imaging shows, at 62, absolutely clean coronary arteries — and my father’s family had terrible heart disease. No statins for me. (I do eat fairly healthily, very little red meat, ingest more than 3 grams oat bran per day, plus olive oil and lots of nuts.)

      • Hello Altostrata. Did you come to a decision about what fish oil to take? I am in a similar situation in that I need something to deliver 3.000 mg of well-absorbed EPA+DPA daily without breaking the bank. I could research dose and price of the list of rTAG products which PIXE posted here Jan. 2, 2013… but if you’ve already done that I would really appreciate if you would share your conclusions. Thanks!

        • Lisa Jane, I would surely appreciate your comparison of rTAG products!

          For now, I’m taking Natural Factors Omega-3 Factors. Still awaiting PIXE’s data on that.

          I got terrible fish burps from the Jarrow MaxDHA from calamari, which is also underpowered for my purposes, which are similar to yours.

          • Altostrata:
            My bottle of Natural Factors Omega-3 Factors with 400 mg EPA (37.7%) and 200 mg DHA (18.8%) with total of 56.5% total EPA+DHA has the remaining product as fatty acid ethyl esters and is the same as marine biodiesel. I would not take this product for myself. As I mentioned earlier, there are other ethyl esters of higher purity and less expensive. Double check the Health From the Sun Eco-DHA because the bottle I have has 400 mg DHA and 100 mg EPA.

            Also, you should get an omega-3 index determined because knowing this number will mean that you could possible cut back on your intake. The money you use to pay for the test can be offset with less capsules taken. It was shown that taking high concentrations of these omega-3s becomes the same effectiveness after a certain concentration has be taken. Then, all you need is a smaller maintenance dose. After taking high concentrations of OM3, your body will reach a steady state concentrations where taking more does not do you any good because your body is saturated. I will try to find the specific reference to this study. I believe this is one of the reasons why the FDA has a limit of 3,000 mg (3 g) daily dose of OM3’s as dietary supplements. Here is the statement: “In response to a petition (GRASP 6G0316) from the National Fish Meal and Oil Association (NFMOA), FDA issued a final rule on June 5, 1997 (62 FR 30751) (the June 1997 final rule) affirming menhaden oil as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) for use as a direct human food ingredient with limitations on the maximum use levels of menhaden oil in specific food categories. FDA concluded that these limitations are necessary to ensure that daily intakes of EPA and DHA from menhaden oil do not exceed 3.0 grams per person per day (g/p/d). As stated in the June 1997 final rule, the maximum limit of 3.0 g/p/d on the total daily intake of EPA and DHA is a safeguard against the possible adverse effects of these fatty acids on increased bleeding time (the time taken for bleeding from a standardized skin wound to cease), glycemic control in non-insulin dependent diabetics, and increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.”

            Menhaden oil is TAG fish oil containing 180 mg EPA and 120 mg DHA. The other impurities in EE fish oil are not GRAS and I believe they are being sold illegally on the market as dietary supplements. There are no GRAS ethyl ester omega-3s dietary supplements in the database (public).

            I will get back to you about rTAG products as I mentioned are more expensive than the traditional fish oil dietary supplements. However, you digestive system knows how to handle these fats since your birth date. My student is in the process of updating my database on all the products with mass, size, cost, TAG vs EE, etc. With more than 675 products, this will take some time since I also have photographed every product.

            Then don’t get me started on the krill oil marketing fiction from scientific fact.

            PIXE

            • Thanks, PIXE. That’s a very good point, maybe I’ve reached omega-3 saturation.

              Several of us in this conversation are looking for that quality-price-strength junction. Most likely this would be a high-quality EE or a low-price rTAG. If you can identify such, we would be very grateful.

              From Amazon:
              http://www.amazon.com/Health-From-The-Sun-60-Count/dp/B003AKXGG2
              Health from the sun® eco dha™ contains molecularly distilled, concentrated calamari oil in fish gelatin capsules. each 2 softgel serving provides 800 mg dha, 200 mg epa and 1,200 iu vitamin d3. the oil is concentrated at a favorable 4:1 ratio of dha and epa, the naturally occurring ratio of dha and epa found naturally in vital organs and breast milk. As an nutritional supplement, the raw material used in eco dha(tm) is harvested and processed using techniques involving little to no by-catch. As with all health from the sun(r) marine oils, eco dha(tm) is independently tested, using strict guidelines, for pcbs, heavy metals and other contaminants.

  7. Not only do we have to be concerned about what the consumption of rancid fish oil does to our bodies and apparently a high percentage of all fish oil capsules are rancid according to a study done in New Zealand.

    And now we learn that the benefits of fish oil have been greatly overstated.

    Fish oil doesn’t help prevent heart attacks, study shows
    http://www.foxnews.com/health/2013/05/09/fish-oil-doesnt-help-prevent-heart-attacks-study-shows/#ixzz2TZ54LrUz

    I could go on but don’t have the time.

    I’ve run out of reasons to take fish oil or krill oil.

    • I’m from New Zealand and am trying to produce a quality fish oil at the moment. I think you will find ALL fish oils are rancid, but it is just to varying degrees of rancidity.

      Also, I’m no expert on the subject, I’ve been researching for a while now, but if there is one thing I know it’s not to trust fox news.

      There is also tonnes of other benefits that are seemingly ignored in this article, so I’d hardly say the benefits are over stated.

      But yes, if you are wanting to take these to prevent a heart attack I’d probably make general lifestyle changes instead.

  8. Hi Pixe,

    I would also like to know which of the EEs are high-quality.

    Thanks for all of your hard work.

    • Mary and Alto:
      I just returned from Vitamin Shoppe and I purchased their Ultimate Gold Omega-3 Fish Oil ethyl esters supplying 735 mg EPA and 165 mg DHA in a 26.69 mm long by 10.75 mm diameter capsule that weighs 1.92351 g. This a large capsule that is made of a hard crackling softgel. My bottle 06613110 Exp 03/2015 cost me $16.49 for 60 softgels. I would get BEST VALUE: Omega 3 Fish Oil 735 Epa / 165 Dha (1290 MG) (120 Softgels , $0.25/serving ) which for me would be more cost effective with $0.25 per softgel that supplies 900 mg of EPA+DHA as ethyl esters. This product is very pure and I would not consider this as marine biodiesel because it has very very low concentrations (impurities) of saturated and mono-unsaturated fatty acid ethyl esters. I did not analyze these products for PCBs, heavy metals, or dioxins.

      Another product that I would take is Health from the Sun Omega-3 PFO Pure fish Oil Ultra Potent. My bottle 150806 Exp 11/13 provides 750 mg EPA and 250 mg DHA as ethyl esters in a capsule that weighs 1.76521 g with length 26.17 mm and diameter 10.40 cost me $24.46 for 60 softgels i.e. $0.41 per capsule. This product is very pure and is sourced from Alaskan Pollock, whiting and/or cod and is made in the USA. I believe it is sourced from the same fish offal as Pure Alaska Omega-3 that I purchased and discussed above.

      So, if I needed to lower my serum lipid profile (triglycerides) these are the products that I would be comfortable taking. However, this is my personal choice and it may not fit your needs or medical conditions. Also check with your health-care provider before taking any dietary supplements. Again, the products that I would take were not analyzed for PCBs, dioxins, or heavy metals. Therefore, caution is advised.

      Hope this helps.

      PIXE

  9. PIXE, thanks, as ever, for your patience and knowledge.

    This is very important to me, so I want to bring it to your attention again. In http://chriskresser.com/the-definitive-fish-oil-buyers-guide#comment-49406 you list some EE-type fish oil products. Some you say are of “high quality” and some of “low quality.”

    Which EEs on that list are “high quality” (meaning NOT “marine biodiesel”)? Next to rTAGS, this seems like my best option, as I take 3-4 grams EPA+DHA per day.

    Please post the subset of EEs responding to this question.

      • E-mail sent. Thank you. (I think the others reading this also would be interested to know which EEs are NOT “marine biodiesel.”)

        • Alto:
          My suggestions are based on chemical analysis and I am not a physician. In addition, I did not determine the concentrations of PCBs, heavy metals, and dioxin in these products. My main interest was in determining which products were mislabeled and contain marine biodiesel fuel. The products that are of high purity in ethyl esters EPA and DHA with very, very low concentrations of saturated and mono-saturated fatty acid ethyl esters (found in cheaper low quality products, same as marine biodiesel) are:
          Minami Cardio-3 which is made in the EU which has stricter rules than those products made in the US and OMAX3. My bottle Minami Cardio-3 Lot 25982C Exp 4/14 has 60 capsules providing 635 mg EPA and 194 mg DHA has 82.9% of these two PUFAs in a capsule that weighs 1.46164 g with diameter 9.65 mm and length 25.06 mm.

          For OMAX-3, my box Lot 1106083 Exp 4/13 has 562.5 mg EPA and 137.5 mg DHA in a softgel that weighs 1.22488 g with length = 22.20 mm and diameter = 9.31. This product is made by boiling natural fish oil with H2SO4 (concentrated sulfuric acid, yes car battery acid) with ethanol to make the ethyl esters. The ethyl esters are then extracted with hexane (Page 11 and 12 of patent). You can read the detail production process for this product in US Patent 7652068. Product also claims in the patent to cure baldness.

          PIXE

          • Thanks, PIXE. I’m afraid that, at around $.50 per capsule, those products are too expensive for my budget.

            Of the list of EE-type fish oil products in http://chriskresser.com/the-definitive-fish-oil-buyers-guide#comment-49406 , which are of “high quality”?

            I looked at my Natural Factors RxOmega-3 Factors and it has 630mg omega-3 fatty acids in 1170mg fish oil concentrate per capsule, or 53.8% omega-3s. Wouldn’t that fit your rule of thumb for good EE fish oil? It is less than 70% EPA and DHA.

    • Emma:
      Costco Chingford
      1 Shadbolt Avenue
      Off Harbet Road
      Chingford
      London

      Get the Kirkland Natural Omega-3 Fish Oil 1000 mg (400 capsules) and it has the USP seal of approval. This is natural “18/12” fish oil that has the similar quality as MaxEPA from Seven Seas in the UK. MaxEPA was the first prescription natural fish oil drug that has proven efficacy and safety. However, as all dietary supplements also carry the warning “check with your health care provider before use”, this would be a good idea.

      See my web site http://www.fishoildetective.com for more information on fish oils.

      PIXE

  10. Hi! I was wondering if you could tell me the difference between fermented and rancid? I know that rancid oils are very bad for your body and I am definitely effected by rancid oils. I also know one way to tell that they are rancid is to smell them and if they smell like stinky fish then they are bad. I’ve also heard how wonderful Fermented Cod Liver Oil is for you and I have tried taking Green Pature’s FCLO & Butter Oil. I got the chocolate paste kind and it was so terrible that I really have to work at taking it. And there is NO way my kids will take it. It smells and tastes like stinky fish. Why is it not concidered rancid and why does it not effect a person body the same way rancidness does?

    Also, my family currently takes Eskimo PurEFA 1000mg by Integrative Therapeutics. I have trouble with it as it makes me feel sick to my stomache about 10mins after I take it and I can get a headache from it. Is this a good type of Fish Oil to take and why might I have those sympotms? Could there be a binder in it that bothers me?

    Thanks for your time! You article is the best resource I have found yet on this confusing subject.
    Kristen

    • Kristen:
      My bottle of Integrative Therapeutics Tyler Eskimo-3 “Natural Stable Fish Oil” (Lot U1 121211 EXP 4/30/2013) is real fish oil but lower in EPA and DHA compared to cheaper brands. However, these are pearls size. On the low end based on label, there is only 22.6% EPA and DHA as compared to say Kirkland which is 30% but in a larger harder to swallow capsule. The Eskimo-3 is a reputable brand source. The capsule I analyzed contains a trace amount of trans fat and I will look into the possible reasons. This is one of the few products I have analyzed that shows a larger than normal trans fat content. You could try putting them in the freezer and take them frozen to lesson the stomach problems. This has worked for me. Check the label because there are several items like “natural lime flavor” etc.

      At least this product tells who made it “Manufactured by Cardinova International, Uppsala, Sweden” whereas many other dietary supplement products don’t list who made them. They only list “distributed by” or “manufactured for” which leaves the consumer to wonder where and how they were produced.

      PIXE

  11. Note: This study found absorbability of krill oil was the best, but it contains more fat overall. rTAGs were absorbed about 20% better than EEs (thereby indicating to me a price premium of only 20% is justfied). To varying degrees, all raised omega-3 levels in plasma.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3168413/

    Lipids Health Dis. 2011 Aug 22;10:145. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-10-145.
    Incorporation of EPA and DHA into plasma phospholipids in response to different omega-3 fatty acid formulations–a comparative bioavailability study of fish oil vs. krill oil.
    Schuchardt JP, Schneider I, Meyer H, Neubronner J, von Schacky C, Hahn A.

    Abstract
    BACKGROUND:
    Bioavailability of omega-3 fatty acids (FA) depends on their chemical form. Superior bioavailability has been suggested for phospholipid (PL) bound omega-3 FA in krill oil, but identical doses of different chemical forms have not been compared.
    METHODS:
    In a double-blinded crossover trial, we compared the uptake of three EPA+DHA formulations derived from fish oil (re-esterified triacylglycerides [rTAG], ethyl-esters [EE]) and krill oil (mainly PL). Changes of the FA compositions in plasma PL were used as a proxy for bioavailability. Twelve healthy young men (mean age 31 y) were randomized to 1680 mg EPA+DHA given either as rTAG, EE or krill oil. FA levels in plasma PL were analyzed pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48, and 72 h after capsule ingestion. Additionally, the proportion of free EPA and DHA in the applied supplements was analyzed.
    RESULTS:
    The highest incorporation of EPA+DHA into plasma PL was provoked by krill oil (mean AUC0-72 h: 80.03 ± 34.71%*h), followed by fish oil rTAG (mean AUC0-72 h: 59.78 ± 36.75%*h) and EE (mean AUC0-72 h: 47.53 ± 38.42%*h). Due to high standard deviation values, there were no significant differences for DHA and the sum of EPA+DHA levels between the three treatments. However, a trend (p = 0.057) was observed for the differences in EPA bioavailability. Statistical pair-wise group comparison’s revealed a trend (p = 0.086) between rTAG and krill oil. FA analysis of the supplements showed that the krill oil sample contained 22% of the total EPA amount as free EPA and 21% of the total DHA amount as free DHA, while the two fish oil samples did not contain any free FA.
    ….
    Conclusion
    By comparing plasma PL FA compositions in response to almost identical doses of EPA+DHA in different chemical forms (rTAG vs. EE [both derived from fish oil] vs. krill oil), we demonstrated that EPA+DHA were absorbed in the following order: krill oil > rTAG > EE. While this is the first study to report these differences in bioavailability after oral administration, the study is limited by an endpoint that is not representative for tissue composition. In future long-term studies, such a parameter should be addressed (e.g. the omega-3 index), together with parameters representative for the biological effects of EPA+DHA, such as serum TAG levels, blood pressure and others. Addressing these issues seems important in order to make the use of marine n-3 FA more efficient. Finally, the unexpected high content of free EPA and DHA in krill oil, which might have a significant influence on the bioavailability, should be investigated in more depth and taken into consideration in future trials.

  12. Does anyone have any thoughts on Vital Choice Salmon Oil? It seems very high quality…

    • Angela:
      Your VitalChoice Wild Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Oil is a waste of money in my opinion. The reason being that you are paying $24.00 for 90 capsules with each capsule providing only 80 mg EPA and 73 mg DHA. For the off sale price of Costco Kirkland Natural Omega-3 1000 mg fish oil provides 180 mg EPA and 120 mg DHA per softgel for $9.99 for 400 softgels (I paid $5.99 in January 2013 on sale). The math is easy. Also, you need to be careful of the term “wild salmon” because wild salmon will usually have the DHA concentration greater than the EPA and this is not the case for this product. My bottle (Lot 377069-01, Exp 04/15) of Vitamin World Cold Water Salmon oil (240 rapid release softgels) 1000 with 400 mg “active EPA/DHA” has 90 mg EPA and 110 mg DHA per softgel. I paid $15.99 for 240 but this is still to expensive. What is your reasoning for taking salmon oil?

      Again, a better deal is the Kirkland natural (my bottle Lot 395187-01 EXP 11/16) and it has the USP label that is correct. This product has the same natural fish oil as BJs Berkley & Jensen (my bottle Lot 1055108, EXP JAN 2015) “Natural Extra Strength Fish Oil 1200 mg” with 300 softgels. However, you get less softgels at a higher price. They both claim low Hg and PCBs.

      PIXE

  13. A great round up on the various types and quality of oils.

    I found through a contact who was manufacturing a kind of multi for eye health containing high dose omega 3s, that after much research their company preferred the natural triglyceride form of oil for their product. Aside from increased bio-availability, his research over quite some time had led him to the belief that the ethyl ester forms potentially retain too much residual ethanol through the distillation process.

    This was all several years ago however and perhaps things have changed with fish oil production.

    What I also find fascinating is Dr Leo Galland’s extensive research and clinical experience with fatty acid deficiency. And that fatty acid conversion to prostaglandins can be disturbed via a missing enzyme called delta-6 needed for converting Linolenic acids to n-3s. In this instance, you need EPA and DHA supplementation. Period. However, how many people ever find out they have a chronic fatty acid /prostaglandin deficiency for this reason? I’d hazard a guess, very few.

    A 1990 study discussed the the role PG deficiency plays in a number of chronic diseases. It also hypothesized that the PG deficiency potentially has a much larger role to play in any number of diseases with unknown etiology. Dr Galland’s case studies seem to suggest that, in part, this may well be true.

    Fascinating stuff.

  14. Yes, PIXE, does your testing identify PCBs and other contaminants?

    Up above, in his main article, Chris Kresser says this about natural triglyercide fish oil:
    “And because it isn’t purified, it can have high levels of contaminants such as heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins.”

    While, he says, natural triglyercide fish oil is more bioavailable, wouldn’t you agree contamination is a major drawback of these products? Or do you think the benefits outweigh the drawbacks? Heavy metals include mercury.

    PIXE, could you clarify your statement above: “Some Nordic Naturals, Quell, Pharmax, Jarrow MaxDHA, Bluebonnet, Nutri-Med Logic, and Ascentra NutraSea products to name a scarce few. Expensive production to make “synthetic fish oil.”” Are you saying those brands are the bad kind of synthetic fish oil?

    Please give us a list of your top 20 TAG fish oils, if you can. This would immensely aid shopping.

    • Altostrata:
      With all do respect, the statement “And because it isn’t purified, it can have high levels of contaminants such as heavy metals, PCBs, and dioxins.” is not correct. See the authority on marine oil processing at: http://lipidlibrary.aocs.org/processing/marine/index.htm. He has testified at several GRAS hearings on TAG based fish oils.

      The ethyl ester products are misleading when they say “molecular distilled.” Molecular distilling separates or fractionates compounds based on vapor pressure and molecular weight. If this were true for ethyl ester products then they should only contain a narrow molecular weight of products such as those with carbon numbers greater than 20 i.e. EPA, DHA, and DPA ethyl esters. Based on my analyses, this is not true and they contain high concentrations of C14 (myristic), C16 (palmitic), and C18 (stearic) saturated fatty acid ethyl esters which are the identical compounds in marine biodiesel.

      PIXE

      • PIXE, you MUST take this into consideration: Consumer Reports DID find high levels of PCBs in some natural fish oils.

        I’ve read http://lipidlibrary.aocs.org/processing/marine/index.htm and what I see is extensive detail about 2 types of molecular distillation as a purification process, with mention only in passing about treatment with activated carbon as an alternative. There are no other purification processes described.

        Were you referring to activated carbon as a way natural fish oils might be purified of contaminants? Which brands do this?

        • Altostrata:
          See Table 5 and figure 16 in http://lipidlibrary.aocs.org/processing/marine/index.htm. There are two major steps in going from catch to capsule for making fish oil that is a co-product of fish meal. The first step is producing “crude fish body oil (CFBO)” by the wet rendering process. This CFBO from industrial fish such as anchovies, mackerel, and menhaden are packaged in drums under nitrogen and sold to the refiners for further processing for the second step. Usually, molecular distillation is done after cleaning up the CFBO.

          I am not sure which brands process the CFBO by which method because this is proprietary information. You can follow some refiners such as Nordic Naturals and Ocean Nutrition (ONC), trade mark product MEG3 (they were purchased by Royal DSM on their web sites. ONC use to have a nice description on how they purify their fish oil but they don’t have the nice link anymore. Pronova (purchased by BASF) makes the API (active pharmaceutical ingredient) for Lovaza (prescription Omega-3 ethyl esters). See their web site
          http://www.pronova.com/process-for-purity/category156.html. The two patents for making the API for Lovaza are http://www.google.com/patents/US5502077 and http://www.google.com/patents/US5656667 describe in detail how these ethyl esters in high concentrations are produced. Remember that this EPA-EE and DHA-EE are the same two APIs that are found in incorrectly labeled “fish oil” dietary supplements but at a much lower concentrations. The remaining higher concentrations are saturated and mono-unsaturated fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEE) whose efficacy and safety have not been evaluated. These FAEE (saturated and mono-unsaturated) chemicals have been removed from the prescription Lovaza and the NDA (new drug application)-Chemistry for Lovaza and Vascepa impurity removal and testing have been approved by the FDA so that these two drugs are FDA approved prescriptions. Oddly, EPA-EE and DHA-EE were used in mislabeled “fish oil” dietary supplements long before big pharma made them prescriptions.

          PIXE

          • As I read Table 5 and figure 16 in http://lipidlibrary.aocs.org/processing/marine/index.htm, particularly figure 16, these show the processing leading through molecular distillation and resulting in the end fish oil product.

            Per figure 16, there are only two variations. One goes from molecular distillation –> deodorization –> packaging and the other goes from molecular distillation –> vacuum distilled –> packaging. (The products “ethyl esters, omega-3 concentrates, etc.” are solely the result of the vacuum distilled process, which I’m guessing is an error in the chart.)

            In figure 16, all the products go through molecular distillation, which, if I understand you correctly, turns all the fish oil products into ethyl esters.

            The author (Bimbo) goes on to say “There are additional processing steps…” and lists 7 processes that I’m guessing are optional and perhaps further remove the fish oil from its “natural” state.

            Nowhere in this paper does Bimbo indicate the relative quality for human consumption of any of the fish oil products. He is merely describing various processing steps.

            Are you saying the products that follow the molecular distillation –> vacuum distilled –> packaging route are better? Having been molecularly distilled, aren’t they ethyl esters? Or are they a special kind of ethyl ester?

            • Alto:
              In the article on the processing of fish oil, it does not have to be ethyl esters to be molecular distilled. Those diagrams and figures are the standard industry procedure for making crude fish body oils for refined fish oil for dietary supplements and drugs. All the fish oil supplements have to be purified before human consumption.

              You can read more details about the entire process of making fish oil and krill oil in a detailed report (147 pages) with references and diagrams. I recommend every one read this document (Pub date 10-19-2011) for an in depth information on all aspects of fish oil. They even discuss rancid oils and all the tests used to test them. All included are definitions of what “fish oils”. “ethyl esters”, and re-esterified fish oils. Here is the link for the 147 page document that you can read.
              http://www.vkm.no/dav/4be9bee090.pdf

              Additional information can be found in the review article: “Production of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid concentrates: A review” by Nuria Rubio-Rodríguez in Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies Volume 11, Issue 1, January 2010, Pages 1–12.
              I hope I did not saturate any eyeballs.

              PIXE

              • PIXE, I bow to your greater knowledge. I have no interest in becoming a fish oil processing expert. I’m a consumer, I just want to be able to find the best omega-3 fish oil supplement that’s cost-effective for me.

                I’m sorry I’m so confused by the information you’ve been posting. Could you please clarify:

                – Does molecular distillation always produce ethyl esters?
                – Are all ethyl esters the bad kind (marine biodiesel)?
                – If not, what’s an easy way a consumer can tell a good EE from a bad EE?
                – Are the EEs you listed in http://chriskresser.com/the-definitive-fish-oil-buyers-guide#comment-49406 the better EEs?
                – Are all TAGs the bad kind (marine biodiesel)?
                – If not, what’s an easy way a consumer can tell a good TAG from a bad TAG?
                – Are rTAGs always better than TAGs?
                – Are the rTAGs you listed in http://chriskresser.com/the-definitive-fish-oil-buyers-guide#comment-34741 the better TAGs?
                – Is oil from calamari a good source of omega-3s?

                Perhaps you can write this up as a FAQ for your site. I can see it’s a work in progress and there’s not a lot of clear consumer information there.

                • Alto:
                  Somehow you got all the information I presented all twisted and backwards. Sorry if I confused you or anyone else with information overload. First, molecular distillation is used to separate (fractionate) the different compounds and to remove PCBs, dioxins and furans. It is performed on both ethyl esters and TAG based omega-3s. The consumer can tell if the ethyl ester is mainly biodiesel by the concentrations of EPA and DHA. Usually, if it is more than 70% EPA and DHA, then there are less saturated fatty acid ethyl esters (short chain) that burn.

                  TAGs are natural fat in fish oil and these are not biodiesel (ethyl esters). This is the same type of fat (mother’s milk, corn oil, olive oil, flax seed, ice cream, butter, etc) you have been eating since your birth date but with a much lower concentrations, or none, of EPA and DHA.

                  Yes, the rTAGs I posted in http://chriskresser.com/the-definitive-fish-oil-buyers-guide#comment-34741 are the better TAGs but are synthetic fish oil. I am using the term synthetic fish oil to mean that the components (fatty acids, both saturated, mono-unsaturated, and polyunsaturated) of natural fish oil TAGs have been removed from the glycerol backbone. Then, the intermediate compounds (ethyl esters) are distilled to concentrate EPA, DPA, and DHA ethyl esters. These PUFAs (polyunsaturated fatty acid ethyl esters) are reacted with a glycerol backbone in the presence of a special enzyme that will reattached these PUFAs back onto glycerol to make re-esterified TAGs or synthetic fish oil. In nature, the concentrations of having DHA, DHA, or EPA or any combinations of three PUFAs on glycerol is very rare but they do exist in very low, low, low concentrations.

                  The oil from calamari has less EPA and DHA than fish oil. This “calamari oil” is not really the oil extracted from calamari but instead are ethyl esters made from calamari oil and are the same as marine biodiesel fuel, and yes they make nice liquid candles.

                  The list of EEs I posted are both high and low concentrations of the ethyl esters and therefore low and high quality A high quality product that is made in the USA is Pure Alaska Omega-3 EPA DHA that is made from fish offal and is ethyl esters. My bottle Lot 417405 Exp 09/13 contains 80% EPA+DHA per softgel that weighs 0.91320 grams with length 20.22 millimeters and diameter 8.36 mm.. Each capsule has 356 mg EPA and 144 mg DHA. Therefore, 1 per day (500 mg) meets the AHA recommendations (strange coincidence). See their website http://purealaskaomega.com/alaskan-strength for more details. Oddly, Costco sells this.

                  For your rTAG, it is difficult for the ordinary consumer to tell. One potential helpful site is the IFOS site and look under the Ultra-refined Products Category. Then look for the “Product Type” “TG softgel” and this will be rTAG. Notice that Nordic Naturals PrOmega meets their IFOS seal of approval. Product is only 60% EPA+DHA but it is rTAG fish oil.

                  PIXE

                • What Costco is selling is Pure Alaska Omega™ Salmon Oil, 180 Softgels http://www.costco.com/Pure-Alaska-Omega%E2%84%A2-Salmon-Oil%2c-180-Softgels.product.11745704.html

                  In TWO softgels:
                  “The Total Omega Fatty Acids 600 mg – ** (Supplying DHA (Docosahexaenoic Acid) 220 mg, EPA (Eicosapentaenoic Acid) 180 mg).”

                  Which in my book is 200mg EPA+DHA per softgel. There may be a higher strength Pure Alaska product out there — the “Clinical Strength” Pure Alaska Omega-3 EPA DHA you tested — but Costco is not carrying it.

                • I contacted the manufacturer of Pure Alaska and they said the better “Clinical Strength” Pure Alaska Omega-3 EPA DHA is sold in the stores. The Costco Web site carries the lesser product.

  15. PIXE, great to find you here. I read with interest all of your comments on the HF krill oil thread.

    You mentioned that various processing steps can produce unwanted byproducts. Do you test for any of these? And, would you expect to find them in rTag products?

  16. I wrote IFOS about TAG vs ethyl esters and this is what they replied:

    “….Thank you for your email and for your interest in the IFOS Program.

    The research in support of either TG or EE fish oils is controversial. At this time this sort of analysis is not included as part of the IFOS Program.

    Please note that the second link that you sent refers to research conducted in mice, which in the scientific world, is considered inferior to human studies. From what I can see, the original published paper is also not referenced, which would lead me to question the validity of this claim….”

    (I don’t remember what links I sent, possibly they were from this discussion.)

    • Altostrata:
      Another great product in TAG form is the trade mark brand MaxEPA. This was perhaps the first prescription fish oil and it was introduced in the UK in 1992 by Seven Seas from the UK. Its efficacy and safety have been extensively tested and validated with numerous clinical trials. I purchased MasoN natural Omega-3 MaxEPA 1000 mg (Lot# 10349R Exp. 8-14). To show you the quality of their brand, “MaxEPA” is written on every capsule.

      Your comment about the CVS natural fish oil failing the PCBs in consumer reports from Dec 2011 about CVS Natural Fish Oil 1000 mg was above the CA limit for PCBs may have changed. My bottle marked “New”, with lot number 112038 Exp, 4/13 may have changed the formulation.

      PIXE

      • Hummmm! U 2 r going all in! Hah! I just want to know which Omega 3, fish oils, salmon oils, sardines, snake oils… LOL, will possibly aid me in lowering my cholesterol levels from 370-400 to 150-60 w/out taking prescription meds. I eat healthy and exercise and my high cholesterol levels are believed to be heredity so to speak. Was vegetarian for many years, worked out like a beast, ate healthy and still had/have high cholesterol levels. Any great product recommendations anyone!

  17. PIXE, could you clarify your statement above: “Some Nordic Naturals, Quell, Pharmax, Jarrow MaxDHA, Bluebonnet, Nutri-Med Logic, and Ascentra NutraSea products to name a scarce few. Expensive production to make “synthetic fish oil.””

    My concern is as a consumer. I personally do not want to do primary research to find a good, safe fish oil. I appreciate your sharing your research but I’m finding it very hard to understand. Are we to avoid ethyl ester fish oil? Are we to look for TAG? Is some TAG acceptable and other TAG not?

    Please answer the Consumer Report findings of excessive PCBs in fish oil brands you’ve identified as “natural.” Do the dangers of PCBs not outweigh the benefits of “natural” fish oil?

    • Altostrata:
      My comment “Some Nordic Naturals, Quell, Pharmax, Jarrow MaxDHA, Bluebonnet, Nutri-Med Logic, and Ascentra NutraSea products to name a scarce few. Expensive production to make “synthetic fish oil.” is based on my analyses of the composition of certain products under these brands. For example, Nordic Naturals makes several different products from natural fish oil with typical 30% EPA-DHA to higher concentrations of what I call “synthetic fish oil” or as the trade calls them “re-esterified fish oil.” Because they are TAGs, they have most of the saturated fatty acids removed from TAG to make the TAGs have more EPA and DHA which is not the natural concentrations found in fish. Basically, they restructure the TAGs with more EPA and DHA. Few other brands also do this but it is very expensive. The brands I quoted have products that are of this type. These would be the next best type of fish oils, although synthetic and more costly, to take because you can take one re-esterified fish oil capsule instead of two Kirklands to meet the recommendation from AHA of 500 mg/day EPA+DHA.

      For details on re-esterified fish oil, see http://www.nordicnaturals.com/images/supportMaterials/PDFs/DistillingFacts0311low.pdf and
      http://www.nordicnaturals.com/images/supportMaterials/PDFs/rTGbrochure1011.pdf.

      PCBs in these products are low based on the way in which they are processed. I will take natural fish oil over ethyl ester brands without a worry for PCB content. Unfortunately, I can’t determine the PCB content in fish oil. My expertise is in the composition of the dietary supplements i.e. TAG or EE.

      PIXE

  18. Alto:
    That is correct. The fatty acid ethyl ester profile of many of the ethyl ester products on the market have similar profile as marine biodiesel fuel.

    Here are some references to using fish byproducts (offal) to make marine biodiesel fuel. This paper http://www.sfos.uaf.edu/directory/faculty/sathivel/biodiesel.pdf uses methanol instead of ethanol to make marine biodiesel. However, there are other researchers that are using ethanol because it is less toxic than methanol. See http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236111004650 for using ethanol with waste cooking oil to make biodiesel. The composition of this fuel is similar to the ethyl ester incorrectly labeled “fish oils” that many consumers are purchasing under false advertising. See also http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261909005297 “Production of ethyl ester from esterified crude palm oil by microwave with dry washing by bleaching earth.” Natural fish oil dietary supplements do not combust as compared to ethyl ester products. Check your supplement fact’s labels to see if your product is ethyl ester. Many of the Nature Made products are ethyl esters per listing in fine print on the supplement facts label. I am not trying to scare anyone, but be aware of the composition of your omega-3 supplements. I am sure the ethyl esters have benefit, but my concern is that many products on the market labeled as “fish oil” are not fish oil.

    Your Jarrows MaxDHA is real fish oil. In this product, the oil is from calamari. They changed the formulae from 500 mg DHA and 72 mg EPA to the current formulation that is 130 mg EPA. You need to check to be sure you have the correct product from Vitacost. The newer formula (my bottle Lot# 48269K12, Exp, 11/14) is from Calamari with 130 mg EPA and not 72 mg EPA as you report.

    PIXE

    • Hello,
      I have just came across the article from Chris Kresser and this discussion thread, and find it all very useful since I’ve been taking omega-3’s for quite a while now for various health issues including inflammation and fibromyalgia/CFS and keep looking for the “right” product.
      I have been using the Puritan’s Pride products (e.g., Puritan’s Pride
      Triple Strength Omega-3 Fish Oil 1360 mg/60 Softgels / Item #016105) having read some time ago that it’s a reputable brand.
      I have recently switched to a high DHA product – Ascenta NutraSea High DHA Omega-3 1300mg
      1300 mg / 6.8 oz Liquid / Item #071343) purchased from the same Puritan’s Pride website. This is the first time I am using the liquid form of the oil and now know that I would rather take my omega-3 in a gel/capsule form.
      I would like to get some advice on
      a) whether the products I’ve been taking are on the “good” list,
      and b) your suggestions wrt alternative better products for my situation.

      Thanks in advance for your help!

      Emma

      • Hi Emma:
        Puritan’s Pride is a good brand because they manufacture their own products as evidenced from the bottle labels. Look on the back of their labels on the supplement facts and you will see that triple strength, double strength, and premium mini gels are all “ethyl esters”. Their product “Extra Strength” is real fish oil and this is the one I would take. If you are having a problem with belching, put the capsules in the freezer and take them frozen. This has worked for me. For the liquids, I would take this form only if I had a problem swallowing the capsules. The liquid is not stable and becomes rancid after opening the bottle within 60 days or depending on the manufacturer’s “use by” date could be longer or shorter.

        Looking at the label on your Ascenta NutraSea High DHA Omega-3 1300mg, 400 mg EPA, 800 mg DHA, I would speculate that it is the ethyl ester form which is even more unstable than liquid TAG form.

        The capsules are suppose to be sealed under “nitrogen cover” and contain tocopherols as an antioxidant. Again, read the fine print of your supplement facts labels. I have nothing against taking ethyl esters, my complaint is that products labeled as “fish oil” that contain ethyl esters are wrong and misleading. These mislabeled products violate the current FDA cGMP rules on labeling.

        The efficacy and safety of taking high purity EPA and DHA ethyl esters (Lovaza and Vascepa) have been established in clinical trials and are approved FDA prescription drugs.

        However, the efficacy and safety of taking high concentrations of saturated and mono-unsaturated fatty acid ethyl esters (marine biodiesel fuel) has not been evaluated or established. This is what you are getting in those 30-60% EPA and DHA incorrectly labeled “fish oil” brands.

        PIXE

        • PIXE, this gets more and more confusing. Some ethyl esters are okay for getting your omega-3s but some are not?

          I have no doubt you can determine the difference in your lab but I can’t see any way an ordinary consumer can tell one from the other.

          It’s interesting that you have confidence in Puritan’s Pride. I’ve always been suspicious of their very low pricing; I’ve assumed they relabel supplements manufactured in China.

          I was unable to find an omega-3 product called “Extra Strength” on the Puritan’s Pride Web site. The closest is Triple Strength Omega-3 Fish Oil 1360 mg http://www.puritan.com/fish-oils-056/triple-strength-omega-3-fish-oil-1360-mg-016105 , which claims “Contains 850 mg of active EPA/DHA per softgel” and says it’s “Ester-Omega Fish Oil” “as Ethyl Esters.”

          This product is apparently one of the ethyl ester imitation fish oils. Was this the one you tested or was it another one?

          • Altostrata:
            The Puritan’s Pride item number #035714. It is perhaps easy to tell the difference. First, read the supplement facts label. If not, get yourself some inexpensive but real fish oil such as Puritan’s Pride Extra Strength or Kirkland Natural Fish Oil 1000 mg, 400 capsules. Just open the capsule and let it spread on any smooth service. You will notice that it is viscous. Now compare with a product you know that is ethyl ester, say Kirkland Enteric Coated Omega-3 Fish Oil 1200 mg. one per day and do the same thing. You will notice that ethyl esters will spread more than natural fish oil.
            PIXE

            • That would be http://www.puritan.com/fish-oils-056/omega-3-fish-oil-1500-mg-035714
              Puritan’s Pride
              Omega-3 Fish Oil 1500 mg
              1500 mg / 60 Softgels / Item #035714
              450 mg EPA + DHA per softgel

              I’m still finding it hard to believe the cheapo brands like Puritan’s Pride, Nature Made, CVS, and Sundown contain better fish oil than the more expensive brands. (It looks to me like Nature Made and Sundown Naturals come from the same source — the supplement facts labels are identical.)

              I had written Natural Factors regarding their RxOmega-3 Factors. This is their response:

              “….Natural Factors RxOmega-3 Factors are molecularly distilled and are in the Ethyl Ester form. We use anchovy, sardine, and or mackerel wild caught fish.

              Below is from Dr. Michael Murray regarding fish oils.

              Triglyceride vs. Ethyl Ester
              A triglyceride consists of a glycerol “backbone” with three 3 fatty acids attached. Fish oils naturally contain triglycerides containing DHA, EPA, and a saturated fat. During the production of all concentrated fish oils through molecular distillation, the fatty acids are liberated into free ethyl ester forms. Some fish oil products are made by synthesizing the free fatty acids back to a triglyceride form while others, including the pharmaceutical forms, maintain the purified oil in the ethyl ester (EE) form. Some companies selling fish oils claim that the triglyceride form is more natural, has better stability, and is better absorbed than the EE form. None of these claims is true. The recombined triglycerides are not necessarily in their natural form, they are not more stable, and they certainly are not better utilized by the body. My personal opinion is that the EE form actually possesses some advantages:

              In order for the body to utilize the DHA or EPA in a triglyceride form they must be liberated from the glycerol backbone. The EE form provides an easier to assimilate form for many and is significantly less likely to cause burping up of a fishy smell. Think of the EE form as a pre-digested form of fish oil.

              While early absorption studies showed an advantage to the triglyceride form, it turns out the studies were not taking into account the fact that the EE form is processed in a more efficient manner. Very detailed absorption studies have shown that the EE form is actually more bioavailable in that it is more easily processed by the cells that line the intestines and is also more easily incorporated into cell membranes.

              Though the triglyceride form is very effective, the EE form may produce even better clinical results. For example, studies looking at the effects of fish oils on reducing factors that promote dangerous blood clots as well in the important effect of lowering triglycerides show some greater benefits with the EE form. In one study, while the EE and triglyceride forms at equal concentrations showed a similar effect on raising blood levels, the EE form showed significant advantages in lowering triglycerides and reducing platelet aggregation than the triglyceride form.

              The EE form is backed by considerably more in depth scientific research and it is the form preferred when higher dosages of EPA and DHA are required.

              Our own detailed quality control analysis at Natural Factors has shown exceptional stability in soft gelatin capsules and studies have shown feeding humans either pure DHA or EPA EE at a dosage of 4 grams does not increase lipid peroxides or cause oxidative damage.

              The bottom line
              While there are certain advantages to the EE form, the truth is that both the EE form and the triglyceride form produce great benefit to human health because they both provide EPA and DHA. That is the critical effect that both forms provide. The reasons why these fatty substances are so important revolve around their role in cellular membranes. A diet that is deficient in omega-3 fatty acids, particularly EPA and DHA, results in altered cell membranes. Without a healthy membrane, cells lose their ability to hold water, vital nutrients, and electrolytes. They also lose their ability to communicate with other cells and be controlled by regulating hormones. They simply do not function properly. Cell membrane dysfunction is a critical factor in the development of virtually every chronic disease, especially cancer, diabetes, arthritis, and heart disease. Not surprisingly, fish oil supplementation whether as the EE or triglyceride form have shown tremendous beneficial or protective effects against all of these diseases. Again, the majority of this clinical research has been conducted with the EE form.

              Practical recommendations
              How much fish oil should you take? According to the latest scientific evidence, a daily dosage of 1,000 mg of EPA and DHA (combined) is sufficient to produce significant protection against heart disease and strokes. When there is a therapeutic indication for EPA and DHA such as in elevated triglycerides, rheumatoid arthritis, depression, and asthma the daily dosage is usually 3,000 mg of EPA and DHA. Keep in mind that these dosage recommendations are based upon the level of EPA and DHA versus the amount of fish oil in the capsules or liquid, so you must read the label carefully to make sure you are getting the correct amount….”

              This discussion reminds me of the questions around “extra virgin” olive oil from Italy. Apparently there has been a tradition for hundreds of years among Italian oil merchants to bottle any old oil and sell it as “extra virgin.” You never know what you’re getting in a bottle of Italian olive oil; it could be third-press, it could be soybean oil, it could be a cheap blend (I buy Californian olive oil myself).

              • http://www.webmd.com/diet/news/20111206/some-fish-oil-supplements-fishy-on-quality
                Some Fish Oil Supplements Fishy on Quality
                Consumer Reports: Some Popular Fish Oil Supplements May Contain PCBs

                “Dec. 7, 2011….Researchers say the total PCB amounts in four brands (CVS Natural, GNC Triple Organic, Nature’s Bounty Odorless, and Sundown Naturals) were below the USP safe limit but within the range that would require a warning label under California’s Proposition 65, 90 parts per billion.
                ….
                Two of the three samples of Kirkland Signature Enteric 1200 fish oil supplements had an enteric coating (designed to prevent a fishy aftertaste) that did not disintegrate properly. The coating may break up in the stomach rather than in the small intestine, as desired for proper absorption by the body.

                Nine brands passed all quality measures tested, including:

                Spring Valley Omega-3
                Finest Natural
                Walgreens Omega-3 Concentrate
                Barlean’s Organic Oils EPA-DHA
                Nature Made 1,200 MG
                The Vitamin Shoppe Meg-3 EPA-DHA
                Carlson Super Omega-3 Gems
                Norwegian Gold Ultimate Critical Omega
                Nature’s Way Fisol

                One product, Nordic Naturals, could not be properly evaluated because it contained lemon oil, and there are no industry-standard tests that Consumer Reports could find that could test for spoilage in products with lemon oil.

                Nordic Naturals did meet every other quality measure in the study, though…..”

              • Altostrata:
                Most of the information posted by Dr Murray is incorrect. For example, the statement “During the production of all concentrated fish oils through molecular distillation, the fatty acids are liberated into free ethyl ester forms. ” is totally wrong. Fish are caught, cooked, squeezed, and the liquid centrifuged to separate the “crude fish body oils (CFBO)” that are sold as a commodity to fish oil refiners. They will process the oil in one of three ways. 1. Refine further to leave as “natural fish oil” and will most likely be 180 mg EPA and 120 mg DHA per 1000 mg of oil or what is known as “18/12 TAG Oil.” 2. Boil the CFBO with H2SO4 (sulfuric acid) with ethanol to make the ethyl esters of the fatty acids from natural fat (triacyl-sn-glycerols, i.e. TAG) molecules in fish, molecular distill to concentrate mainly EPA-EE and DHA-EE. This is one method how the product OMAX3 is made per US patent. 3. Take the DHA and EPA ethyl esters react with an enzyme in the presence of glycerol to make structured TAGs with high concentrations of EPA and DHA mainly in the TAG form.

                Some Nordic Naturals, Quell, Pharmax, Jarrow MaxDHA, Bluebonnet, Nutri-Med Logic, and Ascentra NutraSea products to name a scarce few. Expensive production to make “synthetic fish oil.”

                This is also false: “The EE form provides an easier to assimilate form for many and is significantly less likely to cause burping up of a fishy smell. Think of the EE form as a pre-digested form of fish oil.” Ethyl esters are a poor substrate for pancreatic lipases and EE is a lipid and is not water soluble. It is not “pre-digested form of fish oil” because it is toxic in the body and kills liver cells. The only way fatty acid ethyl esters exist in the body is with alcohol intoxication. They use the same FAEEs found in ethyl ester fish oils to determine if you have been drinking alcohol. It is also used as marker to determine if pregnant women have been drinking alcohol during pregnancy.

                The other statement is correct about many clinical trials have been with ethyl esters but these are with high purity 95% EPA and DHA ethyl esters and not the low quality ethyl esters mislabeled as “fish oil” sold on the market today that many consumers paid for thinking they were getting “fish oil”. Taking high concentrations of saturated fatty acid ethyl esters typically found in mainly omega-3s on the market has not been proven to be safe and has not been studied.

                For excellent tutorial on how your body processes fat (TAG) see: http://www.wiley.com/college/grosvenor/0470197587/animations/Animation_Lipid_Digestion_and_Absorption/Energy/media/content/dig/anima/dig5a/frameset.htm.

                More information on ethyl ester bioavailability can be found at: http://www.ergo-log.com/ethylesteromega3.html and follow the link to the article for more detailed information.
                PIXE

            • PIXE,
              I noticed that the label for the Puritan’s Pride item number #035714 (Extra Strength Omega-3 Fish Oil 1500 mg) says that it’s “Ester Omega™ Fish Oil” and the Mason natural Omega-3 MaxEPA fish oil lists the following “Other Ingredients: Marine lipid concentrate, Gelatin, Glycerin, Purified Water, Ph Eur, Propylene Glycol Ph Eur, Ethanol B.P., Hydroxypropylmethyl Cellulose 15cp Ph Eur, Titanium Dioxide Ph Eur.”
              So, both brands look like EE….
              Emma

              • Emma:
                Here is my take on Doctor’s best that is ethyl ester. Now, some manufacturers are using calamari but they end up converting it to the ethyl ester form and still call it calamari oil. However, when you look at the labels on some products using Calamarine, the chemical form is not stated. For example, Doctor’s BEST DHA500 from Calamari uses Calamarine 50/500 ethyl ester in their product but this is not listed on the bottle (Lot SB004151 Jul 2015). Appliednutrition Nordic Calamari uses EE form (not stated on bottle, Lot SB002374, Exp 10/2012) of Calamarine 140/360 when they could of used the TAG Calamarine 140/360. On the other hand, Dr. Sinatra’s Omega-3 Calamarine (SKU CAL02G11000) uses the ethyl ester derivatives of EPA and DHA and is listed on the bottle. http://www.drsinatra.com/calamarine/omega-3-calamarine. However, my bottle, ordered from http://www.drsinatra.com, does not have a lot number nor an expiration date. For details on calamari derived omega-3s, visit http://www.calamarine.com/default.aspx?menu=41. While there, check out their formulas used in their omega-3s raw materials used in dietary supplements. http://www.pharmamarine.com/default.aspx?menu=22 You can see that both ethyl esters and TG (Triacyl-sn-glycerol) forms are produced by Pharma Marine.

                PIXE

        • NutraSea does not manufacture ethyl ester oils. AND they are the only company that provides a third party testing report for every batch of product they make. My favourite! I like to know what I’m taking.

    • My latest Jarrow MaxDHA has 130mg EPA.

      Thanks very much for this information, PIXE. I am sure the quality of fish oil varies widely and some may be completely counterfeit. Still, I find it hard to believe the inclusion of the word “natural” on any fish oil label means much.

      Given there is no other list of good fish oils elsewhere (please publish your database!!!!), it seems IFOS http://www.ifosprogram.com/industry-home might be the best source for consumer information.

      • Emma:
        I visited the website for “Maximum Essential Omega-3” and it is very expensive and the claim is natural Omega-3 in Triacylglycerol form. $17.90 for 30 cap is very expensive. I just ordered this product and will let you know if it is synthetic fish oil (re-esterified). As I said previously, take the less expensive Kirkland Natural Omega-3, 1000 mg and you get 400 capsules for $7.99 or $5.99 when on sale at Costco. This product also has DPA but it is opposite in the DHA/EPA ratio. In addition, this product from Kirkland also has the USP seal of approval which claims that the contents are correct. Take two of these per day and you get more than the American Heart Association’s recommended daily dose of 500 mg/day.

        From USP: “The USP Dietary Ingredient Mark & What It Means
        Manufacturers of dietary ingredients that pass USP Verification can display the USP Verified Ingredient Mark on containers of verified products, as well as on an accompanying Certificate of Analysis. When the manufacturers of dietary supplement finished products see this distinctive mark on the containers of ingredients they buy, they can feel confident that
        The ingredients are consistent in quality from batch to batch.
        The ingredients meet label or certificate of analysis claims for identity, strength, purity, and quality.
        The ingredients are prepared in accordance with accepted manufacturing practices.
        The ingredients meet requirements for acceptable limits of contamination.”

        However, be careful of this label because not all USP labeled products are correct and don’t meet the USP qualifications even though they have the seal. For example, the Krikland Enteric Coated Omega-3 (ethyl esters) and Sam’s Club Simply Right triple strength all natural fish oil (ethyl esters) should not have the USP label because according to USPs definition of “fish oil” these products are not fish oil (TAG).
        PIXE

        • PIXE,
          What do you think of the “Best DHA 500 from Calamari” supplement from Doctor’s Best ?
          Thanks.

          • Emma:
            This product is ethyl ester and should not be taken if you are pregnant or nursing. See my earlier post about the consumer misleading information on calamari based fish oil. Also, see my site http://www.fishoildetective.com where I discuss this product in detail. As I said, ethyl esters in high concentrations such as Lovaza (465 mg EPA-EE, 375 mg DHA-EE) or 93% EPA+DHA and Vascepa (90% EPA-EE) are prescription drugs and used to treat specific health problems. VASCEPA has this warning label “Studies with omega-3-acid ethyl esters have demonstrated excretion in human milk. The effect of this excretion is unknown; caution should be exercised when VASCEPA is
            administered to a nursing mother.” lLovaza warning label: “There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. It is unknown whether LOVAZA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproductive capacity. LOVAZA should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.”

            These two drugs have the same identical active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) as all those mislabeled “fish oil” products. However, these fish oil supplements have lower concentrations and the remaining concentrations of the ethyl esters are saturated and mono-unsaturated fatty acid ethyl esters. The issue is that these other fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEE) have not been approved or studied for use as impurities in omega-3 dietary supplements. Fish oil, TAG based, have gone through the FDA process of GRAS (generally recognized as safe) process and are approved for human consumption. No ethyl ester based “fish oil” (contains high concentrations of saturated, mono-unsaturated fatty acids ethyl esters, with DHA-EE and EPA-EE) has GRAS status. See http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fcn/fcnNavigation.cfm?rpt=grasListing&displayAll=true for the entire list of substances approved for food use (dietary supplements). Notice that krill oil, tuna oil, menhaden oil, and other fish species are on the list, all in TAG (natural fish fat).

            Your first meal on your birth date was either mother’s milk (fat, TAG) or baby formula (fat, TAG). From cradle to grave, your digestive system has evolved to digest fat (TAG) and not ethyl esters. That is why there is a difference in absorption between the two chemical forms and all the prescription EPA-EE and DHA-EE products state “take with a meal”. This is not the case with TAG based fish oil. It is not how much you take, it is how much gets absorbed that matters. Why waste your money on marine biodiesel that is a fuel and the body can’t fully digest. Instead, invest in a good quality TAG fish oil that you were born with the correct pancreatic enzymes (lipase) that can more than 98% digest and absorb this type fish fat (TAG).

            PIXE

            • PIXE, please clarify your reference to “consumer misleading information on calamari based fish oil.” From your earlier comments, it seems you approve of calamari as a source. Do you not approve of it?

              • Alto:
                Here is my comment on misleading information. Now, some manufacturers are using calamari but they end up converting it to the ethyl ester form and still call it calamari oil. However, when you look at the labels on some products using Calamarine, the chemical form is not stated. For example, Doctor’s BEST DHA500 from Calamari uses Calamarine 50/500 ethyl ester in their product but this is not listed on the bottle (Lot SB004151 Jul 2015). Appliednutrition Nordic Calamari uses EE form (not stated on bottle, Lot SB002374, Exp 10/2012) of Calamarine 140/360 when they could of used the TAG Calamarine 140/360. On the other hand, Dr. Sinatra’s Omega-3 Calamarine (SKU CAL02G11000) uses the ethyl ester derivatives of EPA and DHA and is listed on the bottle. http://www.drsinatra.com/calamarine/omega-3-calamarine. However, my bottle, ordered from http://www.drsinatra.com, does not have a lot number nor an expiration date. For details on calamari derived omega-3s, visit http://www.calamarine.com/default.aspx?menu=41. While there, check out their formulas used in their omega-3s raw materials used in dietary supplements. http://www.pharmamarine.com/default.aspx?menu=22 You can see that both ethyl esters and TG (Triacyl-sn-glycerol) forms are produced by Pharma Marine.

                These calamari oil products have the “Friend of the Sea” seal which implies that the source is sustainable.

                PIXE

                • Thanks, PIXE. That clarifies the calamari source. My Jarrow MaxDHA says it’s from calamari, it contains 250mg DHA and 65mg EPA PER CAPSULE, which would make it TAG, correct? (It also is certified as Friend of the Sea.)

      • Altostrata:
        Here is a partial list of only ethyl ester forms. I use EE to mean ethyl esters and I have also included the amount of EPA and DHA in mg per capsule and not per serving, which is misleading.
        OM3= omega-3, FO = fish oil

        Ethyl Ester
        Advanta Supplements Omega-3 FO 400 EPA 300 DHA
        All Natural Greenway OM3 300 total EPA DHA EE
        Arctic Oils Omega Pure 780 450 EPA 330 DHA EE
        ArcticOils OmegaPure EPA 660 EPA 30 DHA EE
        Barleans ultra DHA triple potency 50 EPA 265 DHA EE
        Brain Research Labs Omega-3 DHA 300 EPA 200 DHA
        CareOne Extra strenght FO 260 EPA 175 DHA
        Carlson Super Omega 3 Gems EE r2
        CVS Half the size FO 300 mg Total Only
        Doctors A-Z mega OM3 300 EPA 200 DHA EE
        Dr Sears Zone OmegaRx 400 EPA 200 DHA EE R2
        Finest triple strength 647 EPA 253 DHA EE
        Fundamental Health wild caught FO 360 EPA 240 EPA EE
        Jarrows Formulae balance 400 EPA 200 DHA EE
        Kirkland signature omega-3 FO 410 EPA 274 DHA EE r3
        Mason Natural OM3 300 Total EPA DHA EE
        Meatgenics High DHA 600 DHA 60 EPA EE Calamri extract
        Metagenics EPA-DHA 6 to 1 500 EPA 80 DHA EE
        Minami nutrition cardio-3 FO supercrital 635 EPA 194 DHA EE
        Minami nutrition MorDHA FO supercrital 465 DHA 63 EPA EE
        Nature Made New Ultra Omega-3 244 EPA 89 DHA EE R2
        Nature’s Blend Omega 3 1760 mg Fish Oil EE r2
        Nature’s bounty triple strength 950 total OM3 EE
        Nordic Calamari Higher Potency Omega-3 360 DHA 140 EPA EE R2
        Nourishlife speak FO 362 EPA 137 DHA EE
        Now Super Omega EPA 360 EPA 240 DHA EE
        NutriGold Omega-3 Gold 647 EPA 253 DHA
        O3mega extra strength 400 EPA 200 DHA EE R2
        Omega DHA 900 450 DHA 112 EPA EE R2
        Omega Smart Ultimate FO 780 EPA 120 DHA EE
        Omegavia FO EE 700 EPA 100 DHA
        OmegaWorks super OM3 300 EPA 200 DHA EE
        OmegaWorks Ultra OM3 Triple strength 625 EPA 245 DHA
        Pharmassure FO 240 EPA 200 DHA EE R2
        Rite Aid Extra Strength FO 240 EPA 200 DHA EE R2
        Rite Aid triple strength FO 647 EPA 253 DHA
        Sealogix OM3 400 EPA 200 DHA gel
        Source Naturals Ultra Potency 450 EPA 340 DHA EE R2
        Twinlab Mega twin EPA FO 550 EPA 215 DHA EE R2
        Twinlab Omega-3 270 EPA 180 DHA EE R2
        Vitamin Research Ethyl EPA bot 2 300 EPA 200 DHA lot 38377 EE
        Vitamin Research Products Ethyl EPA 300 EPA 200 DHA EE
        Vitamin World triple strength 1360mg OM3 625 EPA 244 DHA EE
        Windmill Natural Omega III EPA + DHA EE

        Again, a good buy is the Kirkland Signature™ Omega-3 Fish Oil Concentrate 1000 mg, 400 Softgels for $9.99. However, get it when it is on sale for $5.99. Just to warn you that the capsules are large and maybe a choking hazard. Taking two of these gives you more than the AHA recommended dose of 500 mg EPA+DHA per day.

        I still don’t understand why anyone would want to take marine biodiesel fuel for your dietary supplement when you can purchase real “fish oil”, natural TAG for less money. Your only negative is that you have to take more than one capsule and they are larger than the marine biodiesel fuel capsules.

        Here is a quote from “Fatty acid ethyl esters Final report for Lot 3a of the Bioscopes project”
        Authors:Carlo Hamelinck (Ecofys) – Lot 3a coordinator”

        “However, with the prospects that the
        production of biodiesel from oil crops could slow down at some moment and that the production of
        bioethanol becomes more and more attractive, it is valuable to know the opportunities for using
        ethanol in the diesel sector. One option is to use ethanol in the production of biodiesel or so-called
        Fatty Acid Ethyl Ester (FAEE), thereby replacing the fossil component methanol.”

        These FAEEs are the same compounds that are in your ethyl ester mislabeled “fish oil” dietary supplements. I am trying to get the FTC and FDA to require these dietary supplements to have the correct labeling so that you and I, the concerned consumers, know exactly what we are spending our hard earned money on and not some bait-and-switch inferior products.

        PIXE

        • PIXE, first and foremost I want to thank you for doing your best to share your knowledge here.

          That said, I’m finding the way you answer questions to be very confusing, to the point that I don’t know what you’re recommending. Please read my questions carefully and and answer them clearly.

          I do NOT care to take marine biodiesel for my fish oil supplement. Please be aware I’m taking 3,000-4,000mg EPA + DHA per day for a neurological condition, I’ve been taking mostly concentrated ethyl esters for years, I’ve had only benefit with no adverse effects from it, and my good HDL cholesterol is very high.

          I had asked for a list of your top 20 TAG fish oils. Are the above TAG or EE?

          Are you recommending the EE types you’ve listed above?

          If it is the good kind of EE (not marine biodiesel), how is it distinguished from the bad kind?

          What does R2 mean?

          • Alto:
            The list I posted is for only EE types of omega-3s. I am not recommending any, just posting information on these products because many are labeled “fish oil” but are really marine biodiesel fuel. R2 means “run 2”. I will post a list of TAG fish oil products shortly.

            PIXE

            • Thank you, PIXE.

              I guess I want to avoid taking 3 grams a day of “marine biodiesel,” so your help is greatly appreciated. (But — if you think of it, a biodiesel vehicle will run on soybean oil, would soybean oil be considered “plant biodiesel:?)

              You may have guessed I’m going to ask for rTAGs, too. This would be IFOS Ultra type http://www.ifosprogram.com/consumer-reports.aspx , correct?: “Containing greater than or equal to 60% concentration of EPA and DHA per gram of fish oil.”

              If you have your results in an Excel spreadsheet, you might just want to make it available on your site in .csv format to download.

        • PIXE, which of these EE types does NOT meet your definition of “marine biodiesel”???

          That’s the important information for me — which EE products are preferable.