A streamlined stack of supplements designed to meet your most critical needs - Adapt Naturals is now live. Learn more

What Causes Elevated LDL Particle Number?

by

Last updated on

iStock.com/Jezperklauzen

To read more about heart disease and cholesterol, check out this eBook on the Diet–Heart Myth.

In the last article in this series, I explained that LDL particle number (LDL-P) is a much more accurate predictor of cardiovascular disease risk than either LDL or total cholesterol. In this article, I’m going to briefly outline the five primary causes of elevated LDL-P.

Conventional medicine is primarily focused on suppressing symptoms. If your blood pressure is high, you take a medication to lower it. If your blood sugar is high, you take a medication to lower it. If your cholesterol is high, you take a medication to lower it. In most cases there is rarely any investigation into why these markers are high in the first place, with the possible exception of some basic (but often incorrect) counseling on diet and exercise.

On the other hand, Functional Medicine—which is what I practice—focuses on treating the underlying cause of health problems instead of just suppressing symptoms. If your blood sugar, blood pressure or cholesterol are high, the first question a Functional Medicine practitioner will ask is “why?” If we can identify the root cause of the heart health problem, and address it at that level, medication is often unnecessary.

To use a simple analogy, if you have weeds in your garden, what happens if you just cut the weeds from the top? They grow right back—and sometimes faster than before! If you really want to get rid of them once and for all, you have to pull them up by their roots.

With this in mind, let’s look at some of the potential causes of elevated LDL particle number. If your LDL-P is high, it makes sense to test for and treat any of the conditions below (with the exception of the last, which is genetic and thus can’t be treated) before—or at least along with—taking pharmaceutical drugs.

5 common causes of elevated LDL particle number that can increase your risk of heart disease.Tweet This

Insulin Resistance and Metabolic Syndrome

LDL particles don’t just carry cholesterol; they also carry triglycerides, fat-soluble vitamins and antioxidants. You can think of LDL as a taxi service that delivers important nutrients to the cells and tissues of the body.

As you might expect, there’s a limit to how much “stuff” that each LDL particle can carry. Each LDL particle has a certain number of cholesterol molecules and a certain number of triglycerides. As the number of triglycerides increases, the amount of cholesterol it can carry decreases, and the liver will have to make more LDL particles to carry a given amount of cholesterol around the body. This person will end up with a higher number of LDL particles.

Consider two hypothetical people. Both have an LDL cholesterol level of 130 mg/dL, but one has high triglycerides and the other has low triglycerides. The one with the high triglyceride level will need more LDL particles to transport that same amount of cholesterol around the body than the one with a low triglyceride level.

Numerous studies have found an association between increased LDL particle number, and metabolic syndrome. One study measured ApoB, a marker for LDL particle number, in a group of 1,400 young Finns with no established disease. The participants with the highest LDL particle number were 2.8 times more likely to have metabolic syndrome than those with the lowest levels of LDL-P. (1) A much larger study of over 300,000 men also found a strong association between LDL-P and metabolic syndrome and its components (i.e. insulin resistance, abdominal obesity, high blood pressure, etc.). (2)

Poor Thyroid Function

Poor thyroid function is another potential cause of elevated particle number. Thyroid hormone has multiple effects on the regulation of lipid production, absorption, and metabolism. It stimulates the expression of HMG-CoA reductase, which is an enzyme in the liver involved in the production of cholesterol. (As a side note, one way that statins work is by inhibiting the HMG-CoA reductase enzyme.) Thyroid hormone also increases the expression of LDL receptors on the surface of cells in the liver and in other tissues. In hypothyroidism, the number of receptors for LDL on cells will be decreased. This leads to reduced clearance of LDL from the blood and thus higher LDL levels. Hypothyroidism may also lead to higher cholesterol by acting on Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 protein, which plays a critical role in the intestinal absorption of cholesterol. (3, 4)

Studies show that LDL particle number is higher even in subclinical hypothyroidism (high TSH with normal T4 and T3), and that LDL particle number will decrease after treatment with thyroid hormone. (5)

ADAPT Naturals logo

Better supplementation. Fewer supplements.

Close the nutrient gap to feel and perform your best. 

A daily stack of supplements designed to meet your most critical needs.

Chris Kresser in kitchen

Infections

Another cause of high cholesterol profile is infection. Multiple studies have shown associations between bacterial infections like Chlamydia pneumoniae and H. pylori, which is the bacterium causes duodenal ulcers, and viral infections like herpes and cytomegalovirus and elevated lipids. (6) For example, H. pylori leads to elevated levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, lipoprotein (a), ApoB or LDL particle number, and triglyceride concentrations as well as decreased levels of HDL. (7)

Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the association between infections and elevated blood lipids. Some evidence suggests that viral and bacterial infections directly alter the lipid metabolism of infected cells, and other evidence suggests that lipids increase as a result of the body’s attempt to fight off infection. Other evidence suggests that LDL has antimicrobial properties and is directly involved in inactivating microbial pathogens. This has been confirmed by studies showing that mice with defective LDL receptors—and thus very high levels of LDL—are protected against infection by gram-negative bacteria like H. pylori. (8)

Leaky Gut

One of the primary functions of the intestinal barrier is to make sure that stuff that belongs in the gut stays in the gut. When this barrier fails, endotoxins such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) produced by certain species of gut bacteria can enter the bloodstream and provoke an immune response. Part of that immune response involves LDL particles, which as I mentioned above, have an anti-microbial effect. A protein called LPS-binding protein, which circulates with LDL particles, has been shown to reduce the toxic properties of LPS by directly binding to it and removing it from the circulation. (9) Studies have also shown significant increases in LPS-binding protein (and thus LDL particles) in cases of endotoxemia—a condition caused by large amounts of circulating endotoxins. (10)

Though more research is needed in this area, the studies above suggest that a leaky gut could increase the level of LPS and other endotoxins in the blood, and thus increase LDL particle number as a result. I have seen this in my practice. I recently had a patient with high LDL-P and no other risk factors. I tested his gut and discovered H. pylori and small intestine bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). After treating his gut, his LDL-P came down to normal levels.

Genetics

The final cause of elevated LDL-P is genetics. Familial hypercholesterolemia, or FH, involves a mutation of a gene that codes for the LDL receptor or the gene that codes for apolipoprotein B (ApoB). The LDL receptor sits on the outside of cells; the LDL particle has to attach to the LDL receptor in order to deliver the nutrients it’s carrying and be removed from the circulation. ApoB is the part of the LDL particle that binds to the receptor. If we use a door lock as an analogy, apolipoprotein B would be the key, and the LDL receptor is the lock. They both need to be working properly for LDL to deliver its cargo and to be removed from the bloodstream.

Homozygous carriers of FH have two copies of the mutated gene. This condition is very rare. It affects approximately 1 in a million people. And people that are homozygous for this mutation have extremely high total cholesterol levels, often as high as 1000 mg/dL. And unfortunately they usually die from severe atherosclerosis and heart disease before the age of 25.

Heterozygous carriers, however, only have a single copy of the mutated gene, and the other copy is functioning normally. This is much more common. The prevalence is between 1 in 300 to 1 in 500 people, depending on which study you look at. These heterozygous carriers of FH have total cholesterol levels that often range between 350 and 550 mg/dL, along with very high LDL particle number. They have about three times higher risk of death from heart disease than people without FH if it goes untreated.

It’s important to note that people with FH have primarily large, buoyant LDL particles, and yet are still at much higher risk for cardiovascular disease. While it’s true that small, dense, oxidized LDL particles are more likely to cause atherosclerosis, large, buoyant particles can also be harmful when their concentration is high enough. This is one reason why LDL particle number is a superior marker to LDL particle size.

In the next article in this series, I will debunk the myth that statins extend lifespan in healthy people with no pre-existing heart disease.

Like what you’re reading? Get my free newsletter, recipes, eBooks, product recommendations, and more!

Affiliate Disclosure
This website contains affiliate links, which means Chris may receive a percentage of any product or service you purchase using the links in the articles or advertisements. You will pay the same price for all products and services, and your purchase helps support Chris‘s ongoing research and work. Thanks for your support!

240 Comments

Join the conversation

  1. Hello, I was wondering if some expert could help me with an ldl-p question. I just had blood work taken and received the results last week. I was shocked to see that my cholesterol was at 233, while the most shocking (and unknown) number was my ldl-p count. Apparently, people are to be >1000. Mine was at 3375. When I researched that, it does not look good. But then why didnt my PCP call me back and explain that to me to get it remedied? Also, my father in law who is an internist looked at my results and was concerned until he asked me if I had been fasting prior to the blood work. I had not. In fact, I had eaten lunch a couple hours beforehand. But I cannot imagine lunch would have impacted my numbers that much. I am a 37 year old, 6’0 185 pounds who does not drink or smoke. Any thoughts as to what is going on with those numbers?

    Thanks in advance.
    Anthony

    • LDL-P of 3375 with a TC of 233 does not compute.

      Can you post your LDL-C, small LDL-P, HDL, etc?

      • LDL-Cholesterol=156
        Total HDL Cholesterol=43
        non-HDL Cholesterol=190
        cholesterol rich LDL=131
        TOTAL VLDL=34
        APO B=124

        Does that help?

        • It is NOT possible to have LDL-P of 3375 AND LDL-C of 156

          ApoB is a surrogate for LDL-P. With ApoB of 124 your LDL-P CANNOT be 3375!

          Again – are you sure that you’re not misreading the test results?

          • Everything I wrote is directly from my bloodwork results sheet.

            Should I be deceased? Do I have leaky gut?

            Did the fact that I ate a couple hours before the bloodwork have any effect on the numbers?

  2. Thanks for these informative articles. After doing a fair share of research on atherosclerosis, I know that LDL buildup in the vessel is usually initiated by damage to the endothelium and that damage leaving an “opening” for oxidized LDL to enter the vessel. Risk factors for this damage are often cited as smoking, hypertension, diabetes and high cholesterol itself. Im having trouble processing that last one. How does high cholesterol itself contribute to endothelial damage? It really seems to me that molecules of LDL need a reason to start piling up and its amazing that its often difficult to find good research that explains that reason. Thanks!

    • Lauren, good question.

      Part of the answer, firstly, lies in the confusion caused by misuse of terms. People often say “LDL cholesterol”, as though that is a kind of cholesterol. It really means cholesterol that is currently being carried around by LDL. LDL is just a vehicle for getting fats to travel through an aqueous medium like plasma. It can carry cholesterol, but it can also carry triglycerides or phospholipids.

      When people say “oxidized LDL” they may mean “an LDL particle carrying oxidized cholesterol”.

      Chris’ whole article is about the dangers of having “high” numbers of LDL particles. One, and just one, of the reasons for “high” numbers is that if there is more cholesterol being carried than is being called for by the tissue (where it is used in cell membranes, etc.) then this means there are less LDL receptors in cells, across the total body, than there are LDL particles in circulation, because cellular receptors get REDUCED when there is less need for more cholesterol.

      This leaves excess LDL particles circulating that are carrying cholesterol. This cholesterol is essentially “aging” as it circulates in the plasma. Aging means oxidation. Once the LDL particle, with oxidized cholesterol as the passenger is identified by the immune system, as Wiki says, the LDL particles “are taken up by macrophages, which become engorged and form foam cells. These cells often become trapped in the walls of blood vessels and contribute to atherosclerotic plaque formation….”

      So going back to Chris’s original claim that a single LDL particle can only carry so much cholesterol because it must also transport triglycerides, but that it will probably always carry SOME cholesterol, and you can see that, if the body already has plenty of cholesterol in place in it’s cell membranes, but has an overload of triglycerides that must be deposited in fat cells because the person is overeating, then there is going to be LDL circulating that is doing it’s job of depositing triglycerides, but just has nowhere to dump the cholesterol. The cholesterol on such LDL particles will age and age until the whole particle is deemed “suspect” by the immune system, and when the macrophages are called out to gobble up that LDL, that starts the cascade of events that bring that particular macrophage into vile contact with the endothelium where it lodges and starts the cycle of atherosclerosis.

      So even though it is true that the cholesterol in such a situation is “high” (relative to what is needed in the cells), the critical issue is really that because excess triglycerides need transportating, the number of LDL particles has reached such a high number (from the point of view of cholesterol again) that small amounts of cholesterol is aging in the LDL (but undeliverable, because there’s no demand) while more and more triglycerides get picked up and delivered to fat cells.

      It’s the carbohydrates, eaten to excess, that cause this oxidation of cholesterol.

        • i HEARD TODAY FROM A DOCTOR THAT I SHOULD EAT 2 EGGS EVERY DAY TO REDUCE MY TRIGLYCERIDES AND CHOLESTROL…. DO YOU HAVE ANY RESEARCH ON THIS..

  3. Does anyone know why it seems to be totally impossible to print the *comments* on the Chris Kresser website?

    I like to review what I read here at leisure, making notes on the pages. But it looks like the website designer made it impossible to print the comments – just the base text from Chris.

    I realize that often people will want just the blog post – but other times people will want it all. How about a website design that lets us *choose* what we want to print?

  4. I’m 65 & have always lived a healthy lifestyle but left the grains & sugars several years ago & changed to grass fed meats,coconut oils, low carb& lots of home grown veggies & our girls give us beautiful eggs. Last few years cholesterol has been heading upwards, it is now , total 412, hdl 95,LDL 306 ( scary) & triglycerides are56 . Doctor says Statin…. She thinks I have the gene for high cholesterol , is she right or this just as things should be naturally ?

  5. A doctor who had a high ldl-p http://azsunfm.blogspot.com/2012/09/font-definitions-font-face-font-family.html , has an interesting take, did his more advanced scan for fat around the arteries yield better results, I read in a blog it did,

    So is there a more accurate test than ldl particle size or number or apo-b, many low carbs have high ldl-c but ok ldl-p, some don’t but don’t seem to have heart issues.

    So in an effort to defend a lower-carb diet if your ldl-c is high the high ldl-p and apo-b will bring nagging statin advice from the doctor, meanwhile should you be prompted if your ldl-c is low to just not ask for the test that the doctor does not want to do or in some cases does not really know about so you won’t get nagged, and then the doctor will get stressed saying “well you asked for these advanced tests so know what the results are not good”.

    This is important because jumping to a better test that is still imperfect without further explanation can get folks confused and worrisome. So what is the best tests to ask the doctor, assuming of course you do not seem to be at a high risk of heart disease but may have metabolic syndrome or not. Obviously I state that because those with genetic backgrounds or liver filtration issues will have more tests, so there is not one single test for everyone, but what’s the test that should clear up issues for those with a lower risk of heart disease with metabolic syndrome or not and those who are on lower-carb diets.

  6. I find it interesting that so many people mimicking starvation with their nutritional ketosis seem to have elevated LDL-P numbers in the setting of low or low-normal thyroid function tests, low hs-CRP, and, almost uniformly, CT coronary calcium scores of zero. Rakesh Patel documents his LDL-P in the three thousands and REVERSAL of coronary plaque on his IMT. So, taking into consideration what we know of the “survival phenotype” associated with caloric restriction–and ketosis, at least in vivo as demonstrated by Hirschey, et. al in 2013, we expect the following:

    (1) Inflammation to be low due to upregulation of cellular and mitochondrial antioxidants through the concerted effects of sirtuin-class proteins and their associates.
    (2) Low or lowered levels of thyroid hormone.
    (3) Absence of atherosclerosis, which can be inferred by the longevity associated with CR.

    In light of these observations, perhaps the assumption that elevated LDL-P in the setting of VLC or KDs is detrimental to health is wrong.

    In fact, one might hypothesize the oppposite, that it is beneficial. Perhaps the increase in LDL-P does actually reflect a “thrifty gene effect,” however not so much as Dr. Davis suggests in terms of improved energy shuttling in times of famine, but in terms of immune function. FH, for example, is thought to confer an immunologic benefit to individuals. Furthermore, it has repeatedly been shown that conserved sequences on apoB protein play an important role in innate immune function. I think it is entirely concievable that the elevated LDL-P’s in so-called “hyperresponders” might reflect and entirely normal range of expression in terms of individual polymorphisms reflective of increased immune “surveillance” in times of famine.

    I think it is an interesting hypothesis that mechanistically makes sense–in times of famine, thyroid function goes down to conserve energy and LDLr expression (regulated by thyroid function) is decreased, leading to an increase LDL-P numbers and aid in the organism’s immunologic defense efforts. What does not make sense is how a diet that mimics at the molecular level the one thing known to extend life span in non-human primates and that also, in humans, improves all markers of health including radiologic studies of atherosclerosis would singularly increase the strongest marker for CAD against all the other benefits.

    I haven’t quite had the time to comb PubMed to find literature to support or refute, other than to quickly find a few studies showing that cholesterol levels in CR’ed rats usually fall. Far more intersting would be to observe the LDL-P response to CR or a ketogenic diet in an animal model of FH…

    • I personally hope you are right after having NMR done with an LDL-P of 2500. This is on Crestor 20mg. I have FH and have been on statins since my early 20’s. Since starting HFLC diet, my cholesterol has been much more difficult to control. Your theories are interesting. If you have any more ideas on the matter, I’d love to hear them. I am a practicing physician, but this is all cutting edge stuff, and feel I’m largely in the dark on where to go from here.

  7. I am 55 good health just got my blood work back and total cholestrol was 213 and LDL was 155 which is down 22 points from last blood test a year ago. I use Red Yeast Rice 200mg instead of a statin and have for the last 3 years and the numbers are about the same as far as LDL levels as they were on a statin. I eat mainly fruits and vegs very little red meat some pork and chicken. 2 questions how can I move this LDL number down more and or is it necessary to worry much about it. My doctort wants me on Lipitor but I am not agreeable.

    • Hello Eric, I have a friend who just sent me information on taking large amounts of Omega-3. He takes something called RES-Q 1250 and LDLX, 4000+ of DHA and EPA along with Red Yeast Rice to lower his LDL. Referred to a web site: http://www.n3inc.com. In 8 weeks his total cholesterol went from 240 to 164, LDL from 164-95, HDL from 54-60. He also is on something called the zone diet- emphasizes Omega-3 but balances protein, complex carbs and fat in each meal. I am going to show this to my Dr. today and tell her I want to try this

      • You are right..My Dr. told me today that Mevacor is Red Yeast Rice..it works but you need to have it monitored. Just like taking a statin!

    • My husband was on lipitor and he swore by it took many years. could eat anything and levels stayed good but still in 6 years had stents put in for this. but he was a heavy smoker. also had 100% blockages in both sides of neck and was well for years then in 2010 after 39 wonderful years of marriage from God he died in 5 months with stage 4 lung cancer. but without his lipitor i done studies it helped his panels and cholestrol . God Bless you

  8. Was having side effects from Crestor (20MG), and asked to go on another statin and Dr. put me on 40MG of Pravastatin although I had asked for Simvastatin. Well, my total cholesterol is now 299, my LDL is 202, and my HDL is 81. I am reading all these posts with people trying to avoid going on a statin with their high numbers and I am on a statin! Always had a high LDL but NEVER as high as 202. Any advise on what I need to discuss with my Doctor – follow-up in a few days. BTW, have been tested for thyroid and things are normal. I am starting to wonder if I do have some type of bacterial infection going on. What tests do I ask for?

      • Well, today I go see my Dr. Doing some research on my own I realized that there may be a connection between taking 2000 mg of Vit D a day and a connection between high calcium blood levels I have had for years (10.4-10.5). Asked for a Vit D test, came back at 20.3, and was told to take supplement. Vit D can cause cholesterol levels to rise ‘significantly’ and could cause pains in arms and legs. Will discuss this connection with my Dr. and possibility of having hyperparathyroid issues. From what I am reading, calcium is not being absorbed correctly in my body and taking a mega dose of Vit D was the wrong thing to prescribe. Might be time to find another Dr.

  9. Hi Doc,
    I am 46 years old male with familial history of high lipid profile. My recent tests show:
    LDL-P 2053
    HDL-P 25.6
    LDL particle size 20.9
    Large VLDL particle number 7.4
    Large HDL particle number 0.9
    VLDL size 50
    HDL size <8.3
    LP-IR 73

    My LDL-C was always high (150-170); fasting glucose always 105-112, A1C 5.4-5.9.
    I have this stupid belly fat that does not want to go away.
    After looking at the numbers, do you have any suggestions? I started taking Niacin 500 mg/day and 500 mg of Artichoke Extract. I don’t want to go on statin drug for as long as I can.
    Thank you.

  10. I recently had an NMR particle test and my numbers were high (1887). I am currently taking 2 supplements which are recommended in the High Cholesterol Action Plan, Annatto Tocotrienols and Pantethine. Will these supplements reduce my particle number or are they specifically geared to reducing the concentration of cholesterol?

    • HI Les – did you get further bloodwork done and did Tocotrienols reduce your LDL..?
      Thanks

      • Hello Andy,
        I haven’t had the NMR particle test done again as the test isn’t available in Canada, as far as I know, and I haven’t had the opportunity to return to the States to have it done there.

  11. I know this question has been asked, but i am not sure if it was answered. I do eat tons of nutrient rich foods ( like liver at least twice a week, tons of lard, grass-fed butter and full fat meat, gelatinous stocks, pastured fertile eggs, and i additionally supplement with minerals etc.) and my cholesterol sky-rocketed to 350. LDL is the highest at 242. If LDL is a transport for nutrients, could such a high number be connected to the diet and the need for numerous nutrient transportation? When i was eating SAD with a “healthy” angle (low-fat with no saturated fat, lots of plants etc) my cholesterol was still around 250 (considered “high”), but i was always depressed, had more weight, was plagued by candida and literally had no libido. Now my cholesterol is super high, but i feel great, MUCH better than before.

  12. I just finished reading Fat Chance (pub. Dec. 2012) by Dr. Robert Lustig. It is a great, but somewhat technical look at the effects of fats and sugars on health, and specifically on lipid numbers.
    Yes, Chris, you are right that LDL number of particles can be taken as an important marker of cardiovascular health. But it is a secondary count, based on, as you say, the “needs” of other substances to be carried around in the plasma, and therefore the needs of the other substances for “taxis” to do the transportation.
    Lustig states that if one wants to “fix the numbers”, it is as simple as removing most sugars from the diet, and especially fructose, and definitely commercial fructose, as opposed to the lesser quantities found in natural, raw foods.
    His does a credible job of showing that moving the diet away from sugars improves all 3 commonly accepted measures of cardiovascular health: It raises HDL, and lowers triglycerides and small dense LDL substantially! It can easily be seen, with the numbers of 2 items reduced, and only 1 (HDL) increased, that this will also reduce the number particles that your article emphasizes. But the way the particles numbers are reduced is actually what is important, as there are still strong technical reasons to look at types of LDL present, at HDL, and at triglycerides. I would suggest that people continue to let their doctors focus them on these numbers if they continue to have lipids tested.
    I think most people though could just cut the sugars and rest assured that their “cholesterol” will be fine after reading “Fat Chance”.

  13. hi, my total cholesterol is 5.22 mmol/ l and my ldl is 2,69 mmol/l, my hdl is 2.11 mmol/ l, triglycerides are 0,92 mmol/l , and vldl cholesterol is 0.42 mmol/l. i am 21 years old (woman ) and my BMI is 23, 5 . So should i take some steps to reduce it ? and is there some serious reason to bother about it ?

  14. Hi, I have subscribed to the Cholesterol Action Plan, and there you mentioned that ApoB:ApoA1 ratio is a good indicator of LDL-P, especially for those without access to NMR. Now that I have my APO results I have difficulty trying to figure out how to interpret whether they are good or not.I couldn’t find it in the course materials.

    I see from some of the previous comments here that they are aware that there levels are high and I am just wondering how I can make the same determination. Most of the information online on the subject were very medically heavy and was really beyond me. Hope to get some clarity. Many thanks.

    • I managed to get some information on this from Chris’s team and I thought I would also share it here.

      Range – The ideal range for ApoB is 40–125 with <100 mg/dL considered desirable in low/intermediate risk individuals and <80 mg/dL desirable in higher risk individuals.

      An ApoB:ApoA1 ratio of <0.8 is considered optimal.

      Correlation to LDL-P – In general, you have 1 ApoB for every LDL particle. It's not exact, but it acts as a solid estimate. Chris explains this in a blog series regarding cholesterol. http://chriskresser.com/what-causes-elevated-ldl-particle-number