In the last article we learned that type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is characterized by chronic inflammation. We also learned that while inflammation often precedes the development of obesity and T2DM, obesity and T2DM contribute to inflammation – creating a vicious cycle of metabolic damage.
In this article we’re going to review the complex and sometimes murky relationship between body weight and type 2 diabetes. There’s a strong association between obesity and T2DM in the scientific literature, and it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to determine that there might be a connection between the two.
But some obese people never develop T2DM, and and some type 2 diabetics are extremely lean. Even more strangely, recent research suggests that obesity may actually protect certain people from developing T2DM.
How do we make sense of this? Let’s find out.
How Obesity Causes Type 2 Diabetes
As I explained in the previous article, body fat isn’t just a lump of inert tissue. It’s a metabolically active endocrine organ that secretes inflammatory cytokines and hormones, both of which have profound effects on our physiology.
The first step in this process is an abnormal gain of fat mass, usually caused by overconsumption of wheat, fructose, industrial seed oils or other dietary toxins. As fat mass increases, more leptin is secreted. (Remember, leptin is the hormone that tells the brain to decrease appetite, increase metabolic rate and increase physical activity.) Chronically high levels of circulating leptin cause leptin resistance. It’s like leptin is banging on the brain’s door, but the brain has its headphones on and can’t hear leptin knocking.
Leptin resistance causes free fatty acids (FFA) to spill over into tissues other than fat cells, such as the liver, pancreas and heart. This starts a chain reaction of inflammation and toxicity, because fat does not belong in these tissues and damages them when present.
Also, obesity causes excessive growth of fat tissue in two ways: it makes the fat cells larger (hypertrophy) and increases their number (hyperplasia). These overgrown fat cells become unstable and eventually rupture, releasing their fat content and causing further inflammation as the body attempts to clean up the dead or dying fat cells.
The end result of this “lipotoxicity” and inflammation is insulin resistance, which as you know is the defining feature of type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome.
Not All Obese People Get Diabetes
At one point it was assumed that all obese people were at higher risk for developing T2DM. But in recent years, research has proven that assumption to be untrue. We now know that a subset of obese people are “metabolically healthy”, which means that their fasting glucose, triglycerides, and other metabolic markers are normal. This population, referred to as the metabolically healthy obese (MHO) are at no higher risk for type 2 diabetes or cardiovascular disease (CVD) than their metabolically healthy lean counterparts.
Early studies suggested that up to 1 in 3 obese people were metabolically healthy. But these studies used either insulin resistance or the presence of metabolic syndrome (which includes 3+ risk factors) alone to determine metabolic health. But a newer study that used a stricter definition of metabolic health (the absence of any risk factor known to contribute to T2DM) found that the percentage of metabolically healthy obese is much lower: only 6%.
Though the number of MHO is much lower than was once assumed, it’s still true that a small subset of obese people 1) does not develop type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome, and 2) is not at higher risk for cardiovascular disease.
How might that be possible?
Like what you’re reading? Get my free newsletter, recipes, eBooks, product recommendations, and more!
Not All Obesity Is Created Equal
The most honest answer to that question is, “we still don’t really know”. But there are a few possibilities.
The first is that not all obesity is the same. There are two main areas where we store fat: under the skin (subcutaneous) and in the abdominal cavity (abdominal or visceral). Visceral fat (a.k.a. “beer gut”, “spare tire”, and “wheat belly”) is distinguished from subcutaneous fat by a large waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio. As it turns out, the amount of visceral fat you have is far more important than body-mass index (BMI) in predicting whether you’ll develop type 2 diabetes or metabolic syndrome.
Let’s take a step back and look at why obesity develops in the first place. You might be surprised to learn that obesity is actually a healthy response to high blood sugar. High blood sugar is extremely toxic. The conversion of glucose to fat is the body’s attempt to protect the liver, brain and other vital organs from glucose poisoning. But this mechanism only works for so long. Eventually the fat cells can’t accommodate any more glucose, and metabolic dysfunction sets in.
Subcutaneous fat has a much larger capacity to store the converted glucose as fat, given its much larger size and distribution throughout the body. This may explain why it appears to be protective against metabolic syndrome, and why men, who possess a smaller amount of subcutaneous fat than women, tend to more easily develop “beer gut” or “wheat belly”.
Visceral fat, on the other hand, is not only a smaller storage depot than subcutaneous fat, it is highly active from a metabolic point of view. It is associated with a higher production of inflammatory cytokines, and it is more susceptible to lipolysis. Visceral fat cells are also subject to sudden pressure variations (cough, physical exercise, etc.) that cause them to rupture more easily than subcutaneous fat cells. And as we saw earlier in this article, ruptured fat cells cause inflammation.
All of this explains why visceral fat is an independent predictor of insulin sensitivity, impaired glucose tolerance, high blood pressure and high cholesterol and triglycerides.
A second factor in determining whether obesity protects against or causes type 2 diabetes is levels of a hormone called adiponectin. Early studies suggested that high adiponectin levels protect against obesity, and it was observed that adiponectin levels were inversely correlated with BMI. But later studies found that increased levels of adiponectin in mice led to remarkable weight gain – that wasn’t accompanied by high blood sugar or other metabolic abnormalities. In fact, the mice with high adiponectin levels are up to 5 times fatter than the control mice, but they still don’t develop type 2 diabetes.
This suggests there may be something about adiponectin that protects against the metabolic abnormalities that cause T2DM, and that adiponectin levels may be another explanation for why some obese people don’t develop diabetes.
A third explanation for the MHO phenotype may be genetics. I’m going to leave it at that for now, because this article is already getting very long, and I’ll be writing more on the contribution of genetics to diabesity and metabolic syndrome.
Metabolically “Healthy” Obese Still Isn’t Healthy
As we saw above, the MHO are not at higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes or heart disease. However, there’s more to health than normal triglycerides and blood sugar. A group of researchers recently found that the MHO who don’t have T2DM and CVD die at the same rate as those that do. The MHO are at higher risk for cancer and death from any cause than the non-obese, and they are also at higher risk for dying from traumatic injuries.
This highlights the negative impact of excess weight alone. What’s more, weight loss still improves insulin sensitivity and fasting insulin levels in obese people that are metabolically healthy.
Although nearly 1 in 3 Americans are obese today, it hasn’t always been this way. Overweight and obesity have only become common in the last 40 years in the U.S., and is virtually unheard of in traditional hunter-gatherer societies. Leanness is the natural human state, and obesity is a sign that something has gone wrong.
That’s why I think it’s still a good idea for the overweight and obese to lose weight, provided they do it in a responsible way that doesn’t include severe caloric restriction (which won’t work in the long-term anyways, and can actually predispose towards increased weight gain in the future). Given the non-metabolic problems that characterize obesity – such as impaired mobility, joint problems, reduces sexual function, psychological and social status, etc. – all obese individuals will benefit from losing weight.
In part 2 we’re going to discuss the mirror reflection of the metabolically healthy obese phenotype: the “metabolically unhealthy non-obese”, a.k.a. the “skinny diabetic”.
Better supplementation. Fewer supplements.
Close the nutrient gap to feel and perform your best.
A daily stack of supplements designed to meet your most critical needs.
Nice article, I agree that not all fat people get diabetes and not all diabetics are fat ,you know one of the best way to do to prevent diabetes drink some leptin supplement not only for diabetes, it also burn fat which is the no. problem of many
Nice article, I agree that not all fat people get diabetes and not all diabetics are fat ,you know one of the best way to do to prevent diabetes drink some leptin supplement not only for diabetes, it also burn fat which is the no. problem of many
Exhaustive article, thanks.
I think I disagree that fructose from fruits is too much of a problem, especially when eaten after exercise/fast induced glycogen depletion:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2714385
Fruits have fiber, after all. Lindberg upped the fructose content in his paleolithic clinical trials by fruits with no adverse metabolic effect.
Perhaps HDL might drop though ?
Some fruits have high fiber…some decidedly don’t. Also, a lot of fruit servings are consumed in juices (esp. apple, orange). Squeeze one orange and see how much juice releases (approx. 1/4 c or 2 oz.). Compare that to the “traditional” serving size of orange juice–back in “the day” 6oz, and lately as much as 8oz.
Not hard to see how we can overload our systems with fructose.
Well, they do have a 5% chance. 😉 Honestly, my hope is that you can go on to prove your diet works and keeps weight off, then publish how to do it and make scads of money, because then I will have hope. Until then though, I’m not going to try another diet that will result in weight gain. I just have too much to lose, pardon the pun.
I’m not just talking about myself. I’m talking about the patients I treat and the many, many readers who’ve written in with success stories. I get between 3-5 emails a day with reports like this.
There are many non-dietary causes of weight gain, and limiting factors to weight loss. I’ll be writing more about those in the future. It sounds like perhaps you’ve had a difficult time losing weight. I’m sorry to hear that. But that doesn’t mean that weight loss is a hopeless endeavor for everyone else. Far from it.
Chris
What do you think about the argument out there that obesity might possibly be a symptom rather than a cause of T2DM or metabolic syndrome?
You’ve proven that it works for you. Which is great. In those studies there are 5% of people who lose weight and keep it off, not 50%. Let’s say it was only 50% though… that means a 50% chance of losing weight and a 50% chance of getting even fatter. Not the best odds.
I am very glad that you’ve found a way of eating that works for you.
So which method will allow for successful weight loss? Since you say weight loss is possible, I’m assuming you can point to a peer-reviewed study that shows some method successfully allows people to get down to a “normal” weight and keep the pounds off for at least 5 years. I’ve been searching for such a study, and can’t find one. I really hope you’ve found one, because otherwise telling fat people to lose weight is like telling a short person to get taller.
Show me a study that uses the methods I’m advising people to use (paleo-type diet, high-intensity strength-training, thyroid normalization, anti-inflammatory detox, stress management) and I’ll show you a study where people lose weight and keep it off. Also, keep in mind that there ARE people who lose weight and keep it off in those studies – but there are an equal number who don’t. That’s not the same thing as saying “telling fat people to lose weight is like telling a short person to get taller.” Not even remotely.
“However, although it’s true that insulin surges don’t cause diabetes, it’s still true that chronically elevated insulin levels do.”
What causes chronically elevated insulin? Here’s one possibility:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3905458
I haven’t been able to find full text. If you are interested and manage to get it from somewhere I’d love to read it.
I’ll be writing an article about the connection between the gut microbiota and diabesity soon. I don’t have access to the full-text of this particular study, but I’ve seen others like it.
“There are also studies of both lean and obese diabetics that don’t have elevated levels of inflammatory markers, so inflammation isn’t always the primary causative agent.”
It does not have to be inflammation that drives the disease progress. Lack of things related “anti-inflammatory system” can make the difference too. I think it’s much more crucial than all of these pro-inflammatory stuff. Loss of tolerance is the key.
I wanted to ask same question as Aaron did because it sounded like “high insulin causes insulin resistance” which is false. 🙂
Insulin resistance is caused atleast partly by elevated FFA and it is related to inflammation since activation of innate immunity in fat tissues increase lipolysis of stored fat from adipocytes. Inflammation could be behind leptin resistance also because SOCS-3 has been strongly connected to the development of leptin resistance:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18560028
SOCS-3 is part of inflammation responce to the activation through TRL4 by LPS:
http://www.jimmunol.org/cgi/content/abstract/179/9/5966
In conclusion I’d suggest that activation of innate immunity in adipose tissue could cause leptin resistance through SOCS-3.
I don’t disagree that inflammation plays a role. In fact, I just wrote an entire article about that a few days ago. However, although it’s true that insulin surges don’t cause diabetes, it’s still true that chronically elevated insulin levels do. That’s just basic hormone physiology. There are also studies of both lean and obese diabetics that don’t have elevated levels of inflammatory markers, so inflammation isn’t always the primary causative agent. These conditions are complex and multifactorial.
Thanks, Chris, I see what you’re saying. Even constant potato eaters would only have surges after meals, not high insulin levels all day every day without other contributing factors, so that makes sense.
But if leptin works the same way, how does someone who is already leptin resistant AND obese (and presumably producing chronically high leptin levels) break out of that cycle? When levels of the hormone drop, sensitivity will improve; but how do you get the levels to drop in the first place when leptin resistance and inflammation from overloaded fat cells are causing your hypothalamus to say, “Supersize those fries!”? If that’s still coming in your series, I’m looking forward to it.
Aaron:
Chronically high insulin levels do cause insulin resistance. Insulin surges (from natural carbohydrates) in the absence of inflammation, lipotoxicity and genetic factors do not.
It is possible to restore insulin sensitivity to varying degrees. Our body is a dynamic and adaptable system. In the presence of too much of a hormone, the cells downregulate receptor site expression to avoid overload. When levels of that hormone drop, the cells increase receptor site expression (which improves sensitivity). The same is true for leptin.
Good stuff. One question:
“Chronically high levels of circulating leptin cause leptin resistance.”
Do we know this to be true? I ask because low-carbers used to think that high insulin levels alone (from high-carb eating) caused insulin resistance, but healthy and trim high-starch societies seem to prove that wrong, and I think we know now that something else has to get the insulin resistance started, like the chain of events that you describe involving inflammation.
I think that’s an important question because, if high leptin levels cause leptin resistance by themselves, then people who are already obese would seem to be stuck. Even if they eliminate all other unhealthy factors, their obesity will keep leptin high, keeping leptin resistance up, keeping leptin high, etc. The only way out would be liposuction — actually removing fat cells to cut leptin production (I’m just guessing that would do it) — or a drug that blocks leptin production (if one exists). But if other factors (like gluten or PUFAs) cause the leptin resistance, there’s hope of breaking the cycle.
Plagiarizing Paul of PerfectHealthDiet: a leaky gut, caused by a bad diet (consumption of grains and fructose+omega 6 in excess), could lead to more pathogenic infections and thus increasing inflammation and diabetes incidence? There seens to be a connection between diabetes and some infections (Pubmed 11417300, 20632447, 20508853, for some examples). On this line of thinking, Pubmed 20415859 seems to be an interesting article! Too bad it’s not open access.
Mario: yes, there’s definitely a connection there. As I’ve been arguing in this series, T2DM is an autoimmune, inflammatory disease involving a pathological expression of innate immunity. This is characteristic of other Th1-dominant autoimmune diseases, like Crohn’s and Hashimoto’s. We know that infection can trigger those conditions, and of course some believe that they are caused by an unidentified, persistent chronic infection. They hygiene hypothesis has been advanced as a possible explanation for autoimmune disease, and pig whipworm (which provokes an immune response) therapy has been used successfully to treat Crohn’s, ulcerative colitis and some autoimmune allergy conditions.
When you say “fructose” do you mean fruits too? or are you meaning the fructose adding in other products?
Great blog !
Yes, I also mean fruits. A small amount of fructose from fruit (say from 2 servings per day) is okay, but beyond that fructose begins to be harmful.
Thank you for your comment on fruit. I think the over emphasis on fruit in the diet is a mistake. One reason is that fruit juices are seen as healthy, but they are too easy to guzzle and are lacking any fiber which would slow their metabolism.
Thanks for your advices. I guess I should take in account my vitamin D levels and my thyroid functions too.
Would taking inflammation reducing supplements like Zyflamend and/or a Tumeric extract (curcumin) help in weight loss?
I have an interesting story relating to these in how they might have helped me carpal tunnel syndrome and as a side effect kick started my initial 50 pound drop in weight.
In 2007 I was 100 pounds overweight. I started an overnight job working in a freezer. This drastic change forced me to intermittent fast daily as I wasn’t hungry at night and slept through the day. I also started eating lower carb although not strictly. I wasn’t trying to diet at the time I just started eating that way because of circumstance. 3 months went by and I lost about 10 pounds.
Then I developed carpal tunnel (cold environment, repetitive motion) and decided to try a natural regimen first. I’m glad I did. Within a month of using Zyflamend and a separate Curcumin extract the carpal tunnel went away. Well, so did the fat. As in about 50 more pounds seemed to disappear in the next month. People thought that I was sick it went away so fast. I was definitely in a ketogenic state as I had no cravings whatsoever for anything and had to force myself to eat once a day. I had incredible energy and felt the strongest I had ever felt in my life.
Full disclosure: I’m sure the 4 cups of coffee (no sugar) had something to do with it as well…but what do you think about the anti-inflammatory supplements?
Yes, anti-inflammatory supplement can help. I do a weight loss program with my patients that is based on a 3-week elimination diet and anti-inflammatory cleanse. It’s remarkably effective.
Very interesting. I am eagerly waiting for the second part and hope to find out more about my condition. I am a skinny 5’6″ 134 lb male with impaired glucose handling. Despite not eating simple sugars, white rice and soda, I have ended up with a condition where my 2HPP glucose levels over between 180-200. I have given up wheat (but do eat some barley – is it bad?) completely, eat lots of fish and eggs. I sure hope to make better sense of my health with your next installment.
Thanks!
In short: eliminate wheat and dramatically reduce fructose and omega-6 fat consumption, eat fatty fish with high levels of omega-3 a few times a week, normalize your vitamin D levels, address any thyroid issues (if present), manage stress and restore adrenal function.
Interesting article, especially on the MHO issue. I never thought obesity as a healthy response to high blood sugar.
I agree with you that leanness is our natural state and being obese is unnatural and unhealthy. I have some spare tire myself from years of eating lots of bad stuff like wheat, sugar and vegetable oil. Is going low carb the best way to reduce my visceral fat?